Your federal goverment has just handed a small university in Pennsylvania hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight a rape problem there is no evidence exists.
The money was paid courtesy of a democractic senator whose relationship with women voters is tenuous because he identifies as pro-life. This story is a tiny microcosm of how the sexual grievance industry works.
In Erie, Pennsylvania, Ted Marnen, the director of Gannon University's office of campus police and safety, says there is no evidence that the university has a problem with sexual violence. He said that the university, with an enrollment of about 4,200 students, averages 1.66 rapes on campus per year. (One rape is one rape too many, so it isn't fair to say there is "no" problem. It is fair to say it is not a widespread or significant problem.)
But wouldn't Gannon's figures be underreported? Mr. Marnen isn't ready to buy into that. "It's difficult to tell," he said.
Nevertheless, little Gannon University has just been awarded $298,638 from the U.S. Department of Justice to reduce violence against women on the university's campus. The grant will fund anti-violence programs for students for the next three years. With the money, the school will get a new violence-prevention coordinator, develop a community response to violence, offer mandatory anti-violence programs for students and develop new crime-response policies.
The funding was procured by pro-life Senator Bob Casey. “Every student deserves to study in an environment where they feel physically and emotionally secure. This funding will help Gannon accomplish this goal,” said Senator Casey. Casey provided no support for the premise that Gannon women do not already feel physically and emotionally secure.
Can anyone name a single program that has ever been hailed a success to reduce the rape "epidemic"? There have been billions of dollars spent to wage the war on rape over the past 30 years, and
yet we are told that under-reporting is still 95 percent on campus, higher than ever. The more money spent, the more people hired with it, the worse the problem supposedly gets. Instead of asking what's really going on here, the only "solution" pursued is to keep doing more of the same.
Heather MacDonald once famously wrote: "It’s a lonely job, working the phones at a college rape crisis center. Day after day, you wait for the casualties to show up from the alleged campus rape epidemic—but no one calls." Ms. MacDonald thinks the rape "epidemic" on campus is rubbish.
At Gannon, Mr. Marnen said "it will be hard to judge if" the funding is successful. "If we see an increase in assaults, does that mean more women are reporting, or there is an increase in sexual violence?" Marnen said. "It's very difficult to measure."
Earlier this year, Senator Casey introduced the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act (SaVE Act), which, among other things, would do legislatively what the Department of Education has already improperly done by executive branch fiat: mandate that colleges use the "preponderance of the evidence" standard of proof for sexual assault cases.
In other words, if your son is accused of sexual assault at college, Senator Casey thinks its fine to expel him even if the hearing tribunal believes there is a 49.9999% chance he didn't do it.
Sources:
-News story regarding Gannon: http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110929/NEWS02/309289865/-1/newssitemap
-Sexual assault reporting stats are available on line: http://ope.ed.gov/security/InstList.aspx)
-Bob Casey announcement: http://casey.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=aec5071e-1b92-42c8-a3a0-a88c504b451e
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Feds hand small university hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight rape problem there is no evidence exists
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
“Every student deserves to study in an environment where they feel physically and emotionally secure. This funding will help Gannon accomplish this goal,” said Senator Casey.
The irony here is that the funding will probably cause the students to feel less secure. I'm not saying that ignoring the problem is a solution (there's those 5-ish annual rapes that need to be prevented). But if the information released by anti-violence programs resembles the 1-in-4 lie at all, the students will fear a threat that doesn't exist.
Once again the actual number of rapes reported blows out of the water feminist claims of there being a campus rape culture.
Let's do the math.
Gannon has a student body of 4,200 students. The national average according to the latest stats I know shows that, on average, 57% of students are female which means that only 43% are male due to the odious patriarchal advantage that our woman-hating society refuses to come clean about. Let's be slightly generous and assume that 55% of the student body is female. Feminists make the claim that 25% of all women are raped or subject to attempted rape while in college but that only 5% report it. It seems strange that only 5% would report it when you consider all the encouragements given to coeds to both report or simply think they were raped but let's say it's true anyhow.
Fifty-five percent of 4,200 is 2,310 which means that every year 577.5 female students should be the objects of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault. If you accept the 1-in20 figure for actual reporting there should be about 29 reported rapes or attempted rapes per year. Instead all they can come up with is a lousy 1.6.
No matter how you slice it campus rape culture is obviously a myth.
As a male I feel so emotionally secure knowing that.
O/T - but you'll be happy to see many of your ideas being espoused in a non-manosphere site.
http://www.bigsoccer.com/soccer/bill-archer/2011/09/26/frimpong-didnt-do-it/
How does this help the male students?
Anon at 3:44, the man is a hero. Wow!
must see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xR7g41_4758&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34RZ-nIp4Yw
American Law enforcement are redefining what the meaning of is, is, in order to hide the now "Culture of false rape accusations" from the public.
I believe these semantics games, and manufactured statistics are beyond the scope of "policing powers" that the US constitution allows them to do.
All these federal pork bloating dollars have very little to do with stopping a ???"Rape Culture"??? and has everything to do with "Empowering" the Gender-raunch community and their agenda.
Mr Clemente on his death bed decides to help free some innocent men from false accusations of rape. God bless this man!!
Alot of folks try to get right with god when they are facing their mortality
Pork barrel feminism pays really, really well.
More jobs for women in this mancession.
Obama supports women's jobs (at sexual grievance industries known as colleges)
Now you must prove consent upon accusation, better be videotaping guys!
Or have a signed letter of consent witnessed by your attorney ala Cherry 2000.
Anonymous said...
Mr Clemente on his death bed decides to help free some innocent men from false accusations of rape. God bless this man!!
Alot of folks try to get right with god when they are facing their mortality
Sep 29, 2011 4:48:00 PM
It is better later than never but then, it is better sooner than later.
It is more proof that the "Feds" are engeged in the war on/against men and boys.
1)
“Every student deserves to study in an environment where they feel physically and emotionally secure. This funding will help Gannon accomplish this goal,” said Senator Casey.
They mean every female student. Male students will feel emotionally insecure, because at any moment they can be "assaulted" and "raped" by a false rape accusation.
2)
People keep writing that men need written notarized consent. This is rubbish. Consent can be withdrawn at any moment. Thus written consent is totally worthless, unless there is seamless recording proving that there was no withdrawal of consent.
Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman2 //Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman // Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children
3)
Never forget: if there is zero proof for a rape allegation, most feminists think there is a 99% chance she is right. Even if the man proved his innocence with 95% certainty, a feminist court would still be convinced with certainty of 51% that he did it.
So things are much worse!
4)
Anyone has numbers, what percentage of rapes reported at colleges are rape-rape, forcible rape, rape in the traditional definition? I suppose probably under 10%!?
My only rebuttal is not of course that the funding obviously is wrong, but taken things out of context while correct, should be clarifies,s t otherwise someone could argue that well a lot of universities received grants to fight cases which may or may not occur in the future, its amazing how tax $ are wasted, and yes the 1 in 4 lie is repeated.
Post a Comment