An 18-year-old Blakeslee woman and her friend have been charged with making up a story about her being abducted and sexually assaulted early this morning.
Pocono Mountain Regional Police received a report at about 4 a.m. that Odalis Tejada of Cranberry Drive, Greenwood Acres, had been abducted after leaving her residence.
Police eventually found Tejada at around noon at the Exxon on Route 115 in Blakeslee. She told detectives that she was abducted and taken out of the area, where she was sexually assaulted. She also said her cell phone and a diamond ring were taken.
Further investigation revealed holes in her story, and Tejada admitted to making up the story with help from two friends, according to police.
One of those friends was Christina J. Adams, 19, of Fairless Hills, who allegedly made the initial call to police. She faces charges of criminal conspiracy, making a false alarm to public safety and making a false police report.
A 17-year-old Effort girl will also be charged with criminal conspiracy/false reports to law enforcement.
Tejada will be charged with criminal conspiracy, making false reports to law enforcement, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and possessing alcohol while underage.
Charges against Tejada and Adams will be filed before Magisterial District Judge Richard Claypool. The juvenile charges will be processed by Monroe County Juvenile Probation.
Link:
http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100819/NEWS/100819785/-1/NEWSMAP
Posts
16 comments:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5598
It seems to me that alot of the stories we hear of women being charged with filing a false rape report are minority women. Is this because white women rarelly file a false rape accusation, or is it that Gender feminists have conditioned society that white women are too pure to be charged with anything?
Gays and lesbians are the only "PURE FEMINISTS".
"Tejada will be charged with criminal conspiracy, making false reports to law enforcement, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and possessing alcohol while underage."
It's good that she's being charged with multiple crimes. That way, she may actually receive some real punishment. Plus, criminal conspiracy, tampering/fabricating evidence, and even under aged possession of alcohol are all considered far more serious offenses than is making a false rape/sexual assault allegation.
From the linked articles comments section:
"naomi pompliano
And another innocent male has been saved."
It's always heartening to see where even women are starting to "get it".
And, since no one else is likely to do so, once again, KUDOS to the cops who sniffed this one out, and avoided any instincts to arrest some (random) man to prove they were "protecting women".
Just to be clear, I'm not trying to "rub it in the face" of our growing anti-LE contingent here, I'm just trying to provide some balance.
In reviewing what I missed over the course of the past week, there were five cases of FRA reported and link on FRS:
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Claim of robbery and kidnapping ends in charge of false report
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Girl tells rape lie to keep from getting in trouble with her parents 'for messing up a piece of furniture'
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Police: Woman made up sexual assault report
Friday, September 17, 2010
Rape Claim Turns Out to be a False Report
Monday, September 20, 2010
Police: Blakeslee woman, friend fabricate abduction, sexual assault story
Guess what things these five stories all have in common?
In every case, the police investigated the claims, determined them to be false, and (from what I can tell) never arrested nor even detained any innocent men.
Surprise, surprise, the police went 5-for-5 in getting it right.
Rather than just dumping on LE when they F' it up, perhaps we ought to be showing our appreciation when they get it right - so as to provide a contrast between the "right way" and the "wrong way" of doing rape cases.
"Just to be clear, I'm not trying to "rub it in the face" of our growing anti-LE contingent here, I'm just trying to provide some balance."
Frankly, I'm less sympathetic, as it's nothing but childish, irrational hatred that undermines this blog. Such as this deranged nonsense:
"Gays and lesbians are the only "PURE FEMINISTS"."
Where does this article mention anything about gays or lesbians?
TO: Sep 20, 2010 11:21:00 AM
"Where does this article mention anything about gays or lesbians?"
I am not the original poster of:
"Gays and lesbians are the only "PURE FEMINISTS"
But his point comes from a militant branch of feminism that claims that all feminists are lesbian and not straight. They insinuate that a heterosexual feminist is not really a feminist but a hypocrite and a poser. Basically, you can't call your yourself a feminist and still sleep with the enemy. This pseudo-intellectual, misandrist tripe usually comes from women's studies departments on various college campuses.
Sir, you call my comments childish, but i see yours as "willfull ignorance"
Can anyone answer my question about "why is it only minority women that are being charged with false rape accusations??? Is it because white women never lie about rape??
Anonymous - ""why is it only minority women that are being charged with false rape accusations???"
Where did you get the idea that only minority women are being charged?
Having checked-out many of the articles linked, I've found all manner of women pictured along with those articles (hint - plenty of white women included in the numbers).
"why is it only minority women that are being charged with false rape accusations??? Is it because while women never lie about rape??
Anon, you may want to check this out.
http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/09/this-is-woman-who-lied-to-police-by.html
Well, if you read the stories posted here, some 90% of them involve the police getting the liars to recant. Slwerner said
In Response Arod99k said to Slwerner. Slwerner you have no clue of what you are talking about. Please get educated on this subject, before commenting.
District Attorneys who only care about power, numbers, and statistics. District Attorneys who have a win at all cost mentality, so that they can get more funding for next year, regardless of innocence. District Attorney's who are looking at the next promotion, and even the possibility of becoming a judge. The DA will never admit maleficence, even when confronted with irrefutable DNA evidence of innocence. There is a much bigger problem going on. The problem is the doing away with jury trials. There are no more jury trials because most cases are settled in plea bargain agreements. 95% of all criminal accusations are settled in plea agreements. The government will offer the defendant 2 years in a plea deal. If the innocent man refuses, he is then threatened that if he is to loose at trial, he will get 20 years.
The current system rubber stamps criminal charges to any accusation made by anyone. Detectives and prosecutors can be charged with obstruction of justice but they never are. Prosecutors and police withhold, hide, and destroy exculpatory evidence, lie, use trickery, and engage in witness tampering. Detectives engage in tunnel vision and never investigate. Police and prosecutors work harder on cases that play out in the media. Evidence is usually fabricated or lied about, but it is usually admitted. Police arrest on little or no evidence. The accusation is the conviction. A person is usually held on high bail and coerced into confessing through lengthy pre trial detention 2 years being the minimum before a trial, (See Star Chamber).
None of us know the facts behind any news story on this topic.
I don't buy into the gender/raunch conspiracy guy's theory -
But I don't buy into the LE as hero story, either.
There's just too much benefit by "the state" and all those involved in prosecution to believe the majority willingly forgo the glory.
It's not like they get in trouble for false prosecutions.
A lot of people enjoy the misery of others.
That's just a fact.
Maybe Gender / Raunch guy lives in an area of the country with elevated levels of lesbian violence (like boston), and has witnessed the structure of perversion that gives these violent , bi-polar, raunch lesbians a sort of untoucheable status in the eyes of the local media, and law enforcement.
Its like the loudmouth violent lesbians are the attack dogs for the gender / Raunch movement.
Arod99k - "Please get educated on this subject, before commenting."
Oh, I am. I know DA's, and what they do very well.
Thus, I know how frequently DA "Dec" (pronounced "deck"), also known as "decline to prosecute" cases - especially those that involve allegation of sexual assault that lack conclusive or even compelling evidence. I also know about a number of cases wherein the continuing investigations by DA's offices have turned up the evidence that thew police missed that proved that an FRA had been committed (and charges against the falsely accused dropped).
Did you know that it is now typical to do an on-line search of the accuser, looking at things like their social-networking pages and posts to friends?
I'll bet you did not, because, like our anti-LE ranting friend, you're just making it up as you go, based on little more than your barely concealed seething contempt for all of LE.
And, it's not just in my wife's jurisdictional that they investigate accusers as well. A few months back, I had dinner with a number of DA's attending a conference in Alexandria, VA.
It wasn't even my doing, but the conversation turned towards woman making FRA's. Almost all of them recounted their own encounters with woman making them. One woman even specifically mentioned a recent case she had had wherein the accuser was found to have bragged about getting her ex in trouble by saying that he had raped her.
So, yeah, I have a bit of and in-side view. where do you get your info, might I ask?
Oh, and even though I've brought up the subject many times on this forum, I'll once again point out that the reason many cases are taken to trial is because either the alleged victim, or the alleged victim's family insists that it be done (typical with under-aged alleged victims). DA's get no pleasure in taking a "loser" of a case to trial. They get the proverbial heads handed to them (and often get admonished by presiding judges for bring that "Sh*t" into their courtrooms). But, even that's easier to face than a disgruntled alleged victim of family taking their one-sided gripes directly to the public via a press eager to smear.
Why, it's sort of like you taking out your personal gripes with LE on this forum, when you think about it.
Post a Comment