Westminster -- A now former L.A. County Sheriff's deputy Monday was charged with filing a false police report and firing her weapon in such a manner that it endangered children and others.
O.C. prosecutors say on November 18th, 43 year old Patricia M. Bojorquez told Huntington Beach Police investigators that her ex-husband was sexually assaulting a 13 year old female relative.
Bojorquez is also accused of firing her gun inside her Westminster home. The bullet reportedly narrowly missed children playing outside her home.
O.C. prosecutors say she allegedly lied about the sexual assault incident because she was upset over custody issues.
According to L.A. County Sheriff officials, Bojorquez was a sheriff's deputy at the time of the alleged crimes but left the department in June.
Bojorquez is currently on probation for two DUI convictions in Orange County, the district attorney's office said.
She is scheduled to be arraigned Sept. 24 at the courthouse in Westminster.
Link:
http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-deputy-charged-false-report,0,6135622.story
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
24 comments:
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/crime/s/1327019_woman_jailed_for_year_for_lying_about_being_raped
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/8383968.___False_rape_allegation_has_just_ruined_my_life___/
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/charges-loom-for-rape-victim-who-claims-she-was-attacked-at-mt-martha/story-e6frf7kx-1225927291766
It is the perversion of American law enforcement protocol over the last 20 years that has fostered and enabled the "false rape culture" we are now in the middle of.
Gender feminist quack scholars have ???trained??? law enforcement on how to deal with false rape accusations, and how to deal with domestic violence...And they have perverted them both.
Gender feminist quack perverts are the new "bosses" in American law enforcement, and they have told law enforcement that "By charging false rape accusers, it somehow deters real victims from coming forward", and American law enforcement has perverted their protocol to meet their demands.
I say, "where are the studies that prove this gender feminist theory, cause it smells ???fishy???.
Anonymous - "It is the perversion of American law enforcement protocol over the last 20 years that has fostered and enabled the "false rape culture" we are now in the middle of.
Gender feminist quack scholars have ???trained??? law enforcement on how to deal with false rape accusations"
So, S.,
I see your back to the nonsense. No! strike that. It's now becoming idiocy.
Once again, you didn't even take the time to read the story. The accuser has not only charged, but she was forced to resign her job as a Sheriff's deputy.
I'm still hoping to get it through to you, but, you just cannot seem to realize how stupid it makes you (and, by extension, the rest of us) look when you throw out those unsupported and (even by the article to which you seem to be responding) unsubstantiated drivel.
Please, please please! I'm begging you. read the articles, and tailor a response that at least seems to fit.
While you may revel in a handful of others who cheer on your ill-thought police-bashing, there is a substantial likelihood that you posts serve only to convince many, many casual observers who stop by to check us out that we are just another bunch of loons, engaged in the same rhetoric & demagoguery typical of hard-core feminist sites. Nice going! Thanks!
All:
Check out AfOR posted links, especially the last one - in which you can click on the comments and read were (when I checked) 42 of the 45 comments were solidly against the FRA liar, and even those that weren't were but a pitiful effort towards unclear ends. It's actually quite heartening.
Yes, a lot of the comments will be of the "harm to potential future victims" type - but, when you stop and think about it, there are so, so many things wrong with FRA's that there really is nothing particularly wrong with people bring up that aspect as well.
Here's the last posted comment - for the enjoyment of all who understand the worstr of the evils of FRA's:
" Mattayus of Melbourne Posted at 1:27 PM September 21, 2010
And what of the victims of false rape accusations? Men have had their entire lives ruined because of lies like this. When is the government going to take it's finger out and make all parties in rape cases anonymous until a conviction is found? Why are only the accusers protected?
Comment 45 of 45"
Sep 21, 2010 10:37:00 AM
I completely agree, except your hoping to get through to him. Sorry, but just like the loony demagogues typical of hard-core feminist sites, there is no reasoning with such people. Why the owners of this blog continue to defend his insane idiocy is beyond me.
Mr Werner, with all due respect sir, you are ill informed. This case of a girl being charged with a filing a false rape accusation is a very, very, very small percentage of all false rape accusations.
Folks are gonna break the law, and it is law enforcement who are paid to deter them, and because of the Gender feminist perversion into law enforcement, this new perverted Alliance no longer protects the innocent.
Sir, I'm not gonna argue with you or call you a simpleton, but the perversion of American law enforcement is the root of the perversion.
It is not only a perversion but it is also unconstitutional for American law enforcement to in effect "manufacture faulty and inflamatory missinformation" that prejudices against the innocent.
"it is also unconstitutional for American law enforcement to in effect "manufacture faulty and inflamatory missinformation" that prejudices against the innocent."
Except law enforcement is not manufacturing faulty misinformation.
Nor is there anything about crime statistics in the Constitution.
Folks, i would love to put all this activism against false rape accusations behind me, and just move on with my life, but since i see that very few folks here understand the root of the perversion, which is "gender feminist Empowerment at the expense of all heterosexual males"...than I feel it is my duty to point this out.
America may not be able to wash out this stain on our constitution very quickly, but at least other nations may know better than to let the perverts into their law enforceement community for the purposes of "manufacturing faulty and inflamatory statistics"
One Example of American law enforcements "Manufacturing faulty and inflamatory missinformation".
When law enforcement is called to a domestic violence call, and the violent party is clearly an out of control, bi-polar, drunk violent female, and they arrest the nonviolent male, this gives a faulty statistic of mens violence, when in reality it is the violent, drunken, bi-polar female who was violent.
So this meets the "Faulty" part of the "faulty and inflamatory" accusation.
Now when violent, bi-polar Gender / raunch perverts use this "faulty arrest statistic" when they teach their college students, thats when the faulty becomes "Inflamatory".
Anonymous - "When law enforcement is called to a domestic violence call, and the violent party is clearly an out of control, bi-polar, drunk violent female, and they arrest the nonviolent male, this gives a faulty statistic of mens violence"
While not entirely unrelated, DV and rape (and false allegation of both) are all different crimes.
Yes, in some jurisdictions, police carry a "must arrest" attitude towards DV calls. But, this does not necessarily translate directly into the same being applied to rape claims (one of the big things we've all been harping on is the idea of arrest first, investigate later).
I'm sure you averted your eye's so as to not have to deal with what I posted yesterday about police going 5-for-5 in recent FRS stories in that they investigated first, uncovering the FRA before arresting any innocent men.
This is what we've been targeting (well, those of us who don't have a hard-on for lining up all of LE against a wall and executing them with automatic weapons, anyway). Five years ago, you'd have never seen it. Then, cops did largely follow a "must arrest" attitude. But, things seem to be changing.
Of course, for those of you whose primary issue has become unrestrained hatred of LE, nothing they will ever do could ever be enough to convince you. Hell, you don't even blame the woman who accused you - as you noted several times (you still feel that way?), just the cops who didn't do what you asked them to do so as to clear your name.
But, in case you still haven't caught on, they are not the only persons involved in LE. They are just 1 or 2 incompetents, or white-knights who were just looking to protect the little-lady from the consequences of her own actions (yes, at your expense).
It's hard to get a handle on just how many cries of rape never even get past the first officer that hears them, but, most every cop who has spent any time on the force can tell you stories of some drunk/stoned woman, who realizing that she's about the be in trouble and claims rape, who they challenge, and who quickly admit that there really wasn't any rape.
Now, in most instance, the cop is likely just playing white-knight, and trying to keep the woman out of further trouble (as opposed to an instant and reflexive concern for the potential harms to innocent men). Yet, what it shows is that police aren't just out to take any claim, arrest any man , and try to make a case out of it.
You case, bad as it has been for you, is but your one piece of anecdotal evidence on which you've based your projection upon all of LE. And, just for example, your one example is outweighed by five cases detailed in the past week where the police did get it right.
Obviously, I'm not trying to make the case that police (now) always get it right, because that would be almost as inane as trying to "cherry-pick" one lone case where they didn't, and trying to make the case that they therefore always fail.
"Yes, in some jurisdictions, police carry a "must arrest" attitude towards DV calls. But, this does not necessarily translate directly into the same being applied to rape claims (one of the big things we've all been harping on is the idea of arrest first, investigate later)."
Not only does it not translate directly into rape claims, it's not a matter of the police choosing a must arrest attitude, but rather it's a matter of law. The police don't make the law. Politicians do.
It is unconstitutional for law enforcement to engage in the "manufacture of faulty and inflamatory missinformation" that builds a prejudice against the innocent.
This is the pervert in the living room that everyone pretends not to see.
Anonymous - "This is the pervert in the living room that everyone pretends not to see."
While it is true that arrest data will be used (by some) as a way to taint men as a gender, the lie is that LE sets out to manufacture it (as LE rant guy keeps saying).
In reality, officers typically just follow the orders they are given as to what to do (i.e. mandatory arrests of "primary aggressors - who, unless there is some obvious evidence to the contrary, are going to be assumed to be the men). They are given little leeway in how to handle such situations.
It's even true that such policies are largely due to feminist influence and demand. But, there is hardly any "alliance" (as LE rant guy keeps saying). Politicians knuckled under, and made laws to force LE into line.
But, again, this all has more to do with DV situation than FRA's. Conflating the two is not completely invalid, but is NOT a reliable way to look at things.
And, what, exactly, do guys like anti-LE rant guy expect to be done differently with allegations of rape? He never actually gives any ideas, just some nonsense about how no women should ever be believed (and perhaps their statements, if even taken down, to be dumped promptly into the trash).
But, guys like him are being willfully dishonest about the changes that we are seeing. they just seem to have it in for LE for personal reasons.
I pointed out a five-for-five week for police in stories posted here (six-for-six, given this one today).
This is a substantial improvement over what we could have expected just a few short years ago when a man would be arrested first.
And, look at AoFR's links. I believe it's the first one wherein the sentencing judge excoriates the women for the harm she's done and innocent man. It wasn't that long ago that the male victims were never accounted for in such stories nor by judges.
Things seem to be looking up. But anti-LE rant guy remains purposefully oblivious, and keeps posting stuff about LE being at the core of the FRA epidemic.
Even if there were this supposed LE-feminist alliance, and even if it could be broken, it would still not stop woman from lying about being raped. He seems to forget that prior to this supposed alliance, we have solid evidence that women were already making FRA's (Scottsboro Boys, anyone?).
He even points out that this has happened, somehow missing the plainly obvious fact that it clearly means that a perversion of LE was NEVER a necessary component to FRA's.
What is really needed is adequate and just punishment for false accusers and training for those in LE who will have to deal with rape allegations. The idea that all that needs to happen is for LE to be liberated from feminist influence id preposterous. While feminist certainly support and encourage FRA's, they neither invented them, nor do they force them to happen (nor does LE , for that matter - as rant guys has claimed many times).
Thus, while he has some good points to make, he invariably dilutes them with his repeated inaccurate and unsubstantiated nonsense; and any good he could have achieved is thereby lost.
Slwerner, you're batting your head against a wall and it's going to drive you nuts. Stop debating the "inflamatory missinformation" idiot. Why is he aloud to post here?
Mr werner, Im not picking on the local beat cop, I'm pointing out the perversion of the law enforcement protocol, which is gender /Raunch feminist inspired and executed.
Thats why i say " Break the missinformation Alliance" between law enforcement and Gender /Raunch constructionists, for this perversion is not attacking all men equally, and is defacto just attacking the heterosexual males, just the way the Gender / Raunch community want it.
Well, if you read the stories posted here, some 90% of them involve the police getting the liars to recant. Slwerner said
In Response Arod99k said to Slwerner. Slwerner you have no clue of what you are talking about. Please get educated on this subject, before commenting.
District Attorneys who only care about power, numbers, and statistics. District Attorneys who have a win at all cost mentality, so that they can get more funding for next year, regardless of innocence. District Attorney's who are looking at the next promotion, and even the possibility of becoming a judge. The DA will never admit maleficence, even when confronted with irrefutable DNA evidence of innocence. There is a much bigger problem going on. The problem is the doing away with jury trials. There are no more jury trials because most cases are settled in plea bargain agreements. 95% of all criminal accusations are settled in plea agreements. The government will offer the defendant 2 years in a plea deal. If the innocent man refuses, he is then threatened that if he is to loose at trial, he will get 20 years.
The current system rubber stamps criminal charges to any accusation made by anyone. Detectives and prosecutors can be charged with obstruction of justice but they never are. Prosecutors and police withhold, hide, and destroy exculpatory evidence, lie, use trickery, and engage in witness tampering. Detectives engage in tunnel vision and never investigate. Police and prosecutors work harder on cases that play out in the media. Evidence is usually fabricated or lied about, but it is usually admitted. Police arrest on little or no evidence. The accusation is the conviction. A person is usually held on high bail and coerced into confessing through lengthy pre trial detention 2 years being the minimum before a trial, (See Star Chamber).
Arod99k - "Slwerner you have no clue of what you are talking about. Please get educated on this subject, before commenting."
Apparently you neglected to read my previous response to call for me to become educated (previous thread – Blogger eats my posts with links, it seems).
Fact is, I know the prosecutorial process very well. Thus, I recognize that much of what you are claiming is simply untrue.
While somewhere near 95% of cases are plea bargained, this is due to the shear numbers of cases that are handled. Most plea bargains are given for more minor crimes, and seldom involve prison time. For more serious crimes, the amount of prison time that is typically offered is based on how solid the evidence is, and even when the evidence will likely lead to a conviction, the plea bargain represents a shot at a lesser sentence.
Your claims about prosecutorial misconduct, while true in certain instances, are far, far from the norm. There are serious consequences for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence, or tampering in any way with either evidence or witnesses- consequences so serious to effectively deter it from happening in all but a handful of the hundreds of thousands of cases that come up every year.
Rape and DV allegations are quite unique in the world of crimes. Thus, while it’s true that they tend to expose the innocent unreasonably, that is not the choice of DA’s in most cases. The police normally must show probable cause for any arrest to be made. Even less serious charges like DUI are routinely dropped due to a determination (often by DA’s) that the police did not have proper “probable cause” before stopping a driver.
And, with other crimes, unlike rape, there are no “shield laws” and evidence must meet a fairly high standard to be introduced to a jury (which is why those “Rape Sheild” laws are so decried here).
Your whole speculation about coerced confessions, and accusation being equal to conviction smacks of the angry ranting of some one who deeply hates LE for some undisclosed personal reason. Rational people can easily recognize that while their have been some false convictions, thanks to the prevalence of DNA as evidence, the likelihood of the wrong suspect being convicted have been greatly reduced. And, the easily substantiated fact that rape cases taken to trial have a fairly low rate of conviction should be self-evident to the open-mind and rational that men are not so routinely railroaded into prison as you’d have people believe.
Of course it does happen. Even police and prosecutors are human, and subject to error. And, some are truly incompetent, and some are even rogue. But, they are still the exceptions.
You can ignore the elephant in the room as you prefer, but all those stories of FRA’s uncovered in the archives of this forum stand as testament to the fact that LE often do the job they are supposed to do, and there efforts are responsible for the vast majority of FRA’s that we know of. I don’t know how you can explain them all away? And, as we see in several recent accounts, even the tendency to arrest first is declining.
slwerner
Geez, I'm trying to reply, but Blogger has now eaten all four attempts - even without embedded link
alright, I'll try it in 2 parts...
Arod99k - "Slwerner you have no clue of what you are talking about. Please get educated on this subject, before commenting."
Apparently you neglected to read my previous response to call for me to become educated (previous thread – Blogger eats my posts with links, it seems).
Fact is, I know the prosecutorial process very well. Thus, I recognize that much of what you are claiming is simply untrue.
While somewhere near 95% of cases are plea bargained, this is due to the shear numbers of cases that are handled. Most plea bargains are given for more minor crimes, and seldom involve prison time. For more serious crimes, the amount of prison time that is typically offered is based on how solid the evidence is, and even when the evidence will likely lead to a conviction, the plea bargain represents a shot at a lesser sentence.
Your claims about prosecutorial misconduct, while true in certain instances, are far, far from the norm. There are serious consequences for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence, or tampering in any way with either evidence or witnesses- consequences so serious to effectively deter it from happening in all but a handful of the hundreds of thousands of cases that come up every year.
Rape and DV allegations are quite unique in the world of crimes. Thus, while it’s true that they tend to expose the innocent unreasonably, that is not the choice of DA’s in most cases. The police normally must show probable cause for any arrest to be made. Even less serious charges like DUI are routinely dropped due to a determination (often by DA’s) that the police did not have proper “probable cause” before stopping a driver.
And, with other crimes, unlike rape, there are no “shield laws” and evidence must meet a fairly high standard to be introduced to a jury (which is why those “Rape Sheild” laws are so decried here).
part 2...
Your whole speculation about coerced confessions, and accusation being equal to conviction smacks of the angry ranting of some one who deeply hates LE for some undisclosed personal reason. Rational people can easily recognize that while their have been some false convictions, thanks to the prevalence of DNA as evidence, the likelihood of the wrong suspect being convicted have been greatly reduced. And, the easily substantiated fact that rape cases taken to trial have a fairly low rate of conviction should be self-evident to the open-mind and rational that men are not so routinely railroaded into prison as you’d have people believe.
Of course it does happen. Even police and prosecutors are human, and subject to error. And, some are truly incompetent, and some are even rogue. But, they are still the exceptions.
You can ignore the elephant in the room as you prefer, but all those stories of FRA’s uncovered in the archives of this forum stand as testament to the fact that LE often do the job they are supposed to do, and there efforts are responsible for the vast majority of FRA’s that we know of. I don’t know how you can explain them all away? And, as we see in several recent accounts, even the tendency to arrest first is declining.
"Slwerner, you're batting your head against a wall and it's going to drive you nuts. Stop debating the "inflamatory missinformation" idiot. Why is he aloud to post here?"
I couldn't agree more. Nor do I have any idea why he is still allowed to post here. It makes no sense that this blog has often deleted informed and relevant comments, but refuses to do anything at all about comments that clearly undermine its mission. Worse, the owners of this blog have even gone out of their way to defend him, and made fools of themselves in the process.
While I respect and appreciate Slwerner for his excellent contributions, I do agree that that trying to show gender/raunch/alliance maniac the error of his ways is an exercise in futility.
Well folks, Its the guy that pulls no punches, and points out the disturbing reality that the rights of men/ fathers / and boys is Directly inverse proportional to The new Gender / Raunch culture Empowerment.
Feminism as was known around 20 years ago, has very little resemblance to the NEW FEMINISM, which is "Gender / Raunch feminism" which has added homosexual males to their ranks.
As one of my favorite social scientists, and possibly one of the most observant and learned minds in the world Mr David Brooks, And Mr dinesh D,sousa both point out that, Americas greatest Enemy is now itself...for the appetites of the priveledged "pork class" are so ravenous that not unlike pigs, they eat everthing, even their own young. And the neo "Gender feminist construction" has divided any men who could resist this piggish culture of decline that is destroying itself.
Anonymous - "...the disturbing reality that the rights of men/ fathers / and boys is Directly inverse proportional to The new Gender / Raunch culture Empowerment."
The thing is, this isn't some sort of enlightening revelation for most of us (if any of us). Those who've spent any time reading things in the Manosphere (which includes the MRM) are already aware that excessive female empowerment has come largely at the expense of men and men's rights.
What we really need to do is to start to focus on what we can do to change the situation.
The FRS sets out to enlighten people to the reality of FRA's - the reasons behind them, the harms they do, the lack of effective punishments for them, and what victims of that evil crime can do to protect themselves.'
To that end, closer discussion of the issues fundamental to FRA's helps to provide the "missing link" for many who come by to investigate what we're up to here.
Some discussion of more general MRM issues is a logical by-product, and can even bring additional info/evidence out for readers. And, naturally, the influences of feminism (as it is so deeply inter-twined with the FRA issue) will come out quite regularly.
However, if FRS is allowed to degrade into a forum for those with issues with other groups (be it feminism, those of different racial/ethnic/religious/economic status, or just a group like [dare I say] Law Enforcement) to "bash" those groups, the ensuing loss of focus will harm the main message by diluting out of existence.
While some groups - feminists and LE - are certainly in need of change and reform, simply bashing them in a knee-jerk manner does nothing (save for stroking the fancies of those who have personal bents against them).
The Internet has plenty of forums for the bashing of feminism. I'm sure it has site for bashing LE, as well. What there is a dearth of is sites addressing particular issues with a meaningful focus.
Let's try not to lose ours (and, I include myself in that admonishment).
"Well folks, Its the guy that pulls no punches, and points out the disturbing reality that the rights of men/ fathers / and boys is Directly inverse proportional to The new Gender / Raunch culture Empowerment."
Except what you repeatedly "point out" is not reality, because you are constantly getting your facts wrong. For example:
"Feminism as was known around 20 years ago, has very little resemblance to the NEW FEMINISM"
Actually, second-wave or gender feminism is much older than 20 years, and feminism today is almost indistinguishable from feminism in the 90's.
Regardless, even if you were correct, it's no excuse for repeating the same thing over and over again.
Post a Comment