If you want to destroy a man without officially killing him, there is no better way to do that than to falsely accuse him of rape. If a government wanted to hurt someone (provided he is male), is it so difficult to believe it would arrange for him to be falsely accused of rape?
We don't know the full story behind the murky Wikileaks rape claim that initially saw Swedish prosecutors issue an arrest warrant for Australian whistleblower Julian Assangelate on Friday night only to withdrew it the following day. For example, no one is using the word "false" in connection with the rape claim, but it seems unlikely that prosecutors simply decided not to press rape charges based on a determination that it couldn't prevail at trial, or even based on the women's decision not to cooperate. Not that quickly.
Assange said in an interview published on Sunday that he believes the Pentagon could be behind the rape accusation. He said that he had been warned previously that groups such as the Pentagon "could use dirty tricks" to destroy Wikileaks -- adding that he had been particularly warned against being entrapped by sexual scandals.
Read the story here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100822/en_afp/swedencrimeintelligenceinternetwikileaks_11
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
Yes. I think it's pretty obvious that this was a smear job.
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/08/21/1138240
Julian Assange Faces Rape Investigation In Sweden — Updated
and
http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/08/22/1542256
Sweden Defends Wiki Sex Case About-Face
*both* are essential reading IMHO
It may have been some rogue hooker looking for some cash, and a book deal from operah that made this false rape accusation.
Whoever it was, the general public have a right to know, so we can stay the f#ck away from this nasty pig.
Now that nearly all western societies are Gender / Raunch feminist dominated, we will False rape accusations outnumber real ones 500 to 1.
How many 17 year old boys need to be beaten to death in their sleep by a baseball bat, before humanity wrestles the law enforcement community away from the Gender / Raunch perverts who "Empower" themselves off their missinformation Alliances with law enforcement??
"unfounded" is never seen the same as "false".
This is how feminists can still assert that all rape accusations are factual. This is how they can continue their missinformation campaign that women never lie about rape. This is how they can blame law enforcement for 'bungling' the rape case because they made too many mistakes. But "falsified", never! This would mean that a woman actually lied about being raped and that is not a part of what feminism is all about.
For example, no one is using the word "false" in connection with the rape claim,
Actually, I plastered that all over the comments sections of major newspapers when this story first broke. I also said that the feminist Swede female prosecutor was in collusion with the Pentagon and US gov't and that she should be forced out of office. I also demanded to see the affadavit of the accuser because I know that she doesn't even exist. This was a frame up of a man, pure and simple, and they used the allegation to try to ruin him. It was dropped almost immediately after it was made public and in the media. Of course, the gov't controls the media as well and have ways of putting pressure on editors and owners of papers.
Loud mouth, angry, Gender / Raunch feminists would loose all their "Rape hysteria Empowerment", if society found out most of the ???Rape accusations??? that make the newspapers are actually false accusations. So yes they have perverted law enforcement into a semantics game of what actually is the meaning of is, and law enforcement now "Label" false rape accusations as "unfounded", and they have further word games to falselly justify to the public why they pervert the word false into "unfounded".
Its all part of the "Gender feminist construction" that rules the western world, but is also collapsing it under the weight of its own pork.
"Was the Pentagon behind Wikileaks rape claim?"
Not meant as an objection, but...
Asked and answered.
Man, there is so much wrong with this story.
First, it was found that there was no evidence to support these charges.
Second, I read the original charges, and all he did was refuse to use a condom and that is all they are accusing him of, not rape. Yet somehow the charges became rape.
Third, it is a big coincidence that these charge overlap his second release of the US pentagon documents. It is even a bigger coincidence that Sweden, the largest state sponsoring wikileaks is bringing up the charges, or I should say dropping the charges, or now again bringing up the charges but in special manner without the formal arrest warrants because the evidence for rape does not justify such normal arrest warrants under Swedish law. In short, Sweden is only doing this call for him to step down because they are feeling pressure from washington for giving so much money to the site.
And lastly, wtf? Typical Aussie? If not having a condom in considered sex in Sweden then calling someone a typical Aussie should also be considered a hate crime. WTF ever, worst bs story since Ricky Martin being gay. This is a reference point for Noah Chomsky's manufacturing consent theory.
PS. You should also google what molestation means in Swedish law, it can be anything from just looking at a girl (Doesn't count if a girl looks at a man, btw) to basically just being plain old creepy in another person's personal opinion.
PSS. Your version of this story is one of the best I have read, it is a joke that I need to go to blog to get an honest version of this story, nice work.
Mikeinreality
Post a Comment