Two teen-age girls who told authorities they were thrown out of a van after one of the girls was sexually assaulted were ultimately found to have been at an all-night house party — and not telling the truth about the events of the night.
Deputies from the Oakland County Sheriff's Office were called to Panera Bread at 6:38 a.m. Monday morning after an 18-year-old girl called 911 to say her 17-year-old friend "may have been raped" and that the two girls, both from Clinton Township, were thrown from a red van near the Rochester Road restaurant.
When the deputies arrived at the scene, the 17-year-old girl had disappeared; she was discovered two hours later sleeping at a friend's home on Parke Street in Rochester Hills, according to a sheriff's office report.
The Rochester Hills Fire Department was called to transport the girl to Crittenton Hospital Medical Center; when fire department personnel arrived, "the 17-year-old female was found to be highly intoxicated and had taken some prescription pills ... the victim became combative toward fire department personnel and was out of control and had to be restrained," the report stated.
An investigation determined there was no criminal sexual assault and that the girl had gotten into a fight with another female at the all-night party before she and her friend were dropped off at Panera Bread.
The 17-year-old girl was released to her mother.
It was not immediately known if the two girls would face any charges.
Link: http://rochester.patch.com/articles/claims-about-possible-rape-being-tossed-from-van-false-deputies-say
Deputies from the Oakland County Sheriff's Office were called to Panera Bread at 6:38 a.m. Monday morning after an 18-year-old girl called 911 to say her 17-year-old friend "may have been raped" and that the two girls, both from Clinton Township, were thrown from a red van near the Rochester Road restaurant.
When the deputies arrived at the scene, the 17-year-old girl had disappeared; she was discovered two hours later sleeping at a friend's home on Parke Street in Rochester Hills, according to a sheriff's office report.
The Rochester Hills Fire Department was called to transport the girl to Crittenton Hospital Medical Center; when fire department personnel arrived, "the 17-year-old female was found to be highly intoxicated and had taken some prescription pills ... the victim became combative toward fire department personnel and was out of control and had to be restrained," the report stated.
An investigation determined there was no criminal sexual assault and that the girl had gotten into a fight with another female at the all-night party before she and her friend were dropped off at Panera Bread.
The 17-year-old girl was released to her mother.
It was not immediately known if the two girls would face any charges.
Link: http://rochester.patch.com/articles/claims-about-possible-rape-being-tossed-from-van-false-deputies-say
Posts
10 comments:
Feminists have long called for men who rape women to be castrated. Therefore, feminists --- who claim they only want equality --- would then say that it is only fair that women who make FRA should be circumcised and sterilized.
As part of their punishment, these two 'women' should stand in the parking lot of Panera Bread with a sign that says 'only women can stop FRA'.
BTW, don't buy any of the day old breads at Panera even when they promise you it will still taste as if freshly baked. The female clerk lied to me. Lied I tell you.
Aharon
Well anyone want to wager those little ladies WON'T be charged?
"Two teen-age girls"
Hmm feminists in training...
Did these girls name a perpetrator? Has anyone seen statistic on the number of FRAs made each year where a perp is name and the number of FRAs each year where a perp is not named?
It is problematic for American law enforcement to not charge false rape accusers. When false rape accusations outnumber real accusations, that could be the breaking point, and the call for action from American taxpayers to return the rule of law to American law enforcement; and start charging false rape accusers.
I believe if the American public were given the truth (and not some manufactured 2% number), we have in fact already gone over the breaking point of; there are now more false rape accusations than true ones.
Two teen-age girls"
Hmm feminists in training...
Jan 24, 2012 6:43:00 AM
Teen aged girls have been making false accusations since the Salem Witch hunts. Therre is nothing new under the sun.
Every false rape accusation that American law enforcement use protocol perversions and semantics games to classify as "Un-founded", instead of false; serves to empower Gender-Raunch.
It is a perversion of American law enforcement to use state and federal dollars to get empower one political faction over the other.
Anonymous - "Did these girls name a perpetrator? Has anyone seen statistic on the number of FRAs made each year where a perp is name and the number of FRAs each year where a perp is not named?"
Okay, this is probably just a semantics issue, but...
The perpetrator in the case of an FRA is the person who made the false allegation.
Any wrongly named persons being accused of the non-existent attack are, at worst, suspects. Barring evidence of an actual attack upon the accuser, they should ideally be no more than "persons of interest". Same holds for those unnamed.
The term perpetrator is used to denote someone who has committed a crime.
Yes, semantics. Should have said the alleged perpetrator.
Did the girls actually accuse a real person?
Anonymous - ”Did the girls actually accuse a real person?”
It would appear that they did not. Seems that they did as many others who are looking to make an FRA-for-alibi have done before them, and simply fabricated unidentified individuals as their attackers.
Fortunately, the police did not believe the account of two intoxicated girls, and their lies were quickly unraveled.
Seems there is even a chance, however slim, that there may be charges leveled (although given that one is under-aged, she is much less likely to actually be charged). At least charges weren’t immediately ruled out, as we have seen in so many other cases.
concerned citizen (different day, same inanities) - ”blah blah protocol perversions blah blah empower Gender-Raunch blah blah federal dollars blah blah”
If you had been able to read the article, and if you had the ability to decipher the meaning of the words you were reading, you might well have noted that no semantic games were used to declare this case “unfounded” – it is clearly stated that it did not happen; thus, no Gender-Raunch was served nor empowered, and (as is always the case) no federal money was provided to local law enforcement, and the expense will be born out of the PD’s tax-payer supplies annual budget.
Still, I suppose that given the sheer number of false rape cases, even if you never bother to actually read any of the articles, and if you just keep on posting the same “boiler-plate”, there is a likelihood that someday there will be a case in which federal money was involved (even if only as a tertiary consideration) , where a law enforcement agency will have attempted to use some protocol perversion and/or semantic games to try to cast a clearly and objectively false case as merely an unfounded one, and where the Gender-Raunch practitioners will actually gain some discernable empowerment via their ability to bully LE into not charging in a case where the facts were indisputable, a conviction all but guaranteed, and the prospects for meaningful punishment (actual jail time) were clearly extant.
And, when all of that falls into place in that one case, then, you will have finally gotten one right, and your cut-n-paste, one-size-fits-all rants will actually fit in with the facts of the case.
Post a Comment