HOPKINSVILLE POLICE SAY A DENZIL DRIVE WOMAN WAS ARRESTED WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON FOR FALSELY REPORTING SHE WAS RAPED JUNE 28TH.
POLICE SAY 19 YEAR-OLD CHRISTY DAWN LAVENDER OF 1300-2 DENZIL DRIVE WAS ARRESTED WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON AFTER SHE ADMITTED TO DETECTIVES THAT DESPITE HER INITIAL CLAIMS, SHE WAS NOT RAPED ON JUNE 28TH AT HER HOME. SHE TOLD THE DETECTIVE SHE MADE THE CLAIM BECAUSE SHE WAS TRYING TO SAVE HER MARRIAGE.
LAVENDER INITIALLY ACCUSED OF A FORT CAMPBELL MAN OF HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH HER AT HER APARTMENT.
Link:
http://www.wkdzradio.com/pages/7699314.php?
Link:
http://www.wkdzradio.com/pages/7699314.php?
Posts
27 comments:
Rape charge stayed amid questions
'A strange turn of events saw the Crown stay a sexual assault charge following four days of trial and after the accused man had waited 26 months in custody for a judge and jury to hear his case.
James Ferris, 36, walked out of Superior Court a free man yesterday when the prosecutor told Justice Kim Carpenter-Gunn the Crown had re-evaluated its case in light of new developments and no longer believed there was a reasonable prospect of obtaining a conviction.
The rape trial went off the rails earlier yesterday when Ferris's lawyer, Peter Boushy, told the judge what he'd learned from a colleague in the legal community about the 27-year-old female complainant.'
http://www.thespec.com/news/crime/article/248502--rape-charge-stayed-amid-questions
Rape Shield Laws and False Convictions
by Welmer on August 26, 2010
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/08/26/rape-shield-laws-and-false-convictions/#comments
Why do women believe they can "Save their marraige", or "get there boyfriends back", by saying they were raped by someone???
Because it works!!! In this current culture where society is led to falselly believe that women NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER, lie about rape, when the reality they are now lying about it alot, again because false rape accusation work out for them 95% of the time.
The current approach by western law enforcement of "Not Charging" is near barbaric, for eventually we will reach the point where there are so many false rape accusations that it trivialises real accusations. In order to return some sanity to this situation, Law enforcement needs to be told they have a constitutional obligation to deter false rape claims in order to keep public order, and protect the sanctity of real victims.
I'm wondering how making a false rape claim could save a marriage.
And what's with the all caps?
This is one case out of hundreds that do not get prosecuted. Most law enforcement are now under the Neo Gender feminist theory that "By charging false rape accusers, it somehow deters the real victims from coming forward".
I say, this theory that has perverted law enforcement protocol smells ??fishy??, and where are the studies that prove this??
One real consequence of this new protocol perversion of law enforcement, is the "false rape culture" that has developed over the last 20 years.
Don't Ask me why women believe "they can save a marraige with a false rape accusation"...its this silly girl that did it, not my...I'm just a pundit.
I assume it has something to do with all the attention and sympathy women get from saying they were raped.
I have read that statistically the number one reason for false rape accusations in America from young women is "They were late for work"!! which is equally silly, but again they have found "It works".
Nothing challenges irrationall "Rape hysteria" but the facts. The gender feminist community are too drunk on their "Empowerment" to lets the facts get in the wat, so they pervert law enforcemnt to "redefine what the meaning of is, is", in order to keep it from us.
Aug 26, 2010 9:30:00 AM
Aug 26, 2010 9:36:00 AM
Aug 26, 2010 9:41:00 AM
Can you please "stop posting" until you learn "grammar" or at least enforce a spell checker alliance, without which is a "perversion" of English, and incontrovertible.
Aww, it's just Gender/Raunch guy. No one takes him seriously.
He's like your annoying little brother.
The Gender/Raunch robot ... will not "STOP" at anything .. until we at false rape society have been "convinced" that LE law enforcement pigs drinking from the trough of public money are part of the "CULTURE" of Gender/Raunch false accusations ... lzozlzozlzozlzz
LOL this incident happened in my unit. We got called back in because of that rape complaint and a DUI. Barracks whores are unbiquitous on an Army post, and the population has exploded with the division deployed. Also ubiquitous are rape awareness lectures and the 2% false rape claim lie. Thanks for posting this. My wife and I had a good laugh over it.
Anonymous - "I'm wondering how making a false rape claim could save a marriage."
There have been many instance in which a married women was caught (or feared she was about to be) having an affair, where they've tried to claim that their lover raped them rather than admit to the infidelity. They seem to believe that if they can just get their husband to believe that they were forced into sex, then he will be less likely to want to divorce her.
It happens when they get caught cheating on boyfriends too. Danmell Ndoyne's lies started when her boyfriend realized that she'd just come from having sex with someone else (several someones, as it turned out).
As it turns out that he is close to the situation, perhaps our new friend, WolfmanMac might be able to tell us if this was a case of a woman getting caught cheating, and trying to pass it off as rape?
"One real consequence of this new protocol perversion of law enforcement, is the "false rape culture" that has developed over the last 20 years."
What was going on before that -- before 1990?
As it turns out that he is close to the situation, perhaps our new friend, WolfmanMac might be able to tell us if this was a case of a woman getting caught cheating, and trying to pass it off as rape?
She spent the night with him in his barracks room, and they had sex. He stated she was perfectly cool until sometime in the early morning hours, she got a text message from her husband (he is deployed, we are currently on rear detachment, I am deploying in a week). He stated "started acting freaky and scared" after she got the text message, leaving shortly afterward. The next day or the day after, MP's showed up at the company and took him to the Provost Marshalls office, where he was questioned by CID, and told he was charged with Lifetime TV's favorite fantasy.When the story made its way around the recall formation the day we got called back in, everybody immediately suspected it was barracks whore bullshit when the we heard that she was in his barracks room and her husband was deployed. Further, if memory serves, she stated the rape took place at her residence. He is in the clear now.
Yeah, re-reading the story that was her claim - that she was raped at her home, begging the question...
I so wish there was a way to open the records on a military post and have an unbiased look at all the bullshit that the sexual assault coordinators pass of as an "epidemic." No need to violate anyones privacy - the can redact names and other identifying information. Just make it public record so we can have a look at this 2% false rape lie. The Air Force study showing 40% was not the least bit atypical, I assure you. And considering the rigorous standards the used to assess what actually constituted a false rape claim, a low ball figure. This. happens. all. the. time.
WolfmanMac - "She spent the night with him in his barracks room, and they had sex. He stated she was perfectly cool until sometime in the early morning hours, she got a text message from her husband"
It seems oft-as-not that a married women who cries rape is doing so to cover-up an affair. It seems to be rather common, in fact.
It also seem s to be not particularly uncommon amongst women with boyfriends who get caught cheating.
In a way, it's not that unlike a "Hail Mary" pass at the end of a football game. If one is losing anyway, and there's no additional "cost" to trying, it actually makes a good deal of sense (a perverse sense, to be sure, but cold, calculated sense, none-the-less). It just goes to show the increasing need for some real punishments for those who make FRA so as to provide a meaningful deterrent.
WolfmanMac or whoever knows the answer. If a man is accused of rape while in the military by an accuser who claims he was not with his unit on the day of the rape, would his unit records prove who's telling the truth?
I'm not sure I understand your question. If you are asking if there is accountability of personnel during duty hours, pretty much like any other job. At least two formations a day most days (P.T. in the morning and work call at 0900 are usually the minimum, some days a formation at the end of the work day around 1700-1730). In between you are either where you are supposed to be, doing what you are supposed to be doing, or somebody is asking where you are. Accountability starts at team level (1 team leader for 3-5 soldiers), who answers to a squad leader (1 per 8-10 soldiers) who answers to a platoon sergeant (1 per 25-30 soldiers) who answers to a company First Sergeant (1 per 75-120 soldiers. In any event, at least twice a day someone is going to be putting eyes on you, or accounting for your whereabouts. If that wasn't your question, Im sorry. Ill try to answer with some clarification.
WolfmanMac, here's what happened. A military man was stationed in the Philipines. A woman in the U.S. claims that he raped her on a certain day (in the U.S). I'm asking if this man's unit records (showing he was with his unit on that day and not away on leave) would "prove" his innocence.
I guess the answer is "yes", but would his unit records be available to back up his side of the story?
From what you describe, it certainly should. To go on leave or pass requires a DA form 31 be filed and approved prior to departure, signed and submitted for deduction of leave (if leave was taken) or record of the pass (if no leave was taken but a pass was requested and approved)upon return. The only other explanation would be that this man flew back to the States without unit approval (perhaps over a 4-day holiday weekend), committed the crime and then flew back before the next duty day. That is possible - if you have a long weekend and take off, as long as there is no police contact and you are back before the next scheduled formation/duty day, noone would be the wiser. But then we are talking about travel time, airline records, surveillance video, etc. I was never stationed in the Phillipines, but I've been overseas and travelling from the Phiilipines to the U.S., committing a crime and getting back in 4 days (with NOONE noticing) seems a considerable stretch. Of course, if she is alleging the crime occurred at any other time (than over a long weekend), no. It just isn't possible to disappear for the length of time it would take to complete a mission like that and have noone notice.
From what you describe, it certainly should. To go on leave or pass requires a DA form 31 be filed and approved prior to departure, signed and submitted for deduction of leave (if leave was taken) or record of the pass (if no leave was taken but a pass was requested and approved)upon return. The only other explanation would be that this man flew back to the States without unit approval (perhaps over a 4-day holiday weekend), committed the crime and then flew back before the next duty day. That is possible - if you have a long weekend and take off, as long as there is no police contact and you are back before the next scheduled formation/duty day, noone would be the wiser. But then we are talking about travel time, airline records, surveillance video, etc. I was never stationed in the Phillipines, but I've been overseas and travelling from the Phiilipines to the U.S., committing a crime and getting back in 4 days (with NOONE noticing) seems a considerable stretch. Of course, if she is alleging the crime occurred at any other time (than over a long weekend), no. It just isn't possible to disappear for the length of time it would take to complete a mission like that and have noone notice.
I shot off a little at the mouth there - if he is in the Phillipines he is most likely Navy or Marine Corps, in which case ahe leave form would of course not be a DA form 31. But the substance of the comment remains - all services have a requisite form that must be filed for leave or pass. Absent that form, someone reported him "present or accounted for" if it was a duty day.
Good explanation, thanks. It was not over a holiday weekend, and she claims the rape happened in the mid 70s. Do you know how long the military keeps these unit records?
Also I misspoke. He was stationed in Formosa. At any rate, he might need to prove that he was not in the U.S. on the day of the rape. I'm trying to get a feel on how difficult it would be to prove that.
EEEW, pretty tough. I don't know how long the military keeps records, but it is a finite length of time. A leave form from the 70's? I wouldn't bet on it. Even if it did still exist somewhere in the ether - a ginormous "if" - God knows whrre it is, or even where you would start looking.
The only way to verify his whereabouts would be a DD 214 - a record of military service given upon discharge. That would show where a person was stationed and when they were stationed there, but it wouldn't reflect leave dates and it certainly wouldn't be useful for verifying someones whereabouts on a particular day during that time period.
But you never know. I'd get with the VA and try, but I'd be amazed if he could lay hands on anything but a DD 214.
Best of luck, hope I was helpful.
He's my uncle and I think he's already notified the VA. I'm fishing around the web for any information that might help.
He hardly remembers the accuser. He took 2 separate two-week leaves to the U.S., but not during the time she claims he raped her.
We are hoping someone can help us dig up the proof. You have been very very helpful. God bless.
The new Gender feminist "paradigm construction", is basically a group of "women as victim theories" bunched together in a linear construction, and fed to a society that protects women at all costs, and hence would never challenge the "women as victim constructions" cry for help, and in turn, would never challenge the new gender feminist construction.
History will note that the GLBT community has also joined the "Empowerment" parade. They changed the game a little bit over the last 20 years by twisting the rhetoric into, Now it is only the Hetero-sexual males that are the scourge of society.
I beleive "Empowering" yourself with the usage of faulty and inflamatory missinformation may win some immediatte battles, but the long term consequences will prove it a phyric victory.
Even if the United States is completelly dominated by the Gender / Raunch community (which some areas clearly are) other countries will have no choice but to ban the faulty and inflamatory rhetoric construction that "Empowered" these Gender / Raunch folks.
Post a Comment