Lawyer says city officials misrepresented confidentiality agreement in wrongful arrestBaltimore officials paid a $200,000 settlement to a distinguished violinist who had been wrongly arrested on child abuse charges and withheld his name, citing his desire for confidentiality, but the man's attorney says it was the city — not his client — who requested secrecy.
Yakov Y. Shapiro, a musician and teacher, filed suit against the city after he was jailed for 40 hours on child abuse allegations because of a police clerical error. Officers issued a warrant for the Germantown man although they had been seeking a Baltimore man named Yisroel Shapiro, who is three years younger and 9 inches taller.
On Wednesday, city officials disputed the attorney's claims and said they acted in an effort to protect Yakov Shapiro. The details of the settlement were first reported by The Daily Record after a months-long investigation.
"My information, and I have no reason to doubt it, was that [the confidentiality agreement] was in there at the insistence of the plaintiff or the plaintiff's lawyer," said City Solicitor George Nilson. "My understanding was that he was relieved that there was not further publicity around the lawsuit when it was published."
"If the only purpose is to protect the city from embarrassment, that's not in my judgment a sufficient reason" to not disclose the name," said Nilson. "That was not the purpose here."
But Steven D. Kupferberg, an attorney for Yakov Shapiro, said he was surprised to spot the confidentiality clause in the written agreement because city officials had not discussed it in the meeting in which they hammered out the settlement deal.
"I wrote back to [Assistant City Solicitor Neal M. Janey Jr.] and said that wasn't part of our discussion and we would rather not enter into that type of agreement," Kupferberg said. "He said we had to go with his wording or the case wouldn't settle."
In March, when the city's spending board — which includes Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Comptroller Joan M. Pratt and City Council President Bernard C. "Jack" Young — approved the settlement, a mayoral spokesman told The Baltimore Sun that the plaintiff "demanded confidentiality as part of the settlement agreement."
"We've attempted to provide as much transparency as possible within the confines" of the agreement, Ryan O'Doherty, a spokesman for Rawlings-Blake, said at the time.
O'Doherty did not answer questions Wednesday about whether city officials misrepresented or were misinformed about the details of the settlement, saying in a statement only that it was "undeniable" that the plaintiff's attorney had agreed to and signed the settlement.
"The entire Board of Estimates, including three independently elected officials, approved the agreement in the interest of protecting the claimant from further harm," he said. "The solicitor believes that protecting the claimant was an entirely appropriate objective and has no second thoughts."
Former U.S. Attorney for Maryland and former state Attorney General Stephen H. Sachs said he saw no justification for withholding information about such a large city expenditure.
"I don't care who asks for it. A settlement of that sort … the public has a right to know the facts of how $200,000 is being spent and to whom and why," Sachs said. "To me, that's self-evident. It's irrelevant whether the motive was to protect the victim at his request or whether the motive was to protect a policeman who blundered.
"Those things, to me, are and ought to be irrelevant," he said. "The public has a right to know how its money is being spent. End of story."
Pratt said she agreed to keep Shapiro's name private because Nilson informed her it was a confidential settlement. She said she did not ask Nilson who had requested secrecy.
"I believed him," Pratt said. "I hope this is an isolated incident."
She said she would demand more details if asked to approve confidential settlements in the future.
Attempts to reach Young for comment were unsuccessful Wednesday.
The city and Shapiro agreed that some details of the settlement could become public after a legal challenge by The Daily Record.According to court documents, Shapiro was arrested in November 2007 after Officer Keith Merryman, a member of the sex crimes division, searched in the state motor vehicle database for an accused sex offender named Yisroel Shapiro.
Two brothers had told police and prosecutors that Yisroel Shapiro had molested them more than a decade ago in his Baltimore home while preparing them for their bar mitzvahs, according to the documents.
In a deposition, Merryman said that Yakov Shapiro was the only person he found in the state when he searched for a "Y. Shapiro" in the database. Although Yakov Shapiro lives in Germantown, not Baltimore, a warrant was issued in his name.
The warrant listed Yisroel Shapiro's address, but also included details of Yakov Shapiro's physical description culled from his motor vehicle records. Police never went to Yisroel Shapiro's home; rather, officers knocked on Yakov Shapiro's door as he was heading out to baby-sit his granddaughter.
Through his attorney, Yakov Shapiro declined a request for an interview. But in an interview with a psychiatrist that was included in court papers, the physically slight man, then 60, described the "frightening" experience of being arrested and herded into a small cell with 25 other men, many of whom appeared to be on drugs or ill.
Yakov Shapiro's son defended his father at a bail review hearing and explained that he had still been living in the former Soviet Union, where he grew up, when the first molestation episode was alleged to have occurred. He explained that his father had never taught bar mitzvah lessons, did not speak Hebrew and had only visited Baltimore on a few occasions, according to court records.
After his son offered his home as collateral to post a $40,000 bond, Shapiro was freed. But his ordeal was far from over — administrators and parents at the Montgomery County Jewish community center where he taught had been informed of the charges against him, according to court records.
Although police quickly realized their mistake and arrested Yisroel Shapiro, it took months to clear the incorrect warrant from law enforcement databases, Kupferberg said. His client was afraid to leave the house during that time for fear that he would be rearrested, according to court papers.
In an interview with the psychiatrist, Yakov Shapiro said he was "anxious and edgy" after the arrest and developed symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
'He finds it incredibly ironic that all the time he lived in the Soviet Union he was never arrested, but here in the United States, a place he chose for its promise of safety and freedom from harassment, he was falsely arrested, detained and slandered," psychiatrist and expert witness Susan J. Fiester wrote in a court report.
Kupferberg said his client did not ask city officials to withhold his name because he did not want "people to think he had covered something up."
Kupferberg said that after The Sun reported in March that officials were not divulging the name at the plaintiff's request, he sent an e-mail message to Janey, the assistant city solicitor, asking him to correct the information.
Nilson, Janey's supervisor, said he had not seen such an e-mail and could not confirm that it had been received.
Kupferberg raised concerns that police could repeat the error. Anthony Guglielmi, a Baltimore police spokesman, said he could not reveal whether Merryman had been reprimanded because it was part of his personnel file and therefore protected from public scrutiny.
Shapiro's arrest was a "very unfortunate mistake and a training issue," he said.
"At the end of the day, our officers try really hard and arrest about 70,000 people a year," he said. That's not an excuse, but that's why we have to do our part when it comes to training and things like that."
Yisroel Shapiro, who is also identified in court records as Israel Shapira, pleaded guilty to one count of child abuse. He was sentenced to two days in jail on a five year suspended sentence and remains on probation.
Link:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-ci-shapiro-wrongful-arrest-20101222,0,1947426.story?page=2&utm_medium=feed&track=rss&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20baltimoresun%2Fsports%2Fboxing%2Frss2%20%28Boxing%29&utm_source=feedburner
Special thanks to continent at The Spearhead.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
"Shapiro was arrested in November 2007 after Officer Keith Merryman, a member of the sex crimes division, searched in the state motor vehicle database for an accused sex offender named Yisroel Shapiro."
In doing a search of a motor vehicle database, one thing that would be returned would be the license photograph of a person.
If a possible identification was made, but with different name, it would seem a very simple, and very prudent thing to do would be to show the license photo to the alleging victim to see if they could identify the person indicated via such a database search.
If this Merryman was either too stupid or too lazy to do such a simple verification before asking for an arrest warrant, then it's little wonder that the city of Baltimore had to "settle" for $200k.
This seems to be an example of the poor police work that has too often plagued the issue of rape/false-rape allegations. Taking shortcuts and failing to verify information or evidence can, and has, lead to some horrific outcomes for innocent men. Such disgraceful practiced need (desperately) to be weeded-out. A $200k cost seems like a good way to send that message to LE.
in the United States, a place he chose for its promise of safety and freedom from harassment, he was falsely arrested, detained and slandered,"
____________________________
Welcome to America.
Child sexual abuse/molest false accusations are Ground Zero in the war against the Constitution and males in this country.
You think "gender/ Raunch" on college campuses are the problem?
That's N-O-T-H-I-N-G compared to false child abuse accusations.
ANYthing goes when it comes to child accusations, and the FIRST thing to go are Constitutional rights and due process dating back to the Magna Carta.
This is the "trickle UP" theory, the well spring of "rape culture", with everyone so busy hating on "pervs" they are blind to their own rights and due process being blown to bits.
Officer Keith Merryman is not lazy or stupid. Quite the contrary - he was a man after easy prey.
No prey is easier to accuse, convict or isolate than a person targeted for a child accusation.
The Believe The Children witch hunt has enjoyed decades of unfettered growth. How could such success NOT find it's way into main stream "false rape accusation" culture?
Officer Keith Merryman is not lazy or stupid. Quite the contrary - he was a man after easy prey.
The warrant was defective and therefore the arrest was false. A citizen may use deadly force to repel a unlawful arrest and I can assure you that cops will be VERY careful if more men did this.
http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
http://tinyurl.com/7svsb
http://tinyurl.com/7svsb
My son was falsely arrested this past summer.
He was arrested for a blatantly non arrestable offense.
He kicked the crap out of the squad car on the way to spending 1 1/2 days in jail, and was charged $1,200. for the damage.
He was pulled out of the back seat of a friend's car, thrown to the ground tearing his clothes and skinning his face to be arrested for drunk driving by a Park Ranger.
On the way to jail,the Ranger's partner radioed to say the incident had been taped, that he was not seen driving at any time.
When my son demanded to be released, he was told he was now being arrested for Boating Under The Influence - a NON arrestable offense.
He spent over $4,000. defending himself, where the arresting officer was allowed to rewrite the arrest report, later "remembering" he forgot to mention my son urinated in public and used "racial slurs". The evidence he offered was my son's pants were wet(having just come off a boat).
They were both of the same race so the "racial slurs" were questionable.
For the next three months,while awaiting his hearing, he was forced to perform and pay for daily breathalyzers, leading to an arrest warrent when he refused to continue the breathalyzers for a crime he had not committed.
His attorney succeeded in having the charges dropped before mentioning the arrest warrant needed to be dropped, which he paid an additional fee for.
"Can I sue, or get my legal expenses compensated?"
"Don't even bother" advised his attorney.
He's lucky to be alive. If this had been a "real" cop instead of a park ranger I don't think the outcome would have been the same.
Post a Comment