Thursday, April 4, 2013

'As long as I’m safely unconsious [sic] and therefore shielded from the costs of an assault, why shouldn’t the rest of the world (or more specifically my attackers) be allowed to reap the benefits?'

Found here: http://www.thebigquestions.com/2013/03/20/censorship-environmentalism-and-steubenville/

This is a joke, right?

The answer is self-evident, and the fact that someone who teaches in a university thinks this question has any place in the public discourse is a telling barometer of the unfortunate times we find ourselves stranded in. The answer, dear professor, is that the scenario you describe is an appalling affront to the dignity of man that reduces human beings to the level of animals. No civilized society would ever entertain such a barbaric notion.