Two claims of sexual assault in Worcester in the space of 24 hours - both turned out to be false.
The first suspected attack happened on Quay Street at around 10 o'clock. Then, between 1 and 2am, another woman claimed she'd been attacked in a field just off Red Hill Lane.
A youth, who was arrested over one of the alleged assaults, has now been released.
34 officers were used to investigate the incidents and both areas were cordoned off yesterday while forensic teams carried out searches.
West Mercia Police say they're taking no further action over the alleged assaults as the claims turned out to be false. They also say there's no evidence to suggest the two are connected.
A Police Spokesman said:
“The circumstances surrounding both investigations convince us that no further action is necessary or appropriate.”
“South Worcestershire remains an extremely safe place in which to live and work. Genuine sexual assaults are rare in the Division – and it is even rarer to have two reports within hours of each other. We are pleased to confirm that neither reported victim was assaulted in any way.”
Police have also told Wyvern no-one will be charged for wasting their time - and they don't want anyone to be put off from reporting these serious crime to them.
Link:
Posts
9 comments:
and another one
http://www.thisisexeter.co.uk/news/Judge-tells-jury-clear-man-rape/article-2681325-detail/article.html
"Police have also told Wyvern no-one will be charged for wasting their time - and they don't want anyone to be put off from reporting these serious crime to them."
This is like saying no one will be charged for stealing cars because they don't want anyone to be put off from driving.
This is the perversion folks right here..Gender feminists have ???trained??? law enforcement to never charge false rape accusations because it will somehow deter real victims from "coming forward."
This theory smells fishy, and i would like to see the studies that prove that this perversion of our law enforcement is in fact legitimate and justified. Where are the studies and facts??
One very real consequence of No longer charging false rape accusations, Along with bi-polar violent gender / Raunch deviants encourageing young women to make false rape accusations...is the now explosion of false rape accusations.
Perverts that are "Empowered" and that now dominate American universities will not correct this themselves. A concerned religious community is the only power strong enought to challenge the lies and perversion, and the wreckage of innocent (mostly boys) lives.
"Police have also told Wyvern no-one will be charged for wasting their time - and they don't want anyone to be put off from reporting these serious crime to them."
What about the guy who was detained (presumably for questioning)? Is hid plight to simply be shrugged off with a flippant "it happens!"?
In the UK they do have the "Perverting the Course of Justice charge, and, as we've seen, authorities there have been making more frequent use of it (despite the oft-repeated lie of gender/raunch, anti-LE rant guy above) that feminists have trained LE to "never" charge them).
Allowing these two to walk-away unscathed for their lies represents an inconsistency in the application of the law that can have the effect of persuading some women that the "get-out-of-anything, cry-false-rape" card is still in-play for them).
I think it's important to charge them, without fail, even if the penalties are light, just so that the offense will be on their records (should they think to try it again).
Still, i have a question about these two statements:
"They also say there's no evidence to suggest the two are connected."
&
"Genuine sexual assaults are rare in the Division – and it is even rarer to have two reports within hours of each other."
So, actual assaults are rare there, but suddenly they have two false ones, and they don't seem to think there's ANY relationship between them?
I can believe that the two women neither discussed nor coordinated their efforts at lying. Still, the extreme temporal proximity for two such "rare" events leaves me wondering if the two women might not share a connection to some other source that might have encouraged then that FRA's could be useful in predicaments that they might face. Perhaps some local self-appointed female self-help guru that's but spreading the feminist manure in that locality plant the idea in both of their minds.
Well, that's just speculation on my part. I'm just curious about the seeming lack of curiosity on the part of the local investigators.
Of course, it would be helpful to understanding the circumstance if the press or police would release and publish more telling information. When they had to report FRA's both entities still seem to want to protect the poor little women from the consequences of their actions.
Police have also told Wyvern no-one will be charged for wasting their time –
A crime that could have put away an innocent man in jail for up to 24 years, goes unpunished again. Even if it was punishable, it is the equivalent to stealing a pack of gum.
We need criminal justice reform.
Women can not continue to get away with there vicious crimes.
Arod99k - ” A crime that could have put away an innocent man in jail for up to 24 years, goes unpunished again. Even if it was punishable, it is the equivalent to stealing a pack of gum.
We need criminal justice reform.
Women can not continue to get away with there vicious crimes.”
I’m just curious…
How do you “square” that comment with your comment 20 minutes later on the next thread:
"Women are not the problem in most cases, but rather a broken, corrupt legal system that exploits the lie. Once the FRA lie is told, it cant be taken back. If the woman tries to change her story or renege, the prosecution will threaten her with criminal charges.”
If, as you claim, ” Women are not the problem in most cases”, how do just call for them to be punished as a deterrent? And, if it’s such a bad thing for women who want to change their stories to have to face the threat of “criminal charges”, aren’t you further arguing against such criminal charges. Women are getting away with their “vicious crimes” because they are not charged…but, they’re “not the problem”, Arod99k? How is that?
In the UK, where this case took place, we are actually seeing more and more women getting prison time for Perverting the Course of Justice for their false accusations. Seems to me we don’t need criminal justice reform so much as we need such felony level charges for FRA’s – and the “balls” to apply those charges consistently.
Oh!, But, wait! That would mean that we would (necessarily) have to see the women who make false allegations as "the problem", now wouldn’t it?[/snark]
I have to agree with Arod, it is a perverted legal system that fosters and enables a culture of false rape accusations that we are now in the midst of.
Without any consequences as a deterent, why (for example) would a girl even think twice about saying her Ex boyfriend raped her when the couple breaks up.
Rape hysteria is the main tool for the "Empowerment" of the new Gender / Raunch community; and now law enforcement (with state and federal dollars) is furthering the Gender / Raunch adgenda by fostering and maintaining Rape hysteria.
If law enforcement started charging false rape accusers, the Gender feminists would quickly lose all their hysteria / mob / Klan "Empowerment".
So you can't shout "Fire" in a crowded theater where none exists, but women can cry "rape" and get away scot-free.
Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life on this planet.
Date-rape accusations have always been a sham; who could be STUPID enough to rape someone who knew their name, address and phone-number?
A few years back I broke up with my GF and called her a bitch via text-message (she was playing mind-games and I got tired of it). Next week, a cop shows up asking questions; I couldn't believe it, you never think it'll happen to you until it does.
Then, you realize how EASY it is for some bitch to ruin your life and put you through hell just on a whim.
Post a Comment