We are posting, without comment, an email we received from a reader. We have received permission from the writer to post it, but I am not publishing the name of the writer:
Just wanted to let you know I got interested in your website after being force fed mandatory bystander intervention training by the Air Force. The entire Air Force needs to have the training by June. We were told how we are complacent in rape when we tell dirty jokes and talk about women and their physical aspects. The training was segregated male and female. The trainer became hostile whenever any of her facts where questioned like the number one reason women do not report rape is because no one will believe them. We had to answer questions like "Is it OK to ever call a woman a bitch". I wonder what kind of questions the women got in their training. Our training basically inferred that we were all guilty of contributing to rape. This personally offends me as a defender of liberty to be on the losing end of a privileged class, especially coming from an organization that has such an emphasis on equal opportunity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
25 comments:
http://www.afforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30990
It doesn't seem too popular on the enlisted forums.
I have heard that gender feminists are now as powerful in the military as they are in Quackademia.
American gender feminists are not "Empowering" themselves on the virtues of being "gender-feminist". American gender-feminists are "Empowering" themselves through the perversion Alliance with American law enforcement, and the perverted statistics this "Alliance" is manufacturing.
For example, every protocol perversion, and every semantics game that American law enforcement are now engaged in to get more innocent men and boys arrested, leaves a perverted statistic in its wake.
This "manufactured" or "perverted" statistic then gets funnel to the gender-raunch Empowerment professors who use this as agitation and empowerment propaganda to paint a picture that the scourge of the world is hetero-sexual males.
This perverted misinformation and manufactured statistics Alliance is not only the "first perversion" of which much perversion rests upon, its also unconstitutional.
Here's a post from the Air Force forum that will make you sick:
Have not had the new training yet, but going along with stories from the old briefings... buddy of mine asked the following (in almost this exact wording):
What if I am a little bit drunk and me and this stone cold sober hottie decide to get freaky and videotape us getting it on. She is riding me six ways to Sunday in every girl-on-top position you can imagine. She is very vocal too, telling me how much she is loving it and how it feels great. She decides the following morning that it was a mistake and reports it as a sexual assault.
Does she really have a case against me?
The answer: Yes, it is possible.
"Gender-Raunch" are the new special forces of the military.
For example If a girl is out partying with her male counterparts, and she is late for drill the next morning, she can claim she was raped, and this triggers a "military gender-Raunch attack".
'We were told how we are complacent in rape when we tell dirty jokes and talk about women and their physical aspects'.
--- being ex-military, i can only imagine how many guys went out for pizza and beer afterwards, told dirty jokes, and then went to the strip clubs to celebrate being male.
how about when women tell dirty jokes, talk about men, and their physical attributes? even better how about when women tell dirty jokes about other women?
seriously, all joking aside here, that misandry training must be bad for moral. no dirty jokes or discussing female attributes yet it is your duty to lose an arm/leg or die for Amerika?
welcome to the new world religion of pc progressive-feminism where people like mary kellet and obama are the high priests and teachers of morals.
atlas
So the cancer has metastasized to the right arm.
Let's not call it cancer,but dress it up in pink for the television shows.
This "raunch" subversion is
a rotting death, the military will react eventually by killing death.
After all, that is the bottom line.
Then again, perhaps all those mommy's boys are helpless in the face of
a good political
CASTRATING.
"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow...."
Facebook - the CIA conspiracy
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10456534
Thaks for posting that forum site, Sedulous. Reading through to pg 5 was a chart - why she will never be a slut- that should be reposted here on FRS.
In reading through the posts, I wa glad to find women posting negatively about it, as well : I can get an Article 15 for getting a sunburn tht interferes with my duty but I'm not responsible for getting drunk and taken advantage of?
Good question.
Actually this is such a convuluted way of dealing with a very real problem.
Bear in mind - MEN GET RAPED IN THE MILITARY too, ya know.
Men get pressured into have sex they later deeply regret (I'm NOT gay!)
Maybe teaching BOTH genders how to avoid being manipulated, or physically how to rebugg unwanted attacks is the Military's responsibility - responsibility they are putting off onto the male heteros exclusively.
Put the ball back in Uncle Sam's court - TEACH THE TROOPS SELF DEFENSE. IT'S YOUR JOB!
They have a whole new thing called "Command Rape" now. Watch for "Fellow Soldier Rape" in the near future.
Is it OK to ever call a woman a bitch".
...so don't leave me breathless. What was the answer?
Is Bitch the new "N" word?
Only "they" can call themselves that?
Let's see ... low pay, constant deployments, ridiculous rules of engagement, 24/7 political correctness, and now this bullshit.
Tell me again why any man signs on to defend American anymore.
Our politicians have never served and their only concept of military life is Star Trek reruns.
What do you get when you cross a congress member with James Dean?
... a rebel without a clue.
I wonder when telling dirty jokes will be formally against military law resulting in an Article 15?
I'm not going to make any sarcastic jokes about getting a court martial and prison time for dirty jokes. However, I can see some psycho feminists rationalizing dirty jokes as treason against Amerika and calling for such jokes be punishable by firing squad...
Western Civilization is dead and has been replaced with Zombi lunacy.
Atlas
The bottom line is folks, we can argue about "who's perverting what" until were blue in the face. But we should come to a common agreement that a girl who's late for drill instruction in the morning cause shes out partying with the males, should not be able to cry rape, and have the "military gender-raunch community" all up into some innocent soldiers ass, over a lying bitch-pig who's late for drill.
What kind of perversion has entered into the military legal community, where they will try "like perverts" to arrest an innocent soldier because a girl he was out partying with, was late for drill duty the next morning, so she cried rape to get out of trouble??
This site is interesting as it reflects the dark insane underside of the evolving NWO Society we are living or rather enslaved in.
There is a scene in the film Apocalypse Now when the renegade American Colonel rhetorically and bitterly states:
"they train their young men to drop fire (napalm) on people yet their commanders will not allow them to write the word 'fuck' on the sides of their aircraft because it is obscene".
Atlas
"Is Bitch the new "N" word?"
Anyone who argues that deserves to be laughed at.
Calling a black person a nigger (as an insult) automatically means you're insulting them for being black.
Calling a woman a bitch is basically calling them a jerk. That's why it's not considered unoffensive if a woman calls another woman a bitch.
And in case anyone asks yes I do have a problem with people who use bitch as a synonym for any woman.
A new assault on our freedom:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-in-police-unlawfulen,0,6950521.story
Do you remember the good old times when US bases in Asia had entire brothel cities around them?
Angeles City, Subic, etc .....
Made the guys happy. Made the women happy that worked there. Helped the local economy.
Now the women are safe in their mud huts in the province taking care of their pigs and buffalos ........
'Now the women are safe in their mud huts in the province taking care of their pigs and buffalos ........'
haha :)
Just wait for an American feminist to declare that now the women's lives are their own and they have freedom and that must account for some type of greater happiness blah blah blah...
atlas
'They have a whole new thing called "Command Rape" now. Watch for "Fellow Soldier Rape" in the near future.'
after that will come 'barrack's rape', 'field rape', 'extra-duty intimidation rape', 'denial of promotion rape', 'superior rape', 'subordinate rape', 'discharge rape', 'mess hall rape', 'standing in line rape', 'inter-service rape', 'radio-communications rape', 'standing at attention rape', 'shaking hands rape', 'salute rape', 'out-performing physical-training fellow soldier rape', 'battle-field first-aid rape', 'gender favoritism rape', 'out-target-shooting fellow soldier rape', etc.
atlas
I wasn’t in the military, but I was the member of a ROTC unit in college. Our commandant was a self-described “cold, black heart” Air Force woman. Before she was the commandant of our detachment she wrote an article for an Air Force newspaper about sexual assault, in it, she stated (in pretty much this exact wording), “we were both drunk is not an excuse for rape.” Insanity! Consensual drunk sex is now rape? It’s always puzzled me what women hope to accomplish by expanding the definition of rape SO wide that it ensnares so many innocent men. What does that solve? It doesn’t solve a thing. I’m really glad I stumbled upon this blog and started reading it semi-regularly.
"We were told how we are complacent in rape when we tell dirty jokes and talk about women and their physical aspects."
In other words, being a healthy heterosexual male is rape.
I don't know,maybe this overreach will be good for our cause. After all, if it is a crime to be interested in women sexually, (if you're a man) what do we need them for?
Babies and pussy, that's about all most of them have.Take that out of the equation,and the old saying changes from "can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em" to a simpler "can't live with 'em".
I love this quote from the forum:
"You don't actually have to have sexual intercourse to rape someone - you just need a penis."
Post a Comment