The community of the wrongly accused has a new home--click the picture above to join us.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

False rape claims: increasingly a tool to skew the current economies of sex, where sex is cheaper than most women prefer

The cultural tenets governing sexual encounters have witnessed a sea change in recent years because of the loosening of sexual mores, the feminist-inspired norms that pressure young women to "party like the guys," and the explosion of birth control.

The experts tell us that men have a much easier time obtaining sex than they did in days long gone. "College campuses and urban areas are often dominated by women, which means that men can and will decide how much — or how little — they will exchange for sex."  Women who'd prefer to put a higher price tag on their sexuality are finding themselves locked out of the market. See here.

The results are all too predictable.  Women are having sex more often when they secretly are conflicted about it. We've frequently reported here about the proven gender "regret asymmetry" where young women have much higher levels of after-the-fact regret than men following sexual hook-ups.  Regret too often is transmogrified into feelings of being used, and feeling used too often metamorphoses into false rape claims.

Having studied the false rape phenomenon closely for a number of years, it is my conclusion that young women are increasingly resorting to false rape claims as an inappropriate method of skewing the current economies of sex, which favor men and which make sex cheaper than most women consciously or subconsciously prefer. Women are pressured by feminist-inspired norms to make themselves more available to men than ever, but they have also learned that crying rape after-the-fact is a culturally accepted, indeed feminist approved, antidote to sex they feel was too cheaply obtained.  Instead of saying "no" up front, women are retroactively saying "no" -- with false rape claims -- after-the-fact. The feminists who dominate the public discourse on rape because of their roles in what can aptly be called the sexual grievance industry tacitly, and sometimes overtly, approve of this antidote by their open tolerance of false rape claims. 

Where does this leave men, who have every legitimate right to depend on the woman's up-front assent?  We see where that leaves men every single day on this blog.

One cure is to enhance the value of female sexuality by decreasing the supply and thereby reduce both regret and false rape claims. That, of course, can never happen in a society where "slut walks" are celebrated as liberating events, where colleges excuse women from underage drinking charges so long as they report they were raped, and where false rape claims are routinely excused and implicitly encouraged. In short, it can never happen in a society that encourages young women to be promiscuous and to then tell rape lies when that promiscuity results in an unfavorable sexual experience.

The other cure is the one that every fair-minded person should endorse: charging every false rape claim, and enhancing the sentences for false rape claims so that women know if they tell a rape lie, they risk serious punishment.

23 comments:

jso said...

affirmative action, tolerance, diversity and all that have flooded the market with females

their sexual value has dropped precipitously, because the demand has gone down slightly and the supply has gone way up

RM said...

Regret is not rape! Guilt is not rape!

Hear that "DAWN"?!!! I know you're lurking here.

slwerner said...

Archivist - "Women are pressured by feminist-inspired norms to make themselves more available to men than ever, but they have also learned that crying rape after-the-fact is a culturally accepted, indeed, feminist approved, antidote to sex they feel was too cheaply obtained."

This is an absolutely brilliant observation.

I find myself at a loss to be able to add anything to it.

girlwriteswhat said...

I've always had real issues with the feminist cognitive dissonance between, "I'm not just my body! My self worth has nothing to do with how many men I sleep with! I am a whole person, not a sex object and my sexuality isn't sacred or anything, and how dare you shame me for being a slut!" and then, "OMG, I was RAPED!!! I'm so ashamed and my self worth is gone! And you--you know who I'm talking about, you bitches who weren't devastated and ashamed and completely destroyed because someone took sex from you against your will!--you can just shut the fuck up and not talk about YOUR experience, because it will make all us shamed and devalued women FEEL worse about our rapes, and because if you talk about it, people might stop thinking rape is the worst violation ever, a crime against all that is holy, a transgression upon a woman's sacred sexuality!"

Make up your freaking minds, feminism. Is female sexuality sacred? If so, women really shouldn't be giving it away willy nilly. Or is it like a guy's, where nonconsensual sex often gets shrugged off as a bad night he wouldn't care to repeat? Because if so, why treat rape any differently than being stabbed or mugged? (Speaking as someone who was almost raped at 14.)

It's too late to shove the cat of female sexual sacredness back in the bag, ladies. If sex is something "special", a "gift" you want to hand over to someone who's earned it, maybe more of you should save yourselves for marriage, hmm? If not, stop feeling freaking guilty about enjoying casual sex and look at it like an adventure rather than a mission.

If women have so many hang-ups and conflicts involving sex, they probably shouldn't be having it. If every woman who wasn't mature enough for casual sex stopped having casual sex, a few more men might actually have to commit to sticking around for a week. Just sayin'.

Anonymous said...

Dr Kanins study has revealed that statistically the most common reason for women and girls making false rape accusations was because they were "late for work" or late for something.

Anonymous said...

VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE FOLKS…concerning the fictitious lesbian from Damascus blog..
How many other fictitious blogs are out there "inflaming the public" with stories of “Oppressed lesbian children”???, blogs done in their basements by 40 year old gay males (who insist they are straight).

Archivist said...

girlwriteswhat, that is so well said. Please understand that I have a problem with the hook-up culture in general. I do not single out women. While I do believe that men have an enhanced sex drive, that means only that they need to work all the harder to control themselves -- it does not excuse the recklessness of the hook-up culture.

I also find it curious and perplexing that for all it's supposed liberating elements, a hell of a lot of women are feeling pressured by it into having sex they are conflicted about. Feminism isn't about liberation, it's about conformity -- to a mindset that wants to combat a society deemed dominated by men.

Archivist said...

Anon at 11:30: you or someone else has said that previously on this site and it isn't true. We link to Dr. Kanin's report under here http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/p/informative-sources.html -- you need to read it.

Nick S said...

This is a good point Pierce. I am sure that much of our current era's draconian policies towards sexual assault, sexual harassment and the like are less about combating genuine abuse and crime, and more about simply punishing and restricting male sexuality. In particular, they are about women punishing men who they feel have gained too much sexual freedom and not enough responsibilities.

But if you dig a little deeper, there is more going on here than simply good girls being led astray by modern feminism and raunch culture. What has really happened is that the sexual revolution and feminism has given women vastly greater sexual freedom compared to men (women have more contraception options, reproductive technology means women control reproduction and can make decisions about having children without a man involved, there is increased tolerance of single parenthood, women no longer need men for economic support as the state largely does the job of redistributing more resources from men to women through various means, DNA technology means it is easier to track down absent fathers and enforce child support etc. etc.).

The truth is that women today are more promiscuous because the penalties and risks of such behavior are negligible today compared to in the past. Instead, it is actually men who are more at risk if they sleep around (false rape allegations, paternity fraud etc.). In times past women were less promiscuous because the risks and social penalties were greater. A woman who slutted around ran the risk of ruining her reputation, not finding a husband, living in poverty, etc.

[to be continued]

Nick S said...

[continued]. But while women today have gained a great deal of sexual freedom, they still have not given up the desire to keep a man on the leash. This is where the conflict and ambivalence comes in. Women cannot enjoy greater sexual freedom without also granting men greater sexual freedom and opportunities as a result.

Women want their increased sexual freedom, but they don't want men to have the same freedom. We have created a new sexual double standard, one that is enforced by a police state.

Nick S said...

One thing that is often overlooked in these discussions is the role of female sexual preferences and male status hierarchy in distorting the sexual marketplace. Studies done in the UK and elsewhere in recent times actually confirm that the majority of young women have sex more often than the majority of young men. How is that possible? Simple. Because a few men who are high status or have good 'game' tend to get laid all the time, while a larger number of men don't get much action, or only get lucky once in a while. That is, the market is slightly more even among women than men.

Of course, single guys are not going to admit that they are not getting any, because they don't want to be seen as losers. While the guys who do get lucky regularly tend to boast about it. So you have the illusion of sexual abundance for men. And it is easy for women to get the impression that all men are cads. When women nowadays complain about not being able to find a decent man to commit to them, often what they really mean is that they wish the alpha male fucking every piece of skirt he comes across would commit to them exclusively, as opposed to the beta males who may be available but the women are not interested.

Whenever stable monogamous relationships between the sexes break down, society has a tendency to move back to a harem-like situation. That is, a minority of high status males mate with a larger number of females, while the majority of males are marginalized from the sexual marketplace.

RM said...

"Is female sexuality sacred?"

When I was in college, I was screamed at by militants that the vagina was sacred and that I had no right to it. It was off-limits to all men. I was basically told off that intercourse is not a right and it's all rape regardless of whether it's consensual or not.

Anonymous said...

If the vagina ever was sacred it has now clearly become profane.

Anonymous said...

Nick is right, vagina is abundant only for the select few.

Women want strongly to control the supply of vagina for regular guys. But if you are a movie star, you can have as much as you want. The rest of us are just valued for the work we do, nothing else, and then just barely.

Anonymous said...

Here's more confirmation that Nick S is spot on.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html

Check out this quote from the article:

"Jayne Dallas, a senior studying advertising who was seated across the table, grumbled that the population of male undergraduates was even smaller when you looked at it as a dating pool. 'Out of that 40 percent, there are maybe 20 percent that we would consider, and out of those 20, 10 have girlfriends, so all the girls are fighting over that other 10 percent,' she said."

Female hypergamy in action. Yes, sex is cheap now but only a small minority of men benefit from this by getting lots of sex. The rest get occasional sex, and often none at all.

Archivist said...

Yeah, well, if someone stumbled onto this blog, the last thing I'd want them to think is that my principal concern is men getting more sex. Female hypergamy and "game" (oh, spare me from that topic!) are really not on my radar.

Anonymous said...

Pierce:

Manboobz discovered this piece and has been mocking it. Of course it doesn't look like there's hardly an MRA to be found in his comment section - which is a good thing because no one is putting out any evidence based posts anyway.

Clarence

evilwhitemalempire said...

"feminist-inspired norms that pressure young women to "party like the guys,"

Rubbish!
Hookup culture isn't feminism.
(REAL) feminism IS ball and chainism even if it's less obvious today than in previous decades.
Hookup culture is a product of birth control technology.
Feminism only pretends to be pro hookup because it was unable to stop it and so pretends to be for it to save face. (think PeeWee Herman's "I mean't to do that!" scene)
(meanwhile anti-fem females are only anti-fem because modern fem's sex pos veneer is that convincing.)

Not being able to stop casual sex didn't mean not being able to poison the well. That is why feminists make it so easy for females to file false rape claims.
Draconian date rape laws may appear to empower females but it's real aim is to discourage casual sex altogether. (This is beginning to work in Sweden as we speak.)

Nick S said...

evilwhitemale, it is probably a bit of both. I suspect that a large number of feminists are either Victorian prudes or lesbians who simply dislike heterosexual sex period, and are out to "poison the well".

But there is another strand of feminist-lite, modern women who wish to enjoy their own sexual freedom, but begrudge men the same. We have created a new sexual double standard where female promiscuity is celebrated as a sign of liberated, modern womanhood, while men who behave promiscuously are seen as evil cads and predators who need to be punished.

I agree that promiscuity among young women today is less to do with feminist influence, and more to do with the fact that scientific and economic changes mean women are freer to throw off traditional paternalistic constraints on their behavior.

evilwhitemalempire said...

@Nick S
"But there is another strand of feminist-lite, modern women who wish to enjoy their own sexual freedom, but begrudge men the same."

I agree. The goal of those feminists isn't just to re-saddle the male but to do so in a way that still maximizes their own sexual freedom. Their's is the aim of what we might call female sexual optimization.
OR they would simply stick with traditionalism.

I believe that if ANY (straight) female had her way she would have every buff dude on the planet waiting on her hand and foot (all the beta's, omega's, etc. would be exterminated) and she would be the most beautiful female ever and NOT ONE female better looking than her.
If you take this much as axiomatic (both common sense AND evolutionary psychology say's you can) then much of feminism can be viewed as an attempt to try and synthesize this as closely as reality permits.

But to truly gain insight into the bottomless selfishness that is the female mind consider this nasty bit of rad fem writing.
http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/
Understand that while this is radical feminism the mind of the less radical feminist or nonfeminist female should be understood to differ only quantitatively and NOT by any qualitative measure from that of the rad fem. There is only a difference in amplification.

"-lesbians who simply dislike heterosexual sex period-"

Yes it could well be that at least some of feminism is ax to grind lesbianism. Makes sense when you think about it. All throughout puberty they watch as the (mostly straight) girls they fall in love with get snatched away by those... those... boy things!
Indeed dykes could quite easily grow to regard men as a very serious group of rivals. Naturally this would make them feel the same kind of hatred for men that normal females feel for other rival females.

Nick S said...

Evilwhitemale, I don't really buy the idea that young women are being pressured into having sex more than they would like. If most women really have no interest in sex outside of a committed, long-term relationship, I don't think there is much stopping them from doing just that.

Indeed, women today get more than enough validation (from both feminists and cultural conservatives) for the belief that they have the right to refuse sex, that men are evil predators who are best kept away from, and that women are invariably the victims in sexual encounters. If anything, young women today would be even less likely to submit to unwanted sex than women in previous times.

If women nowadays are screwing around, it is clearly because they want to, not because they feel they have to. To say that women are being pressured into being more promiscuous than they really wish to be by modern female empowerment propaganda strikes me as an attempt to reconcile the traditional notion that women are more chaste, virginal and less carnal than men with the observed reality of women's increasingly skanky behavior. There is a certain cognitive dissonance to it.

The simple reality is that today's women are more promiscuous because the risks, costs and social stigma is less than it was for women in the past or men today. The circumstances have allowed women to liberate their inner slut. And that is exactly what they are doing.

Nick S said...

Pierce, I don't mean any of this to be having a go at you, as this piece is a fairly minor example of the kind of argument we are criticizing. Indeed, in the past my ideas about the differences between male and female sexuality were somewhat closer to yours. It took some study and observed experience to turn my ideas around.

The truth is that chivalrous societal programming and cultural biases leave deep psychological footprints on most of us, with even some vestiges in the MRA community. I liken what I have been going through in the past several years to a form of deprogramming. The more you rid oneself of the myths perpetuated by the existing culture, the more you see the world in a whole new perspective. At the end of the day it can be quite rewarding and liberating.

I realize not everyone wants to tear the whole house down. Some would prefer to just replace a few bricks, but keep the structure intact. That's okay. I can accept that.

evilwhitemalempire said...

@Nick

"If women nowadays are screwing around, it is clearly because they want to, not because they feel they have to. To say that women are being pressured into being more promiscuous than they really wish to be by modern female empowerment propaganda-"

NO! Not by that! As I already explained."

"-strikes me as an attempt to reconcile the traditional notion that women are more chaste, virginal and less carnal than men with the observed reality of women's increasingly skanky behavior. There is a certain cognitive dissonance to it."

Not necessarily. What has to be unlearned (deconstructed) here is the false dichotomy that either females adore sex and will basically fuck anything that breathes OR that sex is something they more or less despise that they do for money, attention, etc.

NEITHER of these two views is the correct one and you will never correctly understand feminism until you dispense with both.

The keyword here is control.
Females are totally cool with sex provided THEY are in control.
The problem is when a female feels she is loosing that control.
If she is of a mind to not exactly want to just give it away (some are like this and some aren't)what's she to do when a guy she want's to keep around has so many other options?
(Options which WOULD NOT EXIST were it not for ubiquitous birth control.)
If she doesn't put out she looses him.
If she DOES put out she still looses him.
So what does she do about it?
Cry rape.
And guess who's there to help her do it?