We dip into the archives to briefly spotlight the case of Damon Hadley who landed himself in the news and on national television a couple of years ago. (That's Damon and his Mom in the picture.) Damon seems like a perfectly normal kid, a good kid, in fact. In no manner does he fit my notions of a bad guy or, heaven forbid, a criminal.
Damon didn't deserve what happened to him, and by my count, he was victimized three times for doing nothing more than average 17-year-old guys do all the time: Damon had first time, consensual sex with his slightly younger girlfriend. Mind you, this is not an endorsement of teenage sex, it's a recognition that it is common.
How was Damon victimized? (1) Damon was victimized by his 15-1/2-year-old girlfriend, who lied that he raped her because she feared getting in trouble for having consensual sex; (2) Damon was victimized by his girlfriend's father, who assaulted him outside school when he learned his daughter had been "raped," and later publicly professed that he wished he had done worse even after he found out his daughter lied; and (3) Damon was victimized by an absurd law that branded 17-year-old boys who dared to have sex with their 15-1/2-year-old girlfriends as "criminals" who should be sent to prison for a year.
How's that for a brief, illicit romp in the sheets? The frightening thing about Damon's experience is that it is so terribly common. Every aspect of this story rears its ugly head in our newspapers on a regular basis.
To briefly summarize: one September school day, Damon and the girl he was secretly dating (her parents didn't allow her to date -- red flag number one) skipped out of school and went to his house for consensual sex. It was his first time. "[Having sex is] something that she brought up before I did, so I thought it was something she wanted to do," said Damon. In fact, she later admitted it was entirely consensual. But it was still illegal -- for him alone, of course -- because she wasn't yet 16. “I didn’t know there was a certain age you had to be to have sex,” Damon later admitted. Most boys probably don't. Never mind that girls mature faster than boys in every way. The boy is the predator who should have his life destroyed for doing something his equally mature girlfriend initiated.
Later that day, Damon and his girlfriend tried to sneak back into school. School officials separated them, and questioned them. It was then that the girl accused Damon of forcing himself on her, but Damon didn't know that just yet. He was to find out quickly. That afternoon, as school was letting out, Damon saw his girlfriend’s father and brother waiting in a car outside school. The two jumped out and ran toward him. “I didn’t move at all, I just froze,” Damon said. “I didn’t know what to do. Her dad hit me. I was on the ground, I just remember him standing on top of me and hitting me. He kept saying, ‘Did you (have sex with) my daughter?’” As the father hit Damon, his son stood behind him watching. Damon's mouth filled with blood. Some students walked by; others stopped to stare. (Would they have walked by or stopped to stare if a girl was being beaten by an adult male?) Eventually, one of Damon’s friends took him to the school nurse’s office. Damon learned that his girlfriend had accused him of rape. She later admitted lying, saying she made up the false report because she was scared. Damon told police the girl's parents did not allow her to date.
The girl's father admitted without regret that he hit Damon, and, in fact, he publicly stated he wished he had done worse. Here is what the father said even after he found out his daughter lied about Damon forcing himself on her: "So I hit him. Do I regret what I did? No. Would I do it differently? Yes, I would, I would." And what would he do differently? "Now? Take that kid, stick him in the car, tie a rope around his neck and go as fast as I could up and down the highways, every single highway there is," he said. Nice man. The father was charged with simple assault for his attack on Damon.
So, up to this point, Damon was twice victimized: once by his girlfriend, and once by his girlfriend's father. Hadn't he suffered enough for doing what teenage boys do on a regular basis every single day of the week? The law enforcement apparatus didn't think so. Damon was arrested and charged with misdemeanor sexual assault, which carried up to a year behind bars, because the girl was not 16, the age of consent.
Eventually, the girl's father was sentenced to 12 months in jail and Damon was sentenced to three months. Both sentences were suspended on condition of good behavior. Thankfully, Damon was not placed on a sex offender's list.
The girl's father was later charged in an unrelated incident with aggravated felonious sexual assault, sexual assault and providing alcohol to minors. I will not talk about "poetic justice" because I do not know if he was guilty of the crimes charged, or if he, himself, was the victim of a false accusation. I suppose the latter would be poetic justice of some sort, but I never wish a false rape claim on anyone.
So, who do you think was the only one to emerge from this ordeal unscathed? The girlfriend, of course. Some demanded that she be charged with filing a false police report. The problem was, she didn't make a false police report. She lied to her mother, and her mother called the police, so technically, the girl didn't make a false police report.
The Lessons
Teenage boys need to understand the dangerous world they live in. Rape lies are common and the poison they emit takes many forms. When a girl claims her boyfriend raped her, the male members of her family typically go insane. And when one of them beats up the boy, people will walk by and let it happen -- because, after all, he's just a boy. So if you are a young man having sex with a girl who might think she needs to cover it up from a parent, please know that too many girls will not hesitate to throw you under the bus and cry "rape" to save her skin.
And boys need to be taught the law about the age of consent. Every state has its own laws, and boys need to know what their state says. As it is, we are allowing our sons to be branded as criminals for doing what boys always do -- even though no sane person thinks it's criminal.
In addition, the law needs to be changed in several respects. First, anyone who tells a rape lie to someone with the reasonable expectation that such other person will make a police report should be criminally charged. (But don't hold your breath waiting for that change. Heaven forbid we should discourage rape liars from coming forward.)
Second, the legislative efforts in various states to de-criminalize consensual sex between teens within several years of each other should move faster. No state should send a 17-year-old boy to prison for having sex with his slightly younger girlfriend.
The biggest lesson: you young men need to know that your penises are viewed by pretty much everyone as dangerous weapons, more deadly than firearms. You will be looked upon as a suspect for all sorts of things merely because you are packing one of those things. And because you're a suspect, it's damn easy to make people believe you did something awful even when you didn't.
You all need to know that now, before it's too late.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
How many ways can a falsely accused teenage boy be victimized? Meet Damon Hadley
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

20 comments:
How was Damon victimized?
A chivalrous society. Women and girls don't ever lie about rape. Period. That is the assertion that has been pounded into our minds the last 40 years by academic feminism. This is the main cause for the twisted mindset of today's young women who think falsifying a rape is a viable option, a liberty and a right.
This has got to stop. Work with your local politicians, fight for change, fight for tougher laws against false rape.
And if Damon refused to have sex with her, she still could have turned around and said that he tried to rape her.
Anonymous - "How was Damon victimized?
A chivalrous society"
Yes! Exactly!
Was he mistreated by the police, prosecutors and the courts? Yes! Yes, he was. LE is certainly complicit in the serious injustice done to this young man.
But, unlike what is sometimes (anonymously) suggested, LE is not THE, but merely a part of the overall problem – which, of course, begins with those who chose to make false allegations.
In those instances of FRAs’ where LE fails to do it’s job, and ultimately fails to protect innocent citizens, it is oft-as-not out of a misplaced sense of Chivalry. Much like the father in this story who, knowing full well his daughter had willingly engaged in consensual sex, never-the-less wished to cause her boyfriend physical harm out a a similarly misplaced sense of Chivalry which would have him “championing” the virtue of his daughter [ever wonder how many good men have died in duals believing that they were defending the honor of a woman who, in fact, had none?]. It’s a blind devotion to the quasi-religious notion of Chivalry, which, sadly, has at it’s core the idolization of woman as paragons of virtue.
I posted this comment from uber-mangina Chivalrous White-knight Jesse Powell on a recent post (They Were Expendable by The Elusive Wapiti), as it fit in with the idea of male disposability in the service to women. But, it also says a great deal about how Social Conservative Christians view the obligation of men to sacrifice themselves for the benefit of women (without questioning if the women are justly benefitted.):
(As I noted before, I hope those reading this haven’t recently eaten)
"It is the primary duty of men to protect women, and by extension the children a man fathers with the woman he loves. Surely part of the code of protecting women includes protecting women from rape, and fundamental to protecting women from rape is punishing the men who commit rape. There is no way around that. Because life is not perfect and the knowledge we possess in incomplete punishing men who rape necessarily entails punishing men who have not raped but are believed to have raped. That is simply the price that must be paid for the social good of protecting women from rape to the best extent that we as men are capable of."
(his comment is found at the end of that discussion thread)
Of course, we could cite dozens of instance where innocent men DID end up incarcerated, and ask, just exactly how did THEIR sacrifice/imprisonment protect one single women (any women) for being raped? How about those cases where the WRONG MAN was convicted, leaving the real rapist to roam free? Did that protect women, or did it, in fact, put women at increased risk?
The Jesse Powell’s of this world will not wish to answer, but instead turn to their blind devotion to the faith, Chivalry.
[/rant]
This guy's life is ruined.
http://www.winknews.com/Local-Florida/2010-08-04/Charlotte-County-Sheriff-witnesses-two-girls-exposing-breasts-to-him-and-other-motorists
Jesse Powell would do well to read Blackstone sometime. There is a legal term for people who think like that: "Nitwit."
By the way, we help rape victims best by raising the integrity of women who cry "rape." Rape victims uniformly tell us that they hate false accusers. Aside from reading Blackstone sometime, Jesse Powell should talk to a rape survivor.
Anonymous - "This guy's life is ruined."
From that linked article:
"Based on the evidence, Blevins was charged with felony Possessing Photographs of Sexual Performance by a Child, and misdemeanor Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor. He was transported to the Charlotte County Jail and posted $3,500 bond.
The two girls were arrested for exposing their breasts to Blevins so he could take a picture; they were also transported to the County Jail and both were charged with Indecent Exposure in Public/Exposure of Sexual Organs."
In case anyone isn't already aware, Indecent Exposure is considered a sexually based offense (in that sexualized body parts are involved), and could lead to the offenders having to register as sex offenders (right beside perv's who've sexually abused children, no distinction made, and no explanation as to why they are listed).
The same goes for public urination.
Now, there's virtually no chance that under-aged girls are going to be held to such a standard. In fact, adult women who expose themselves are (almost) never required to register.
But, this guy, who made the mistake of snapping pictures with his cell phone of them committing their crimes (for which they will likely get a stern warning, and little more) is going to have it far, far worse in that HE was in possession of kiddie-porn. There is almost no chance that this guy will avoid having to register.
Again, it's really a matter of societies misplaced Chivalry. Women can do most anything they happen to want tot do, and we largely give them a pass...because, "hey, they're women, and we need to protect them (even from the consequences of their own acts of willful commission).
Chivalry no longer "fits" into a world where women have become sexual libertines, and often direct competitors with men. Real Chivalry is long-dead. It's time for people to quit worshiping it's stinking corpse.
"Damon was victimized by his girlfriend's father, who assaulted him outside school when he learned his daughter had been "raped," and later publicly professed that he wished he had done worse even after he found out his daughter lied"
I have previously mentioned that often the "driver" behind prosecutions are the parents of under-aged girls, who could care less if their daughters willingly had sex (even if it was the girl who initiated the sex), and just want the guy who "defiled" their precious little girl punished.
Fortunately, here in Colorado, the "magical" ages are 14 (for consent), and less than 4 years in age difference if either is under the age of 18.
I understand the general mistrust of prosecutors often expressed here, but I can tell you that I have heard from them (and not just from my wife) that being able to tell angry parents that there is nothing they can do (in terms of charging the boy). It gets them out of having to prosecute a case that they really do not want to, without any worries of repercussions when the parents (inevitably, it seems) file a formal (or, even informal - such as calling the media to complain about not getting "justice") complaint against the DA's office.
Sadly, Damon Hadley was in a jurisdiction that did not have such sane laws regarding consent and age differences.
"It is the primary duty of men to protect women"
Jesse Powell can cry about metaphysics all he wants, the fact is that I, a man, have no duty at all towards women, let alone protecting them.
Senseless murder:
http://cbs4.com/local/richard.rojas.davie.2.1839789.html
When is it gona get to the point where pissant government workers who are more dangerous to society, then they are to criminals; won't even dare leave their homes past certain hours? Also, when you cause men more and more resent to women, it's only going to be LESS safe for women to go out late at night as well.
THe more I read stuff hear and especially that "They were Expendable" article the more I take the attitude that I wont help any woman who is not my flesh and blood, or of course partner.
Letting women and girls willfully lie to law enforcement about being raped when they were not..Is a very serious perversion of said law enforcement community.
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/38574025/ns/sports-college_basketball/
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - A Kentucky woman was convicted Thursday of demanding millions of dollars from Rick Pitino to keep secret their one-night stand in a restaurant, then claiming the Louisville basketball coach raped her after he reported the extortion.
Karen Cunagin Sypher, 50, of Louisville, was found guilty of three counts of extortion, two counts of lying to the FBI and one count of retaliating against a witness. She stared at the ceiling as the verdict was read, while one of her sons wept openly.
The case involved a 2003 sexual encounter between Pitino and Sypher, a former model at car shows, at a table inside an Italian restaurant closed for the night. Pitino testified she came on to him and the sex was consensual. After she was charged, Sypher told police it was rape but Pitino was never charged.
Sypher faces up to 26 years in prison, although lesser sentence more likely
-----------------------
The moral? ... if you want to see your false accuser sufficiently punished, make sure she tries to extort you as well. That's a crime that carries real sentence, despite its lesser capacity for destroying human life.
I wish I could post something about the main article, but I just can't. Everything has been said and said again, it's just terrible. I don't hope that the father's new charges are real, but if they actually are, I do hope he goes to jail for the beating.
But this:
This guy's life is ruined.
http://www.winknews.com/Local-Florida/2010-08-04/Charlotte-County-Sheriff-witnesses-two-girls-exposing-breasts-to-him-and-other-motorists
I don't know if you guys remember the naked (or topless) girl in the park that asked men to take their pants off, only to be arrested by cops?
And how the cops let the naked/topless girl be just to bait men?
Suppose this cop allowed the girls to do so just so he could arrest a "sex offender". Not saying it is, but nothing would surprise me.
zarko
The moral? ... if you want to see your false accuser sufficiently punished, make sure she tries to extort you as well. That's a crime that carries real sentence, despite its lesser capacity for destroying human life.
Unfortunately the police didn't believe my husband. She was blackmailing AND trying to extort money from him.
They believed her instead.
CBGirl
I think it'd be great if there could be seminars organized by people for young males especially, I think an apt title would be "How to protect yourselves from rape of the legal kind."
As I'd seriously be afraid to have a son, as even with the best preparations it seems just one slip up and the "fairer sex"(lol) could ruin his life with a sentence.
Except that no "slip up" is necessary. Let's not blame the victim.
Chivalry and feminism walk hand in hand, creating hell all over the land.
www.rickyslife.com
CNN Covers Ricky's Story
Read the story and view the featured videos here.
Oklahoma's FOX 23 Reports on Ricky's Situation
Read the story and view the featured video here.
Tulsa's News on 6 Covers Ricky's Story
Read the story and view the featured video here.
ABC News 20/20 "Age of Consent"
To see 20/20's coverage, click here.
Minnesota Public Radio Presents Ricky's Case
To listen, click here.
Los Angeles City Beat Covers Ricky's Situation
"Being labeled a sex offender has completely changed Ricky's life, leading him to be kicked out of high school, thrown out of parks, taunted by neighbors, harassed by strangers and unable to live within 2,000 feet of a school, day-care center or park." Read more of Is Ricky Really a Sex Offender here.
When Getting Tough Backfires
Dan Gunderson of Minnesota Public Radio interviews North Dakota Senator Tim Mathern, criminologist Lisa Sample and Patty Wetterling, mother of an abducted child about effective, fact based policies. Listen here.
Read more here.
@Aug 6, 2010 6:48:00 AM
too true, didn't mean to come off as blaming the kid at all, as he really didn't do anything to deserve this, not his fault he associated with this little tart. :/
Post a Comment