Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Getting jilted & crying rape doesn’t fly

Andrea Peyser
NEW YORK POST

Times have changed, and so have the players. But one thing remains constant in affairs of the heart and other body parts — give it up too easily, and he won’t love you in the morning.

It happened in the 1990s with three players from the New York Mets, including legendary pitcher Doc Gooden. It happened again a dozen years later, with basketball star Kobe Bryant.

And the same type of psycho-sexual drama may be playing out today, law-enforcement sources say, with Police Commissioner Ray Kelly’s son Greg (pictured).

These famous men were all accused of sexually assaulting near-strangers. At some point, perhaps months after the fact, the gals woke up believing they’d been intimately brutalized.

But is it rape?

In the case of the Mets and Bryant, authorities determined after exhaustive investigations that the men engaged in an act no less degrading, but quite different, from rape: They didn’t call in the morning.

Which begs a question: When did feminists start telling women they could have emotion-free sex like men, and live with themselves?

In these days of random hookups and booty calls, where buying a girl dinner — or even getting a room — seem quaint notions out of the “Mad Men” era, how can a woman expect a guy to respect her if she doesn’t respect herself?

My first encounter with this trend dates back nearly 20 years, with a Manhattan jewelry designer who was temporarily dating Mets pitcher David Cone at spring training in Florida.

Motivated by some kind of twisted thirst for revenge, teammates Gooden, Daryl Boston and Vince Coleman had sex with Cone’s gal at Gooden’s house. At the same time.

Afterward, the lady made the bed. A year went by. Cone was gone. She never heard from the gang-banging trio again. Then it hit her.

“I’ve been raped!”

She should have hit the gym or drowned her sorrows in whiskey. Because after a monthlong investigation humiliating to all, prosecutors determined that while the players got freaky, the sex was consensual. No charges were filed.

I spoke with the lady, now 51, this week. She’s glad she reported a rape.

“I’ve made peace with it. I did what I had to do,” she said.

As for Kelly’s accuser, she said, “I hope she finds some justice.”

But at what cost — to women?

In 2003, a 19-year-old Colorado hotel concierge stalked Kobe Bryant to his hotel room, where he flipped her on her stomach and had sex with her. The lack of flowers and candlelight upset the lady, who cried, “Rape!”

But prosecutors didn’t see it that way. Charges were dismissed.

Now, the case against Kelly, 43, has a problem. Sources told The Post the single “Good Day New York” anchor and former Marine Corps Reserve pilot was approached on the street in October by a 29-year-old fan with the star- struck line, “You’re cute!” She sent him sext messages for two days. Their tryst occurred, after drinks, in the building in which the woman works as a paralegal, right in her boss’ office. This might not violate company policy, but it surely goes against everyday rules of hygiene.

Afterward, the pair continued to text and planned another rendezvous. It’s unclear when it all went wrong. Was it weeks later? Or when the lady’s boyfriend found out? Three months after the office party, the woman called her encounter with Kelly “rape.”

A law-enforcement source tells me that, contrary to some reports, the woman has given consistent accounts of the night in question. And consistently, the stories don’t add up to sexual assault.

“There are only two ways to allege rape, forcible compulsion’’ — force was never alleged here — “and physical helplessness,” said the source, who defined the latter as near-unconsciousness.

“She did not seem to be physically helpless.”

Women who work long and hard to be taken seriously are furious.

“I think we’re so much stronger and better than this,” said Tish Ferguson, a global recruiter. “The whole trend of the last 20 years is victimization. I don’t think it’s doing the next generation any favors.”

Laura Osenni, of Brooklyn, fears repercussions: “This could present a huge problem for future rape victims.”

For the sake of women, the justice system must take its course.

Let the truth win.

http://www.nypost.com/columnists/andreapeyser

11 comments:

Brandon Webb said...

And the article, framing the context of false rape allegations only in terms of how it effects only women doesn't fly either.

Anonymous said...

"For the sake of women, the justice system must take its course".
--- What a pathetic way to finish the piece. What about for the sake of men, children, and society?

Men need to realize:
1) Women lie more than men.
2) Women lie more smoothly and easily than men.
3) Women can come to believe their own lies within a surprisingly brief time through rationalizing and emotionalizing a false imagining of the event.
4) Women, unlike men, can turn on and off their tears of manipulation to convince others of how they have been supposedly victimized.

Aharon

slwerner said...

Brandon Webb - "And the article, framing the context of false rape allegations only in terms of how it effects only women doesn't fly either."

Okay, it's far from perfect, bet...

It gets the issue into the public mindset and the public discussion. Andrea Peyser doesn't have to hit every single point of contention held by those of us who've followed the issue and this site to be very effective.

Not that many years ago, the issue of false rape allegations being a common and even predictable thing was strictly verboten amongst journalists. Just think back to the Twana Brawley incident. When it was discovered to have been a hoax, reports didn’t report about it much at all. All there seemed to be was a perfunctory acknowledgement that her claims of being kidnapped and raped had turned out to have been a fabrication. Despite the veritable wealth of material for young journalists looking to build a name for themselves to delve into, they were too scared to do so. It may have had something to do with the race angle involved, but, even more so (IMHO) it was the perceived “third rail” of false rape claims that nobody wanted to touch fro fear of “electrocuting” their careers.

And for years after that, while many people knew about rape allegations that turned out to be false, there wasn’t much reporting about it. Maybe a paragraph on the back page indicating that the crime that had been previously reported about (at length) had turned out not to have happened. There was a great shroud of secrecy surrounding FRAs in the press, and from law enforcement.

We are actually seeing a significant turn-around from those dark ages and now major media outlets are covering the issue. They aren’t (yet) holding to the FRS line – and I really wouldn’t expect them to. But, they are addressing the issue and being more honest about it. I had never hear of the incident involving the Met’s players – but Andrea Peyser knew all about it (she actually covered it, but it doesn’t seem to have been a national scandal that the woman lied). Now, she has another chance to inform the public by linking that incident to a current. This is a very good thing.

My own personal opinion is that a good many people know of some personal example of a woman lying about having been raped, but have never made the connection that it wasn’t really all that rare or unique – women have been doing it down through the ages – because it’s never been present to them as “yet another example” instead of a singular incident. I’d like to think of light bulbs popping on in peoples heads all over the place once journalist finally start talking not only about individual cases, but linking them as part of the pattern (that we all know and hate). [/$0.02]

Archivist said...

I thought it was a fine article. I would have written it much differently, of course, but underlying the author's words is the thing I'm looking for in all these articles: a sense of the wrongness of false rape claims. The headline alone is priceless -- this movement can't buy that kind of publicity.

Missing are the stories about the terrible effects FRAs have on the men and boys who are victimized. But SLW is correct: We are actually seeing a significant turn-around from those dark ages and now major media outlets are covering the issue. When we started here, the two percent canard was the rule. Now it's creeped up to 8 percent. Coincidence?

Please know this -- and you can roll your eyes and insist I'm wrong but I think know more about our readership: everyone writing about false rape claims is coming to this site. They may not be buying into it entirely, but they are seeing that this is a serious issue. The only people mocking this site are the Davey Futrelles and his fringe far leftists. And believe me, when we get requests for help from television networks, none of them are smirking at us or calling us "boobz."

billy williams said...

Because as we all know, Only women can possibly be harmed by FRA's.
Not the innocent men & boys who have had their lives ruined & have killed themselves NO!-It's really WOMEN who suffer from false accusations the most.
Oh Andrea...

billy williams said...

"At some point, perhaps months after the fact, the gals woke up believing they’d been intimately brutalized."

Umm, How do you know they believed they had been brutalized? Do you think everyone who makes a false rape claim really thinks they had been raped? No women ever can make a rape claim they don't know is false? Shame on Andrea for excusing the actions of false accusers by assuming they really think they had been assaulted.

billy williams said...

Not that it matters whether they think they have been assaulted or not. It's still a false accusation & cannot be tolerated.

billy williams said...

Anonymous @ 5:58
Bingo!

Hieronymus Braintree said...

Fine work, Archivist. And thanks for all your efforts in turning back the tide. Rest assured that when you die there will be a very special place reserved for you in feminist hell--one possibly involving forced sex with Amanda Marcotte who will then accuse you of rape.

But, don't worry. I'll probably be in the next room with Melissa McEwan.

zarko said...

Actually, we sometimes to understate the damage FRA do to actual rape victims. Just because news outlets and feminists don't care the actual damage it does to innocent men, we shouldn't be as callous.

Brandon Webb said...

slwerner - Okay, it's far from perfect, bet...

It gets the issue into the public mindset and the public discussion. Andrea Peyser does not have to hit every single point of contention held by those of us who've followed the issue and this site to be very effective
.

You are correct that it is not perfect and I agree that Peyser does not have to address everyone's points of contention on the matter. However, it should be intellectually honest which, I do not believe it is.

Moreover, the issue of false rape allegations has been in the public mindset and discussion for a while now. The overriding problem with the discussion and the public mindset in general is that a social issue like FRA's, or rape, or DV have been continually framed in the context of a gender problem focusing almost exclusively on one gender (women)in terms of impact and victimization.

In my opinion, Peyser's article only serves to perpetuate this specific, contextual framing of the issue