For those who don't visit A Voice for Men on a regular basis, there is a new site up, that several people have collaborated to get up.
It is called Register-her.com, and lists voilent offenders, false accusers, killers, etc. who all should be serving lengthy sentences, but suprise, are not.
Please feel free to stop by.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
16 comments:
"...Criminal Court Judge Mark Fishburn sentenced Katrina Cornwell, 36, to serve intermittent jail sentences in one-week increments over Father’s Day weekends and Christmas holidays for the next 10 years, according to a release from the district attorney general’s office. Cornwell pleaded guilty to vehicular homicide by intoxication and leaving the scene of an accident involving a death."
http://nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/woman-serve-intermittent-jail-time-during-next-10-fathers-days-christmases
Judge Mark Fishburn has a habit of going easy on women, while he goes very hard on men. A man would have been sentenced to a life term or death row.
The people have to make sure that it is only convicted women that show up on that site.
It was atrocious when the website for people to report their real or imagined rapist existed. It would be equally horrible for this to exist for women that have not been at least found guilty.
"In the U.K., the government has issued advisories to magistrates instructing them to give women lighter sentences than men. The Ministry of Justice is also considering a proposal to abolish women's prisons altogether.
In Australia, it is now policy to prohibit media sources from printing the names of female pedophiles, even after their conviction for molesting children."
Does anyone have any sources for these claims?
[Off-topic, but of potential interest to readers of this Blog]
Not a case of and FRA (per se), more like a case of bad judgement – both on the guy’s part for having sex with her, and on her part for drinking wine with him, and going with him to the bedroom to sleep, in which a man ends up being convicted of rape, and was facing a (virtual) life sentence (in Colorado, what is known as an Indeterminate Sentence, is the sentence to be given under the Sentencing Guidelines to those convicted of rape, and is for all intents and purposes, a de facto life sentence).
A Colorado judge has decided to take a stand against seeing the man, who seems to have made a misjudgment based upon the prior actions of the victim, being imprisoned for life over it.
I’ve taken the liberty of reorganizing portions of the news accounts to provide a better chronological sequencing:
She said she had gone to Hilty's house the night before to babysit, and when Hilty arrived home about 10 p.m., he had obviously had too much to drink, the affidavit said. Both kids were asleep when he got home, the affidavit said.
He opened a bottle of wine, she told investigators, and they shared drinks while talking. The woman said she told Hilty that she suffered from chronic back and shoulder pain, so he offered to rub it for her.
They went to the master bedroom, according to the affidavit, and the woman said she fell asleep around 11 p.m. When she woke up, the affidavit said, Hilty was performing oral sex on her, and he then began to have intercourse with her.
The woman finally pushed him off, according to the affidavit, got dressed and ran out of the house. She walked about five blocks before waving down a car, according to police.
Leading to…
Curtis Jay Hilty, 39, of Broomfield, was found guilty last week of sex assault on a helpless victim and sex assault, overcoming a victim's will, both felonies. He could face life in prison for having sex with his children's babysitter after she fell asleep. [emphasis mine]
But, rather than risk this man spending the rest of his life in prison, the follow-up story details his choice of alternate sentencing, as well as touching on the controversy which has arisen from the inflexibility in the Sentencing Guidelines imposed by lawmakers:
In issuing the sentence, District Judge Thomas Ensor said he chose probation because Colorado's indeterminate sentencing laws for sex offenses make it very likely that Hilty would spend the rest of his life in prison if sentenced to any amount of time there. That's because state law allows corrections officials to keep offenders in certain sex cases in prison for the rest of their lives
Because, as…
University of Colorado law professor Pat Furman said indeterminate sentencing has been a concern to defense attorneys for some time, and that worry is starting to be shared by prosecutors and judges.
Boulder County District Attorney Stan Garnett, who was not involved in Hilty's prosecution, said there is "frustration" among prosecutors that the law treats all sex offenses as if they were the same.
Garnett said he'd like to see the state Legislature re-examine the statute and create more sentencing options. He said some victims also want to know how long their attacker will be in prison.
zarko,
That is explicitly stated in the submission guidelines, and will be vetted by the admins on the site. So only those convicted should show up.
zarko - "The people have to make sure that it is only convicted women that show up on that site."
I would take exception to this because, as we have seen numerous times on this forum, women have often confessed to having made false rape accusations, but, since they were not charged (with the crime of filing a false report - there is no law specific to false rape claims), they were (of course) not convicted.
They have admitted being guilty, so I would argue that the lack of conviction ought not spare them from being listed/registered.
Of what crime is Valenti guilty that the home page should ask why she is not in prison?
Not fond of the First Amendment, are we?
Nicolas,
Did you notice the caption of her picture? Doesn't state she is a criminal, just a bigot.
Nicolas Martin said...
Of what crime is Valenti guilty that the home page should ask why she is not in prison?
Not fond of the First Amendment, are we?
Jun 29, 2011 11:57:00 AM
Except when it suited/suits them, bwhen have feminists ever expressed unbiased concerns when it came to the U.S. Constitution?
E. Steven Berkimer said...
Nicolas,
Did you notice the caption of her picture? Doesn't state she is a criminal, just a bigot.
Jun 29, 2011 12:27:00 PM
Bigotry is only considered a crime when the victim/"victim is a member of a protected class and the accused is of a privileged class. Laws against bigotry are biased/slanted.
Feminism and favoritism have infected/poisoned the whole system.
1. Women/womyn
2. Children (mostly female children)
3. Animals
4. The enviroment
Men? Men, even if they are useful to the feminist cause(s), are irrelevant. The only exceptions areP: non white hetrosexual men.
The bias(es) should be clear to defence attorneys and men in general.
The system of law and the prosecutorial legal system have been engaged in the war on/against men.
Proof? Feminist lawyers/prosecutors and feminist legal scholars/theorists who are able to use their positions of power/authority to hide their bigotry/hatred for men and further destroy the lives olf both men and future men. At least one name comes to mind: Catherine MacKinnon.
It bothers me that a woman is called a "Rapist" for having consensual sex with a juvenile boy. BUT, as long as men are called "Rapists" for having consensual sex with underage girls, it's equitable, and any double standard would be absurd. Objection withdrawn.
This is an international data base but I also think that men should run local data bases for their towns because it would be interesting for the local people and also warn men about who the false accusers are locally. There are also cases where a man is named for things like rape, DV, harassment, stalking etc but the case is dismissed and you never learn who the false accuser was. It's a lot easier to get this information locally. And internet newsmen have a 1st amendment right ro publish those names because they are there somewhere in the police report. I've noticed that even in the past that newspapers would name the false accuser when the bogus charges are dropped but it was very hit and miss with most not bothering to follow up on the story about the "rape" that they first published and clearing the man's name publicly. If we do this locally it will probably force them to do it too because people will be going to our sites for info. Many towns have their own bulletin boards etc and we can just put a link in there to our local site.
Zarko-if there is a police report of a female making a rape accusation it is a public record and whether the accusation was against some ghost or actual man and the charges were dropped then she should be named.Even females who make accusations against some man who doesn't exist are causing damage and contributing to rape hysteria. Men may have been questioned and harassed by cops even if they were not held and men should not put up with this. Name the liar.It may deter other liars.
I understand that sometimes (often I guess), false rape accusers get away with it. This needs to be clearly marked in their "profile".
I understand that this holds us to a higher standard than it does them. I am fine with that as well.
I am not really opposed to the site as it is :).
zarko-if a female makes any complaint that cannot be sustained then it is a false complaint. She should have been more careful before making the complaint. Females who do things without thinging are dangerous and must be named and shamed. It appears that news media is not so careful when printing these accusations. And no, we won't use a higher standard because this is not a criminal case and we're merely naming the females who made complaints which is a matter of public record. In fact, I'd name females who have simply made complaints whether the man was convicted or not because you can be damn sure that the man did not receive a fair trial. Even a wealthy man would have a hard time equaling he resources of the state and he could never recoup his losses.
And if it were up to me I'd also name any local female who had the reputation of making false reports even if the cops didn't make an actual report because they knew she habitually did this.Females must be put on the defensive not the other way around.
Not fond of the First Amendment, are we?
***
I am very, very fond of the First Amendment. It is the noblest thing about this country.
But free speech flows in both directions, pal. You can devote your life to lying about men, but when you do that some of the men you've defamed just might call you a bigot.
See how that works?
It would be helpful if the offenders on register-her were indexed by state and city. Then we would know who in our area to avoid.
Post a Comment