A woman pretended she was the victim of a double rape to escape a driving ban, a court heard.
Sarah Hunter, 30, told police she was dragged from her boyfriend’s car and raped in an alley by two men.
Two specialist officers spent seven hours interviewing her, while forensic teams performed a fingertip search of the area where she said she was attacked.
But Hunter finally admitted she made up the allegation because she was scared of being prosecuted for crashing her boyfriend’s car, which she was not insured to drive.
Her lies wasted 15 hours of police time and left a community distraught at the prospect that two rapists were at large, Coventry Magistrates’ Court heard on Friday.
Hunter, a mother of two, admitted causing wasteful employment of police time - which carries a maximum six-month prison sentence - as well as using a vehicle without insurance and failing to stop after an accident.
The court heard she took her boyfriend’s Vauxhall Astra on April 28, uninsured and without his permission.
Shortly after 3am, she crashed into two parked vehicles in Canley, Coventry, causing £5,000 of damage to the Vauxhall Astra and a Mazda.
But instead of owning up to the accident, Hunter went to a house and told residents she had been dragged from the car before being raped in an alley.
When police and paramedics arrived, she ‘hysterically’ told them the same sob story, the court heard.
Prosecutor Katie Baker told the court: ‘The defendant was noted as being extremely upset and hysterical. She told them she had gone from her mum’s house to the car to get cigarettes when two men approached her and demanded that she get into the vehicle.
‘She described how she was dragged from the car and raped in an alleyway.
‘She said she was dragged back into the vehicle where the collision took place. She said the men ran away and left her.’
The court heard residents living nearby were shocked and disturbed by reports of the rape, amid fears the attackers were still at large.
Miss Baker said: ‘The defendant said she was sorry for her actions and to the officers who dealt with her case.
‘A great deal of time, money and effort was spent. It had a big effect on the community and this has a knock-on effect on victims of genuine rape.’
Last night, Hunter’s own sister condemned her for crying rape.
Annette Perkins, 36, said: ‘Sarah told me that she’d been raped and I was really gutted for her. I couldn’t believe it.
‘She was crying so much and she was hysterical. Now that I know the truth I’m very shocked. I can’t believe she lied so much about something so appalling. For me that’s just wrong.’
Hunter refused to comment at her new-build townhouse in the suburb of Hartshill in Nuneaton, Warwickshire.
Neighbours said she rarely left the house, apart from visiting her boyfriend, known as Dot.
One woman in her 30s, who did not want to be named, said: ‘It’s disgusting what she tried to do. For her to cry rape in an attempt to slime her way out of a motoring charge is appalling.’
Hunter will be sentenced at the end of the month.
[FRS COMMENT] - That unidentified woman at the end of the story said it all. Too bad, like most, she doesn't want to be named. She knows what kind of storm she would call down, by those in the 'victim' industry, if her name was published.
Thanks to AfOR for the tip.
Link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284648/Woman-brutal-rape-story-hide-fact-crashed-boyfriends-car.html
Posts
29 comments:
And feminists will continue to insist -- in spite of all of this evidence -- that women all but never make up stories about being raped. Why, why, WHY would they subject themselves to the traumatic process of being grilled repeatedly by the police, subjected to medical exams, etc, if nothing happened?
Unfortunately for the feminists, the answer to that question couldn't be more inconvenient:
Some women will lie about being raped just for the fun of it.
Others, who lie, lie to cause the most damage they can to somebody's life,name, health family, career, reputation, social status, personal enfranchisement, finances, rights and their core.
and unfortunately for us, lots of those feminists work in the sexual grievance industry.
and unfortunately for us, lots of those feminists lie just as much as false rape accusers.
‘A great deal of time, money and effort was spent. It had a big effect on the community and this has a knock-on effect on victims of genuine rape.’
I bet this statement raised the blood pressure of many feminists. Some probably suffered apoplexy too.
Rape hysteria is now the main tool for the "Empowerment" of the Gender feminist community, and they will not let go of this "Hysteria power" very easilly.
They will only be forced to sucumb to "Equality under the law", when there is a civil rights lawsuit that removes Gender feminist missinformation and "Manufactured statistics" from law enforcement.
She's now been sentenced.
12 weeks in jail.....suspended!
I.e. NO PUNISHMENT AT ALL!
forgot the link regarding sentencing:
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/183160/Drink-drive-mother-who-cried-rape-is-spared-jail
Let look at her offences:
Aggravated vehicle taking
Driving without insurance
Drink driving
AND a false rape claims on top.
The first few offences deserve at least the 12 weeks (no suspended) themselves.
When compounded by the false rape claim you've got to be looking at a couple of years and that's being as lenient as possible.
"Baltimore has established a new hot line for victims of rape and sexual assault...
It's part of the city's response to a report in The Baltimore Sun, which found that Baltimore led the nation in rape cases that police believe are false or baseless. Over the past five years, more than 30 percent of the rape cases investigated by detectives each year have been deemed unfounded. That's five times the national average."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/crime-scene/baltimore/new-rape-hotline-in-baltimore.html
Still, no idea how they can claim to know what the national average is.
"The first meeting of a task force charged with auditing Baltimore police rape reports is due to meet July 8. This comes after Sunday's Baltimore Sun article that reported city police have one of the highest rates of unfounding rape complaints made by women."
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/blog/2010/06/review_of_rape_cases_to_begin.html
"But Stefan Hunkha, defending, said: “This was a kind of attention seeking or cry for help to bring her to the attention of people so she could speak in a rather strange and bizarre fashion about her problems.”"
Funny, no one ever says things like that when commit crimes.
"But Stefan Hunkha, defending, said: “This was a kind of attention seeking or cry for help to bring her to the attention of people so she could speak in a rather strange and bizarre fashion about her problems.”"
Funny, no one ever says things like that when commit crimes.
Women! *laughs* What WILL they make up false rape claims about NEXT?
OT- this will make you sick: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/06/women-will-rule-the-world.html
In the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, in which a vastly disproportionate number of men have lost their jobs, the feminist (AKA female supremacist) media continues to gloat over the fall of men.
****
When historians write about the great recession of 2007–08, they may very well have a new name for it: the Mancession. It’s a term already being bandied about in the popular media as business writers chronicle the sad tales of the main victims of the recession: men. They were disproportionately represented in the industries hit hardest during the downturn, including financial services, manufacturing, and construction, and their higher salaries often put them first in the line of fire. Men are the victims of two thirds of the 11 million jobs lost since the recession began in 2007; in August 2009, when U.S. male unemployment stood at 11 percent (versus 8.3 for women), it was the largest unemployment gender gap in the postwar era. Those numbers have improved, a bit—new unemployment figures show men at 9.9 percent and women at 7.8—but not enough to stop Larry Summers, the president’s top economic adviser, from speculating recently, that “when the economy recovers, five years from now, one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working.”
If they are lucky, they’ll have wives who can take care of them.
***
Yeah, welcome to New Cuntia. If you're REALLY lucky you'll have a wife to take care of you who doesn't lie about domestic violence or rape in order to get out of a traffic ticket.
This crap is is so stupid, it's insulting.
Yep. They don't need men. Except to build things. To make things. To fix things. This mancession talk is a feminist's wet dream.
"Yep. They don't need men. Except to build things. To make things. To fix things. This mancession talk is a feminist's wet dream."
Archivist - it's Snark - they're entirely deluding themselves. No massive social changes favouring women will result from this. The economy will recover, it's all boom and bust, cyclical, y'know? What goes down must come back up. And they betray their utter lack of understanding when they extrapolate some kind of long term trend - 5, 10, 100 years into the future - from what is in effect, a pattern detected over a few months, a pattern which marks only the beginning of the total effects of this recession, which has (as it must do) hit the private sector first, and will inevitably (it is iron law) hit the public sector next. The unemployment gap is not only going to decrease, women stand a good chance of actually overtaking men. When you have a liberal leader openly advocating (and putting into practice) 25% cuts across the entire public sector, then that sector is fucked.
Thankfully, the invisible hand is here to guide us all to eventual safety, and private sector jobs will reappear. Can't say the same thing for the public sector, where the whimminz are mainly employed - there's no 'invisible hand' making jobs available on public funds. Nosiree. That all has to be lobbied and fought for. It doesn't happen on its own, and it might not even happen again to quite such an extent in the foreseeable future; that's political pragmatism, by the way, not the spurious extrapolation of not enough data.
Let the dears have their moment in the sun, celebrating the supposed 'end of men'. Thirty years from now they're going to be looking pretty stupid. I assume that at that point they will resort to blaming 'the patriarchy', since in that time they will have done nothing to help themselves grasp the realities of economic law, and that the private and public sectors are fundamentally different employers. All Chicken Little pieces about male unemployment have summarily been divested of meaningful content, and are hereby stripped bare to their true motivators, that is, wishful-thinking misandry. Thankyou and goodnight.
"All Chicken Little pieces about male unemployment have summarily been divested of meaningful content, and are hereby stripped bare to their true motivators, that is, wishful-thinking misandry. Thankyou and goodnight."
Yet another brilliant essay, from a brilliant essayist.
It's really very simple, but let me spell it out for any feminists who might still have fanciful ideas about patriarchy and such.
1. There are two sectors, and they are named the public and the private.
2. The private sector generates its own wealth. It does not require the public sector to survive. The private sector props itself up.
3. The public sector does not generate any wealth of its own. It requires the wealth generated by the private sector to prop it up, through mandatory taxation. Money does not simply invent itself.
4. This is a huge generalisation, but men occupy the private sector more than do women, and vice versa for the public sector. They CHOOSE to do this. Nobody is coerced/oppressed/raped into working in either of the two sectors.
5. The recession has hit the private sector first. With less money to go around, capitalists are not able to embark upon entrepreneurial adventures as much as they would have been able to beforehand. Not only this, but existing firms must cut down their expenditure - which includes EMPLOYEES!
6. As we have established, males primarily find occupation in the private sector, unlike women. Hence a greater number of MEN find themselves out of work!
For feminists, the story ends there; they cannot envisage that current trends might not simply continue forevermore.
But, think hard, girls.
What happens next?
7. With less people employed in the private sector, there is a significantly reduced tax take.
Now, remind me ... who is it who is propped up by the private sector through taxation?
8. Uh oh! Public sector debt is spiralling out of control and its employees can no longer be paid for. Since they don't generate wealth themselves, there's an even stronger rationale for giving them the sack.
9. As we've established, this sector primarily employs women ... ouch ... ah, geez, that's going to hurt for you ladies. Too bad you're so dense as to not realise that she-cession is the inevitable result of a he-cession. You were celebrating your own demise this entire time. Divorcing your husbands and marrying the state didn't mean you weren't still dependant on men's labours, you silly things!
10. Looking to the future? ... markets always bounce back. They work in cycles. Adam Smith's invisible hand will ensure that where there is demand, a crafty young salesman shall supply what is needed - for his own benefit, of course. The same cannot be said for the public sector, which does not generate wealth. Indeed, since the overblown bureaucracies of the public sector are what, by and large, CAUSED this meltdown, politicians might well pursue a conscious strategy of ROLLING BACK THE STATE in the foreseeable future.
Now cover your heads, ladies.
The sky is falling.
"Funny, no one ever says things like that when commit crimes."
That should have been "Funny, no one ever says things like that men when commit crimes."
Exactly Anon re: the public and private sectors.
"The recession has hit the private sector first."
Ever hear of government laying off people? Rarely happens. No such thing as tightening belts there. Our state where I live is in financial trouble, so what's the plan to acheive solvency? Get federal money!
And don't forget, President Big Ears initially wanted to pump more stimulus money into construction and manufacturing until -- remember? -- NOW bellyached. So "women's" jobs, that didn't need stimulus money, got 42% of it. While men lost their jobs in droves. And they can insist they don't hate men? Seriously.
Archivist, if I remember correctly, NOW referred to "burly" men.
They simply can't help themselves.
They're whores.
Now that I think of it (pun intended) maybe we should found our own organization called NOW.
Never Obey Women.
It is still exceptional for anyone to cry rape when no attack has occurred, perfectly evident in the tiny number of, unprovable, stories on this board.
This is not a feminist issue, it's a human issue.
Pretty laughable number of woman haters on here, did Mummy not love you all?
"It is still exceptional for anyone to cry rape when no attack has occurred, perfectly evident in the tiny number of, unprovable, stories on this board."
You are either insane, lying, or haven't read this board.
"Pretty laughable number of woman haters on here, did Mummy not love you all?"
I hope to God that YOU don't have sons, given your total antipathy towards males.
Posie,
Really, is that the best you've got? Your shaming language is right up there with a 4 year old.
However, you serve to illustrate the point that most false rape apologists really don't care about those who actually have been raped. For every lie that is posted on here, hurts the credibility of those who truly are raped.
Oh, and you will notice, in about 98% of the posts we make, it is the accuser themselves that admits that they lied. How is that not proven?
It is still exceptional for anyone to cry rape when no attack has occurred, perfectly evident in the tiny number of, unprovable, stories on this board.
This is not a feminist issue, it's a human issue.
Pretty laughable number of woman haters on here, did Mummy not love you all?
***
Did you even read this article? How can you call this "unprovable?" It is perfectly obvious to anyone who reads this blog without being lobotomized first that women are routinely filing false rape reports for the most frivolous, idiotic reasons imaginable. That is "perfectly evidence."
If this is a human issue, then you need to be at least as concerned about the innocent men whose lives are being destroyed as you are about these very strange women who lie about getting raped for attention or to get out of getting a ticket. The fact that you aren't proves that you are anything but a humanist.
But I guess you just hate men because daddy slipped it to you in the shower, or whatever gets you on Oprah. Right, Posie?
That’s a great post thanks for your time very interesting, good work.
Post a Comment