Let your comments be heard on Salon: http://www.salon.com/news/crime/?story=/mwt/feature/2011/07/28/rape_assange_dsk_response
My comment is here:
Prejudging by gender:
". . . I believe her story."
Thank you--thank you very much--for parading your bias for all the world to see and for not even putting up the pretense of impartiality.
Your predisposition isn't a rush to judgment, it's a 60-meter sprint in record time.
It is, in fact, inane statements like that (and the two percent canard -- ever hear of that one?) that not only engender disrepute of the entire feminist movement, but that prompted me to start what is now the nation's leading site dedicated to giving voice to persons falsely accused of rape, False Rape Society.
Personally, I do NOT know whether DSK is guilty, or if Nafissatou Diallo was actually raped. But, you see, I refuse to label her claim a lie because, unlike Ms. Brownmiller, I don't prejudge people by gender.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
17 comments:
Which story does this femi-nazi believe??? I understand their are multiple versions.
Of course she beleives her, gender-feminist "Empowerment" rests on rape hysteria, and if society is shown that women and girls are now lying over rapes because they don't want to pay a cab fare...well this information would "Dis-Empower" gender-feminists.
So you can see, she would have a "conflict of interest" if she didn't believe this lying crack whore. This lying crack whore bruised her knees she jumped on them so quick to get to Mr Strauss's million dollar payoff package.
Bruised knees, neck, and vagina ... yep she's guilty alright!
Of course she believes it, this is the scuzz that convinced the world that false rape accusations were no more common than false accusations in other crimes. 2 % my ass...
Which version does the dumb whore claim to believe? Sorry; don't have time to read this filth.
I would like to circumvent the US media's "Inflammation", and ask Mr Strauss what happened.
Mr. Strauss's lawyer said it best, when he said The current American media circus is an attempt to "Inflame" the public.
I would like to think that the feminazis are sapping their own credibility when they support obvious false acccusers.
I'd like to think that -- but I'm starting to get the opposite impression: that lying about rape is becoming more and more an acceptable path to fortune and fame for diseased chicks. Is there any moral outrage left in this warped country?
Incidentally, Susan Brownmiller's support of a proven serial false rape accusers proves that the 2% myth was a deliberate lie on her part.
The false rape epidemic was no accident, folks.
Susan Brownmiller would believe Susan Brownmiller committed the rape if the accuser accused her.
She is the latest in a line of man-hating Jewish feminists --- what is so unfactual about that?
I don't think her ethnicity has anything to do with it, 11:30.
What Brownmiller missed is that the issue is not whether people believe the accuser's story. It is whether the accuser's story is true, and whether it is fair to drag the accused through the dirt before any evidence comes out.
Strauss-Kahn was treated as guilty from the moment the accusation hit the media. The same thing happened to Assange and to the Duke Lacrosse boys. There is nothing wrong with waiting until the facts come out before declaring someone is a rapist.
It's far worse than that, Toysoldier. Now the issue is whether or not we're going to go on pretending that an innocent man is a rapist, long after the liar has been recorded admitting that she's a liar.
The government in 1984 could hardly be more wilfully illogical and morally depraved than the Susan Brownmillers. She's going to MAKE two plus two equal five, with the sheer force of her ovaries!
What an asshole that Brownmiller is, don't you think?
Based on what she said here, she's a complete nitwit.
Susan Brownmiller is an intellectual psychopath. No matter how many times she is proven to have lied, she never changes. She has absolutely no conscience.
Nicholas Stix
Post a Comment