Tuesday, July 20, 2010

A whirl around the wacky world of false rape claims

▲Imagine if a court convicted a black man of rape because he led his "victim" to believe he was white to gain her consent to have sex with him.  The widespread outrage, even among progressives, would be wholly justified.  Then consider that an Arab who had consensual sex with a woman who believed him to be Jewish was convicted yesterday of rape by deception and sentenced to 18 months in prison by the Jerusalem District Court. See here.

▲A New Mexico mayor is going to trial for misdemeanor assault and battery stemming from a fistfight with the publisher of the local newspaper that arose from newspaper articles linking the mayor to the gang rape of a teenage girl in 1948 when he was 16 years old. The mayor denies the allegations. See here.  We don't know if the rape actually occurred, and we don't condone violence unless it is essential.  We do note, however, that if a man resorts to fisticuffs to protect a woman from being raped, he's a hero. But if he resorts to fisticuffs to protect his good name and all that is important to him from a false rape claim, he's a criminal.  We further note that society does essentially nothing to protect men from the harm of false rape claims.

▲Fun fact of the day: guess which reviled scholar is relied on in the Koss report?  Yep. Studies by Prof. Eugene Kanin, who is widely attacked by rape feminists because of his landmark false rape studies, are cited as authoritative. Kanin's studies on male aggression and acquaintance rape in the 50s and 60s made him a pioneering feminist icon, a sociologist whose writings were quoted without question.  Suddenly, however, Kanin became a nitwit who knew nothing about "methodology" (the favorite word of rape feminists when attacking Kanin) when he wrote his false rape claim report.

▲From the archives: Add Judge G. Michael Prall to the Misandry Hall of Fame. A teenage girl who admitted that her rape lie unjustly sent a teenage boy to a juvenile detention center for more than three months and caused him to lose a football scholarship to the high school he wanted to attend, was sentenced to probation. "Putting her into a detention facility with some hardcore delinquents is not the answer to the problem. The main problem here is you have two children having sex," Prall told the girl. "This is an obvious reason why kids your age shouldn't do that. Save that activity for when you're older and get married."  See here

▲Ever wonder how the sexual grievance industry became institutionalized and so deeply embedded in our law enforcement apparatus?  Ever wonder why Congress was hoodwinked by the prevarications and hysteria of rape advocates?  As but one example, just look who testified at the VAWA hearings:  Mary Koss.  You want to lose your breakfast?  Read that article.

▲Here's a college girl who insists the word "rape" is being misused: "Some people have started using the term 'rape' to denote an egregiously bad, or inversely, extremely good outcome – e.g. that test 'raped' me or I 'raped' that test." She concludes: "Diluting an effect the word has on people’s consciousness may further skew a rape culture that often victimizes people who speak up for themselves/against their attackers."  See here.  Of course, using the words "kill" and "murder" in a colloquial sense is perfectly OK, I am sure, because murder is not deserving of the solemnity of rape. I mean, murders in the inner city are not nearly as serious as the countless rapes on our college campuses that no one is reporting.  I wonder if this college girl would support use of the term "second rape" to describe the rape "victim's" supposed experience when she reports rape. My guess is she'd be OK with that because that doesn't dilute the horror of the act, now does it?

▲Speaking of Prof. Kanin, I was recently viciously attacked on another forum for misrepresenting Kanin's false rape report (by someone who has never read the entire thing, I am quite certain): I discussed Kanin's study of the police records of two large Midwestern state universities which found false rape claims represented 50% of all forcible rape complaints. I was attacked because I pointed out that neither police agency employed the polygraph, and the person who attacked me wrongly insisted I was wrong.  I was, of course, correct.  (Kanin's study of the other police force that yielded 41% false claims is often attacked by rape feminists because that police force used polygraphs, which are verboten in VAWA-Land.)

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

If we started charging people for lying about themselves to the opposite sex, a lot of women would be in trouble.

Anonymous said...

"Kanin became a nitwit who knew nothing about "methodology" (the favorite word of rape feminists when attacking Kanin) when he wrote his false rape claim report."

Yes, they keep repeating that he used a "flawed methodology", but none of them can explain how.

slwerner said...

Anonymous - "Yes, they keep repeating that he used a "flawed methodology", but none of them can explain how."

I've also encountered the argument that his sample size is too small to be meaningful - without any discussion of what would be meaningful.

What I find telling is their unqualified acceptance of the 2% myth. They cannot point to one single study which has ever put the rate of false reporting of sexual assault/rape at that low level, yet they continue to proclaim it as Gospel - even while denouncing Kanin (and others) for their poor methodology.

So what about Susan Brownmiller's non-existent methodology?

To them, her "word" is held to be above reproach. [as I understand it, she claims to have been told by someone in law enforcement that their best guesstimate would be that it was about the same rate as for other crimes - 2% (although I know of no study which determined the overall false reporting of crimes was 2% at that time). It seems that Brownmiller's "methodology" was to use an unknown/un-cited source's off-hand guess, based on another guess - what could possibly be more reliable that that?[/snark]]

Anonymous said...

The case in Israel is not really relevant because they operate under a quasi religious law. However, females in their simple mindedness do consider certain things as "deception" when it comes to sex. What was just some consentual sex suddenly becomes "rape" if the female discovers that the rich man she was shagging is really a poor one. Even when the guy is not accused of rape he is sometimes accused of fraud. You see this all the time where a man may have had a number of girlfriends and given the impression that he was wealthier than he really was and may have "borrowed" money or was given gifts from them.Of course this cad has to be punished because he hurt a female's feelings and made her look like a fool and wasted her time when she could have been looking for and shagging a real rich man. Btw, none of this is a crime unless he forged or stole something but females seem to believe that this is rape by deception lol Rape by deception simply means that a man represented himself as another man eg. husband or boyfriend and got into bed and had sex with the woman with the woman believing he was the husband etc.

The New Mexico mayor had every right to beat the newspaper man. Publishing something this patently offensive that will inflame another person comes under the definition of "fighting words"


Yes, Michael Prall is a nitwit and the girl who was 14 should have been charged with raping the 13yo boy. In fact, if that boy was a day under 13 it would be a VERY serious felony. And if this Prall moron thinks this is just two kids having sex, why did he send the 13yo kid to jail? The boy's family should sue the county,town, police and judge in Federal Court for violating the boy's civil rights and Prall will soon learn that there is no judicial immunity in Federal Court in cases of violation of civil rights. The guy is probably dumb enough to think he is immune.

Zeta said...

Regarding the first story (man misrepresenting himself as a Jew being charged for "rape" - there's even a name for this now, "rape by deception"), refer to this story from Massachusetts in 2008. They were pushing a bill to make this sort a thing a crime. Feminists were, shockingly, behind it - which should tell you it would be applied equally to women who lie about their age and have fake boobs, for example. Let's not forget makeup. Or lies about STDs, of which women have more. Yes, that was sarcasm: of course it's meant to solely punish men.

I'd be very interested if anyone could track down the status of this bill. Massachusetts is misandry central, and this is the sort of thing white knight social conservatives and man-hating feminists love to unite on together. I'd be surprised if it didn't pass.

Link to the article: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/29/politics/uwire/main3894875.shtml

switchintoglide said...

You are missing the fact that mainstream feminists have decried the "rape by deception" case because of the institutionalised racism.
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/07/22/on-rape-by-deception/

Anonymous said...

"You are missing the fact that mainstream feminists have decried the "rape by deception" case because of the institutionalised racism."

In this particular case, but as soon as this is applied to white guys, they'll be falling over themselves to make it law.