Monday, January 30, 2012

Jezebel's Anna North . . .

. . . another progressive, man-hating nitwit.

http://jezebel.com/5879162/are-yale-guys-bad-at-sex

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's essentially only the Onion, err I mean Jezzy reporting on and interviewing some Yale coed who wrote a university modern dating sex piece complaining about the Yale men's oral sex skills and interpersonal maturity. blah blah blah

I feel sorry for Anna North of Jezebel. I suspect that she has lots of deep emotional problems having little or nothing to do with men.

A French philosopher said it best: "feminists are useful idiots". The political puppet masters over looking the stage know how to pull their strings and make them dance.

Aharon

Anonymous said...

Women are man-hating nitwits and useful idiots. Now that that's out of the way, do any of you men, besides Aharon, find yourselves in the following category:

"I got an email from a guy who said the article was hurtful because a lot of guys are already really insecure about sexual performance, and this is going to make things so much worse now that they know girls actually talk about this stuff amongst themselves."

Don't you just hate it when they turn the tables!

Archivist said...

Anon at 3:58: No, but I did get an email from someone who teaches at a college that said, "It's for good reason that writers like North end up in a circle jerk like Jezebel. I don't know what reeks worse, the smugness or the misdirected rage."

Archivist said...

P.S. Thanks for trolling here. The condescension, snark, and wholesale absence of wit and intelligence in your comment was a welcome relief from the serious work we do here on behalf of a class of people that extremists like you pretend are a myth.

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:58,

Men of all ages know that feminized women talk and complain about men near non-stop. It's the easiest and cheapest way for many of those women to momentarily feel better about themselves by bashing others.

I doubt many young guys are insecure about their performance as you claim. Rather, I suspect many young men sexually over-rate themselves or don't care what women think about them since even young guys know that feminized women are useful idiots.

It must be frustrating being a feminized women. After your 40+ years worth of trying to change men, feminism has made women more miserable, angry, lonely, and desperate than ever.

Some questions:
How have girls turned the tables? How many feminists does it take to turn a table? Why do feminized women have such lousy senses of humor?

Run along now. You are out of your league here.

Aharon

Archivist said...

Last I saw North, she was standing over a cauldron in MacBeth, incanting spells.

Funny how some folks who claim to want true equality have no problem with double standards that belittle men. If the genders had been switched in North's story, the same angry banshees would be screaming for the writer to fired.

Ya can't have it both ways, ladies. When you print stuff that maligns a gender, you tell the world it's OK to malign a gender. Get it?

Let me guess: you don't. Because I write in English.

Anonymous said...

'Let me guess: you don't. Because I write in English'.

Followers of the feminist religion speak and read in witch-tongue an ancient language closely related to baby talk.

Aharon

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:58,

BTW, I almost forgot to mention here something that women almost never hear about. Women are not, as a group, nearly as good in performing sex on men as guys let you on to believe. Knowing that women have huge sensitive egos when it comes to their sexual skills with a deeper core that is insecure and weak most guys are smart enough never to complain.

Sure men can often use improvement in their love-making skills and so too can you women use improvement. Men sometimes discuss women's poor skills with other men and some men don't ever bother complaining about it to other men. Why talk about women when men can discuss sports, politics, and investments? If complaining, whining, and feeling victim were a sex-based trait you women would win that award. Actually, you do win that award.

Aharon

Doug1 said...

The remarkable scarcity of nice-looking, not-evil and socially adjusted straight single males (NLNESASSM) is a real issue on Yale's campus, particularly in light of the abundance of nice-looking, not-evil and socially adjusted straight single females.

What she’s really talking about is the relative scarcity of alphas on Yale’s campus. Socially adjusted is code for having alpha game skills. As well I imagine she is inflating the attractiveness of Yale women.

She’s complaining about hook up culture, which does indeed tilt the balance of power towards alpha men, and away from the females that want them to have sex with them. The real problem, aside from there being significantly more girls than guys at many non elite campuses (but probably less of a problem at Yale despite it’s not having an engineering department I don’t believe), is that due to feminist anti-slut ideology, cute female 6’s and pretty female 7’s want to sleep with lesser alpha male 8’s and alpha male 9’s of much higher sex rank, and are willing to slut it up, accept no strings attached hookup sex, and to not complain about infrequent oral, to do so.

This description of the current sexual marketplace especially in college but also afterwards for girls in their twenties was first fully fleshed out by Roissy/Heartiste.

This is something that Susan Walsh has made it her mission to change, mostly by convincing girls in the 5 through 7 range to only have sex once they’re already in a monogamous committed relationship.

Masculist Man said...

The personnel at Jezebel and Wikipedia are pretty close. If it's not the same people at both then it those close to them.

This is what I mean: click here