Thursday, March 17, 2011

The Annual Male Shame-Fest: Take Back the Night

“We are here to publicly say that we’re against the abuse of women, we won’t take it anymore, and we are taking back the night,” said Shira Brown, professor of gender women’s studies, at California State University's 8th Annual Take Back the Night March last Thursday.

Stop there for a moment so we don't overlook the obvious. Professor Brown says she is against the abuse of women.  Period. Words matter, and in the law, there is a canon of statutory and contract law construction known as expressio unius est exclusio alterius, which means the expression of one thing implies the exclusion of another. Professor Brown purposefully omitted "men" even though it is our sons, far more than our daughters, who need to "take back the night," since "[m]en are 150 percent more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than women are. . . . . Men are more likely to be victimized by a stranger (63 percent of violent victimizations) . . . ."  J. Friedman, J. Valenti, Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape at 23 (2008).

Let's get one thing straight. Rape survivors, indeed survivors of any traumatic event, are to be encouraged to overcome their ordeals in any manner appropriate.  But a male bashing circle-jerk that can't possibly prevent a single sexual assault, and that won't bring real healing to a single survivor, is not an appropriate way to seek healing, attain empowerment, or raise awareness about rape or anything else. As politically incorrect and as insensitive as it might sound, Take Back the Night is just another in a cavalcade of gender-divisive passion plays -- an otherwise useless publicity stunt like this one -- concocted to justify the existence of the paid sexual grievance industry and to "prove" that rape is rampant even though it isn't. 

Oh, but what a night it was!  There was a festival atmosphere in the air, replete with approximately 100 shirts hung on a clothesline surrounding the Plaza del Sol with phrases like “Men must change” painted on them. 

I don't know about you, but I can't think of anything that would make 43.5% of the school's student population feel more welcome than an officially sanctioned event that shames them about their gender.  A representative of the university counseling service declared that the event "adds to the mental health of our community."  That's a new one on me: mental health therapy that involves maligning an entire class of citizens. 

The school's provost and vice president for academic affairs was there to lend the school's imprimatur to the entire sordid affair, telling the crowd that Take Back the Night was about a "worthy cause."  What "worthy cause" is that? Misandry, no doubt.

Although the event was principally intended to moisten the vaginas of the man-hating crowd, some earnest young men weren't about to be excluded. Two males painted slogans on signs, “Beat off, not women,” and “I don’t hit.” You see, those two men, and the other males who marched with the women, aren't like all those "other" men -- the bad men -- including, I am sure, most of the readers of this blog (because, you know, we must be rapists, or at least rape apologists, since we dare to speak for people who've been falsely accused of rape).

Students representing that landmark of the theater The Vagina Monologues also spoke at the rally. (My guess is that this play is now performed more frequently than Hamlet. Fitting for this age.)

One of the highlights of the night was when Professor Randy Picarelli discussed the daily routines women must endure that men do not, such as getting errands done before it is dark outside, staying indoors at night and never looking down as she speed walks to her car.

Now, read that last paragraph again.  In light of the fact that innocent men, far more than women, are at risk of serious bodily injury at the hands of criminals, what Professor Picarelli describes is a gender in the grip of serious mass hysteria.

In fact, there is a legal term for Professor Picarelli's description: bullshit. A comment under the story brilliantly exposed the inanity behind the good professor's assertion, and we will end by quoting it: 

"Wow. I've known women all my life, many in fact. Not one of them has ever mentioned how unsafe they feel at night or how scared they are while walking from Point A to Point B. None of them cower at home because of fear of attack. None has ever been attacked or raped by a stranger. Only one I know was 'date-raped' in high school. On the other hand, I know some men who were robbed on the street at gunpoint. The activists love to blow things out of proportion in order to get funding or because they think it will help their causes. 

"Don't misunderstand me: Sexual assault is a problem, but people should know the truth. Here's a piece called 'The Campus Rape Myth' that gives another rarely-heard perspective: http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html"

Link: http://sundial.csun.edu/2011/03/csun-community-comes-together-to-take-back-the-night/

43 comments:

Anonymous said...

Exhibit "A" of how you piss of the feminists. Every word of this is true, and every word is gold. I laughed when I read this, and went back and reread it, its so good. Without disrespecting Paul or anyone else, you guys are the leaders of this movement.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if the comment was written by an MRA since he cites heather Macdonald's article.

Anonymous said...

I watched the video with the story and cringed when I saw all the earnest young men.

Archivist said...

Anon at 9:12: no, no, no. We deal with one subject, which includes even some women victims, so I don't even know if we are MRAs! But thanks much for your sentiments.

Anonymous said...

Instead of calling it Take Back the Night, they might as well call it Fight Back Against the Boogeyman.

Because these nutty professors are imagining things! There is no epidemic of crimes against women occurring against women, save in their puerile imaginations. The real crimes are being committed against men, in the darkness of our courts, universities and other corrupt institutions.

"Men must change?" Wrong. WOMEN MUST CHANGE. Starting with embracing reality!

Anonymous said...

That should read, 'There is no epidemic of crimes against women occurring at night, save in their puerile imaginations.' Sorry.

Axel said...

Thing of all the money these events waste. They could write every "survivor" a check to get real counseling instead of marching around declaring what victims they are.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if these women get out of the way for ambulances.

Nah, probably not.

Opus said...

When you read nonsense like this you cannot but think that educating females nevermind granting them academic posts is a very bad idea. This has witchcraft hysteria written all over it.

witman said...

End chivalry, Take Back the Knight!

Anonymous said...

The greatest paragrpah in the history of the men's movement --

Let's get one thing straight. Rape survivors, indeed survivors of any traumatic event, are to be encouraged to overcome their ordeals in any manner appropriate. But a male bashing circle-jerk that couldn't possibly prevent a single sexual assault, and that doesn't bring real healing to a single survivor, is not an appropriate way to seek recovery, empowerment, or to raise awareness about rape. As politically incorrect and as insensitive as it might sound, Take Back the Night is just one more gender-divisive, and otherwise useless, publicity stunt to justify the existence of the paid sexual grievance industry -- like this one -- and to "prove" that rape is rampant even though it isn't.

Anonymous said...

Incidentally, I think that the feminists are highly disingenuous when they talk about "taking back the night" -- in other words, ending violence.

After all, if violent crime were to vanish from America tomorrow, what would they have left to talk about? They would no longer be able to exploit the myth of male violence and power for political gain.

That said, we should be even more opposed to violence than the feminists claim to be? But realistically, how could you REALLY "take back the night"?

Well, since there is a very strong connection between fatherless households and crime, the first step would be to encourage the return to traditional/patriarchal family structures, especially in impoverished neighborhoods. But the feminists don't want to talk about that! They would rather continue to failed social policies that cause crime.

A second step would be to return men in general and fathers and husbands in particular to the respected status formerly enjoyed, since criminals are often people with impoverished egos who are unable to find their place in society.

A third step would be to apply the law equally to women, as an unfair system undermines respect for the law.

Archivist said...

Anon at 11:09: your point about fatherless homes is important. Every serious study every conducted shows how important the father is GENERALLY to children. President Obama agrees with that. Yet, it's too politically dangerous to actually DO anything about it.

P.S. I am not suggesting that a loving lesbian couple couldn't raise a child. I am talking in general.

Anonymous said...

Hate Crime 101

Why is no one indicting the Universities for this obvious hatred against men...?

Are not hate crimes illegal in Western countries...?

Time to indict.

Dehbashi said...

Exactly what you said about the professor, bullshit.

"One of the highlights of the night was when Professor Randy Picarelli discussed the daily routines women must endure that men do not, such as getting errands done before it is dark outside, staying indoors at night and never looking down as she speed walks to her car. "

Like you all said, men are in more danger at night. Also, I do errands at night all the time. Especially for my parents, even though I do not live with them.

And no is supposed to be looking down when walking. They could smack into something while walking. Common sense.

Keep up the good work on this site, guys. People need to read about this more and more.

Anonymous said...

Pretty bitter article, but i love it!!

atlas said...

Boycott Chivalry, give them back their Knight!

Decades ago, in college, I watched the kick-off event for Take Back the Night. The speakers were nuts. No male would consider wanting to have sex with those women who looked like walruses with crew cuts.

Sequel said...

Perhaps it's time to look at the topic of Statutory Rape. As Whoppi Goldberg pointed out, "it's not"'rape' rape." When do we begin advocating that Statutory Rape is in fact, false rape?

http://tinyurl.com/4da2mg9
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape

Sonja Newcombe said...

Had I been there with a butane cigarette lighter, those shirts wouldn't have lived more than 5 minutes.

Men don't need to change at all.

Archivist said...

Sequel, I'm not interested in doing that here.

Sonja, I agree: men, as a class, don't need to change at all.

As a society, we would benefit if certain individuals changed.

Sequel said...

Archivist: It's a reality, and somewhere, somehow it's going to have to be addressed. Why not here & now?

Archivist said...

Sequel, it's not an issue I believe in. I can understand arguments about lowering certain ages of consent, etc., but I am a firm believer that children who can't drive, much less enter into a contract that isn't voidable, shouldn't be having sex with adults. And I mean no disrespect to someone who has other beliefs, but it's beyond the scope of what we do here, and I am not comfortable with that topic in any sense.

witman said...

Archivist:

"I can understand arguments about lowering certain ages of consent, etc., but I am a firm believer that children who can't drive, much less enter into a contract that isn't voidable, shouldn't be having sex with adults"

Whatever your belief system, the laws are on the books so far as age of consent is concerned. In Canada a 16 year old can consent to sex with anyone else over 14. This just got raised to 16 a few years ago when it was 14. People were uncomfortable with that and it was raised.

On a personal note, I could never respect a 25 year or older person sleeping with a 16 year old, but it would be legal and not rape.

Archivist said...

"Whatever your belief system, the laws are on the books so far as age of consent is concerned."

That's how I feel.

Many states have become enlightened with respect to teens two or three years apart having sex -- it's no longer statutory rape. But we need to respect the legislative process; if we don't like it, we can work to change it.

Sequel said...

But we need to respect the legislative process; if we don't like it, we can work to change it.

I thought that was what this was all about. Discussion of the way Society has brought things into the real of crime that are subjective, and calling for legislative change.

Fyi the age of consent is 13 in Spain & Korea, 14 in Brazil. You used to be able to drive at 14 in Idaho.

Plus I think human-stupidity.com makes a very intelligent case for it.

Anonymous said...

Guys, did you see this comment about your post over at RedditMensRights:

From "bennett_marco"

"intended to moisten the vaginas of the man-hating crowd

lol.

Seriously though, I'm always impressed by the poignancy and eloquence of this blog."

I thought that was very nice, and I agree completely.

Anonymous said...

"I AM NOT A RAPER."

No, you're probably a rapIST, you little piece of shit.

Sequel said...

Not sure what that last comment is supposed to convey, but looking around other blogs that deal with the MRM that are not as overly sensitive about age-disparate relationships, it's a topic that won't go away. With the advent of the internet, text, etc. the likelihood for such liaisons increases greatly, and the ability to prevent gets more negligible. Perhaps the best way to insure safety is legalization, so our young adults will be more up front with what is going on in their lives? Often times no one finds out until the younger one has trouble in the relationship and tells a relative seeking help. By being out front, accountability can be better assured every step of the way. I know a girl who married at 16 to a guy in his 20's and the family knew about them getting together and the father consented. Much better assurance of her safety this way.

And of course, add to all of this every other reason that's been mentioned about the Female-centric ways rape laws have been formed, and it's a no-brainer that things need to change.

Archivist said...

Off topic.

This is so great:
http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2011/03/why-no-call-for-gender-quotas-to-fight-the-radiation-at-fukushima-.html

Archivist said...

Sequel, the comment obviously refers to the picture atop this post where the young man has a sign that says "I am not a raper."

Anonymous said...

The American Gender-Raunch community "Empower" themselves by attacking "Non-gender-raunch". Its basically that simple.

Anonymous said...

How or why did "Rape rallies" slowly over the years turn into "Raunch festivals".
Can anyone tell me how are the two connected??

Sequel said...

OK I'm on the comments page I forgot that was there.

Anonymous said...

You want a way out of oppressive statutory laws? talk to this guy:
www.peternolan.com

He posts on the spearhead now and then too.

Anonymous said...

You want a way out off oppressive statutory laws? Talk to this guy:
www.peternolan.com
He posts on the spearhead too

Arod99k said...

“Promiscuity” is a word that you will never see in the pages of a campus rape center publication; it is equally repugnant to the sexual liberationist strand of feminism and to the Catherine Mac-Kinnonite “all-sex-is-rape” strand.

Alcuin said...

In Canada, the Annual Shame Fest for Men is Marc Lepine Day, when a crazy man gunned down a bunch of feminists at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal. Like a gang rape captured on camera, it has been a dream come true for the feminazis aiming to further encage the Great Canadian Mangina, as if he wasn't already tethered enough.

Anonymous said...

I too was offended by the "I am not a raper" sign.

Yet another glaring symbol of the "dumbing down" of our society and diminishing education of males in particular.

Archivist said...

Alcuin, we really need to do something on that. I don't know I've never posted on that craziness.

Anonymous said...

99.999% of men could truthfully hold up a sign saying, "I'm not a raper."

Everybody on this blog could do the same. That idiot is buying into the lie that "all men are rapists" and that there is something unusual about a man not being a rapist.

Anonymous said...

"99.999% of men could truthfully hold up a sign saying, "I'm not a raper.""

While I know what you mean, I would hope most men would write better English.

When I first saw it, I thought, it read "I am not a rapper", but you are still a white guy in a basketball jersey?

I wonder if it said "Bryant 24" on the back.

Anonymous said...

Kobe isn't a "raper," either.

Lugh said...

You can not compare rape, which is a common problem, to being held up at gun point. Being robbed sounds scary, being raped is a whole other level. You directly said that violent crimes happen more to men, we are not talking about violent crimes, we are talking about rape. It happens, a lot. And if you really think you only know one woman who was raped, you either know very few women, or you are very very ignorant.

Get your facts straight, this is embarrassing and absolute nonsense.

Yes, a lot of the feminist movement has its flaws, and a lot of ladies need to learn what men deal with knowing that every women HAS to be concerned about being alone with a guy. You have gone too far though, and seriously need to educate yourself on the realities of rape in the world today.