Friday, December 24, 2010

Check out our latest piece at The Spearhead

 
Victor Heiser
16-year-old Johnstown Flood survivor
Boys: The Second-Class Citizens

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

As usual, feminist "equality" means the same thing it means in that old Twix commercial: "Two for me -- none for you."

Men and boys are being screwed over with every tool in the legal system's Swiss army knife.

AfOR said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341350/Pardoned-Father-set-free-shooting-teenager-lynch-mob-gang-come-son.html

Archivist said...

I have a piece on that story AfOR referenced running on Paul Elam's site the day after Christmas.

Anonymous said...

I'm going to set some time aside this Christmas to think of the countless innocent men who languish in prison, because the system took the word of a non-credible accuser and ignored the truth.

Anonymous said...

Here is Rush Limbaugh, demonstrating that the man who coined the term "feminazi" knew what the word means from personal experience. Here he is, nifonging Julian Assange: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/12/14/2010-12-14_limbaugh_slams_michael_moore_liberals_would_help_a_thousand_rapists_to_free_one_.html?r=news/national

"It's so heart warming to see a bunch of high-minded people out there on the left...coming out of the woodwork and paying the bail of the serial rapist Julian Assange," the conservative talk show host said on his radio show on Tuesday. "Who knew that they were such fans of serial rapists?"

Notice how the Rush-man KNOWS that he's guilty! How? Well, it's convenient for him to trash the opposition by calling them rapist-lovers, so... he's guilty.

What a slime.

Nick S said...

Anon@6:40, reading through those comments by Rush Limbaugh, I am not entirely sure whether they are meant to be taken literally, or whether Limbaugh is simply making an ironic point that all these liberals coming out to defend Assange would never bother to defend a man accused of rape if he was not such a progressive hero.

Then again, it is possible that Limbaugh is promoting a deliberate slur against Assange, all the while giving himself the out that he was quoted out of context if held to account for these claims.

I am no fan of Limbaugh, and I certainly wouldn't put it past him to engage in a character assassination of a likely innocent man to score cheap points with his own side. But it is always useful to look out for irony and context in these things, as many individuals end up looking silly when they are too quick to pounce on any comment such as this.

Nick S said...

Pierce, this is an excellent piece and I can't think of much you haven't covered here.

To a large extent, success at school depends on the ability of pupils to please parental authority figures and to reproduce whatever PC acceptable views are taught as fact in the classroom. It is hardly surprising that females tend to be better at this than males. Indeed, it would be odd and surprising if boys performed better than girls in such an environment.

The problem is that these early experiences tend to shape the outlook of individuals as they enter adult life. Young women who do well at school or university are likely to develop an unrealistic sense of their own abilities and future success, and may become bitter and jaded when life does not work out as well as they expected. Whereas young men who have been put down in school may begin to view themselves as losers and lack the confidence to succeed elsewhere in life.

I notice this a lot among women from the tertiary educated, professional classes, who are often insufferably condescending know-alls. While working-class women tend to be more down-to-earth and easier to get along with.

Anonymous said...

While working-class women tend to be more down-to-earth and easier to get along with.

It's the "down to earth" working class gals that commit "upwardly mobile" paternity fraud or entrapment, not to mention FRAs a bit more than the high and mighty lawyer ladies, don't cha think?

Anonymous said...

BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN

Why American men should boycott American women

http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com/

I am an American man, and I have decided to boycott American women. In a nutshell, American women are the most likely to cheat on you, to divorce you, to get fat, to steal half of your money in the divorce courts, don't know how to cook or clean, don't want to have children, etc. Therefore, what intelligent man would want to get involved with American women?

American women are generally immature, selfish, extremely arrogant and self-centered, mentally unstable, irresponsible, and highly unchaste. The behavior of most American women is utterly disgusting, to say the least.

This blog is my attempt to explain why I feel American women are inferior to foreign women (non-American women), and why American men should boycott American women, and date/marry only foreign (non-American) women.

BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN


And the greener pastures are....where?

I've know plenty of men who turned to "foreign women". Not many are willing to admit to making such a major foolish mistake.

I guess being used and abused by a "foreign women" isn't as bad somehow.

Women are women, and men are men. Go gay or go to another planet - this one is FUBAR.

This would be laughable if it weren't so sad.

The Man On The Street said...

For the record, Rush was 'taking the piss' outah the typical liberal puks sails. - As our lymie friends across the pond would say.

TMOTS

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
While working-class women tend to be more down-to-earth and easier to get along with.

It's the "down to earth" working class gals that commit "upwardly mobile" paternity fraud or entrapment, not to mention FRAs a bit more than the high and mighty lawyer ladies, don't cha think?

Dec 26, 2010 5:44:00 AM


What lead you to believe this?