Chelsea Ann Johnson of Dearing told police that Donteveous Coleman, a co-worker at Zaxby's, dragged her into a restroom at the Washington Road restaurant on April 25 and raped her.
Mr. Coleman has been released, but it still awaiting the charges to be formally dropped, which will require a court action.
Probably the most interesting aspect of this case is that Johnson took a polygraph test, which indicated she was being deceptive, and after further questioning, admitted she lied.
I can only surmise, since a polygraph is neither mandatory nor needed, why she took one? My guess, is hubris, and that she thought she could pass it, and that would lend credence to her claim.
Johnson was arrested Friday and released the next day on a $6,050 bond.
Link: http://mirror.augusta.com/stories/2011/05/17/new_616324.shtml
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
It is the perversion of American law enforcement that has fostered and enabled the now "Culture of false rape accusations" to get this rooted into American society.
Classic- HE has to post bond after SHE admits she lied. Ludicrous.
anon 6:50AM wrote:
"American law enforcement that has fostered and enabled the now "Culture of false rape accusation"
Is it all because of LE or is it also because of morally corrupt politicians, government institutions, the SGI, PC academia, mass media, Hollywood, and other left-leaning cultural institutions?
Atlas
Atlas - ”Is it all because of LE or is it also because of morally corrupt politicians, government institutions, the SGI, PC academia, mass media, Hollywood, and other left-leaning cultural institutions?”
Yes, of course the blame for the current situation of FRA’s is wide-spread (S in Boston is unfortunately extremely narrow-minded, and believes that LE should always be seen as being primarily to blame, without exception).
In any given case (that is reported to them), police can either react entirely in the wrong way, entirely in the right, or in same manner in-between. In this case, the police actually did a pretty go job. They obviously had some appropriate suspicious, as they took the unusual step of asking the women to take a polygraph. And, that was the key to “outing” this FRA – and FRA of a violent kidnap-rape that could have seen the young man spending years in prison.
On an earlier discussion thread, I made note of this story; so, out of simply laziness, I’m just going to paste my remarks into this one as well:
At the time of this writing, the is a story there from the McDuffie Mirror (http://mirror.augusta.com/stories/2011/05/17/new_616324.shtml) about a woman who accuser a coworker of a forcible rape, but apparently the police had adequate suspicions about her story that they asked her to take a polygraph [I though the SGI had succeeded in making it verboten to even suggest to a (rape/sexual assault/woman) claimant that they should take one?].
Based on indications that she was lying while taking the polygraph, they turned on her, and she eventually “cracked” and admitted that she had lied. [I liked the way they termed their grilling of her – “further interviews”]
This is the sort of approach that should be hope for from police – that they dutifully take the report of the complainant, and investigate (it’s not clear that the target of the FRA was arrested – which would be typical for accusations of kidnap/forcible rape, but it is stated that he was released. However, that may just mean from being voluntarily questioned at the PD).
In any event, they seemed to have been willing to consider whatever it was he told them, and instead turned their investigation back onto her.
This was a good example of how the police should respond to rape allegations.
But, the likely “blow-back” from police not believing every word out of the mouth of (female) accusers, and demonstrating that disbelief by such actions as requesting that a woman take a polygraph, is likely going to be complaints and even public protests by the agents of the SGI and their useful idiots. It’s unfortunate, but LE does receive an inordinate amount of pressure to tow the SGI’s line in regards to rape and sexual assault
S from Boston says, the degree of perversion of the legal community varies from state to state, and yes "gender-Raunch" is very loud and dominant in the North-East. Mary Kellet, is but one cog in the pervert wheel.
Anonymous - ”Mary Kellet, is but one cog in the pervert wheel.”
And still, bad as she is, Mary Kellet did not cause Vladic Filer’s dilemma, Ligia Filer did.
What you have steadfastly misunderstood vis-à-vis the FRA issue is that the true “First Perversion” is that of women falsely alleging that they have been the victim of one of mankind’s most loathed crimes – rape – in order to evoke the sympathies, protections, and even revenge and punishment that come about when that very real crime is actually committed. There is no other perversion that even comes close to challenging the pre-eminence of this one. And all others follow from this one, for, without, none of the others could even exist.
The “Second Perversion” is that in which the real crime of rape was sensationalized, exaggerated, and politicized by what has come to be the SGI. Law Enforcement didn’t just decide one day to change the way they handled claims of rape (or, more specifically, the way in which they would view claims of date-rape – they always responded swiftly and harshly to claims of violent stranger kidnap/forcible rapes).
They got their “marching orders”, first and foremost, from the lawmakers who responded to the demands of those presenting themselves as advocates for women/against rape by enacting new and tougher laws. They also had some of their top brass trying to appear more sensitive to the alleging victims of rape and sexual assaults.
This “perversion of American Law enforcement” that you try to focus solely upon is, in fact, at best, the “Third Perversion”, relying on and directly created by the first two.
If women never started making false claims that they’d been raped, and if the feminists of the SGI never started making demands on police and lawmakers, it is highly unlikely that any of LE protocols would have changed from what they were in the 1950’s. We’d still see claims of kidnap-rapes met with a strong reaction (as has been the case throughout recorded history, first by family, then by community, and only relatively recently, by police/LE). But, in cases where a woman felt she’d been forced/pressured to have sex while out on a date with a man would probably NOT result in him being arrested in the most public and embarrassing of ways, perp-walked before press and public, named and shamed in the press, and publicly and privately ostracized.
Some number of who truly did commit date-rape would be spared that ordeal (which, they arguably might well have deserved), but so to would those who were innocent be likewise spared (which has been one of the issues most focused on by the Pierce, Steven, and the whole of the FRS). This would not preclude those who truly did rape their dates from having the evidence lead to their conviction for their crime, but it would allow for the process of investigation, charging, prosecution, and jury verdict to occur as intended – not for a public conviction-without-trial as is not too often the case for innocent men and boys.
At the end of the day, we (the collective we of the FRS) have a truth to expose the public to, and we have many valid argument to present. But, if we allow this forum to become bogged down in your simple-mined, singular-focused hatred of LE, we risk our credibility - especially when you try to blame American LE for foreign crimes, or when they aren’t even involved in a particular issue or account.
If you can manage nothing else, please try to read the lead stories to see if your over-repeated rants even fit. It seems very little to ask of you.
This is the chicken and egg argument.
The first perversion of women lying would not happen near as often as it does when they know they will not be held accountable by those in authority,who are listed as the second and third perversion.
By virtue of their authority and "leadership"
in these criminal matters they lead by example, effectively making them the genuine first perversion.
The real problem in my humble opinion is with the Judges first and foremost.
The cops bring to prosecutors what they can prosecute,the judges judge what is successfully prosecuted,often ignoring the "real law" as they do so.
So the Judges are the real first perversion,the prosecutors second, official police department policy is third, individual cops would be forth,and individual women working in the SGI would be fifth,and individual complainants come in at fifth in my estimation.
The only valid reason I can find that judges would ignore the spirit of the law would be greed via VAWA monies diverted into their personal bank accounts
(this has been proven before)
and CONTROL of the populace and destruction of the nuclear family for reasons too lengthy to enter here.
Mr. R
Not Charging a girl after she "claimed raped" because she didn't want to pay a taxi fare...Is a perversion of the legal system.
Not charging a girl after she "claimed rape" because she was late for drill duty the next morning, is a perversion of the legal system.
not charging a girl for claiming rape because she was late for her curfew, is a perversion, ect,ect,ect.
Post a Comment