ABC News' Web site has a repulsive headline: "Weiner Scandal: A Victory for Women Leaders?" See here.
As if the Greek tragedy of Anthony Weiner's downfall could appropriately be considered a "victory" for anyone. But the purveyors of gender divisiveness who write features articles never miss a chance to drive a wedge between men and women in order to get people to read their dreck.
It reminds me of the height of the recession when men were losing jobs at an unprecedented pace. Clever Pulitzer wannabes declared: "Women are victors in 'mancession'." See here. Yep. "Victors." These writers even concocted a delightful little word that managed to pull off the seemingly impossible trick of both belittling men and trivializing the recession at the same time: "mancession." You know, like a "manwich." Or the "manscaping" that women features writers find so fascinating, in a junior high girl kind-of-way. Or Seinfeld's "manzier."
In both the Weiner headline and in declaring women the "victors" in the recession, there is a nasty streak of gender payback -- of giving men who are down a good, swift kick to the balls to atone for the "sins" of the patriarchy. (And don't get me started on that.)
Sorry that I couldn't celebrate the recession "victory" with you, ladies. There's just something about seeing families struggling to eat that makes me want to put away the party favors.
And despite my own disagreement with Weiner, see here, I am appalled that men are destroyed for legally acting out sexual urges. (Hell, a congressman felt forced to resign recently for putting a shirtless photo of himself on Craigslist.) Weiner's real problem should be that he lied to so many people, but somehow, my guess is that the lying isn't why he's being destroyed.
Mind you, I don't believe it's moral to cheat on your wife. But I also don't believe it's moral to break your marriage vows and file for divorce just because you aren't feeling "fulfilled" and you know that you'll get the kids and a nice custody check every month. Above all that, I also believe it's not moral to judge others or to think myself "holier than thou." Even when the subject is men and sex. So, no, I can't celebrate when a man is destroyed because he acted out apparently lawful sexual urges.
But let's demonstrate the inanity of the Weiner article. Here's a quote found in it: "The world is half men and half women. The government has to reflect the world," said Cecilia Attias. See here.
Put aside the inanity of assembling a government based on demographics (wouldn't we also need a certain percentage of Methodists and every other religion, not to mention atheists? How about members of the blind and deaf and hard of hearing communities? Hispanics, blacks, and other minorities? Gays and lesbians? And on and on and on).
Please note what the quotation omits: the day I hear women calling for half of all the people living on the streets to be women, and half of all jobs with the highest fatalities to be filled by women, that's the day I'll take this call seriously.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
14 comments:
Society, government, and the misandry laws are already biased in favor of women and girls. Males will continue to be exploited and be treated as second-class while being slowly stripped of their last few possessions and self-respect to support the matriarchy.
What is it going to take for men to go from being marginally aware and irritated by the misandry to taking serious action? I think the marriage strike, MGTOW, and ghosting are great movements yet there needs to be more.
Atlas
Here's a quote found in it: "The world is half men and half women. The government has to reflect the world," said Cecilia Attias.
She's just bitter Sarkozy dumped her for Carla Bruni.
Anyway.
The world is half men and half women. You will need to take away about 45% of the children from divorced monthers and give them to their fathers.
You need to put a hell of a lot more women in jail. You certainly need to execute a lot more!
Not to mention you need to set quite a few homeless...
About a million women need to be in industrial accidents... every year... in the US alone...
Etc, etc, etc...
”I am appalled that men are destroyed for legally acting out sexual urges. (Hell, a congressman felt forced to resign recently for putting a shirtless photo of himself on Craigslist.) “
There has not been any shortage of women openly flaunting their sexuality – even publicly flashing their breasts at men (and even children) just to get some sexualized attention. For all the hub-bub about sexted “penis pictures” (Weiner, Favre), there are still far more instances of woman and girls sexting naked pictures of themselves around. And this includes many, many married women flashing and sexting men who are not their husbands either.
It’s often noted through the Manosphere that modern female liberated sexuality has lead to more woman seeking to behave as badly as (some) men do in terms of promiscuity and sexual recklessness. But, in the case of sexting, it seems that we are seeing a bit of the reverse. Men like Favre and Weiner seem to simply be an example of some men starting to act as badly as some women who’ve been doing the naked pic sexting thing for quite a while now.
Of course, no that a few men have started doing it, in’t now a horrible crime – except when women do it (because they were forced to do it by some man, no doubt).
So men who encroach on this formerly female “territory” will face personal humiliation and destruction [which ought to serve to dissuade others], while women who do likewise will be celebrated for it (Paris Hilton, Vanessa Hudgens, just to name a couple of the many), and end up with TV shows, being paid to attended parties, etc.
Tell me about how women are being oppressed by the Patriarchy again…
This congressman spent a lifetime sucking up and pandering to women and women's causes.
If anything, this is a lesson in sucking up, because it applies to anyone who takes that route, be it gender sucking up, racial sucking up, or monetary sucking up.
I used to date a guy who was utterly terrified of black people. He would totally suck up and pander to them to a sickening degree. He was spooked there was going to be a race war someday, and he wanted to be seen as a "friendly".
I finally told him to stop it, when bullets start to fly, all anyone's gonna see is that you are white.
So it goes with Mr. Proud Of His Penis. He sucked, and sucked, and sucked, and all he got was this lousy T-Shirt: Throw Rocks At Boys.
It's a lesson for all - if you're gonna suck up, you are in for the long haul. There are those sucked and then there's the suckers. He's the sucker. It's no tit for tat - it's just permanent sucking and sucking and sucking. For life.
He should have stuck with what he knew best and left his manhood out of it, as every successful sucker knows.
Half of all soldiers serving, fighting and dying for their countries need to reflect the 50/50 representation in order to demand 50/50 governmental representation.
As it stands now, women are doing a LOT of representing government without getting their hands dirty defending and dying for it.
Weiner did his part to promote the war on men by promoting more wide-reaching sex offender laws.
The biggest irony is he passed the KIDS Act of 2007, which forced those on public registries to register all internet identifiers.
http://www.weiner.house.gov/issue_display.aspx?id=844
He ultimately gets caught engaged in deviant internet sexual behavior. He's no different than Mark Foley. By the way, did everyone see Foley on Hannity stating he should not have been arrested?
11:04 AM: That was an excellent post! I couldn't have expressed it better.
Sucking up to feminists will get you a mouthful of slime and nothing else. There is no reward beyond the initial pat on the head.
Incidentally, why does anyone think that half of politicians should be women? If they can't compete with male candidates then they shouldn't be in the game.
54% of voters are women, so obviously there is no unfairness involved.
I believe that marriage is AMORAL.
On some level, we have to recognize that the CIA has had a very active hand in the formation of this 'mans sexuality is scary and bad', rape crying social malady--and that the long lasting effects of destroying a mans reputation is that the quality of women in the gene pool drops considerably.
It is almost as if the CIA has figured out through MKULTRA, MONARCH, et al, that the rape crying woman is the one who will uphold the violent man--the police, the FBI, the CIA.
The rape crier is the young ape in estrus, sitting on the sidelines, insecurely wanting her autonomy, but realizing she is too weak to do it herself; wanting the power to overcome the mother ape in her breeding primacy, and cutting a deal with the violent male apes, rather than the sensitive ones; asnd at the expense of aligning herself with other actually superior females.
I have started two blogs to begin to address these psychic maladies, starting with fightthepolice.wordpress, and then
www.demarginalizer.blogspot.com
We as men must first address the police factor--these types of women dangle the 'police organ' over our heads, and chip away at our autonomy every day. The police power must be addressed, as these women have put them as a social mediating factor into all dialogues.
fightthepolice.wordpress.com - ”We as men must first address the police factor”
While the police, at-large, do bear a great deal of responsibility for the outcome of rape claims, they are not, nor have they ever been the main problem nor the source of the issue.
And, as to Weiner, I don’t see any police knocking down his door to arrest him and haul him off to jail. He is being destroyed by the Press, in the public eye – and now his fellow politicians have joined in against him.
The police remain uninvolved.
And, the same is often true of rape claims. Long before the politicians began making laws which would require the police to over-react to rape claims, woman simply went to other men, not in law enforcement, to get them to do their desired bidding via crying rape. Angry mobs lynched black men who were accused by woman of rape simply because women went to other men first, and likely not to the police at all.
Even recently, on this forum, we’ve seen a number of instances where innocent men have been attacked and even killed, not by police, but by other men whom women have made their “he raped me” appeals to directly.
And, as we see in the efforts by the Department of Education to manipulate college tribunals, there is even a substantial effort underway to eliminate the police from having any role in sexual assault claims.
Further, many rape claims that do end up being taken to police, were initially made with no intention what so ever to involve police. Infamously, both the claims made by Danmell Ndonye (Hofstra Rape Hoxer), and Biurny Peguero (who’s lies lead to William McCaffreys wrongful imprisonment) were made quite clearly with no intention of involving the police.
Ndonye just wanted to convince her boyfriend that she’d not just had consensual sex with other men, and Peguero wanted her friends to stop beating her.
In a similar, if less dramatic way, a significant portion of FRA’s start out as a woman seeking an alibi for some other illicit (usually sexual infidelity) activities, which they are then compelled to bring to the attention of the police. There was even a case covered here of a woman seeking to inspire so sort of sympathy from the man she was dating, who randomly picked a couple of guys out of her old high school yearbook to claim she had been raped by. The guy she was dating, instead of giving the intended sympathy she craved, responded by insisting that she go to police.
What all this is unmistakably pointing towards is that the police are NOT the first problem. The women who make false claims are the first problem that must be addressed.
If they can be effectively dissuaded from ever making FRA claims in the first place, much of the rest of the problems arising from those claims will never occur.
It’s laudable to seek to improve the way in which some PD’s respond to rape allegations, but, not only do many not need reforming (they already get it right), simply taking away the possibility of having the police do their bidding will not effectively stop women from making FRA’s – they’ll just make them to others, which can end up even worse for innocent men.
Atlas, I believe the most effective action a man can take right now is to make folks aware that American law enforcement crossed some very real constitutional boundaries when they started "manufacturing faulty and inflammatory statistics".
"Incidentally, why does anyone think that half of politicians should be women?"
Because the identity politics people are retarded. All those elected to high office swear to uphold the constitution, which means they are supposed to act impersonally and impartially. Hence, just because the person in office is a man, or a Jew, or a black guy, he is not there to represent only his sex or his racial demographic, he is supposed to be representing all people equally.
The identity politics people, having been entrenched so long in racism and sexism themselves, can't fathom that their representatives aren't every bit as racist and/or sexist as themselves.
If you went by these people's playbook, a certain number of politicians would have to be congenitally deformed. You'd also need a certain number of politicians who were dead, in order to represent dead people in any decisions regarding the caretaking of graves or monuments and so on and so forth. It goes to the ridiculous extreme faster than a space shuttle can hit the atmosphere.
Stephen Hawking for Prez, reppin' the cripple vote!
Atlas, another "fundamental perversion" of which many other perversions rest upon, is when gender-feminists own the terms "patriarchy, and Matriarchy".
By gender-feminists telling society that violence is "Patriarchy", when in reality, if you see clearly, a majority of societal violence is coming from the "broken patriarchal, or "Matriarchal" segments of society.
By gender-feminists "owning" these term patriarchy and matriarchy, they can tell us right is left, up is down, healthy is perverted, and matriarchy is patriarchy, cause they have defined the terms, and they own them.
This perversion is a "fundamental perversion" of which many other perverts rest their perversions on.
Take back the terms patriarchy and matriarchy so that gender-feminists cannot pervert them for their "Empowerment" anymore.
Post a Comment