Here are excerpts from Facebook COO Sheryl Sandburg's commencement speech at Barnard College. The thrust of it is her bellyaching over the fact that there is no gender equality in top corporate jobs. She takes some cheap jabs at men along the way.
Whoever reprinted the speech must have left out the part where she called for gender equality in jobs where people are killed and injured (93 percent of work fatalities are male), and where she called for equality among people living on the streets (a group that far outnumbers corporate CEOs and that is overwhelmingly male). Nor does she mention that men are routinely denied anything approaching equality in custody rulings. And we won't mention military fatalities, or the gender gap in sentencing for precisely the same crime, the life expectancy gap, or the fact that young women in urban areas now earn more than their male counterparts. Somehow, the crowd that insists there is no gender equality doesn't see any that.
COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS EXCERPTS:
. . . . Pulitzer Prize winners Sheryl WuDunn and Nicholas Kristof visited this campus last year and they spoke about their critically important book, Half the Sky.
In that book, they assert that the fundamental moral challenge of the 19th century was slavery; of the 20th century, it was totalitarianism; and for our century, it is oppression of girls and women around the world. Their book is a call to arms, to give women all over the world, women who are exactly like us except for the circumstances into which they were born, basic human rights.
Compared to these women, we are lucky. In America, as in the entire developed world, we are equals under the law. But the promise of equality is not equality. As we sit here looking at this magnificent blue-robed class, we have to admit something that’s sad but true: men run the world. Of 190 heads of state, nine are women. Of all the parliaments around the world, 13% of those seats are held by women. Corporate America top jobs, 15% are women; numbers which have not moved at all in the past nine years. Nine years. Of full professors around the United States, only 24% are women.
I recognize that this is a vast improvement from generations in the past. When my mother took her turn to sit in a gown at her graduation, she thought she only had two career options: nursing and teaching. She raised me and my sister to believe that we could do anything, and we believed her. But what is so sad—it doesn’t just make me feel old, it makes me truly sad—is that it’s very clear that my generation is not going to change this problem. Women became 50% of the college graduates in this country in 1981, 30 years ago. Thirty years is plenty of time for those graduates to have gotten to the top of their industries, but we are nowhere close to 50% of the jobs at the top. That means that when the big decisions are made, the decisions that affect all of our worlds, we do not have an equal voice at that table.
So today, we turn to you. You are the promise for a more equal world. You are our hope. I truly believe that only when we get real equality in our governments, in our businesses, in our companies and our universities, will we start to solve this generation’s central moral problem, which is gender equality. We need women at all levels, including the top, to change the dynamic, reshape the conversation, to make sure women’s voices are heard and heeded, not overlooked and ignored.
. . . .
So, what advice can I give you to help you achieve this goal? The first thing is I encourage you to think big. Studies show very clearly that in our country, in the college-educated part of the population, men are more ambitious than women. They’re more ambitious the day they graduate from college; they remain more ambitious every step along their career path. We will never close the achievement gap until we close the ambition gap. But if all young women start to lean in, we can close the ambition gap right here, right now, if every single one of you leans in. Leadership belongs to those who take it. Leadership starts with you.
The next step is you’re going to have to believe in yourself potentially more than you do today. Studies also show that compared to men, women underestimate their performance. If you ask men and women questions about completely objective criteria such as GPAs or sales goals, men get it wrong slightly high; women get it wrong slightly low. More importantly, if you ask men why they succeeded, men attribute that success to themselves; and women, they attribute it to other factors like working harder, help from others. Ask a woman why she did well on something, and she’ll say, “I got lucky. All of these great people helped me. I worked really hard.” Ask a man and he’ll say or think, “What a dumb question. I’m awesome.” So women need to take a page from men and own their own success.
That’s much easier to say than to do. I know this from my own experience. All along the way, I’ve had all of those moments, not just some of the time; I would say most of the time, where I haven’t felt that I owned my success. I got into college and thought about how much my parents helped me on my essays. I went to the Treasury Department because I was lucky to take the right professor’s class who took me to Treasury. Google, I boarded a rocket ship that took me up with everyone else.
Even to this day, I have those moments. I have those moments all the time, probably far more than you can imagine I would. I know I need to make the adjustments. I know I need to believe in myself and raise my hand, because I’m sitting next to some guy and he thinks he’s awesome. So, to all of you, if you remember nothing else today, remember this: You are awesome. I’m not suggesting you be boastful. No one likes that in men or women. But I am suggesting that believing in yourself is the first necessary step to coming even close to achieving your potential.
You should also know that there are external forces out there that are holding you back from really owning your success. Studies have shown—and yes, I kind of like studies—that success and likeability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women. This means that as men get more successful and powerful, both men and women like them better. As women get more powerful and successful, everyone, including women, likes them less.
I’ve experienced this firsthand. When I first joined Facebook, there was a well-read blog out in the Valley that devoted some incredibly serious pixels to trashing me. Anonymous sources called me a liar, two-faced, about to ruin Facebook forever. I cried some when I was alone, I lost a bunch of sleep. Then I told myself it didn’t matter. Then everyone else told me it didn’t matter, which just reminded me of one thing: they were reading it too. I fantasized about all kinds of rejoinders, but in the end, my best and only response was just to do my job and do it well. When Facebook’s performance improved, the trash talk went away.
Do I believe I was judged more harshly because of my double-Xs? Yes. Do I think this will happen to me again in my career? Sure. I told myself that next time I’m not going to let it bother me, I won’t cry. I’m not sure that’s true. But I know I’ll get through it. I know that the truth comes out in the end, and I know how to keep my head down and just keep working.
If you think big, if you own your own success, if you lead, it won’t just have external costs, but it may cause you some personal sacrifice. Men make far fewer compromises than women to balance professional success and personal fulfillment. That’s because the majority of housework and childcare still falls to women. If a heterosexual couple work full time, the man will do—the woman, sorry—the woman will do two times the amount of housework and three times the amount of childcare that her husband will do. From my mother’s generation to mine, we have made far more progress making the workforce even than we have making the home even, and the latter is hurting the former very dramatically. So it’s a bit counterintuitive, but the most important career decision you’re going to make is whether or not you have a life partner and who that partner is. If you pick someone who’s willing to share the burdens and the joys of your personal life, you’re going to go further. A world where men ran half our homes and women ran half our institutions would be just a much better world.
I have a six-year-old son and a three-year-old daughter. I want more choices for both of them. I want my son to have the choice to be a full partner not just at work, but at home; and I want my daughter to have a choice to do either. But if she chooses work, to be well-liked for what she accomplishes. We can’t wait for the term “work/life balance” to be something that’s not just discussed at women’s conferences.
. . . .
Here it is, in its entirety:
http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-coo-sandberg-the-women-of-my-generation-blew-it-so-equality-is-up-to-you-graduates-2011-5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Does her thinking and values represent what the majority of the graduating class and especially the women believe is reality?
While Christina Sommers has stated that about 10% of women aged 18-24 actually believe the radical feminist false claims and propaganda, many other young women know feminists are full of bs with their arguments and statistics.
Ironically, for the first time I'm beginning to appreciate the huge debts and promises the US has to deal with. Eventually, this country will collapse under the weight of $100++ trillion it can never pay back. The danger of course is that the next group or political rulers may be even worse than the current ones. The one hope being that Americans will turn against big government. Yet, there will be many who will still want a police-nanny state deluding themselves that the next one will be better. Better for whom is the question.
Atlas
Trouble is, the handful of men who "run the world" don't give a flying fuck about the totally fucked milions of men who don't. We're the ones who get stripped of custody, falsely accused of raped, and blamed for slavery and totalitarianism (which she somewhat comically compares to the imaginary plight of women and girls in the twenty-first century).
For this feminist to benefit from the unfair treatment of men and then to whine about the very same powers-that-be who administer this injustice is the rankest hypocrisy.
Atlas: about the economy, I don't think it's quite as bad as all that. Look at Japan: not a country we'd care to emulate, but they haven't collapsed under the far greater burden of debt (proportional to GDP) that they have shouldered.
Right now, I'd rather have something done about our unemployment problem, which has been especially bad for men in this country.
"For this feminist to benefit from the unfair treatment of men and then to whine about the very same powers-that-be who administer this injustice is the rankest hypocrisy."
What's most troubling to me is something, I suppose, that would be controversial to utter aloud even in this venue. But I'm going to say it because I grow weary of trying not to offend our readers: it's balls. Yep. Testicles. Sorry, friends, but men are, on average, by nature more competitive, more aggressive, and they have an enhanced sex drive. And don't give me the latest study that "debunks" something everyone knows. Women want sex as much as men? Sorry. Whoever said that has never been married. Women are more aggressive? The mere fact that women initiate domestic violence more frequently than men, and that men can control themselves better than women, doesn't change what I've said. Women are just as competitive as men? Not in this world they aren't. Again, on average.
Men and women are different, but if you listen to your friendly neighborhood feminist, you'd think that balls are there for decoration, or to give women something to kick once in a while. The masculine tendencies noted above are just cultural constructs.
And that's why the farmer has to segregate the bull from all the other animals on the farm. The bull isn't more aggressive, he's just been told he's supposed to act like he's more aggressive because he's male. Right.
When I read this woman's screed, one thought kept going through my head: you didn't invent Facebook; you went the usual woman's route: school, big job, and now you're probably calling yourself a pioneer. But you didn't invent Facebook, and it isn't because you didn't have the opportunity. You had a ten year-plus headstart on your boss. You, and women like you, were more likely the kind who'd roll your eyes at the very idea. Your boss devoted a shitload of time to doing something that, at the time, seemed peculiar and likely a waste of time. The way Edison, Ford, Gates, and million other guys have done. You think anyone ENCOURAGED Mark Zuckerberg to do this -- because he's male? Seriously? I've got news for you, most of the great inventions entailed some guy spending hundreds or thousands of hours alone doing something no one else cared about at that time. (Why aren't more women comedians? I'll tell you why: most of the good young comedians spend an incredible amount of time honing their act -- time that would seem like a waste to most women.)
So after Facebook is a big deal, THEN women like you want to work there. With the big salary and stock options and benefits.
Nope. Sorry, friends. They ain't there for decoration. In many ways, they are the engine that drives the world.
Pierce,
We can agree to disagree about economics and that's ok as our alliance on political values is far more important.
I just did a google search: inventions by women. I hope there is a better way to find results for that subject since the returns were rather weak. I literally, went through the first 20 returns. Most of them all duplicated the same women inventions. In all fairness, I am eternally grateful to a woman for inventing the chocolate chip cookie.
You are correct that most women do not have that focused drive to committing their a huge amount of time for so long and sacrificing their savings to creating something only they believe in.
"A world where men ran half our homes and women ran half our institutions would be just a much better world."
--- If the young women actually follow her twisted take on reality and what makes for a strong society then we can expect the marriage rate to drop even further faster.
Atlas
Stop being a tease and tell us WHO invested the chocolate chip cookie!
AHAA - MERCURY ANYONE?
oh wait ... i think it was radium.
@Archivist,
Best comment ever. 'nough said.
". . . most women do not have that focused drive to committing their a huge amount of time for so long and sacrificing their savings to creating something only they believe in."
Well, whatever the reason, at the time the men are working on their projects, their wives/girlfriends always seem like the sensible ones. But then, a small percentage of those men hit it big.
"A world where men ran half our homes and women ran half our institutions would be just a much better world."
Except studies show women get depressed when men are raising the children, even when they are doing a good job.
"Except studies show women get depressed when men are raising the children, even when they are doing a good job".
Overall and all things considered, kids raised by single dads are actually better adjusted to the real world and are more emotionally healthy than kids raised by single moms.
Among couples with the father/husband home more often than the wife women now increasingly complain of men being the kitchen bitch simply out of jealousy and angry at the sharing of power because husbands have surpassed their wives at cooking and managing the kitchen.
Atlas
... and let's not forget the invention of the toilet by Carl Crapper.
"Except studies show women get depressed when men are raising the children, even when they are doing a good job."
Pierce,
No matter what happens most women get depressed. Despite all the changes and on paper achievements by women the past 40+ years they are less happy and fulfilled than ever. Probably the only happy or semi-happy ones are the real hardcore militant feminist, those who prefer the full-time company of other women, and a few rich alpha women married to alpha-men.
Atlas
Post a Comment