This blog has written extensively about the Obama administration's April 4 directive to colleges that, to be compliant with Title IX, they must apply the lowest standard of proof for all college disciplinary proceedings involving sexual harassment (which includes sexual assault): a "preponderance of the evidence standard," which means that there need only be a slight probability that the offense occurred in order to hold the accused (almost always a male for sex offenses) responsible. Until the directive, the vast majority of institutions applied the "clear and convincing" evidence standard, which means that to find an accused responsible for sexual assault, the school must produce evidence that unequivocally establishes a very high probability that the alleged assault occurred.
Great. A lot of our readers would rather talk about "game" and all sorts of other things that, all due respect, don't seem especially important to me when I've got emails from guys facing prison time for rapes they didn't commit.
Alright. Let's be more direct. Let's try a different approach and illustrate how your son is screwed if a girl at college accuses him of sexual assault. Let's say the girl files a complaint with the school and with the police at the same time. The claim is bullshit, and you hire an attorney to defend your son.
First, your son wants to file a claim with the school, a criminal complaint, and a civil action against her for filing a false rape report. Oops. Under a lot of college handbooks, that could be considered retailiation -- a separate ground for punishing your son. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/02/college-men-who-file-suit-after-being.html So forget that.
Next, your son's criminal attorney's first instinct is to get the college hearing postponed. Why? When you're accused of a crime, you have the right to remain silent both in the police investigation and in the trial against you. That's often the best advice, because the police are looking to build a case against you and they often take what you say -- even though it may seem innocent to you -- and twist it, and pound it, and make you appear to be a liar. Or a rapist. So, as FIRE has explained: "If you have both a university disciplinary hearing and a criminal trial pending, you will almost always want to get your disciplinary hearing postponed until after the criminal matter is settled. Holding the disciplinary hearing before the criminal trial can be very dangerous, because what you say at the campus hearing-where you have far fewer protections than in a court of law-can be used against you in the criminal case"
Well, in light of the Obama administration's April 4 directive, forget that. The directive provides that "a criminal investigation into allegations of sexual violence does not relieve the school of its duty under Title IX to resolve complaints promptly and equitably." The college might “delay temporarily the fact-finding portion” of its investigation “while the police are gathering evidence,” but the “school must promptly resume and complete its fact-finding” even before charges are resolved in the criminal justice system. So, if your son wants to defend himself by testifying in the college hearing, he runs the risk that whatever he says will be used against him by the government in the criminal proceeding, and that's usually too risky.
Nice catch-22, isn't it? So your son's college career is finished based solely on her allegation, and he's expelled.
Then the police finish their investigation, and they determine her claim wasn't credible. In fact, they charge her for filing a false report. Does your son get reinstated at college? Forget it. The school won't even reopen his case. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/03/male-student-expelled-from-college-for.html
Your son's college -- to which you've paid tens of thousands of dollars -- has just destroyed him solely because some woman made a bullshit rape accusation against him. Maybe he'll get a job at a convenience store, but his life will never be what it should have been.
The anti-male crusaders on our college campuses finally have your son where they want him: by the balls. In fact, they've got 'em in a vise, and they're tightening it, slowly but surely.
Is that direct enough for you?
21 comments:
Gender-Raunch perverts are giddy with the excitement over the potential to arrest even more innocent boys.
"Gender-Raunch" get "Empowered" every time an innocent man or boy gets arrested.
Gender-Raunch are extremely dominant in the North-Eastern states, but don't worry folks, federal dollars are coming in soon to start the perversion and Empowerment Alliances in a state near you too.
Oh, wait! You mean like the 2 rapes in San Luis Obispo? The women were raped, but alas! ...not enuf evidence to grab the perps by the balls. Now I get it.
DAWN
Folks don't want to understand that "gender-feminism" does not attack all men equally. "Gender- feminism", as apposed to "equality-feminism" attacks males who are of the wrong gender. Gender-feminists don't like hetero males.
Oh, wait! You mean like the 2 rapes in San Luis Obispo? The women were raped, but alas! ...not enuf evidence to grab the perps by the balls. Now I get it.
DAWN
No you don't. And I seriously doubt you ever will. But thanks for stopping by.
And while I'm at it, DAWN, perhaps you failed to notice that this site is dedicated to false accusations of rape and sexual assault. Please, take your FRA apologist attitude and head somewhere that people will support your bias. Not really wanted here. Thanks.
So - it's 'he said, she said' with no other evidence. He says calmly 'I didn't do it', she is very emotional and can (supposedly) remember everything. Does the ability to put on a good act mean that 'preponderance of the evidence' is on your side?
When will people understand it's not the job of the damn university to investigate crimes. That is the job for the police. This isn't a hard concept.
DAWN is Georgia Girl, in case you don't know.
By the way, DAWN/Georgia Girl is permanently banned here. She's abused her commenting privileges for the last time.
Georgia Girl, Dawn, whatever she calls herself these days, is a false rape accuser who has posted vastly inconsistent allegations about several boys she went to college with. She is a worthless piece of shit -- and possibly dangerous.
And woe betide any college which doesn't uphold enough allegations! How long before we get a quota of proportion of allegations which must be upheld, because we 'know' these rapes are happening?
Couple of critical things.....
Sexual assault is not always heterosexual. There are homosexual related incidents can be found within single sex schools. How these laws will act regarding incidents like that?
Second thing is who voted Obama to behave like this?
And how long before we get a case where the accused is the son of a wealthy and influential alumnus and donor!
Ted, agreed, and it is unconstitutional to create "other courts" in the United states.
It is unconstitutional to create any other courts in the US. The "pervert Empowerment courts" on University campuses are un-constitutional.
"And how long before we get a case where the accused is the son of a wealthy and influential alumnus and donor!"
And I wouldn't advise women to start messing with the sons of Middle Eastern sheikhs or Russian oligarchs either.
It's already happened. Meg Whitman's son was accused of rape. He attended an ivy league University.
@Dulantha: The laws apply to homosexual couples as well. The interpretation is that Title IX holds a University responsible for preventing anything that can be interpreted as creating an environment that is hostile for any individual. On these grounds, any sexual misconduct creates an environment hostile to all individuals and the University obtains jurisdiction to investigate.
Title IX is designed to benefit the so-called historically underprivileged gender. When the federal government decided that girls had been historically deprived of their rightful opportunities to participate in sports, girls were permitted to try out for boys teams, even though this took spots away from the boys. Boys, however, typically were not permitted to try out for girls teams. The law in this area is complex, and while it is possible today, in some circumstances, for boys to play on girls’ teams, legally – not to mention culturally (a topic deserving its own post) – it is more difficult for a boy to play on a girls’ team than vice versa. This is so because, in sports, as elsewhere, the law doesn’t care as much about the harm to an individual boy as it cares about the rights of girls as a class. “It is the class of girls, not boys, with whom the government seeks to redress past discrimination and promote equality. It is girls, not boys, who have suffered and continue to suffer from discrimination and inequalities in athletics. . . . [C]ourts . . . have found that protecting the participation rights of girls as a previously discriminated against ‘class’ outweigh the rights of an ‘individual’ boy to play on a girls’ team.” See http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/Content/Articles/Issues/Title-IX/C/Coed-Participation–Girls-Playing-on-Boys-Teams-and-Male-Versus-Female-Competition-The-Foundation-Po.aspx
@Archivist: There have been some cases of guys playing on girls teams. I recall seeing an article about guys playing field hockey in the northeast pop up on reddit a few weeks ago. The article was mostly about the opposition to the guys playing.
That said, guys have been greatly hurt. Cross country, wrestling, and swimming teams have been cut across the country and still continue to be cut in order to satisfy the Title IX reqs.
"There have been some cases of guys playing on girls teams." And we've written aboout them here.
Congratulations! This is the best thing, Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information.
Apprehended Violence Orders
Post a Comment