Decision Can't Undo Unconscionable Rush to Judgment
See here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/21/us-strausskahn-idUSTRE77J20620110821?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OUR MISSION
Followers
Liberty Bell
AVfM Donations
Reforming the justice system
Defending rights in higher education
False Rape Activist Paul Elam
Links: Information About False Rape Claims
- ● RUSSLYN ALI: 'Dear Colleague letter (lowered standard of proof on campus for sex charges, etc.)
- -- Criticisms of 'Dear Colleague' letter
- ● ROY F. BAUMEISTER: Is There Anything Good About Men?
- ●EMILY BAZELON and RACHEL LARIMORE: How often do women falsely cry rape?
- ● CYNTHIA BELL: Rape should be tough to prove
- ●ROY BLACK: Why we should protect those accused of rape
- ●CAMPUS SAFETY AND SECURITY DATA ANALYSIS CUTTING TOOL
- ● PROF. ALAN DERSHOWITZ
- --The trouble with rape prosecutions
- --When the rape rap is phoney
- ●SUSAN ESTRICH: Discussing the Al Gore rape case
- ●FATHERS AND FAMILIES WEB SITE
- ●ZACHARY FOWLE: Accused often guilty until proven innocent
- ●EDWARD GREER: The truth behind legal dominance feminism's 'two percent false rape claim' figure (debunks two percent canard)
- ●BRUCE GROSS: False Rape Allegations: An Assault On Justice (overview of false rape studies)
- ●AYA GRUBER: Law professor says feminists should abandon tough rape laws and the war on crime
- ●STEPHANIE GUTTMANN: How date rape 'education' fosters confusion, undermines personal responsibility, and trivializes sexual violence
- ●PIERCE HARLAN and E. STEVEN BERKIMER: Don't forget victims of false rape accusations
- ●CHAD HERMANN
- --Men are From Wilkinsburg, Women are From Collier
- --One-in-One-Thousand-Eight-Hundred-Seventy-Seven
- --The lessons of Michael Haywood
- ●AMANDA HESS: False rape claims and rape culture
- ●SANDY HINGSTON: The new rules of college sex
- ●JOANNE JACOBS: Rape and the bathroom wall
- ●KC JOHNSON: Durham-in-Wonderland (the Duke Lacrosse blog)
- ●KRISTIN JONES: A curious anomaly at UC Davis
- ●EUGENE J. KANIN: False rape reports
- ● RICHARD KLEIN: An Analysis of of Thirty-Five Years of Rape Reform: a Frustrating Search For Fundamental Fairness
- ●KENNEDY v. LOUISIANA (outlawed death penalty for child rape due, inter alia, to possibility of false claims)
- ●KOSS REPORT
- ●JIM KOURI: Duke rape case all too common
- ●JESSICA LACK: Playing the victim is overplayed
- ●JOHN LEO: A rape accusation at Brown
- ●PROF. ALAN LEVY: Political correctness is alive and well on college campuses
- ●CARRIE L. LUKAS: One in four? Rape myths do injustice, too
- ●HEATHER MacDONALD: Campus rape myth
- ●MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE: Recommendation for dismissal of Strauss-Kahn case
- ●CHARLES P. McDOWELL: 'False Alligators' and fuzzy data: a new look at crime analysis
- ●WENDY McELROY
- --Continuing to defame the 'Duke 3' as rapists
- --Duke rape case raises issue of protecting identity of accused
- --False rape charges hurt real victims
- --Rape scandal turns sympathy into skepticism
- --Treat accused, accuser alike
- ●MSNBC REPORT: FALSE ALLEGATION THWARTED BY POLICE CAMERA
- ●NATIONAL COALITION FOR MEN
- --False accusations
- ●NCHERM: THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION RISK MANAGEMENT
- ●SARAH OVERSTREET: Coercion doesn't make sex a crime
- ●DR. TARA J. PALMATIER: Shrink4Men
- ●KATHLEEN PARKER: Picking up after the Duke debacle
- ●RADAR: Respecting accuracy in domestic abuse reporting
- ●RAINN: Reducing risk of sexual assault
- ●RAPE INVESTIGATION HANDBOOK: False claim red flags
- ●ANNA RITTGERS: Sometimes Women Lie About Rape
- ●KATIE ROPHIE: Date rape's other victim
- ●THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE: Dedicated to the defense of liberty and human rights
- ●SCIENCE DAILY: Women Have Not Adapted To Casual Sex, Research Shows
- ●SLATE DOUBLEX GABFEST: Jamie Leigh Jones and other high profile rape cases
- ●CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS
- --In making campuses safe for women, a travesty of justice for men
- --Researching the 'rape culture' of America
- ●JONNA M. SPILBOR: What If Kobe Bryant Has Been Falsely Accused? Why the Law of Acquaintance and Date Rape Should Seriously Penalize False Reports
- ●STATE PENALTIES FOR FALSE REPORTING
- ●STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR RAPE
- --National Conference for State Legislatures
- -- Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN)
- ●STERN REVIEW (UK)
- ●SHAUN WEBB: A Motion for Innocence
- ●LAUREN WEEDMAN: I lied about being raped
- ●TOY SOLDIERS WEB SITE
- ●NAOMI WOLF
- --A tale of two rape charges
- --Why is rape different?
- ●CATHY YOUNG
- --Last cry for 'rape crisis' feminism?
- --The noble lie, feminist style
- --Sexual assault on campus--is it exaggerated?
- --The unique power of crying rape
- --Who says women never lie about rape?
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Search This Blog
Become a fan of FRS on Facebook
Buy This Book
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Revolver Maps
Flag Counter
8 comments:
Dsk's lawyer said it best when he said the current American media circus is an attempt to "Inflame the public"
I say, why is it legal in this country for American media to profiteer by "Inflaming the public"???
During the Klu-Klux-Klan rape lynchings, did American media also engage in "Inflaming the public" during that era??
If the American congress passed a law stating that American media outlets can no longer "Inflame the public" with misinformation, the biggest impact would be the American gender-raunch community would quickly lose their "Inflamed Empowerment".
Nafissatou Diallo, to be prosecuted for perjury and other crimes.
That is the headline I would like to read. This woman needs to be investigated.
1. This woman lied on her asylum application to enter the United States, by saying she was ganged raped. Diallo, told her asylum rape story while in tears, as if she was in some type of theatrical event, to the prosecution.
2. Diallo needs to be deported.
3. Diallo committed welfare fraud by exaggerating on her application for Section 8, receiving public money while making 18 dollars an hour as a maid.
4. Diallo committed money laundering when nearly 100,000.00 dollars was wire transferred through her bank account.
5. Diallo, may have assisted her boyfriend who is in prison with moving large amounts of narcotics.
6. Most importantly Diallo, needs to be prosecuted for perjury in the DSk case.
I support that in the U.S. a new law be created like the one in the UK, which is called Perverting the Course of Justice.
1. Offences akin to perjury, making false statement.
2. Arrest of innocent person.
3. Wasting police time, giving false evidence
4. Obstruction
5. Puts another person in real jeopardy of arrest/prosecution or results in the arrest/prosecution of another person
6. Was part of a concerted effort to avoid, pervert, or defeat justice.
7. False reports that a crime has been committed, which initiates a police investigation.
8. Whether the activities of the defendant drew in others.
9. Was intended to or resulted in trivial or 'serious harm' to the administration of justice.
10. Misleads a court, fabricating of evidence
11. Results in the police losing the opportunity to obtain important evidence in a case.
12. Making a false allegation which wrongfully exposes another person to the risk of arrest, imprisonment pending trial, and possible wrongful conviction and sentence.
13. Police resources have been diverted.
14. A substantial cost is incurred, for example a police helicopter.
15. When the false report is particularly grave or malicious.
16. Perpetrating a hoax.
17. Results in the loss of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of the innocent.
Is Faulty and inflammatory misinformation from American media outlets considered "Free speech" and protected by the US constitution??
Anonymous - ”Is Faulty and inflammatory misinformation from American media outlets considered "Free speech" and protected by the US constitution??”
In fact, it is considered “free speech”, and, as such, it is fully protected.
Same holds true for reports about Nafissatou Diallo’s bad character, her lies, her possible illegal activities, and her potential motivations. Yes, she is suing the New York Post over some of it’s reporting about her, but her legal team will have to prove that the Post chose to publish information it new to be untrue (she has a very high hurdle to over-come, and is more likely simply looking for a pay-off to make it “go away”).
Free Speech and Freedom Of the Press are rather wide-open. Just because a given “side” of an issue doesn’t like what’s being reported does not make it unconstitutional.
What is, or would be, unconstitutional would be the government ordered shut-down of sites like the False rape Society, based on spurious claims that it was publishing “faulty” (as they will claim) and “inflammatory rhetoric” and inciting people to think (in ways that gender-feminists, politically-correct speech adherents , and even female-pedastalizing white-knight are opposed to).
Thomas Paine was charged with and tried (in abstentia) for sedition for daring to publish “inflammatory” rhetoric in his pamphlet Common Sense. The laws pertaining to Freedom of Speech and to Freedom of the Press were carefully crafted to ensure that men such as Thomas Paine would have the right to publish their views under the auspicious of Constitutional Protection.
It is a fools errand to try to argue that the leftist media be prohibited from publishing their views, even though they might seem to inflame the public into believing in rape lies, because, first, it is unlikely to ever happen, and secondly, even if it did, that sort of censorship would almost certainly shut down sites like The False Rape Society, and be used to silence modern-day Thomas Paine’s – like Pierce Harlan.
Now she needs to go prison! There is more than enough evidence to convict her serial false accusing ass.
(But instead she can look forward to even more enablement!)
Not to sound tasteless..., aw Hell, who am I trying to kid?
Whoop!, There it is!:
Prosecutors File Motion to Drop DSK Charges, Saying Evidence Does Not Establish Her Claims
...
"It describes her statements about the day as "shifting and inconsistent," and that prosecutors could therefore not be certain about what took place in the Sofitel room that day."
Was it rape? We will probably never know for sure. But the behaviors of DSK following the event seem to suggest that he did not believe that he had raped anyone, and increasingly, her behaviors following the event also begin to suggest that she was more interested in money than in justice - a likely indicator that she didn't really believe she'd been raped either.
It obviously wasn't rape. Why even say "We'll never know for sure" when we do?
Post a Comment