A female student at Dartmouth claimed that a college-aged male, about 6 feet tall, with an average build and no facial hair (and how many Dartmouth male students does that described?), entered her residence hall room at 10:25 p.m. last Sunday and tried to sexually assault her. The man allegedly pushed her down and pulled off her pants, but she kicked and yelled at him, and he then fled. The woman described him as wearing a dark winter coat, dark baseball cap and winter boots. Police said the student didn't recognize the man.
The reported attack resulted in a campus-wide crime alert being sent by Harry Kinne, director of Safety and Security. A campuswide e-mail urged students to lock their dorm rooms. "I appreciated getting the e-mail," said sophomore Katie De Le Rosa. "Knowing that that stuff happens is important to me."
After the allegation, Dartmouth's student newspaper reported the alleged attack by making sure everyone knew it really happened: "Safety and Security and Hanover Police are working to identify an unknown male suspect who entered a residential hall and sexually assaulted a female student on Sunday evening, Director of Safety and Security and College Proctor Harry Kinne told The Dartmouth. . . . . The suspect pushed the woman down and removed her pants, but fled after the victim kicked and yelled, Kinne wrote in the e-mail." (Note that the man didn't "allegedly" enter the room, he "entered" the room; he didn't "allegedly" assault the accuser, he "assaulted" her; he wasn't an "alleged" suspect -- you get the point. At Dartmouth, words apparently don't matter.)
Director of Safety and Security and College Proctor Harry Kinne made problematic statements suggesting that an assault, in fact, occurred, even though the police investigation was ongoing: “We want people to know when something like this happens so that they’re aware and can take precautions,” Kinne said. “Any time there’s an incident like this — any place on the campus — we have the same level of concern."
What was "something like this," Mr. Kinne? You did not mean an allegation under investigation -- you easily could have said that but didn't. You meant an attempted sexual assault. Even though you had no idea if an attempted rape had actually occurred. Why would you not simply issue an email alert advising that a student had made the allegation, noting that it was being investigated by police?
If you were a college-age male at Dartmouth who is approximately six feet tall and has an average build and no facial hair -- and, again, that must describe hundreds of young men -- you can be assured that at least some women, and some men who don't fit your description, were looking at you with suspicion this week. I suspect a few guys started to grow beards or mustaches this week.
It turns out -- surprise! -- according to the Union Leader: "No one tried to rape a Dartmouth College student in her dormitory room, a [Hanover] police investigation concluded." And: "Police said the sexual assault never happened." And: "Hanover police, with the assistance of the college's Safety and Security, conducted numerous interviews over several days and concluded the incident is unfounded and there is no risk to the Dartmouth community or threat to public safety."
It didn't happen. There is no risk to Dartmouth. So will the accuser be charged with a crime? Police Chief Nicholas Giaccone said, "Not at this time." Why not? And why is that not more of a concern?
Suppose one or more of those college-age males at Dartmouth who are approximately six feet tall and have an average build and no facial hair had been arrested and identified by the rape accuser. Their lives would have been effectively destroyed, even if none of them were convicted. Doesn't happen? Spend a few weeks reading through this blog to open your eyes.
Nor would the police release the name of the individual who filed the report but they confirmed it was a Dartmouth College student. You can be certain that if one of those young men who matched the description had been arrested, his name would have been splashed all over the news for the world to titillate to his humiliation -- and good luck if he tried to get a good job after that since any prospective employer would be able to Google his name and learn of the horrid allegation. That, too, is perfectly OK, right?
So students can rest easy, right? Wrong. One news report said: "Police said that although this case was unfounded, students still should take precautions such as locking their dorm room doors, partnering with a trusted friend when going out in the evening, avoid drinking too much and not letting strangers into their dormitories."
Instead of using this false report to raise awareness about a crime that didn't occur, shouldn't this incident be used to urge students -- more specifically, male students -- to take precautions to insure their lives are not destroyed by a false rape claim?
And regardless of what police told the local paper, The Union Leader, that the alleged attack never occurred, some students used the hoax as an occasion to politic: “Although I’m ignorant to the facts of this particular situation, the word ‘unfounded’ suggests to me that reporting an incident is unsafe and possibly humiliating, and that in order to prove a case I have to be 100 percent certain,” said a co-chair of the Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault.
In fact, the term "unfounded" is not a term of art. Different jurisdictions "use different definitions of, or criteria for, 'unfounded.'" B. Gross, False Rape Allegations: An Assault On Justice, Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, Dec. 22, 2008.
Will this "rape" that never happened be added to Dartmouth's tally of sexual assaults for 2011? I will not be surprised if it is.
So, again, we have yet another college rape claim, and yet another rape lie. College campuses are among the safest places in America. As Heather MacDonald said in "Campus Rape Myth": "It’s a lonely job, working the phones at a college rape crisis center. Day after day, you wait for the casualties to show up from the alleged campus rape epidemic—but no one calls. Could this mean that the crisis is overblown?"
No, somehow, it means that college campuses are cisterns of male predatory activity. The fact that there is precisely no evidence for that aside from the stardust wishfulness of the sexual grievance industry is beside the point.
Sources: http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Dartmouth+College+sexual+assault+fictitious&articleId=29b69e37-275d-4685-a093-5a569a6e526b; http://www.wmur.com/news/26528021/detail.html; http://www.wmur.com/r/26558790/detail.html; http://thedartmouth.com/2011/01/20/news/investigation; http://thedartmouth.com/2011/01/18/news/assault; http://thedartmouth.com/2011/01/21/news/assault
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
40 comments:
"Surprise"? I'm NOT surprised.
The culture of false rape accusations centers mostly around college age folks (and younger). I believe most of the growth in readership at false rape society will be that demographic (along with the few who have concerns about what is really happening in our universities.)
Some universities are more gender-raunch dominant than others, and i do believe Dartmouth could be classified as "Staunch-Raunch"!!
Gender-raunch gain "empowerment" by attacking sports teams, and heterosexual males. This would seem silly to those that have not witnessed gender-raunch attacks over, and over, and over.
S, my hope is that you are right. My hope is that a lot of college age men, and women who care about them, are reading this blog. I hope that they stumbled across it, gave it a fair chance, and realized -- no, we're not making this up. This is really happening, and it's happening to guys like you or your loved one. Our readership has skyrocketed over the past year, and I would love to see a demographic breakdown.
“Although I’m ignorant to the facts of this particular situation, the word ‘unfounded’ suggests to me that reporting an incident is unsafe and possibly humiliating, and that in order to prove a case I have to be 100 percent certain,” said a co-chair of the Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault.
So yeah. This person laments that they have to report an actual crime, not a made-up imagined one. THE HORROR!
As a woman who was nearly sexually assaulted in a very similar manner in college (a man came into my dorm room while I slept - my roommate had apparently left the door unlocked when leaving after I'd gone to bed. I fought as he covered my mouth to smother my screaming, and he ran out), I have to say, your point of view is incredibly biased. I filed a report, but since the attack happened at 3am and many of my neighbors were gone for the weekend (Fall Break), no "witnesses" could be found. My report went no further because nothing could be proven. It does NOT mean that I imagined it or that I made it up. It simply means there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute. Women who have been attacked already feel guilt, shame, and fear when an attack happens that often prevents them from reporting. Fear of retribution and accusation of "false claims" is just another reason these attackers often go free.
First of all, the sexual assault never happened. It didn't say that they didn't have enough evidence to persecute or investigate.
That's quite a difference.
Secondly, what do you propose we do? The current system of imprisoning any man accused works fine right?
Imagine your boyfriend, father, brother, son, etc... being thrown in jail innocently? How would that feel?
Same as a wife, mother, sister, daughter being raped?
I am fairly sure it is so. Maybe not for you.
To Kara:
As a police officer, I can tell you that the difference between your case and the one at Dartmouth college is that in your case there was not enough evidence to identify an attacker, and in the Dartmouth case it did not happen. That is what unfounded means. The police determined this while interviewing the supposed victim. In my experience, their story is often highly inconsistent, resulting in the accuser eventually admitting that she was not attacked.
Please do not create a false dichotomy between rape and false rape accusations, as is all cases had to be or the other. Both crimes are horrible.
Kara, there are many valuable web support sites for women who were nearly sexually assaulted, and your time would be better spent there than in lecturing us about a subject on which, I would wager a hefty sum, we are infinitely more knowledgeable than you. This is a site dedicated to giving voice to victims of false rape claims, and your comments do not advance that mission.
Instead of deleting your comment, I will use it as a teaching moment. I merely cited what the Hanover police told the local newspaper: no attempted rape occurred. But, by all means, blame the messenger for reporting the good news that no attempted rape occurred (would you have preferred that an attempted rape actually occurred here?).
Standard procedure would not allow police to end their investigation this quickly and declare that it never happened if there wasn't affirmative evidence showing that it never happened. By why let that get in the way of a good victim fetish, right?
So, yes, Kara, we are biased because we have the temerity to repeat what the police told a newspaper. Probably makes us "women haters," too, right? (For the record, since you are new here, we are both happily married to wonderful women, and we loathe and detest rape.)
You also asserted that one reason women aren't reporting is due to fears of accusation of "false claims." The President and Founder of the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN) recently said that women aren't failing to report due to fears of not being believed. So, is RAINN "incredibly biased," too?
And if women are so fearful of reporting due to "false claims," how do we account for the incredible number of women who DO make false claims, and about whom we report every day? Why weren't THEY fearful of a a false claim being lodged against them?
Let me connect the dots for you: since women aren't reporting due to fears of false claims (which, as noted above, is not true), we should not bring false rape claim charges against women who lie about rape, right? I mean, we should fight one form of criminality (rape) by ignoring other criminality (false reporting), right? Do you realize what a misandrist that makes you? And is that OK with you?
Here endeth the lesson. Go lecture elsewhere, please.
Zarko and Anon at 9:38: thanks for the wonderful contributions. Unfortunately, people like Kara are on a mission, facts be damned. Unfortunately, their mission hurts a lot of presumptively innocent men and boys.
Kara: "Fear of retribution and accusation of "false claims" is just another reason these attackers often go free."
No, Kara. Lack of evidence is the reason your attacker went free. That's it, that's all.
My daughter's rapist went free for the same reason - lack of evidence.
And sometimes you just have to accept that - unless YOU wish to be found guilty of an accusation without evidence.
I know - as a woman, you just NEVER hear of a woman being freed after 12,15,20 years in prison for a crime she didn't commit thanks to DNA. You don't think about all those innocent men in prison where DNA is not available - or it was tossed.
So as a woman, "lack of evidence" may not seem such a big deal.
As a woman I don't agree with everything said here. I've had a few close calls with rape myself to agree that it is "rare". I don't think rape, or attempts at rape are rare at all.
I also don't think false rape accusations are rare, either. I believe that are pretty well equal.
A rapist and a false rape accuser are part and parcel of the same animal. One's usually male, one's usually female - they BOTH are equal in evilness.
One day, Kara, you may find yourself sitting in a court of law looking at other women just like yourself, with your beliefs and your outrage.
Only the accused is someone you KNOW is innocent. Your son. Your husband. Your boyfriend. Your brother.
You'll watch helplessly as she plays up her victim status, surrounded by advocates and supporters. The law will be on her side. Public support will be on her side. YOU will be chastised and deemed "in denial" for not being on her side, a traitor to the sisterhood.
You'll be helpless to stop it. You were a part of creating the monster.
You'll soon learn being falsely accused of this crime is far worse than the crime itself.
Thank you for stopping by, and thank you for allowing me to respond to your comments.
I hope you always find my experience never happens to you, or someone you love.
If Kara had read this blog in the past she'd know that Pierce does not advocate false rape charges on "he said/she said" claims. There has to be real evidence that she lied.
"Anonymous said...
The culture of false rape accusations centers mostly around college age folks (and younger).
"
I don't think that's true, at all.
False rape accusations are pervasive in High schools, colleges, and family court.
BIG TIME in family court.
Anon at 10:03: Yep -- we can't forget Family Law court.
The people who dominate the public discourse about rape insist that colleges are cisterns of male predatory sexual activity, but there's precisely zero evidence for that.
"“Although I’m ignorant to the facts of this particular situation, the word ‘unfounded’ suggests to me that reporting an incident is unsafe and possibly humiliating, and that in order to prove a case I have to be 100 percent certain,” said a co-chair of the Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault."
That makes so little sense I have no idea what she is trying to say.
Anonymous - "That makes so little sense I have no idea what she is trying to say."
Sounds as if she pissed that the incident was labeled as "unfounded" as opposed to just being quietly dropped, with no comment made to the press.
In years gone by (actually, up until recently), if there had been no evidence to support that a rape or attempted rape had occurred, a police spokesperson would have comments in a fashion such as:
"We are continuing to investigate, but we have no leads at this time"
It was their way of "shelving" a case that they were fairly certain wasn't real, but without the risk of being hounded by Woman's Advocates (from the SGI) as to their lack of concern and compassion regarding crimes against women. It was a part of the Politically Correct "Dance" that most all government agencies have been engaged in.
It's only been more recently that police agency have become embolden to come right out and announce that they don't believe a woman's story.
They've come to realize that NOW isn't going to me marching out front of the police station if they decline to "investigate further" into case where they are certain that no crime occurred. They aren't even even rounding up the usual suspects and making making well publicized "PR arrests" as often anymore.
Now, as we see in this case, the blow-back they get consists only of the co-chair of the Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault issuing a tersely worded statement about the police labeling the case "unfounded".
Hopefully, such a lack of response will embolden police even more.
Reading through the comments n the linked article, it appears that public sentiment is coming round. I am always heartened when the ideas that have been long-espoused on this forum are repeated by those who take the time to comment on news stories.
I doubt every one of those comments even knows of this sites existence, so it seems as thought the message is also being effectively spread by word-of-mouth.
I've personally had a number of occasions in which someone else brought up the subject of a case that turned out to have been falsified (not always of rape) in which I've been able to interject the facts and ideology I've gleaned here. In every case, while there has been some initial resistance to accepting what I proffer, I've been able to get people to come around to accepting the reality of the pervasiveness of and great harms from FRA's.
People will listen, because, I believe, most of them already know the truth, but they've been fighting themselves to avoid accepting what they know.
Kara,
This is a site about women who make up rape claims for various reasons. It is not about actual rape. False rape accusers hurt everyone including you.
Some women out there actually lie about about being raped. The high rape numbers on campuses exclaimed by special interest groups are not true.
It is interesting - how women develop a persecution complex over these things.
If you disbelieve one woman's story - it must therefore mean that you disbelieve ALL WOMEN'S stories.
If you disbelieve one woman's story - you are somehow persecuting her for a crime?
And of course what do the larger portion of women have in common?
They do not give a wart on a frog's ass about any men who are falsely imprisoned for crimes they did not commit.
Very interesting.
And very sickening.
American law enforcement has let the culture of false rape accusations get so deep, that there are so many false rape accusations now that it is in fact hurting the very few that are telling the truth.
American law enforcement has to return integrity to the rape accusation by charging the false ones. That is the only way to return integrity to the rape accusation.
I have handed out many pieces of paper around colleges that have the "false rape societies" web address on it. Im quite sure a few have checked out this site because of my reaching out to them.
This site helped save my life, and im sure it will others who have also been falsely accused of rape.
Off-topic
Via The Elusive Wapiti (who's added him to his blog roll), the thoughts of a relatively new blogger, Alcuin on:
Post-modern Rape
Slwerner,
Thanks for that link, but there are several things I disagree with him on, in that post.
The biggest is, simply because she had sex with him the night before, doesn't mean that he gets a second round, if she's asleep (It should be noted, that at this point, that is simply a she said situation). But having sex with someone when they are asleep, means there is no consent. Doesn't matter if they previously had sex, or were in the same bed together.
"Unfounded" is inappropriately non-judgmental. They should have called the girl a liar, which is what she is.
But apparently you aren't even supposed to use "unfounded!" What should you say, then? That the rape accusation was "minimally factual?"
These feminists seem hellbent on destroying any credibility that the rape claimant currently enjoys in this country, although for some bizarre reason they keep getting away with it. It's just creepy.
ESB - "But having sex with someone when they are asleep, means there is no consent."
This is true. What I found more intriguing about his essay was the idea that feminists are more likely to try to "use" for political ends rather than actually being concerned for the effects on the victims:
"These two cases and the ensuing polemics show that women, and society in general, are not so interested in rape per se, but in the relevant politics."
"This deliberate, manipulative confusion, designed to avoid truth-telling, parallels issues around breast cancer. If someone's loved one dies of this terrible disease, feminists are apt to use that death, and the survivors' emotional pain, as a way to get more money for breast cancer research"
"but who cares about the fallout emotionally and otherwise. Who cares about the actual people involved? It's the political upshot that tends to excite liberals in general"
Agreed. Of course, I think anyone with 2 braincells has know that for quite a while.
Once the funding from government agencies started rolling in, it became about continuation of the cash cow, not truth.
Anonymous - "These feminists seem hellbent on destroying any credibility that the rape claimant currently enjoys in this country"
I think that the gender-feminists and SGI are having a bit of a difficult time adapting to the growing disbelief of the claims of women, and are still struggling to come up with a new approach.
Amanda Hess took a stab at blaming FRA's on men who would otherwise view the accuser as a slut (even though the majority of "slut shaming has always come from other women). Of course, the problem with her "trial balloon" was that it admitted that women make FRA's. Most feminists seem to prefer to continue to try to hammer home the notion that woman don't lie about rape (we still continually see the 2% canard trotted out), as they wish to have women viewed as morally superior to men.
It's more a matter of their stubbornness that they cannot accept (in their little minds) that the big lie is crumbling, and people are becoming increasingly aware of the FRA problem, and just how prevalent it is.
My guess is that we will be seeing a "doubling-down" of the "if you don't believe a woman, your a misogynist" sort of shaming language which they effective employed over the past several decades to bully men into unquestioningly accepting the big lie. [Kara’s “you gotta believe her, because the same thing happened to me” being just a more subtle version]
The problem with that old approach is that it worked better when the free-flow of information and shared opinion via the Internet was available, and they could control the dialog by controlling the main stream media.
Forums such as the FRS, the Spearhead, and other related sites are vital in disseminating the inconvenient (from the SGI perspective) so that the collective thoughts (well, wisdom, really) can be more readily introduced into the conversations between ordinary people.
As I noted earlier, the fact that people commenting on the original article, as with some many other stories of FRA’s be discovered, are using the “language” introduced here tells me that the word is spreading, even if not always directly from this site.
"it worked better when the free-flow of information and shared opinion via the Internet was available"
Oops!
"It worked better before..."
I gotta start proof reading...
It is very, very difficult for the bad guys to explain why this liar isn't being prosecuted -- unless they have something to hide.
This is the worst crime that a woman can commit against men; a hate crime far worse than merely using a racial slur, for example.
Anonymous - ” It is very, very difficult for the bad guys to explain why this liar isn't being prosecuted -- unless they have something to hide.”, referring to:
”Police Chief Nicholas Giaccone, asked if anyone is going to be charged with filing a false police report, said, "Not at this time." He would not release the name of the individual who filed the report but said it was a Dartmouth College student.”
There are usually two separate issues at work when women are not charged.
First, when older men (police captains and chiefs) are the ones calling the shots, we tend to see an inordinate amount of chivalrous “white knighting” on behalf of the woman. This would also suggest why Chief Giaccone wouldn’t name her. He’s
“protecting” what he believes to be a troubled young woman crying out for help from any further consequences. Of course, it’s not just old men, as we saw with DA Kathleen Rice in the Hofstra incident calling (previously sexually empowered, sexually libertine, and, like Karen Owens, the very epitome of raunch-feminism) Danmell Ndonye a “deeply troubled young woman”.
This practice of protecting the accuser needs to be challenged each and every time.
The second issue which tends to affect charging decisions is that there is typically nothing more serious than a misdemeanor which can be charged under existing laws. This means that the time involved and cost of prosecuting a (typically) first-time offender, where sentencing guidelines will likely preclude any jail time, will more-times-than-not be the determining factor in choosing not to pursue charges.
This is why it is so vital that laws be enacted that will allow charging FRA’s at the level of felonies (like the “Perverting the Course of Justice” statute in the UK), so that even first time offenders can be given jail time and a permanent felony record.
"The biggest is, simply because she had sex with him the night before, doesn't mean that he gets a second round, if she's asleep (It should be noted, that at this point, that is simply a she said situation). But having sex with someone when they are asleep, means there is no consent. Doesn't matter if they previously had sex, or were in the same bed together."
While I agree in principle, as far as I know her claim wasn't that she was asleep, but that she was "half asleep", which is the same as saying half-awake, or not asleep. Then they continued to go out to breakfast and do things together...
But lets say, hypothetically, he was asleep and awoke to find her performing oral sex on him. That would have the same lack of consent as her being asleep. How many people would call that rape? If a man went to the police weeks later making such a claim, what do you think would happen?
"That would have the same lack of consent as her being asleep. How many people would call that rape?"
This morning I was awakened by my girlfriend's hands all over my junk. She claimed she'd been playing with me for ten minutes but I only woke up when she yanked my balls. Can I file a police report that she sexually assaulted me?
"“Although I’m ignorant to the facts of this particular situation, the word ‘unfounded’ suggests to me that reporting an incident is unsafe and possibly humiliating, and that in order to prove a case I have to be 100 percent certain,” said a co-chair of the Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault."
Funny. Even here, nobody here gets it.
The word "unfounded" is the problem. "The Unfounded Rape Society". How does that sound?
"Hanover police, with the assistance of the college's Safety and Security, conducted numerous interviews over several days and concluded the incident is unfounded and there is no risk to the Dartmouth community or threat to public safety."
Human-Stupidity.com is the lone voice trying to call attention to purposeful abuse of language. Consensual fondling of a minor is called "rape", "child" means 17 years old, so a "child rapist" had sex with his 17 year old girl friend. And now, a "criminally false lie", a "report of an invented crime", is an "unfounded incident".
Why don't they say "The rape accusation was false, invented by a lying student"? There is a reason for such language.
All this language distortion, this "rape of language" serves a political purpose. It is not a coincidence.
Definition of “Rape”: When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape” & the Perversion of Language
“Watching child porn victimizes the child”. The Voodoo science of child pornography laws and women’s studies. | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
Victim dupes man into raping her. How can you rape without knowing you are raping?
Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance
Finally, I would like to remember one rape case which has not been <b>proven</a> to be false but smells very fishy: Unproven Rape charges: Famous German Weather Anchorman Joerg Kachelmann released after 4 months instant jail This case is still on-going in court and unknown in the English speaking worlds
Actually, "unfounded" has a criminal meaning.
The bomb scare was unfounded. The package had been left at the station by mistake.
No lies. Just a mistake. An over-reaction.
The word "unfounded" is inappropriate in the "unfounded rape scare" case.
The rape scare is unfounded because the accuser lied.
It sounds nit-picking. But language mis-use is very important. Just most people don't notice the importance.
Q" It sounds nit-picking. But language mis-use is very important. Just most people don't notice the importance."
Like calling an accuser "The Victim"?
I say that the FCC needs to pull ABC's communications license, for ABC publishes faulty and inflammatory stories over, and over, and over, and over.
There has to be a certain percentage of truth being published by every American news outlet, and if they cross that threshold, they should no longer have access to the American public.
"Actually, 'unfounded' has a criminal meaning."
Read the article -- in practice, there is no one set meaning for that word.
I have been pointing out for YEARS that women have been getting more and more free with the 'rape' accusations.
Heck, I was accused of that by two children myself (years apart) and was extremely lucky that they had older brothers who were suspicious of their sisters behavior, spied on us, and said "Excuse me, but he did not touch my sister in any sexual way!"
We need to start being SKEPTICAL of rape accusations, because women are MORE than willing to make false rape accusations.
Subvert the dominant college campus paradigm...
Fight the feminist lies about rape...
Stop them from breeding a young generation of false rape accusers.
Feminists don't own rape.
Feminists lie when they say there is no such thing as false rape.
Support men who have been falsely accused of rape!
I was at D'mouth 30 yrs ago. I was accused of attempted murder by strangulating with a BOW TIE during a rape. The claimant said it happened TWO years earlier, but couldn't provide a date. Thirty minutes with the Hanover police [during which I offered to show them both of my CLIP ON bow ties] and they refused to follow up. They stated there was no case, and no that no reasonable person would wait two years to make that kind of complaint. D'mouth admin sent me packing anyway. Nothing has changed. She walked [no false rape charges] and got a degree and connections. People lie. Others get screwed. Sorry, I got to be anonymous. I worked hard for years to make people forget those rumours.
Post a Comment