It took a mostly female jury just one hour to acquit a 21-year-old college man of charges that he raped a 20-year-old female classmate at a fraternity party. He burst into tears and trembled after his ordeal had ended.
From the limited information available to us, the case sounds like a classic "he said/she said" college rape claim that never should have seen the inside of a courtroom. The accuser claimed she was high on alcohol and marijuana, and that she blacked out at a frat party only to awaken with the accused on top of her. She said she tried to push him off but that he held her down by one arm while her other arm "got caught underneath him."
The accused, on the other hand, told an investigator that the woman had attacked him by pushing him down on the couch and telling him he was going to have sex with her. Three witnesses testified under oath that they peeked behind the curtain and saw the accused and the accuser, but they said they saw nothing that pointed to a struggle. One man said he glimpsed a woman on top of the accused. "They seemed to be engaged in sexual contact," he said. Story here: http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/dec/09/tdmet01-student-at-ur-is-acquitted-of-rape-ar-1531381/
We do not have all the evidence and don't know what prompted the district attorney to press charges, but from the news story, it sounds as if the district attorney might have just rolled the dice with a young man's life, hoping he or she would "get lucky" and send him away for five years. That, of course, is a gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion. The jury seemed to have little difficulty in disposing of the case, and perhaps that will serve as a warning to the D.A. not to waste judicial resources and put possibly innocent men at risk of unjust incarceration.
The sexual grievance industry will wrongly classify this claim as a "rape" because it can't be definitively ruled a false claim. Actually, it should be put into a different category--the vast gray area of claims where we really don't know what happened. The irrefutable truth is that if you took a group of rape claims and objectively analyzed the evidence on both sides for each claim, you'd be able to say that a certain relatively small percentage reasonably appear to be rape; a certain relatively small percentage reasonably appear to be false or mischaracterized claims; but the vast majority are too unclear to call. The sexual grievance industry wants to include all the claims in the vast gray area as "rape" -- it does this by insisting that "only" 5.9 or 8 or 10 percent of all rape claims are false. What they fail to mention is that "only" a similarly small percentage of claims can also be definitively called rape. The rest--we just don't know. Studies that suggest otherwise are dishonest in the extreme.
How to Address Claims of Unsatisfactory Sexual Encounters
The case cited above had an understandable and, based on the news report, proper outcome. But that should not be the end of it.
A claim that falls in that vast gray area, and that arose via a hook-up, should not be ignored. It should be a concern for everyone -- even though we don't know whether it was technically a rape or a false or mischaracterized rape claim. Almost all of the claims in this area are the product of unsatisfactory sexual encounters that were avoidable. It is long past time that we addressed unsatisfactory sexual encounters without assuming they were either rapes or false rape claims, and without subjecting presumptively innocent young men to the terrible ordeal of a trial that might send them to prison for years.
So how do we address unsatisfactory encounters? With a call for sexual maturity, something gravely lacking on our college campuses. Too many children with adult genitalia are hooking up without considering the consequences. We can help instill sexual maturity with education.
For starters, college students need to be taught that men and women view casual sex differently, and that women feel remorse more than men following one-night stands. A study shows how common remorse is for women following one-night stands: "Overall women’s feelings were more negative than men’s [about one-night stand casual sex]. Eighty per cent of men had overall positive feelings about the experience compared to 54 per cent of women. . . . . The predominant negative feeling reported by women was regret at having been 'used'. Women were also more likely to feel that they had let themselves down and were worried about the potential damage to their reputation if other people found out. Women found the experience less sexually satisfying and, contrary to popular belief, they did not seem to view taking part in casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships."
In a recent edition of Ohio State University's student newspaper The Lantern, Amy Bonomi, a professor of human sexuality at OSU specializing in domestic violence and assault, said: "Women tend to feel bad after having a "random hook up," she said. Typically men are not upset by these occurrences." Bonomi attributed this situation to society's "gender double standard" that men are expected to be more sexually forward than women.
In addition, it is well to note that one of the common motives cited by experts for false rape claims is "remorse after an impulsive sexual fling . . . ." Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, S. Taylor, K.C. Johnson at 375 (2007).
Knowledge of the prevalence of remorse might provide some incentive for both young women and men to more carefully consider whether they should engage in sex; at the very least, an understanding that remorse is a natural byproduct of one-night stands for women would help young women understand the source of their post-intercourse anger and, perhaps, keep them from misdirecting that anger at their sex partner.
Beyond that, there is the elephant in the room: alcohol. "Let's put it this way: the hook up does not happen without alcohol," Professor Amy Bonomi said. In fact, the literature is fairly unanimous on this point. We need to demand more from our college administrators in cracking down on alcohol abuse, and we need to hit the students on the side of the head with the information that alcohol and sex play are especially dangerous for people of college age.
Rape, which used to be just a crime, has been politicized to the point that people spend way too much arguing over the prevalence of rape and false rape claims. Both sides of that issue would benefit by joining hands and focusing on the gray claims--the unsatisfactory sexual encounters--where we just don't know what happened. Focusing on the gray area by instilling sexual maturity in our young people will help protect both our daughters and our sons.
Friday, December 9, 2011
Gray area 'he said/she said' college drunken sex should not be ignored, even though we don't know if it was rape
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
"He trembled and broke into tears" upon hearing the jury set him free.
I know what this guy felt like having a literal army against you perverting what the meaning of is, is in order to try and put you in jail on a false rape accusation.
The only reason im not in jail on a false rape accusation is the girl could not keep her lies straight (even with some rape crisis
councilors working on her story with her).
Why cant someone be held accountable for the trauma that this guy went through??
We really don't know what happened. It is possible the parties themselves aren't real clear. I am suggesting we need to stop relying on the law to straighten everything out after-the-fact for these "he said/she said" claims, and start focusing on the root causes of unsatisfactory sex that should help prevent some such encounters before they reach the point of no return.
I am NOT suggesting that we make rape legal or that we not punish rape. I AM suggesting that it ignores reality if we think we can rely on the law to solve every claim. And our current sexual assault orientation addresses one thing: the clear case where the guy is a predator. My guess is that these programs never prevented a single rape because predators generally aren't swayed by sexual assault programs that teach "don't rape."
"She pushed him down & told him he was gonna have sex with her"?-Sounds like She raped Him,-Wow.To be raped & then falsely accused of rape to cover up the crime must be horrific,-Thank god she aint pregnant right?(CS)
"My guess is that these programs never prevented a single rape because predators generally aren't swayed by sexual assault programs that teach "don't rape."
I agree, and trying to tell young women to avoid making bad drunken decisions probably doesn't do much to prevent real predators, either. However, for as much as people want to call regretted drunken sex "rape" it would prevent such "rape". Yet, it still gets dismissed as "victim blaming":
http://www.phillyburbs.com/ap/state/pa/pa-liquor-board-pulls-ad-on-drinking-rape/article_5a1148c8-d030-5abf-a0fd-f76dd2e62b17.html
We need to demand more from our college administrators in cracking down on alcohol
This is stupid. Years ago the drinking age was 18 which neant that even younger people were drinking and at the time liquor stores and bars were not too particular about who they sold to.If you looked old enough (18) that was good enough but yet there were never any rape allegations.
It's not the alcohol but the fact that feminists and others have created a hysteria about rape and every male from 8 to 100 is a potential rapist even though we all logically know that this isn't possible.
In the past if a girl got drunk and had sex with a stranger and regretted itshe would keep it quiet and hope n one found out about it because they would only think she's a whore.
Today, acting drunk and stupid and having sex makes you a victim.They get all sorts of attention and sympathy for their stupidity.
Just once I'd like to hear people tell these girls, as they did in the past, that whatever may have happened is their own fault.Don't get drunk and don't ask men to fuck you or behave in any way to lead a man to believe that you're asking for it.In fact, actions speak louder than words.Shoving your tits into some 20yo guys face and rubbing up against him is foreplay and a consent to sex.Another thing, why do females go to clubs and bars? They'll say that they just wanted to listen to music and have fun but they could do that at home.Invite some girls over,play music and drink all you like.
The real reason they go out is for male attention and when you do things to attract males, to the male this means you're eager for sex.Females who do this and then don't put out or accuse some man of rape should themselves be charged with aggravated sexual harassment and assault.
The DA must be disbarred. Like Nifong. A dossier to that effect should be developed. And the university should be sued. The woman in question should also be prosecuted, as others have been recently in other venues.
The barbarism that this young man went through, will and is effecting many young men around the country. But make note folks, this barbarism is effecting the young men first, and will circulate to effect society as a whole in the long run. It already is, as hetero-dominance is in fact being broken in many areas (mostly in the north-eastern states) of the US.
When hetero-dominance is broken, women and concerned men will then seek out legal and societal protections for hetero-relationships (hetero-marriages), and society will return to protecting the hetero-marraige relationships out of the basic fundamental need to sustain the country.
If society and laws shrugged whenever another drunk weed-smoking college woman later claims rape then less false rape allegations would occur and a few less coeds would get drunk and smoke. OK, it won't happen. The laws are unequal in biased favor of females over males.
Do men need to walk around 'wired' with a hidden miniature audio/video recording device to protect themselves from false accusations? Is it legal? Is it evidence that could be introduced in Court in defense of the falsely accused?
Atlas Laughed
Feminists and the gender-raunch culture has spawned a huge number of young and not so young idiot women. A police man suggests that women not dress like sluts to reduce the risk of rape and the hysterical women scream in outrage. If a police man suggested that women avoid getting drunk and/or smoking weed to avoid being 'victimized' then the women would scream again in outrage.
The ancient Greeks had a saying: 'those whom the Gods want to destroy they first make mad' (insane). Modern western society with its values, attitudes, and lack of common sense and logic is becoming an increasing mad kingdom.
Atlas Laughed
In the past if a girl got drunk and had sex with a stranger and regretted itshe would keep it quiet and hope n one found out about it because they would only think she's a whore.
Today, acting drunk and stupid and having sex makes you a victim.They get all sorts of attention and sympathy for their stupidity.
This is very true. It's all the work of feminists and their mangina supporters.
The appalling thing is if this case had been brought not by the DA under criminal law, but by a campus disciplinary committee applying the preponderance of the evidence (50.1%) standard that the Obama administration says they must use under Title IX if they want any federal government funds (and all but two colleges in the country get some), this innocent guy likely would have been found guilt of date rape and kicked out of his university.
Actually, he did defend himself at a University disciplinary hearing under the preponderance standard. I represented him at that secret trial.
As a third year law student, I got involved because the University prohibits attorneys from participating. Long story short, we won a "not responsible" verdict six months after the initial accusation. He was directly indicted the NEXT week.
Post a Comment