Kerry Touzin pled guilty to filing a false report of rape on May 27th. Once again, we don't have any reason for why she would do so.
It started when she claimed she met a man on the website Plenty of Fish (an online dating site I assume). She stated that she arranged to meet him, and that when she got into the man's car, he drove to a dead-end road and sexually assaulted her.
The police then created an online persona, arranged to meet the man, and when he showed up, they arrested him. However, during the course of the investigation, it was discovered that nothing illegal happened, and that other evidence showed that Touzin lied about her report. She was arrested and pled guilty in court on the 16th of June.
She has been sentenced to 1* year in jail.
Link: http://www.wmur.com/r/28471778/detail.html
*Thanks to zarko for the catch
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
Are we starting to see a still small yet slightly increasing number of known cases with false rape accusers being sentenced to some decent jail time?
Atlas
"Live free or die!" -- the State motto for New Hampshire. Good for NH for sentencing her to three years in jail. I hope she likes muscular and dominate women inmates who are feeling frisky.
3 years? It's 360 days. And I doubt she'll be there that long.
as long as women think their pussy pass will defend them from any and all consequences, they don't need a reason to manipulate and destroy other people
Zarko,
Sorry, you're right. I misread it as months. Thanks for the catch.
[sorry if this is a repeat]
”
While the man was in custody, police said he cooperated with detectives and an investigation revealed that he did not engage in any illegal acts. Police said further evidence revealed that Touzin made a false report to police and she was arrested on June 16.”
It wasn’t that long ago (perhaps 2 years) when the de facto police Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) in “he said/she said” cases was to interrogate the man at length, complete ignoring his side of the story, and rather than looking into his claims, they would simply try to break him down and get him to confess.
Now, we see more and more that it seems they are “coming around” on the way they handle these cases. The case above serves as a good example of the seeming improvements. While they did arrest the man, it certainly seems that they did listen to what he had to say, and took it into consideration in as much as they then seems to have entirely refocused their investigative efforts away from him, and onto her. Plus, they didn’t release his name for public trashing by the press (another element often seen in the not too distant past).
Not perfect, in that they arrested him as opposed to asking him to come in for questioning [but, they did have a woman’s claims of a forcible rape, so an arrest isn’t out of line with procedure], but certainly a whole lot better than what falsely accused men used to be subjected to back around the time when Pierce and Steven first started this blog up.
In my mind, it has been no coincidence that since they have started getting the word out, there has been a discernible improvement in the way in which law enforcement has conducted themselves and their investigations into alleged rapes.
Post a Comment