*Department of Education's April 4 "Dear Colleague" directive
*Jennifer C. Braceras, Civil rights wronged on campus
*Sandy Hingston, The new rules of college sex
*Peter Berkowitz, College Rape Accusations and the Presumption of Male Guilt
*Robert Shibley, A warning to college parents and grandparents
*Paul Elam, An urgent and rare opportunity to speak out
*Cynthia Bell, Rape should be tough to prove
*Christina Hoff Sommers, In making campuses safe for women, a travesty of justice for men
*Cathy Young, Sexual Assault on Campus--Is It Exaggerated?
*AAUP, First letter to Department of Education
*AAUP, Second letter to Department of Education
*Tim Cavanaugh, Stanford so smart even its rapists are logical
*Jacob Sullum, At the University of North Dakota, yes also means no
*Ilya Shapiro, Due Process stops at the campus gates?
*Harry Crouch, The death of due process for men in higher education
*Charlotte Hays, The pesumption of male guilt
*Harvey Silverglate, Yes means yes, except on campus
*Jeffrey Hadden, The feds' campus Keystone Kops
*Michael Barone, Feds crack down on campus flirting, sex jokes
*Hans Bader, Education Department Undermines Due Process and Accuracy in Campus Sexual Harassment Cases
*Hans Bader, Education Department “Dear Colleague” Letter Shreds Presumption of Innocence in Harassment Cases, Ignoring Supreme Court
*Hans Bader, Falsely accused teachers and students will be harmed by new Education Department policy
*Pierce Harlan, The Chances of Holding Your Son Responsible for a Rape He Didn’t Commit Have Just Skyrocketed
*Mark Bennett, Stanford and the loss of innocence
*Greg Lukianoff, Yale, the Department of Education and the looming free speech crisis
*FIRE, letter to Department of Education
*FIRE, FAQ for Students on New OCR Mandates
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
Thank you very much for posting this. I will provide a link to it for the fliers and emails I will be circulating on campus within the next week, so that others may have a wealth of information at their fingertips.
Great listing!
The situation is even worse then usually described.
"Preponderance of evidence" criterion plus a committee trained to absolutely believe the woman accuser and totally dismiss the man's defense means 100% conviction rate.
The woman is ALWAYS more convincing to people who blindly believe in accusers.
Unless the accused can prove he was in another country at the time of the crime, he has no chance.
And in that case, the accuser always can change her version, change the date.
People of USA must think of an alternative system of education soon. and they must change this stupid way of politics which drives the society to a painful situation.
Post a Comment