Thursday, January 26, 2012

An example of how far colleges have gone . . .

Colleges push anti-male sex policies to the edge: by Pierce Harlan and Paul Elam.  Go read it.

6 comments:

Dulantha said...

We cannot trust present educational systems in any country, they are controlling by hypocrites who have a heterosexual poisoned mindset. They are showing their false virtue by generating hatred attitudes towards natural male sexuality.

Anonymous said...

The campus Gender-Raunch community openly tells students in their classrooms that males, let me re-phrase to be more correct "hetero-sexual males" are the cause of all the worlds problems.
They have no qualms about poisoning and making hetero-sexual behaviors a legal liability, as these new definitions and perversions will not affect them...they are not hetero-sexual.

Anonymous said...

How come its not considered discrimination when "academic Gender-Raunch" say in their classrooms that all hetero-sexual males are the vile-est, sickest, perverts, rapists wife beaters in the world??
Isn't this discrimination based on sex???
Oh I forgot, the Gender-Raunch community determines what is discriminatory and what is not.

billy williams said...

I wonder how long before the law starts sending guys to jail for "pressuring" women into having sex.
With the way things are going my guess is it could be sooner than we thought.

Hieronymus Braintree said...

One of the weird things about feminists claiming that they're all about empowering women is that there's rarely, if any, talk about teaching women how to set boundaries by clearly stating their intentions regarding sex, reminding them that have the power to walk out if a guy won't stop nagging or that she can inform him that her refusal is the final word and any continued pressure will be considered harassment and any sex will be considered rape. There seems to be no apparent thought at all to informing women that if they don't want to have sex then don't go home with a guy or bring him back to their place.

According to feminists, teaching women how to take control is verbotten on the grounds that any such expectation constitutes victim blaming.

As a guy, my understanding is that if I refuse to take obvious precautions to avoid trouble, if I don't exercise control where I obviously can and then, instead of taking responsibility for my own miscues, lay any and all blame for any bad shit that predictably follow at others, it is my understanding that that is the very sort of thing to get one marked as a weasel. Failing to teach or encourage women to take control to prevent unwanted sexual experiences or rape seems a perfect way to guarantee an augmentation of both. If one's goal is to stop rape, the strategy makes no real sense.

If, on the other hand, one's real desire is to increase the frequency of rape accusations and, therefore, the number of women claiming to be rape victims and do it while pretending to be after the opposite, why then the strategy makes all the sense in the world.

Anonymous said...

Colleges are also making the most profit off of all the male hatred:

female enrollment has increased from 25% to 70%.
male enrollment has stayed the same at about 33%

That is, in 1967, 25% of young women aged 18-24 were enrolled in college.
In 2009, 70% of women aged 18-24 were enrolled in college.

Add on top of that, that tuition prices have increased at a rate much higher than the inflation index - somebody (or group of people) - are making out like bandits from the college male hatred...