Sunday, July 24, 2011

DSK maid tells her side of the story in Newsweek

See here: http://www.newsweek.com/2011/07/24/dsk-maid-tells-of-her-alleged-rape-by-strauss-kahn-exclusive.html

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Folks need to start boycotting Newsweek for its continuing publishing of faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that is fueling a "false Rape crisis", and the persecutions of the innocent.
Doesn't the FCC have basic rules over American media that temper this kinda faulty and inflammatory rhetoric that they continue to publish over, and over, and over??

Anonymous said...

Maybe there will be a day when all these "gender-Raunch dominated news outlets" that publish this faulty and inflammatory agitation propaganda get paid back for what they are doing.
The internet is here folks, and maybe, years down the road, there will be a "media accountability movement" that will search current and past stories, for the worst "faulty and inflammatory" offenders, and hold them accounteable.

John David Galt said...

If anyone can afford a good lawyer for a libel suit, it's DSK. I can't wait.

scatmaster said...

How much was she paid for this interview is my question.

Anonymous said...

Mr Strauss attorney said it best," this media circus is an attempt to ""inflame"" the public.
Wev'e been saying that for years!!

Anonymous said...

At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public???
Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??

AfOR said...

Wil the real diallio please step forwards

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/strauss-kahn-diallo-photographs-riddle/

slwerner said...

” At some point in US history didn't congress ban Klu-Klux-Klan propaganda that ""inflamed"" the public???
Why is this newsweek propaganda any different??”


It’s a First Amendment issue. Actually, the FRS is at far greater risk of being shut down over what some would claim as “inflamed rhetoric” than would a major news outlet.

Still, by giving the interview she did, she may have inadvertently sabotaged the case against DSK. Her highly “spun” re-accounting of events has left numerous (now) documented inconsistencies, that even the NewsWeek piece highlights:


”Prosecutors, losing faith in Diallo’s credibility, would later raise an issue about this sequence of events. They said she told the grand jury that after the attack she hid in the hallway, but subsequently changed her story to say she cleaned room 2820 and then began to clean the DSK suite.

If there is one inconsistency for defense lawyers to dwell on in the hospital records, it is a passage that says her attacker got dressed and left the room, and “said nothing to her during the incident.” In her interview with police and her account to NEWSWEEK, Diallo recalled several statements Strauss-Kahn made during the alleged attack.”

Anonymous said...

So the lying cunt has decided to continue lying! Well that's a surprise.

What a disgusting, gold-digging whore.

Anonymous said...

My question: are feminists going to continue enabling this trash, thus sabotaging their own interests, or are they finally going to take a stand against false rape accusers?

I think we all know the answer, but the question still needs to be asked.

Anonymous said...

"Diallo cannot[note present tense] read or write in any language"

What? I assume this means she's functionally illiterate but, if so, how could she get and keep a job at a luxury hotel?

Anonymous said...

By blowing the guests, of course.

Anonymous said...

"Actually, the FRS is at far greater risk of being shut down over what some would claim as “inflamed rhetoric” than would a major news outlet."

Shut down by who?