by Connie Chastain*
Many years ago, when I was a young woman, I tried to read The Feminine Mystique. I don't remember how far into it I got before I couldn't read anymore, or what specific bit of nonsense made me close the book.
But I don't think you have to read the whole thing to know it for what it is--leftist propaganda. Destruction of the family is a leftist aim, as their writings reveal, and feminism has greatly advance this aim.
My apologies to any liberals in the FRS readership. Liberalism and leftism share some similarities, some overlap, but they aren't the same thing. As a staunch cultural and political conservative, even I have some liberal leanings now and then, on some subjects.
For example, I don't mind a taxpayer financed safety net for families with children who are facing unexpected financial difficulties through no fault of their own. Sometimes, there's just nobody else to do it.
What I do mind is generational dependence on the government, the learned helplessness as a way of life, largely because of the absence of a father in the family, which I perceive to be directly related to the grip feminism has on our culture.
I got nothing against, say, women voting -- although I am happy to admit the country got along just fine before women got the franchise. Well...except for that little civil war thingie a hundred and fifty years ago, although I don't see how female suffrage would have made much difference in that.
What I do object to is feminism's destruction of the family and its war against men, seen nowhere more clearly than in the false rape epidemic chronicled daily in this blog.
And while there are a multitude of hardworking feminists, famous and obscure, who share culpability for bringing our culture to the sorry state it's in now, nobody is more responsible than Betty Friedan, author of the aforementioned destructive tome, and founder of the National Organization for Women.
I never had the "problem with no name." Most of the women I've known never had it, either. For us, the question wasn't, "Is this all?" It was, "Can I go on break now?"
It takes only a glimpse of my background to see why I can't relate to Freidan's world, and her complaint. At all. And I do not believe I'm an isolated case. There are lots of us who can't relate.
My maternal grandmother came down out of the mountains to go to work in a cotton mill -- at age thirteen. She met my grandfather there. They both worked in the mill until they retired, and raised five successful daughters while doing so.
My paternal grandmother was widowed when a horrific car-train collision took the life of her husband, two days before her youngest child was born. She never remarried, but raised her five sons herself, with a little help from her own parents.
My mother worked outside the home most of her adult life. In our world, husbands and fathers were the breadwinners. They headed the household and directed the family. Wives and mothers took care of the home and children, and helped out with a supplemental income when they could. Marriage and parenting was a cooperative effort.
Comfortable suburban concentration camps? Not in my experience. It took both parents working hard, and some blood and sweat, and occasional tears, to make it; but by and large people were happy in their family accomplishments.
I sincerely believe the women of the two previous generations were far stronger than mine and those that have followed. There are a lot of things I can't forgive feminism for, but turning two generations of women into perpetural, whining children, with audacious and conscienceless false rape accusers sprinkled liberally among their numbers, rates near the top.
*Connie is a member of the FRS team whose column appears here every Friday. Her blog is is http://conniechastain.blogspot.com/
Friday, September 3, 2010
Rape Culture 101 -- My Comfortable Suburban Concentration Camp -- Not
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 comments:
Blood, sweat and tears yield results, and this is what builds character. This is what modern young women, given everything on a plate without having to lift a finger, are seriously lacking.
My female forbears had to work very, very hard to stay afloat as well. No comfortable concentration camp for them. I agree with Snark: hard work builds character (and leaves you will less time to get into trouble to boot).
Well said. hard work is the key.
I encourage both our young men and women to get a good education.
Education, exposes evil.
Ask, investigate, understand and think.
Oh confound it all, they are welcome to their comfortable concentration camp. But not welcome to whine about such things at my expense. . .
The phrase 'comfortable concentration camp', in reference to the suburbs, is so profoundly insulting to all those who were tortured, enslaved and murdered at actual concentration camps. I have to wonder if feminists bother reading any history at all, because having spent some time reading up on the true horrors of the Holocaust, I could never trivialise it in such a way. It would take somebody with a very cold heart, and extremely misanthropic outlook, to even coin the phrase 'comfortable concentration camp'.
If Friedan was so stifled in her suburban ranch house, she could've got a job at Woolworths, weighing and selling candy in those little white paper bags. Or she could have volunteered at some charity effort.
But Friedan and the feminists of the second wave were revolutionaries; they wanted nothing less than to turn culture, family, relationships, the entire human experience, into some bizarre mutation.
And the kicker is that women are no better off today; they're like Snark says, characterless because they've had it so easy for so long. All you have to do to know that's true is spend a few minutes at Jezebel. Is there anything of any redeeming value on that site?
Many of the early 'feminists' were Jewish, so I don't think your taking umbrage at their use of "concentration camps" will have much affect.
Like the "N" word, they are free to use it as they please.
They are free to use it as they please, as is everybody else; this does not mean it is not grossly inoffensive.
Protip: not every Jew ever died in the Holocaust. You seem to think it impossible that somebody could both be Jewish and say something offensive to Holocaust victims. I guess this is how wingnut feminists view the world: with everybody in neat little boxes, rights and obligations accorded by their demographics ... now THAT is scarily Nazi-like.
"Is there anything of any redeeming value on that site?"
Plenty for our propaganda purposes. Give 'em enough rope.
"grossly inoffensive."
offensive *
HA!
The femi-nazi retain their hedgemony by "constructing" that they are the real victims of oppression.
Recently in Poland to hear a lot of celebration commemorating the creation of Solidarity. There are many discussions on this subject and some of them are very controversial. I wonder whether in other countries, people know what it is and if they have solidarity on this issue a sentence?
br
Matt
[url=http://www.odzywki-warszawa.pl]odżywki[/url]
Anonymous: Many of the early 'feminists' were Jewish...
Not to mention upper class and well-educated. Like so many leaders of revolutions, they tried to palm off their vision of utopia onto the "peasants" who in large measure did not want it and were not helped by it.
What a mess they've made.
Solidarity, and Lech Walensa (sp?) yes, we heard all about it at the time.
Nothing much since though.
Why is it that the upper white middle class Gender / Raunch community can claim they are the real "Oppressed", when they don't even know how to change a tire, because they are so liberated from menial labor. Its a perversion to say that the oppressors are the uneducated white male construction workers that die from lung disease at 50 years old from construction dust. Th real oppressed don't have a voice.
"I got nothing against, say, women voting"
This is the greatest mistake ever done by a man. It's the most important step toward the female supremacist regime we have today. Thank to this absolute insanity the fact that Women only care about Women. And their majority we have now gynarchy instead of democracy.
Friedan was not a "typical suburban housewife" as she claimed. She was a Stalinist Marxist from her college days onwards.
"Anonymous said...
The femi-nazi retain their hedgemony by "constructing" that they are the real victims of oppression."
Sep 4, 2010 10:11:00 AM
They and their ilk are the real oppressors. Look at the demons' of misandry they conceived.
Wrap your brain around this:
"The OPPRESSED will eventually become the OPPRESSORS".
Translated: Women no longer condone white male supremacy.
Gender / Raunch perverts have conditioned college girls to regurgitate the nonsense that women have been oppressed for billions of years, when in actually they were a "protected" class throughout history, and are a protected class now.
Youre translation should read ... "Women and homosexuals no longer condone white male heterosexual leadership."
Post a Comment