Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Mentally impaired teen was beaten into unconsciousness, and the word 'Rapest' was tattooed on his forehead, over a rape that never happened
Another in a long line of vicious, mind-numbing overreactions to a "rape" that never happened, and this one nearly killed a young man.
Two men and two women are in jail after an 18-year-old mentally impaired man was tortured and brutally beaten into unconsciousness after one of the women claimed he tried to rape her.
A police spokesman said there is no evidence to support the rape claim.
Several days earlier, the young man, Stetson Johnson, had befriended one of the women who would later attack him, Kimberly Sue Vergara, 25. Mr. Johnson was leaving Vergara's house one day when her former boyfriend confronted him and started the assault.
Vergara and another woman admitted that they used a stun gun to twice shock Mr. Johnson in the genitals while he was held down. The former boyfriend and another man forcibly tattooed the word "rapest" (sic) on Mr. Johnson's forehead and the words “I like little boys” on his chest.
Mr. Johnson asked them: “Why is this going on? … Why is this happening to me?" The attackers told him to "just shut up."
Then the attackers forcibly tied his hands together, and one of them, a 21-year-old man, beat him into unconsciousness with a baseball bat. The attackers left him to die, lying near a lake.
Police say the attack was so brutal, they are surprised that Mr. Johnson survived.
When Mr. Johnson awakened from his unconsciousness after two hours, he was bleeding, but he made his way to a trailer park a mile away, crawling part of the way. He was taken to the hospital where he spent several days in intensive care. Now, Mr. Johnson and his mother are moving away, due to safety concerns.
To cover up the misspelled word that identified him as a vile rapist, the poor young man had a bar code tattooed on his forehead. His mother plans to have the tattoos removed.
Sources: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-man-had-rapest-tattooed-on-forehead-by-attackers/article/3564467?custom_click=lead_story_title and http://www.news9.com/story/14529653/del-city-police-surprised-man-survived-heinous-brutal-beating
Thanks to J.P.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
31 comments:
so much for the idea that false allegations of rape dont cause harm .
I would assume that all 4 perps were from the out of control , violent matriarchal underclass.
The matriarchal underclass is dominated by women run klans, (not unlike the matriarchies of hyenas).
Most of Americas policy makers (and even alot of the "gender-raunch" themselves) grew up in a sort of orderly patriarchy, so they have no qualms about "breaking others patriarchies".
"gender-Raunch" should not complain about societal violence with their mouths full of federal pork dollars.
"Gender-Raunch" speak of "The great honest, and benevolent matriarchy that is inherent in women.
It takes a lot for me to cry, but this hit me rough. Poor guy.
Ah yes, "only 2% of rape accusations are true" and of course yet another example in an endless array of such of the price paid by the innocent victims of these false accusations...
Public school dumb down - they can't even spell rapist correctly.
Public school dumb down - they can't even spell rapist correctly.
"Vergara and another woman admitted that they used a stun gun to twice shock Mr. Johnson in the genitals while he was held down."
So, are these women going to be charged with sexual assault for having done this? Seems like it's going to be hard to overlook the role of the women in this one (as opposed to some of the other cases where women have got
passes" because they only incited the violence).
Anonymous - ”I would assume that all 4 perps were from the out of control , violent matriarchal underclass.”
Open sores on her face indicate that Kimberly Vergara is likely a Meth addict:
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-mans-attackers-tattooed-rapest-on-his-forehead/multimedia/photos/gallery/3564467/1/
Also note the names of the other perps:
Lorena Amanda Hodges, Zachary Provence, & Richard Lynn Dellert
So much for the classic line of BS too...
...that "feminism" is a bloodless revolution.
I wonder how much probation they will get for these crimes. Maybe someone could write to the prosecutor in this case?
Prosecutors admitted today that out-in-the-cold weather woman Heidi Jones wasn’t read Miranda rights before she allegedly copped to concocting a ridiculous assault story.
But the DA insisted Jones isn’t the victim of a snow job and her incriminating statements should be admitted into evidence.
The former Channel 7 weather babe wasn’t a suspect or under arrest when spilled her guts to cops, prosecutors said.
"The defendant, at the time her statements were given, gave her statements in the context of a criminal investigation she initiated," wrote Manhattan ADA Shanda Strain, in documents made public today.
"Despite defendant's assertion to the contrary, Miranda warnings were not required and the statement taken by the defendant was lawfully obtained.''
The issue is set to be argued at a hearing on June 20.
Defense lawyer Paul Callan said the DA’s admission is slam-dunk proof that Jones got a raw deal and was wrongly bullied into making the incriminating statements.
"That is a clear-cut violation of her Constitutional rights,’’ Callan said. "The DA has confirmed no Miranda warnings were given despite being interrogated by two police detectives."
The DA claims Jones 'fessed up to a wild tale that a Hispanic man jumped her in Central Park and tried to rape her on Sept. 24.
"I made it up for attention,’’ Jones allegedly told cops on Dec. 13, prosecutors said. ``I have so much stress at work, with my personal life and with my family.''
Jones, who wore a gray pants suit, green scarf and small hoop earrings to court today, was initially supported by WABC before she resigned.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/former_tv_weather_woman_was_not_8cW7aK5HFw8pdi3Y9sX8PO#ixzz1LPb4XSVV
If her rights were violated, then the evidence needs to stay out. These aren't some procedural loopholes made for the benefit of criminals. These are crucial protections made for the benefit of innocent people. To make these rules work, they must be applied even-handedly to everyone, even people who seem like they are guilty.
Not when she voluntarily confessed before she was even arrested.
A biology teacher in Kentucky has resigned after cops found her giving a student some private lessons in anatomy.
Carrie Shafer, a teacher at DuPont Manual High School in Louisville, was found by police Friday night inside a car and sharing beer with a 17-year-old student.
The 38-year-old and the teen also were partially undressed, police said. Evidence of contraceptive use was visible near the vehicle.
"There were some articles found that appeared to have been from a sexual act -- like some condoms and some wet wipes that were on the outside of the vehicle believed to have been thrown from that vehicle," Louisville Metro Police spokesman Dwight Mitchell told WAVE 3 News in Louisville.
Shafer, who taught anatomy and physiology, was cited with a misdemeanor for unlawful transaction with a minor.
Sexual consent in Kentucky is 16, and at the time of the incident police were not aware she was a teacher.
Shafer, who resigned Sunday, could face a felony charge because of her role as an educator.
A new law in Kentucky makes it illegal for a person in "a position of authority or special trust" to engage in sexual activity with someone under 18, Louisville's Courier-Journal reported.
The teacher was also ticketed for parking in a handicap space.
Shafer's students were quick to defend the teacher, who had been at Manual High since 2007.
"She's a good person at heart, and you can really tell that in her classes," Kyle Peterson told WAVE 3. "And she cares about her students."
Manual High School issued a statement Tuesday assuring parents the school would find a replacement for Shafer as quickly as possible.
"This is certainly not the kind of publicity Manual wants," Manual High School principal Larry Wooldridge said.
Shafer was a sponsor of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes group, which consisted of nearly 40 students.
"FCA was very saddened to learn of the charges being brought against Carrie Shafer," the organization said in a statement Tuesday. "We are praying for everyone involved that healing and God's redemptive power will be demonstrated."
Shafer will be arraigned March 31, according to the Jefferson Circuit Court clerk's office.
more proof of my theory that women are the worst rapists of all
@Archivist-I don't want to go through the whole weathergirl case but apparently she was giving the cops this bullshit rape story and was being treated as the "victim" not a suspect in a crime when she then admitted that she made the whole thing up. That is still filing a false report and other crimes.
So, are these women going to be charged with sexual assault for having done this?
Of course not. Women who chop off penises can't get themselves charged with sexual assault. At best they get charged with aggravated assault.
Heck, I'd bet, despite admitting to hitting the victim in the head with a baseball bat, they won't even be charged with attempted murder. It also wouldn't surprise me if the girls get lesser charges and/or more lenient sentences than the boys do. Leniency from the prosecutor, the judge, or both, towards female defendants is fairly common in multiple offender prosecutions
@archivist: I agree. But to be fair, the police did not read miranda rights when they attempted to interview me on my FRA because they had not formally charged me or found enough cause to arrest me. If it had not been for a lifetime of great law flicks I might have been dumb enough to tell them my side of the story just to see it twisted.
I have a feeling that the weather woman's defense would not have worked if my case had materialized beyond being an FRA.
I hope those cowards get life in prison! What a despicable crime.
I grew up in the matriarchy. Matriarchies are dominated by violent women and violent girls. What women and girls lack is size they make up for by lying and false accusations and by initiating "violence by proxy".
When American law enforcement refuse to hold women accountable for their violence, maybe its not just out of perversion, maybe its for business reasons.
You see, by not holding women and girls equally accountable, American law enforcement can harvest the fruit of a violent society with one hand, scatter the seeds of the violent matriarchy, with the other hand. Then they get to "Pork bloat" their budgets by cashing in all the statistics.
S - ”Then they get to "Pork bloat" their budgets by cashing in all the statistics.”
Ah, just what this discussion and this forum didn’t need any more of – you efforts to redirect the blame for FRA’s and their attenuate damages away from the woman who make them. You’ve become such a good white knight towards women who falsely accuse and ruin men’s lives and get them injured or killed.
When ever one of them is found to have lied about rape, we can always count on you to show up and rant that it was really the fault of the police. And it’s always the same crap – the police foster and promote false rape claims, the police don’t stop making women from making them (although your inability to explain haw they would stop them in another of your repeated failures), and that the police aren’t holding them responsible (even though they are “outing” them, arresting them, and publicly naming them) – which is odd since you have said you don’t blame the woman who accused you; so, obviously, you hold false accusers to even less responsibility than do police.
How do you explain that?
Steve, law enforcement is an organization designed to deter crime, If they are not deterring false rape accusations, who is supposed to??? the convenience store clerk at the 7-11 down the street??
By not charging false rape accusers, protocol perversions, and semantics games of what the meaning of is, is; American law enforcement have in fact fostered and enabled a now "Culture of false rape accusations".
Anon 8:10 makes a legitimate point: there are economic incentives in place that encourage the status quo to continue.
Analyzing this problem from that perspective doesn't mean that false rape accusers aren't responsible for their actions.
”law enforcement is an organization designed to deter crime, If they are not deterring false rape accusations, who is supposed to???”
Law Enforcement and the Criminal Justice System is supposed to also deter murders, rapes, arson, assaults, kidnapping, car theft, drug dealing, prostitution, etc., etc. But, that task is simply unattainable.
You often made this abstruse demand that LE stop false accusers from making false claims. Of course, you’ve never explained how they would do so. If there are any real clairvoyants out there, they’d likely be able to make millions doing something other than police work. There is simply no way to tell some real accusations from some false ones without investigating. So, women are going to have to be allowed to make accusations (since we cannot disallow real ones just to try to prevent false ones), and, unless the claim is obviously false, the police are just going to have to investigate. More and more, they seem to be doing a better job in this regard. That’s why we are now starting to learn of a large percentage of the FRA’s being made.
And, as with Danmell Ndonye and Crystal Magnum, the majority of FRA’s are made, in the heat of the moment, without any regards what so ever to the question of whether or not police will believe them (they simply rely on police to, at the very least, give them the benefit of the doubt); and many of them are first made to someone other than the police (with no intention at the time they are made of ever repeating them to police – see Danmell Ndonye). These accusations are made irrespective of police policies. Even in the UK where they are being routinely found out, prosecuted, and sent to prison for doing so, woman are still making FRA’s. The policies of the police simply are not, nor have they ever been, the sole determining factor in whether or not a given FRA is made.
The problem with false rape/sexual assault accusations is more-often-than not that the available punishment (misdemeanor) simply doesn’t seem like it would be worth the time and trouble (for either police or prosecutors) given that the sentence that a judge would actually give to a first-time offender would be negligible. This is why I’ve continuously stressed the need for felony-level charges. In the UK, where prosecutors have been given that option, they’ve been convicting quite a few women, and getting sentence with prison time.
Despite what you’ve oft-imagined, there is no money pipe-line for either police nor prosecutors to get Federal money for each and every DV/sex assault/rape case they work. Each and every one costs them, and strains their budgets.
But, I’m sure you’ll find a way to continue to ignore all these other considerations in your quest to try to find a way to place primary blame on the police, and the police alone.
Uh, yeah: I'm not exactly clear on why SLWerner has such a hissy-fit every time anyone comments on cops failing to enforce the law against women the same way they do against men.
Cops are pretty blatant, in most cases, in glad-handing and comforting women even when the same women are being arrested for violent crime.
Pretending that cops are always right and just is exactly as irrational as claiming women are too.
Anonymous - ”Anon 8:10 makes a legitimate point: there are economic incentives in place that encourage the status quo to continue.”
Go ahead and try to find this mysterious rape/DV case bounty system that S so believes in. It doesn’t exist. The latest reauthorization of the VAWA provides for fixed amounts of money to be made available, on a competitive grant proposal basis, for both police departments and for prosecutor offices who design specific plans aimed at addressing issue related to violence against women. That means that they have to propose to implement long-term efforts (such as sex-crime divisions), for which they might be compensated a fraction of the annual cost for, on a one-time basis. The remaining costs long-term will have to be born entirely by the agency. This is no way to get rich from Federal pork – it costs far more than can ever hoped to be recouped.
BTW, the total annual amount available is set at about $56.25 million per annum. Here it is, straight from the reauthorization act:
”TITLE I—ENHANCING JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO COMBAT VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
Sec. 101. STOP grants improvements.
Provides state formula grants that bring police and prosecutors in close collaboration with victim services
providers. Reauthorized at $225 million per year (2007 to 2011). The basic formula allocation – 30% victim services, 25% police, 25% prosecutors, 5% courts and 15% discretionary – remains unchanged.”
And, this money isn’t targeted as rape/sexual assault, it covers the entire spectrum of those things which can (loosely) be considered violence against women.
Assuming that you are capable of simple math, you’ll no doubt be able to figure out that 56 million, divided up between all the states (US territories and Native American Tribes, as well), and all the categories of crimes (against women), just doesn’t go very far to push police and prosecutors to try to encourage women to fabricate more rape claims (which, BTW, have plenty of associated costs to handle).
But, by all means, show me some proof of this “federal pork” being used to “bloat police budgets” based on the number of rape cases they handle. Go on. Consider it a dare.
twm - ”Pretending that cops are always right and just is exactly as irrational as claiming women are too.”
Okay, just try to show were I’ve ever even tried to imply that cops are always right.
What I have repeatedly said is that cops share much of the blame for the problems associated with FRA’s, and in any given situation they may get it entirely wrong or pretty much right, but they are never the primary cause of an FRA having been made (S in Boston’s main claim).
I have always maintained that those who make the FRA’s are the primary culprits. Many FRA’s are never made to police at all – see the recent incidents of “vigilante justice” carried out by friends of the accusers. Many only end up being related to police because the initial target of the lie (often a boyfriend or husband) insisted that the matter be address to police – see Danmell Ndonye/Hofstra rape hoax. Many are so ridiculous that the accuser would never bother to try to make the claim to police, but seek to utilize other channels – see the many college disciplinary boards held for “he said/she said” cases that law enforcement never hears of.
Yet, rather than admit that the police cannot be held responsible in cases where they were never even informed of the complaint, S steadfastly contends that NONE of these FRA’s would have occurred save for the police creating an environment so conducive to them being made that women (who would never ever make such claims except for the inducement of the police) have now, only relatively recently, come to believe that they could get away with it.
My so-called “hissy-fit”s are about his continuing efforts to exonerate the women who make FRA’s and to blame police instead. He has even stated that he doesn’t blame the women who made a false claim against him, just the police who let her do it.
But, then again, maybe you agree with him that those women aren’t to blame, and are just victims of the patriarchy (in the form of the police) who’ve tricked them into do it?
And, this money isn’t targeted as rape/sexual assault, it covers the entire spectrum of those things which can (loosely) be considered violence against women.
While this blog calls itself "The False Rape Society", false accusations of rape are not the most prevalent of false criminal accusations leveled at men. False accusations of domestic violence and child abuse are far, far more common. Unlike rape, however, false accusers of this ilk are never punished, and in cases of divorce or child custody profit handsomely from their deception.
randian,
You bring up a good point. And it is one that Pierce and I have talked of branching out this site to include. False allegations of all kinds. We may look at doing that.
But the reason we focus on the FRA side of things, is that "Rape culture" is such a pervasive theme in the U.S., it was felt that needed to be combated.
People like Glen Sacks and Robert Franklin are fighting the fight on family courts and DV much better than we could.
But I see some expansion in the future, so we likely will cover those issues.
Post a Comment