Thursday, February 9, 2012

Comment from a reader: an all-too-typical tale

The following is from one of our readers. The tale is all-too typical, but no less disgusting because of it. The writer's son was 21-years-old at the time of the alleged incident last year, and the newspaper article about the accusation named the young man and called his accuser "the victim" before a scrap of evidence was admitted at trial.  FRS is not printing the reader's name, or his son's, out of respect for their privacy.

Shortly after my son broke it off with his ex-girlfriend, she made extreme false accusations about him. Twelve hours later with zero evidence and a shady story, he was arrested, jailed, and faced a $50,000 cash-only bail.

The very next day his apartment complex served him with a no trespassing order, without following state law procedures for doing so, and the court was quick to grant it.

For three months, she got to live in the apartment furnished with all of his belongings (she had nothing), while he had to continue to both pay his half of the rent and prove his innocence from the false charges she lodged.

Our lawyer got the trespassing order rescinded fairly quickly, but for nought -- she was granted an order of protection which locked him away.

After petitioning to the court and hiring a peace officer for a few hundred bucks, we were given three hours to move out all of his belongings. (The locks had been changed and he never received a key after they served the no trespassing order . . . all the while still paying his portion of rent.)

Later, she skipped out on the rent, and he is now being sued for HER half of it.

His army career is practically ruined as the order of protection prevents him from possessing weapons even as a member of the armed forces, and even while on active duty. Moreover, the bail conditions prevented him from leaving our state, so he had to miss critical training requirements.  He is one more court date away from losing his civilian job, which will probably happen because of the apartment issue.
The good news . . . the case was nol processed [dropped], but not before losing his reputation, most of his friends, $20,000 in legal fee's and so on.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have learned long ago that the legal system is just that “a system”. This “system” is not about seeking truth and justice; it’s about sucking CASH out of its’ “victims”.

These “Victims” have to pay CASH for bail, attorney’s fee’s, court cost, therapist, interpreters’, forensics’ experts, judges’, clerks, prosecutors, secretaries, suppliers, prisons, unions, guards, and prison builders.

My advice don’t give them any money! Them being the “system”. Tell them to get a get a job.

Many people think the USA only owes 15 Trillion in debt, but the real number is 56 Trillion when you add mortgages and credit cards. No one is working, producing and the check is coming due. The USA is the poorest nation on the planet if you think about it, with 56 Trillion in debt.

Aarod99k

Anonymous said...

The American Law enforcement system has eaten too much "federal Pork Bloating dollars" and is now sick. There are whole wings of law enforcement that are now dedicated to false rape accusations, and all the time spent on these false rape accusations are billable hours to VAWA.
The best American men can now do, is "containment". We can show other nations what happens to a country that lets its law enforcement get into the manufacturing statistics business.

Archivist said...

"There are whole wings of law enforcement that are now dedicated to false rape accusations . . . ."

Really?

concerned citizen said...

Hey lady, Let youre son know he in not alone. Reading here after my false rape accusation saved my life, as i no longer felt alone.
My life has returned to some normalcy, i just stay away from women all together.
I beleieve American law enforceemnt is now so perverted that they have in fact turned Women into a legal liability, and as we are seeing, many young men would rather stay home and play video games, then go on a date and hear some feminist rag go off about her fantasy victim status.

Anonymous said...

Archivist...Sexual victims units. They push paperwork with false rape accusations around each others desks all the time, and its all billable time for VAWA.
So yes, one could say there are whole wings of American law enforcement dedicated and dependant on the false rape accusation culture.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Archivist said...

"So yes, one could say there are whole wings of American law enforcement dedicated and dependant on the false rape accusation culture."

I think that we need to be careful and not assume every police officer who assists sexual assault victims is a man-hating loon who instantly believes every claim.

For me, the more troubling problem is this unholy alliance we see between law enforcement and the television news media. The former won't reveal weaknesses in the case until it falls apart while the latter loves rape stories, won't do its own investigation, and runs with the cops' "best case scenario" about the alleged rape. The result was Hofstra.

Anonymous said...

I pray that someday this insanity stops. Until that day comes, I let my fellow man know that the threat posed by the feminist movement and its hate-fueled agenda is as serious as a heart attack.

slwerner said...

"...and its all billable time for VAWA."

Please explain this process and cite the information as to how individual law enforcement departments go about submitting these supposed bills.

I've made the point to you (under your many aliases) multiple times about how VAWA money is actually dispensed, and given you multiple references as to the actual mechanism of distribution via competitively awarded grants - not direct payment for the costs of processing individual cases. Yet, you either cannot learn, have no regard for facts, or are simply a bald-faced liar.

Your extremely poor writing style suggests that you may well be of sub-par intelligence, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you simple are unable to grasp facts and to learn.

But, for the sake of those who can, yes, law enforcement shares in the blame for the situation (dare I say, crisis) of false allegations, both of sexual assaults and of DV. But, they do not profit directly for their involvement in any case, nor any number of cases. They have to cover ALL associated costs out of their own budgets. As they often note, having to deal with FRA’s negatively impacts their ability to address real crime. Would they make such a claim if they were actually being paid federal money for each and every sexual assault or DV case? No, they’d never seek to dissuade any accusations.

Right now, the FRS has managed to have had a noticeable impact on the public discourse about FRA’s, on the press reporting of them, and even on law enforcements reaction and handling of suspect claims.

But, such a positive effect is bound to draw a heated response from those who hate men and would seek to silence the FRS before the damage to their hate-cause goes any further.

The best way to silence the FRS and to mute it’s considerable effectiveness would be to paint it and those of us who comment here as a bunch of nut-jobs and/or misogynists. Thus, we need to be a bit circumspect about how we go about making our comments. I understand the desire of many to blow-off some steam and vent/rant about the injustice.

That can be done without damaging the integrity of the FRS, and I would encourage harsh comments so long as they are properly directed at those who are actually culpable in individual cases. But, if we (any of us) paint with too broad a brush, and simply randomly smear whole classes of people (be it women or the whole of the criminal justice system), we will undoubtedly harm our credibility with many of those we seek to reach with the truth.

And, of course, repeating simplistic and easily disproved (by anyone with an 8th grade reading level and rudimentary internet search skills) lies and outlandish claims will end up making the FRS an easy target for targeted ridicule.

It would truly be a grand shame should the FRS’s impact on the very serious blight of FRA’s and their multitude of attendant harms be blunted by the loss of credibility in the public eye that repeating falsehoods, rather than thoughtfully addressing the issues with reasoned comment and meaningful and positive suggestions as to how the current situation might be improved.

Anonymous said...

@concerned citizen
I agree, this site helped us through as well. Facing up to 25 years in prison for something you know you didn't do is very difficult. This site gave us hope and strength to fight on.

Anonymous said...

Well there you have it, another typical tale.

It would seem the courts would run out of victims as the populace becomes informed,perhaps all these gender studies and drugging of k-12 boys is an effort to keep them dumb and paying for freedom from prosecution that should never have happened..

Jury nullifcation!

slwerner said...

"...and its all billable time for VAWA."

Please explain this process and cite the information as to how individual law enforcement departments go about submitting these supposed bills.

I've made the point to you (under your many aliases) multiple times about how VAWA money is actually dispensed, and given you multiple references as to the actual mechanism of distribution via competitively awarded grants - not direct payment for the costs of processing individual cases. Yet, you either cannot learn, have no regard for facts, or are simply a bald-faced liar.

Your extremely poor writing style suggests that you may well be of sub-par intelligence, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you simple are unable to grasp facts and to learn.

But, for the sake of those who can, yes, law enforcement shares in the blame for the situation (dare I say, crisis) of false allegations, both of sexual assaults and of DV. But, they do not profit directly for their involvement in any case, nor any number of cases. They have to cover ALL associated costs out of their own budgets. As they often note, having to deal with FRA’s negatively impacts their ability to address real crime. Would they make such a claim if they were actually being paid federal money for each and every sexual assault or DV case? No, they’d never seek to dissuade any accusations.

Right now, the FRS has managed to have had a noticeable impact on the public discourse about FRA’s, on the press reporting of them, and even on law enforcements reaction and handling of suspect claims.

But, such a positive effect is bound to draw a heated response from those who hate men and would seek to silence the FRS before the damage to their hate-cause goes any further.

The best way to silence the FRS and to mute it’s considerable effectiveness would be to paint it and those of us who comment here as a bunch of nut-jobs and/or misogynists. Thus, we need to be a bit circumspect about how we go about making our comments. I understand the desire of many to blow-off some steam and vent/rant about the injustice.

That can be done without damaging the integrity of the FRS, and I would encourage harsh comments so long as they are properly directed at those who are actually culpable in individual cases. But, if we (any of us) paint with too broad a brush, and simply randomly smear whole classes of people (be it women or the whole of the criminal justice system), we will undoubtedly harm our credibility with many of those we seek to reach with the truth.

And, of course, repeating simplistic and easily disproved (by anyone with an 8th grade reading level and rudimentary internet search skills) lies and outlandish claims will end up making the FRS an easy target for targeted ridicule.

It would truly be a grand shame should the FRS’s impact on the very serious blight of FRA’s and their multitude of attendant harms be blunted by the loss of credibility in the public eye that repeating falsehoods, rather than thoughtfully addressing the issues with reasoned comment and meaningful and positive suggestions as to how the current situation might be improved.

Anonymous said...

I'm speechless, after reading this story, which is unusual for me. The ranks of MRAs, ghosts, mgtow, free-range men are said to be growing fast yet imo not fast enough to protect men from women.

Aharon

Anonymous said...

She was enabled to destroy his entire life, with zero evidence.

Our system is a very, very blunt instrument, and it always favors the false accuser.

Anonymous said...

REVENGE.

If something like that happened to me, that's all I'd be thinking about.