Folks need to start boycotting Newsweek for its continuing publishing of faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that is fueling a "false Rape crisis", and the persecutions of the innocent. Doesn't the FCC have basic rules over American media that temper this kinda faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that they continue to publish over, and over, and over??
Maybe there will be a day when all these "gender-Raunch dominated news outlets" that publish this faulty and inflammatory agitation propaganda get paid back for what they are doing. The internet is here folks, and maybe, years down the road, there will be a "media accountability movement" that will search current and past stories, for the worst "faulty and inflammatory" offenders, and hold them accounteable.
At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public??? Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??
” At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public??? Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??”
It’s a First Amendment issue. Actually, the FRS is at far greater risk of being shut down over what some would claim as “inflamed rhetoric” than would a major news outlet.
Still, by giving the interview she did, she may have inadvertently sabotaged the case against DSK. Her highly “spun” re-accounting of events has left numerous (now) documented inconsistencies, that even the NewsWeek piece highlights:
My question: are feminists going to continue enabling this trash, thus sabotaging their own interests, or are they finally going to take a stand against false rape accusers?
I think we all know the answer, but the question still needs to be asked.
Every civilized society must strive to (1) eradicate heinous crimes by punishing the offenders, and (2) insure that the innocent aren't punished along with the offenders. Too often, the second half of that balance is omitted from the public discourse. Accusations of serious criminality, especially murder and sexual wrongdoing, too often are their own convictions in the high court of public opinion because the stigma is so severe. It is our mission to raise awareness about the injustices suffered by persons wrongly accused of serious criminality. Protecting the innocent from unjust harm as a result of a wrongful accusation is a hallmark of a civilized society.
13 comments:
Folks need to start boycotting Newsweek for its continuing publishing of faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that is fueling a "false Rape crisis", and the persecutions of the innocent.
Doesn't the FCC have basic rules over American media that temper this kinda faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that they continue to publish over, and over, and over??
Maybe there will be a day when all these "gender-Raunch dominated news outlets" that publish this faulty and inflammatory agitation propaganda get paid back for what they are doing.
The internet is here folks, and maybe, years down the road, there will be a "media accountability movement" that will search current and past stories, for the worst "faulty and inflammatory" offenders, and hold them accounteable.
If anyone can afford a good lawyer for a libel suit, it's DSK. I can't wait.
How much was she paid for this interview is my question.
Mr Strauss attorney said it best," this media circus is an attempt to ""inflame"" the public.
Wev'e been saying that for years!!
At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public???
Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??
Wil the real diallio please step forwards
http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/strauss-kahn-diallo-photographs-riddle/
” At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public???
Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??”
It’s a First Amendment issue. Actually, the FRS is at far greater risk of being shut down over what some would claim as “inflamed rhetoric” than would a major news outlet.
Still, by giving the interview she did, she may have inadvertently sabotaged the case against DSK. Her highly “spun” re-accounting of events has left numerous (now) documented inconsistencies, that even the NewsWeek piece highlights:
”Prosecutors, losing faith in Diallo’s credibility, would later raise an issue about this sequence of events. They said she told the grand jury that after the attack she hid in the hallway, but subsequently changed her story to say she cleaned room 2820 and then began to clean the DSK suite.
If there is one inconsistency for defense lawyers to dwell on in the hospital records, it is a passage that says her attacker got dressed and left the room, and “said nothing to her during the incident.” In her interview with police and her account to NEWSWEEK, Diallo recalled several statements Strauss-Kahn made during the alleged attack.”
So the lying cunt has decided to continue lying! Well that's a surprise.
What a disgusting, gold-digging whore.
My question: are feminists going to continue enabling this trash, thus sabotaging their own interests, or are they finally going to take a stand against false rape accusers?
I think we all know the answer, but the question still needs to be asked.
"Diallo cannot[note present tense] read or write in any language"
What? I assume this means she's functionally illiterate but, if so, how could she get and keep a job at a luxury hotel?
By blowing the guests, of course.
"Actually, the FRS is at far greater risk of being shut down over what some would claim as “inflamed rhetoric” than would a major news outlet."
Shut down by who?
Post a Comment