Monday, January 2, 2012

Winner of the most odious defense of injustice of the year

As we move into a new year, we thought we would do well to look back at what might just be the most inane, jaw-dropping -- indeed, downright other-worldly -- letter defending injustice we've seen in a long time. It's a letter written by Tom Bale, a Brown University alumni defending unfair campus disciplinary procedures at Brown University.

Professor KC Johnson "urge[d] Brown to pass along Bale’s letter to the family of every incoming male student, to provide a taste of the Alice-in-Wonderland process that their sons will encounter over the following four years."  We offer no further comment of our own on it because there aren't enough synonyms for "despicable" in the English language.

Some context: In November, Brown University's student newspaper, the Daily Herald, published a thoughtful piece by Hunter Fast, who had some perceptive comments about the William McCormick case; specifically, about "the damage that [a school's] profit motives can inflict on the cause of criminal justice." Fast wrote: "When allegations of rape were brought to the University administration against McCormick in 2006, administrators summarily expelled him from campus without anything resembling due process. According to McCormick . . . . the University deferred to its profit motive because the alleged victim's father is an influential University donor." Fast added: "Unfortunately, because the case was taken up by the University — an arbiter with an obvious conflict of interest — justice may never be possible in this case in any real sense."

But the following week, Mr. Bale posited the following defense of the school's handling of the McCormick case:

"To the Editor:

"Hunter Fast '12, in his opinion column related to the alleged William McCormick sexual assault incident at Brown ("It can't happen here," Nov. 11), forgets an important issue that supports the University's management of the unfortunate incident: Women have always been at an extreme disadvantage when faced with sexual aggression. What is rape all about? It is the physical coercion of a man seeking sexual domination over a woman. It is one of the historical tragedies in the history of mankind that has never been resolved. As such there is no level playing field in sexual relationships. Women who have been raped have to deal with a male-dominated and biased justice system, a male-dominated and biased police force, and yes, even a male-dominated and biased student body that at one time included McCormick.

"The University is to be applauded for its attempt to level this playing field. It has chosen not to expose the female student to the inequality of the justice system. The message to all males is: 'You need to check your behavior carefully before you enter into a relationship with a woman. There will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman's version of what happened will always be accepted over the man's account.'

"If a male student knew that was the policy hopefully this would serve as a check on sexually aggressive behavior. McCormick might have backed away from this relationship, knowing the consequences he might face. He might well have remained a part of the student body, and everyone would be wiser.

Tom Bale '63"

7 comments:

Buck Swamp said...

Just more anecdotal proof that the greatest enemies of men's rights are usually men. The old Latin proverb is translated: Man is a wolf to man. A truer version would be: Men are wolves to other men, for the benefit of women.

Archivist said...

They honestly have no conception that harsh laws and university rules sometimes backfire on innocent men. They look at the world as "us versus the bad men." The fact is, if I could be reasonably certain that harsh laws only served to put the bad men away, I would support them, too. But it's worse to punish an innocent man than not to jail a rapist, as harsh as that is to say.

Hieronymus Braintree said...

One of the truly weird things about feminism is the way it parodies anti-Semetism. According to feminists, virtually all men benefit from rape culture and support it whether we are conscious of it or not. There's an expression for this. It's called collective guilt, which, in the mind of the bigot, justifies collective punishment w/o much attention paid to any potentially confounding details. Collective guilt is, of course, anathema to good liberals unless applied to males--especially white straight males. Then it's fighting prejudice.

Feminists have even had a blood libel called snuff films. Although young feminists tend to be pro-porn there was a time not too long ago when feminists were insisting that porn was rape propaganda and encouraged violence against women. Feminists charged that jerking off to films of women being literally butchered on screen was the ultimate in typical male sexual entertainment. The fact that no one ever found so much as one commercial snuff film--never mind an actual distribution network with plenty of product--typically, did not stop feminists from passionately insisting on their existence just as never finding any matzos made out of the blood of Christian children didn't stop anti-Semites from believing in that charge either.

If you genuinely believe in male evil to the extent made popular on modern American college campuses,then anyone insisting on due process and attention to detail is, naturally going to be regarded as a rape supporter. It really can be no other way.

Anonymous said...

"One of the truly weird things about feminism is the way it parodies anti-Semetism'.
"just as never finding any matzos made out of the blood of Christian children didn't stop anti-Semites"

Tell me about it. Feminists are into scapegoating and portraying men as demons. What many of us who follow FRA, MRM, another other issues concerning human rights, liberty, and justice are observing is a growing national craziness and stupidity. A sort of mob madness. Now, if you'll excuse me I'm going to go butter a piece of matza before the feminist lynch mob breaks down my door.

Aharon

Zimba said...

And this man has a degree?! Not a great advert for the quality of the education received at Brown.
-- ZimbaZumba

Anonymous said...

Could be the statute of limitations has run out for Mr. Bale and he can afford to project his own sins on other men.

Where is G.G. when you need her? She and this guy are MADE for each other.

billy williams said...

So men are supposed to stay away from women all together so they don't get falsely accused Tom Bale??-Well,I'm already doing that.