Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Nicole Fabian-Weber supports women who cut off their husbands dicks -- because the women claim they were abused
Wife Cuts Off Husband's Penis & Chucks It in the River
By Nicole Fabian-Weber
A 29-year-old Vietnamese woman, only identified by her surname, Pan, was sick and tired of her husband's philandering ways and his physical abuse. So she did what any scorned, ballsy woman would do: She waited until he was passed out from drugs and sleeping pills and cut off his penis -- with a pair of scissors. Then she threw the severed member in a Taiwanese river like it ain't no thang.
Afterward, she turned herself into police and allegedly told them that she felt no regret for what she did to her unemployed, drugged-out dirtbag of a husband. Bad. Ass.
Although I consider myself to be somewhat of a pacifist, I must admit, I've always admired a woman who has the cojones to cut off a man's weenus. Lord knows I wouldn't be able to go through with it. No matter how much the bastard deserved it. Cutting off a dude's private parts -- with scissors (scissors!) no less -- would probably be more punishment for me than the man itself. Shudder! Blech! Ick!
Then again, I've never been pushed to such a point in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with ... the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They've been abused -- physically, sexually, and emotionally -- for far too long, and cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power seems like the best option. And it probably is.
Pan, who worked at a local karaoke shop to support her family, has been taken into custody on charges of assault. And you know what? I bet she couldn't care less. She probably feels pretty damn good right now.
Do you think cutting off a man's penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?
Link: http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/127533/wife_cuts_off_husbands_penis
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
23 comments:
Yet another candidate for register-her.com. Register-her! It's funny how they keep making volunteering.
No amount of punishment the law could devise is bad enough. I hope the next man this happens to strangles her on the spot. I would vote to find him innocent REGARDLESS of anything that may have gone before.
If i accused Nicole Fabian-Weber of abuse,Could i cut up her Vagina!??
What's really outrageous is the people commenting who agree with her--Or make excuses for her--Not so much Nicole,That's what I've come 2 expect of feminists--When a child takes a car & drives it into a tree,you don't blame the child,-He didn't know any better,No you blame the 42yr old mother who got in the front seat & said,"Drive kid,I trust you!"-Same thing here,-I really don't blame the feminists--That's what they're here for & are all about No,I blame all the commenters who read her article & said"Keep thinking this way Nicole,-I agree with you!"
What particularly struck me was her statement that cutting off a man's dick "would probably be more punishment for me than the man itself. Shudder! Blech! Ick!" Not only does this woman think that the unpleasantness of the act for the mutilator is a greater evil than the effect of the mutilation on the victim, she actually refers to him as "it". She evidently doesn't regard men as human.
Drive kid,I trust you!
Just a few months after Sharon Osbourne & now THIS!-What is this world coming 2???
I can't believe you advocate women cut off penises!
Lets start a campaign to chop off a woman's clitoris if they cheat on us or hurt our feelings! Right!?
I wonder how he abused her. Probably didn't give her as much housekeeping as the man next door gave his wife. Emotional rape.
Imagine the genders reversed here. If a man mutilated his wife's genitals and then claimed he had suffered years of abuse, would anyone give him the time of day to listen? Of course not. This is a heinous crime and no amount of alleged abuse will justify it.
Anon,
Even I missed this. That isn't even Pierce's words. That was taken directly from the piece that sick woman wrote. Sorry.
Nicole Fabian-Weber - ”Do you think cutting off a man's penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?”
Wow! How do we even respond to such a question being asked.
Now, I’m sure that the women who are laughing it up and celebrating the “female empowerment” they perceive in such brutal violence, would try to argue that men have been committing great violence against women as well.
That much is true, and, I’d even acknowledge that men do more and more devastating violence to women than women do to men.
But, what we NEVER see is an audience of men – average Joe’s – yucking it up at some women getting “her due”. We never hear of men shouting “you go guy” in support of a man committing violence against a women – no matter what she might have done to him to have precipitated that violence.
You’ll never find men posing a question as to whether disfiguring and mutilating violence done to a woman is justified.
All you’ll see is men (rhetorically) asking how would women feel if the gender roles were reversed.
But, even doing this presupposes that women are like men, and are capable of feeling general empathy for those of the opposite gender (beyond just those that they know and care about). I’d compare it to the relative response to the crime of rape. Men are generally very keen to women being victims of that vile crime, often experiencing a murderous level of anger over it, even if the victim is a woman they’ve never even met. But, what of men being the victim of rape (i.e. prison rape)? Those male victims suffer no less that women who are raped, yet the typical (nearly universal) response from women will be to laugh and make light of a male victims plight.
Women like to thing that they are the more empathetic sex. But, I’d have to say that their real-world actions suggest quite the opposite. In fact, while men will often empathize with women they do not personal know, it’s uncommon for a woman to do so for men who are stranger to them. I’m sure that it doesn’t take much reflection for anyone here to recall examples of this that they’ve personally witnessed.
Woman can, and do, frequently act as did Sharon Osborne, openly calling for violence to be visited upon men for all sorts of perceived offenses (She also suggested a peniectomy for a disgruntled performer at the musical festival which enriches her by trading on her husbands name. Yeah, calling for the dicks to be cut off men who question a woman’s business practices is certainly the height of female compassion and empathy!). And, one can be sure that when such violence is visited upon men, women will, en mass, have a good laugh at the victim and his plight.
On the other hand, we frequently see men ready to jump into action to protect, rescue, and avenge women.
Of course, I won’t go so far as to proclaim men are the “better”. I’ll just say that the actual actions of actual women certainly point out the absurdity of so many women who frequently proclaim women to be that “better” sex.
This is the new Female Sharia law.
If he "offends" you in some way, cut off his manhood...after drugging him of course.
"Do you think cutting off a man's penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?
If you use the word "hours" instead of "years", then I would agree wholeheartedly that the CHOP is suitable punishment.
Slwerner misleads: "We never hear of men shouting “you go guy” in support of a man committing violence against a women ..."
You're right. You'll never catch a man shouting "you go guy". All he has to do is turn his head away in silence. That's the same thing as supporting violence against women.
"That's the same thing as supporting violence against women."
No, it's not.
Who are you, Jackson Katz or something? Davey Futrelle? What an inane comment!
Blaming innocent men who don't commit violence against women is at least as bad as blaming innocent women who are victimized by social deviants. In fact, innocent men typically have far less ability to stop social deviants than the innocent women who consciously interact with them. But why let the facts get in the way of a good feminist mantra, right?
See, to people like you, "victim blaming" is something you screech when you want women to have no responsibility for their safety. It never applies to men, even when it most assuredly should.
Anonymous Coward - ”Slwerner misleads”
Okay, show me where men applaud and cheer violence against women. What can you find, a few wack-o outliers?
On televison, we were treated to a full studio audience of “everyday” woman laughing and cheering about Kathrine Kieu Becker. I cannot imagine a similar sized crowd of average guys applauding even news that an angry man had punch-out a woman. In fact, there is a very high probability that many of the men would openly voice their displeasure at a man committing violence against a woman – regardless of what she had done. Men who beat and/or murder their cheating wives are not applauded. They are put in prison, and no men speak-up to demand their exoneration based on speculation that the victim had been abusing him. That “silence” is much more telling that the loud-assed whining of women that any of their gender be spared punishements.
Cheering on and out-right calling for violence against men is actual SUPPORT for that violence.
And, by your definition, every women in that audience who did not speak out against Sharon Obsbourne and Katherine Becker was also GUILTY of tacitly supporting violence against men. Is that really a meaningful standard by which to judge?
It is time for men to realize it is a hostile world, and take some responsibility in how they deal with it. I don't know what the mutilated husband might have told the wife had they spoken about this. However I suspect that any wife, being given a clear understanding of the extra-legal consequences she would face for such an act would not do so. Since violence is abjured on this website, I will refrain from advertising the consequences of such an assault on me, and leave them to you imagination. I will say that I would not kill her, though I suspect she would, in the long run, prefer that to the condition she would be in. My wife understands this - does yours?
Exactly how did your wife come to understand this (your threat of violence against her), and how many times has she tried to leave you?
We need Nuremberg Trials for feminazi
Anon 3:48,
If your reading comprehension was in any way adequate, you might realize that he is actually making it known that he will defend himself, not that he will just get violent because he feels like it, in the face of the articles type of attack.
Seriously, stop trying to read into the statement, that which isn't there.
Sorry, that was Anon at 4:38, not 3:48
Yay! I support Pan! If I had the money to do so, I'd support her defense! He got what he deserved.
Were you on the jury, feminist man?
So much for due process among the feminists, right Jovan? Go back to your fellow weirdos.
Post a Comment