A comment from someone who identifies herself as "Alison" was left here, and reads as follows:
"This blog is disgusting.
I hope one day you are raped and no one believes you."
Ah, the enlightened, progressive, peace-loving devotees of the sexual grievance industry.
This is not the first time a feminist has publicly wished me to be raped. And it won't be the last.
For reasons known only to Alison, her comment was tacked onto a post that started as follows: "Orlando police said 'false reporting has reached an epidemic level' after the recent 'spike' in false rape reports." My guess is that Alison is the same reader who previously wrote this, on the same thread: "Oh of course, it's all a conspiracy against males. None of you here have ever done anything as despicable as date rape, right."
Right. Because if we speak up for the falsely accused, we must really be date rapists.
Note it's not the false accusers who are "disgusting" (as a lot of rape victims who read our blog have told us they believe), but rather our blog. Again, let's be honest. We're disgusting because we defend the falsely accused. And people like Alison believe that anyone accused of rape is a rapist.
Well, Alison, our hope is different than yours. We hope that every rape victim is believed, and every false rape accuser is incarcerated for many years as an example to other would-be liars. The two go hand-in-hand.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
26 comments:
"Well, Alison, our hope is different than yours. We hope that every rape victim is believed, and every false rape accuser is incarcerated for many years as an example to other would-be liars."
Touché!
I'd be surprised if anyone in our camp wished Alison were ever falsely accused of a serious crime she didn't commit either.
Welcome to the just side Alison!
Why does Alison think that it would be preferable to be falsely accused of rape than to be raped?
Many of us would love to trade what happened to us for being raped on a date, quite frankly. The falsely accused suffer discrimination for the rest of their lives, as well as severe psychological trauma.
False Accusation IS rape, Alison.
Did you spend much time really reflecting on this ?
I'll repeat for clarification:
False Accusation IS rape.
Alison needs to spend twenty years in prison for something she didn't do, like many of the victims at the Innocence Project website.
Then maybe she'll understand why this blog exists.
"Alison needs to spend twenty years in prison for something she didn't do, like many of the victims at the Innocence Project website."
Someone like her wouldn't learn a thing from an experience like that, she'd just spend 20 years baw-hawwing "Poor widdle me. What did I do to deserve this (Hint: you're evil.)?"
The reason she thinks this blog is "disgusting" is because people like her become physically ill at the prospect of the stick they use to beat innocent people with being removed from their hands,that means that they are reduced to the pathetic,sick, worthless failures they actually are when someone else isn't propping them up.
Chins up,lads. "Alison" isn't worth our time.
Nothing is more disgusting than a feminist. On the evolutionary scale they are below slugs. Best to crush them on sight.
I really like what you said here, Archivist. It highlights the point that both the accused and rape victims are harmed by false accusers.
The two issues are far more closely linked than most wish to acknowledge and I continue to fail to understand why.
Thanks for saying it again.
2:58: Try arguing against them on sight.
You know, I'm a little concerned about the violent "little" comments I've been seeing. I suspect that we have a feminist troll dropping hints of violence here and there in an effort to get MRAs to agree with them.
This is quite dangerous.
Yes, it should be made clear that we do not advocate violence here, and especially not me, even though I have been falsely accused. I harbor no ill-will toward my accuser, but I do seek justice. Equal justice and accountability of everyone involved in the process.
Off-topic:
An article on the Duke Lacrosse case from a teacher in NC
http://reharmonized.an-earful.com/2010/04/when-justice-fails-rich-person-gets/
Sadly, our institutions of higher learning are churning out young women who are being taught to have precisely zero concern for any problem that disproportionately strikes males. Oh, of course, they are happy to feel sympathy for males if issues are framed in terms of race, or class, or gay rights. But when it comes to problems that target males simply because they were born male, the attitudes of our graduates of Women's Studies programs are misandric.
The level of their anger would be comical, it is so over-the-top, if these attitudes weren't hurting so many people. And I can tell you from discussions with university administrators that the professors people are regarded as lightweights but, unfortunately, they are academic lightweights (eyes roll when they are mentioned) who must be bowed to because they yield so much disproportionate political clout.
The lacrosse article is the same old, same old. Duke lacrosse is not a good example for the point about wealthy people being able to afford lawyers. You see, the lacrosse boys were made a target by the corrupt D.A. precisely because the boys were white and well-to-do. If they had been three black kids falsely accused, it likely would have gone away very quickly. It was only worthwhile because the district attorney saw the chance to nail three sets of privileged white balls to the wall, which he figured would score political points with blacks.
Here's another newsflash that's more important but that our progressive friends on the left routinely overlook: if a white kid from a well-to-do school and a black kid from the inner city are both falsely accused of rape, as happens every day, the former will be able to post a bond and make bail and the latter won't. That's because bail is set so high for a claim of acquaintance rape, that it is, in effect, a prison sentence for the presumptively innocent who lack financial means. How is THAT fair? How is THAT allowed in 2010? Sounds more like something that should have gone away with the 16th Century.
Alison said...
This blog is disgusting.
I hope one day you are raped and no one believes you.
Oh, dear.
Here's the thing Alison. I was raped by my aunt when I was seven. Nobody got the chance to disbelieve me because, like many, I didn't say anything about it.
But, Alison, it wouldn't have mattered if I had. You see, Alison, because of the way the laws were framed in my country it wasn't illegal for my aunt to do what she did. Whether I was believed or not was moot.
So I guess you get your wish don't you Allison, in more ways than you could possibly imagine.
"Chins up,lads. "Alison" isn't worth our time."
For every "Alison" that posts here, there are probably 100 just like her that thinks they way she does. So, while she as an individual isn't worth our time, her attitude and the culture she represents needs to be addressed, corrected, and deterred. I can foresee a day in the US, when such statements as she has made will be viewed as hate speech, or "psychological violence."
I also see a day when anonymity on the internet and "flaming" will be illegal:
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Internet-Flaming-Bill-Illegal,news-3912.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10040152-38.html
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/anonymity_and_t_3.html
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/12/global-coincidence-theory.html
http://www.telecomtv.com/comspace_newsDetail.aspx?n=46223&id=e9381817-0593-417a-8639-c4c53e2a2a10#
http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/end_of_internet_anonymity_WEyQu1ci16Bxnx6llqZ9IO
http://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity
Alison is definitely not worth our time, except as a reminder. Every now and again it's important to remind the troops about the anger expressed toward what we do.
Rarely do they go head-to-head with us here. In the early days we had a lot more rape feminists who would challenge us. Now that we have a lot more people reading us, and I am sure, a lot more rape feminists hating us, they stay away.
Yes, Gwallan, that sounds like a win-win all around for rape feminists.
@Alison:
Rape and false accusations of rape are two separate crimes, linked only by the fact that the reality of the former allows the latter to occur. Both are crimes, in and of themselves, and it is perfectly reasonable to take stances against both, as being against one DOES NOT require that one be FOR the other.
If we can take away the gender issue which so taints the views of so many, it might easier to see this. A good non-gender specific analogy might well be see in the crime of auto theft, and the crime of false auto theft claims (for insurance fraud).
As with rape and false rape, the existence of the former makes the latter possible, and yet both are obviously crimes, and one can easily see that it is entirely rational to be against both crimes.
"Rape and false accusations of rape are two separate crimes, linked only by the fact that the reality of the former allows the latter to occur."
They are also linked by the fact that the latter cause the former to be dismissed lightly and not believed.
Archivist - "They are also linked by the fact that the latter cause the former to be dismissed lightly and not believed."
Yes, this is also true.
It was quite a while ago, but I once mentioned the situation a brother-in-law of mine found himself in when his vehicle was stolen by some teen-aged punks who then burned it to destroy evidence. Due to it having been burned, it (naturally) looked suspicious, as if he might have been attempting to defraud the insurance company.
Just as large number of FRA's DO cause misplaced suspicion on the claims of real victims, the corresponding high numbers of false vehicle theft claims likewise causes increased suspicion of the claims of real victims.
The vehicle theft/falsification and rape/falsification analogy was just the first non-gendered one I came up with - but is does seem to be quite apt.
It is kind of ironic that radical feminists have argued in the past that the threat of rape is the means by which men collectively keep women in their place, and yet they are actually using the threat of rape as a means of silencing men who speak up about false allegations.
I'm not sure if this is deliberate irony or payback, though I suspect the Allison's of this world don't get irony.
Nick S, Snark here. Just an addition to what you said.
Rape THE CRIMINAL ACT was what feminists claim all men used to oppress all women.
In reality, rape THE CONCEPT is what feminists use to oppress all men.
Allison here has made a rape threat, though, that is not particularly typical of feminists (not that it is anomalous either).
More typical is feminists using the CONCEPT of rape as a weapon to anoint themselves and all women the eternal victims and to tar all men as the eternal oppressors. We all know their wild successes in this regard and the atrocious consequences for innocent men.
Rape, the concept, is the feminist tool of oppression.
This blog is awesome. I hope one day you influence legislative change in favour of the falsely accused.
Actually, if you were raped, not only would people believe you, they would ridicule you for it. Sad how that works, eh, 'Alison'?
zarko
That only happens in the fantasies of feminist extremists, who need to believe in a boogeyman in order to rationalize their pathetic behavior.
I don't wish Alison to get raped, even though she has an evil feminist attitude that prays for men to get raped.
Many falsely accused get anally raped in prison, where common gangs and criminals love to pray on rapists (if he did not really rape, they will not make that fine distinction). But feminists don't care about men being raped, they even wish that men get raped.
But right, feminists should see what it feels like to be falsely accused, to stop fighting for unconditional conviction of everyone that draws the ire of a vengeful woman. Maybe just for a few hours in a police station, I don't have the cold blood feminists have to wish her to spend months in jail under false accusations.
This blog focusses on one aspect, false rape accusations. But there are many more ways how feminists victimize men. False child abuse accusations to get favorable divorce settlements. Arrest for men who seek consensual sex for pay with adult sex workers. Jail for adolescents who have nude photos of their girl friends. Jail for possession of a few nude photos of 17 year old girls. The list is endless.
human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/mens-rights-feminism
human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/rape-laws-no-due-process (this one I actually "stole" from your site here)
human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape
human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/prostitution/feminist-arguments-against-prostitution-dismantled
Post a Comment