▲The following is a snippet from a 1979 AP news article about the passage of the bill in the California state senate outlawing marital rape. (Note that while marital "rape" was not a crime until relatively recently, assault and battery were -- a husband could not physically force himself on his wife, contrary to current thinking that back in the old days, men could do whatever they wanted to their wives.) Anyway, during the senate debate, Senator Newton Russell openly wondered if the new law would allow wives to falsely cry "rape" against their husbands for revenge. Senator Barry Keene had similar fears, but read his quote, below. It's a microcosm of the male reaction to all feminist rape initiatives of the past 30 years -- the equivalent of "I guess I have to bend over and take it like a man":
▲Much of radical feminism has a seething "payback" quality underlying it, as if women are now going to get back at men for what hypothetical males in the past did to long dead females. Here's feminist icon Germaine Greer on the payback aspect of feminist art: "Late 20th Century feminism protested against the dehumanization of the female as the passive object of the male gaze with a duty to beautify and decorate herself for a man's delectation. A number of committed women artists began working with the male nude as if consciously seeking some kind of revenge for what they perceived as centuries of the portrayal of women in art as mere sex objects."
▲Have you ever noticed that every time a feminist discusses false rape claims, she becomes an actuarial? False rape claims, she posits, are an acceptable risk because there are so few of them and because there are so many actual rapes -- especially of the unreported variety. "I'll start to become concerned about false rape claims," she gushes, "when false rape claims become half the problem rape is." Or, more likely, when she has a son who is falsely accused. Nothing turns a rabid radical feminist into a reasonable human being more quickly than a false rape claim lodged against her son.
▲Here's a plug for a major post we're going to run on Friday: a look back at one of the most widely reported false rape claims in recent American history -- when two Dallas Cowboys were nearly destroyed by an unholy alliance of a false accuser, a local TV station, and the local police.
▲Whenever the people charged with solving a problem are dependent on the problem's continued existence for their livelihoods, you can be certain they will never admit when the problem goes away. We'll never hear that the so-called rape "epidemic" is no longer an "epidemic" because the sexual grievance industry has too much to lose by admitting it.
▲The reason that was most commonly given for scrapping the very modest anonymity proposal in Britain (it would have allowed men accused of rape to remain anonymous until they are charged) was that anonymity would "send a message" that rape accusers aren't to be believed, which would lead women to decide not to report their rapes. Has anyone seen even a scrap of evidence to support this epiphany? It rings especially hollow in light of RAINN chief Scott Berkowitz's recent U.S. Senate testimony that women are not failing to report due to fears that they won't be believed.
▲Finally, a few quotes from Prof. Alan Dershowitz:
•“Rape is such a serious crime that deliberately bringing a false accusation of rape should be an equally serious crime and women are not being punished for those crimes. I believe that being falsely accused of rape is as traumatic as being raped.”
•". . . the rules of evidence have been changed to make it easier to convict defendants of rape and harder to cross-examine alleged rape victims."
•"The idea that these youngsters should be branded rapists and the girl should be labeled a victim is preposterous." (Addressing a case where male teens who engaged in consensual sex with a female teen should be prosecuted for statutory rape while the girl was not charged)
•". . . objective data show that the problem of false rape reports is a serious one, and that the percentage of false reports in rape cases is considerably higher than the percentage of false reports for other violent felonies. One reason for this disparity is that the police rarely prosecute women who deliberately file false rape reports."
•"How can you publish the name of the presumptively innocent accused but not the name of the accuser?"

15 comments:
Sen. Keene - what a fucking, ball-less mangina.
Yeah, we can envision terrible things are going to happen to husbands, but let's vote for the bill that will allow those terrible things to happen.
No one dares to stand against the Gender / Raunch Empowerment movement. Most American politicians now get elected off feeding from mass hystera, Gender / Raunch Empowerment "construction".
The one thing that would deconstruct the Gender / Raunch Empowerment movement; would be to Break the "Gender Feminist / Law enforcement misinformation Alliance" that is feeding Gender / Raunch their faulty and inflammatory Empowerment rhetoric.
But this may take a long time to happen, and the one thing we can do is warn other countries to not let the "perverted misinformation Alliance" start to the first place.
Pierce, you can delete my last post, i dont want to soil every piece with my same rant. Sir, i had an epiphany, and appreciate yer latitude in being tolerant of my rambling angry tirades. My false rape accusation hurt me deep, and i must realize that yer here to help the cause, and i need to respect yer site more, and i will.
Something terrible DID happen down the line - just as you knew it would.
Something terrible happened down the line with rape shield laws as well.
Something terrible is happening right here, right now, yet no one says "how terrible". They just say "we haven't done enough".
This is a terrible time to be male.
S - "Break the "Gender Feminist / Law enforcement misinformation Alliance"
Oh, Great!
Back to the crazy-*ss sh*t!
Although I've been too busy to be highly involved over the past week, it sure seems that (post) traffic is way done here.
I wonder if the oft-repeated unsubstantiated wild-speculation tinfoil-hat crazy rants are starting to put people off as I've feared they would?
slw, we move in cycles. Our audiene is easily double what it was last year but the comments are down because we don't have any raving feminists posting here on a regular basis anymore.
Archivist - "Our audiene is easily double what it was last year"
This is very good news indeed!
Unfortunately, having a few troll and agitators posting does tend to lead to more lively debate.
One thing I'm curious about, do you ever get feed-back from people identifying themselves as members of law enforcement.
I've mention this site to several detectives (all of whom have been personally acquainted with instances of women making false claims), but they seem to be concerned that if anyone should ever discover that they've so much as viewed this site that they might find themselves in "hot water". I can understand why they might be worried about posting anything that might be traced back to them (as LE, they know how this can be done), but I wonder if they ever do "visit", and let you know off the blog-record.
It seems to me that there has been a fundamental shift in the way LE has been handling rape allegations over the past couple of years. For the stories covered here, it seem that they've been doing a better job of doing their jobs properly - investigating first, and delaying unnecessary arrests until they've had a chance to see if there is actually any reason/need to arrest. At least, that's the impression I've been getting of late. Any thoughts?
"slw, we move in cycles. Our audiene is easily double what it was last year but the comments are down because we don't have any raving feminists posting here on a regular basis anymore."
I don't understand why you feel it's a "comfort zone" to have double the audience, but fewer than few comments. How does that benefit your cause?
If you're saying that you regularly delete comments made by feminists, then that would certainly explain your low ratings.
Now I hope you don't delete me just for being honest.
slw, we've already more than doubled last year's visitor total. I can do without the feminist sidetracks that posit inane theories that aren't worth my time.
The only LE who have ever identified themselves are retired. They don't understand they can trust me not to out them -- a lot of things I get I am asked not to publish.
Elly, we don't have "low ratings." The only reason I keep doing this is because there is such a demand.
The comments may be 'low' because these stories are the same - repeatedly.
How often can you say "Oh how awful"?
Girl makes accusation.
Accusation is shown to be false.
No charges filed.
Oh, how awful.
Girl makes accusation.
Accusation is shown to be false.
No charge filed.
Oh, how awful.
There is only so much you can "comment" about before the comments become as redundant as the false accusation=guy's life ruined=no charges filed against the 'troubled' liar cycle.
It just goes on and on...
How does that benefit your cause?
Ummmm.....let's see, more people coming to this site, means wider acknowledgement of the issue, so more and more people know what is happening. How does that NOT benefit what we do?
Anon,
So you mean that person after person having thier life ruined, doesn't piss you off? Or disgust you? That's the main reason that I do this.
If you are desensitized to what we do here, have you considered that it is because the problem is so extensive, that it doesn't shock you? That is the main reason we are here.
So long as Pierce will have me, and I am able, I will continue to do this. Each and every story we post here makes me, to be honest, angry. As it should anyone who cares about fairness and justice.
" E. B. Quote: "So long as Pierce will have me, and I am able, I will continue to do this. Each and every story we post here makes me, to be honest, angry. As it should anyone who cares about fairness and justice."
Are you shitting me?
It makes any sane person angry. It makes any decent person angry.
My point was, as Mark Twain might aptly put it : Everyone talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it.
If the comments are 'down' it's not because this site is losing interest - apparently it is gaining momentum - it just means there is only so much you can say abut story after story after story.
I am one who's life was ruined by a false accusation.
Don't be chiding the choir.
I am one who is living the nightmare - probably worse than most.
If I weren't "desensitized" I'd be dead.
Anon,
Sorry if I misread what you said. Sometimes, text just doesn't translate tone.
Yes, there are only so many ways to say it, but it should be stated over and over again, IMO.
Our first, and primary goal, is to raise awareness, and let those who have been falsely accused, know there is a place to go, where they can see they aren't alone, in what they have endured/are enduring.
You don't get things changed overnight. This blog has existed for roughly 3 years. And it's been an uphill battle every day.
We are gaining momentum, but to get practical things done, such as laws and attitude changed, takes time. It doesn't happen overnight. So we will keep moving forward, one step at a time, until we get where we think we need to be.
What I'm starting to laugh at, are those who say we aren't doing enough, yet every time we ask for people to submit articles or other activities, no one responds.
A case in point:
Not long ago, we asked people to at least get involved and sign the anonymity petition. We get, on average, 500-1k visits each day here. Likely, some of that is repeat visitors, but that petition, only had about 300 signatures.
Here's a request. How about you write up your story for us, so we can run it. Give us your perspective on it. You don't have to name names, just tell us what you went through, your thoughts and feeling when it happened, and where it has brought you.
I extend that invitation to any who read here, who have been falsely accused. Sadly, I've only had one person take me up on that offer, and it was the spouse of a person falsely accused.
And you'll pardon me, but I'll chide the choir, if I believe it is deserved. There is a lot of understandable anger out there, I get that, but either try to channel that into something productive, or what happened to those falsely accused means absolutely nothing.
We're largely in agreement here, so I don't want this to come across as accusatory, but maybe, just maybe, it's time for people to start contributing a bit more, and being more involved.
I contribute a lot.
I do submit stories.
I can still be harmed by going public with me story - for now.
Someday I will speak out a free man.
I don't need to be attacked for speaking the truth.
Post a Comment