This disgusting display of misandry speaks for itself:
Women against violence - be more bonobo!
by Vanessa Woods
What our closest living relatives can tell us about sticking together
In the US, 600 women are sexually assaulted every day. One woman is beaten by her partner every 15 seconds. Despite education campaigns and law enforcement, and penalties, violence continues to threaten women throughout America. What can we do to make women safe?
I believe bonobos, may have the answer. Once I saw Tatango, an unusually aggressive bonobo male, run up to Mimi, the alpha female, and backhand her across the face. He hit her so hard he almost gave her whiplash. Within seconds, five females in the group ran to Mimi’s rescue. They chased Tatango around the night building until he fled into the forest. When he continued his aggressive outbursts, those five females beat him so badly, they damn near ripped off his testicles. After that, Tatango never caused another problem.
One male is stronger than any one female. But no male is stronger than many females. As women, we tend to isolate ourselves. At the office, we backstab our female colleagues and women are mostly bullied by other women.
In this way, we are more like chimpanzees. Like us, chimpanzees are male dominated. Females don’t form strong friendships. They tend to spend a lot of time alone. And when the males reach adolescence, they start battering every female in the group. Like in humans, most of the beatings aren’t about doing a lot of damage, they are about asserting dominance and maintaining control.
Scientific research has already shown that women are more intimate and emotional in their friendships than men, they turn to female friends in times of stress, and our very biochemistry is set up to benefit by female bonding.
The true purpose of a sisterhood isn’t to have gossip buddies, a sewing circle, or a lunch gang. It is a powerful alliance that will protect and shelter you from the battering of work, life, and the occasional chimpanzee male.
As the Czech proverb goes, don't protect yourself with a fence, but rather with your friends.
My new book, Bonobo Handshake, is out now. Buy it here on Amazon or visit my website http://www.bonobohandshake.com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
48 comments:
Yes, this is where feminism ultimately leads: an unevolved, primitive society of monkeys.
And, gee, girlsfriends, if we gang up on one, we can rip off his nuts and make him run away!
I am so pissed off about Cameron, I am banning every feminist from this site.
I'm so pissed off that I might write a new policy for myself:
I will not believe a single rape claim from a woman until anonymity for male defendants is granted.
Crying? Crocodile tears.
Injuries? Self-inflicted.
Traumatised? Faking it.
Think I give a fuck if I'm wrong? Think again.
Desperate times, desperate measures. And I move one step closer to apologia.
Rape happens, and usually not to the fucking feminists. The feminists are gleeful when another rape occurs, let's be honest, because it promotes their victim agenda. My beef isn't with rape victims. My beef is with the feminists, who have NEVER lost a battle in this gender victimization area, and with the fucking men who couldn't give a shit about this issue now but a year from now, will be writing to me asking what they should do because they were falsely accused. Macho college guys, literally reduced to sobbing out of fear that they're going to spend the rest of their lives in prison, and, yes, be raped every day of their lives: "I never knew this could happened!" And: "I can't believe she'd do this to me!" And: "The police treated me like a criminal." I've seen ALL of that.
No, let's be extreme and unreasonable. It's worked rather well for them, so let's do it.
"My beef isn't with rape victims. My beef is with the feminists"
Upon reflection you're right. It's too easy to get sucked into their men vs women games.
Actually, women get along with other women just fine. Men are the ones who need to learn how to bond and stop competing with each other overzealously.
The feminists think they need to become like mindless chimps? I've got news for them: they're already there.
@ Snark
No, let's be extreme and unreasonable. It's worked rather well for them, so let's do it.
Actually, that's the point.
This is PM Question time, not enacted fact, however, the point you make is valid, this backtrack only happened because of feminist extremism... and lack of male extremism.
I tell people (I'm talking real life here) I do not believe ANY allegation of rape, and precious few convictions, and as far as I am concerned rape should be reduced in severity until it is on a par with assault. And let's have some Sharia with that too, didn't happen unless there were four male witnesses.
Now *that* is the male equivalent of extremism, and you know what, the rape advocates, as soon as they realise I am deadly serious, suddenly start getting very reasonable and offering concessions in their arguments.
Sharia frightens the living shit out of them, and they are so busy trying to convince you to drop the Sharia bit of your argument they will concede anonymity and even concede a different, less severe class of rape where the accused alleged rapist is or was in a relationship with the accuser.
You say "sharia" and nobody in this country ever listens to anything to say ever again.
and look at Clegg's face, he ain't buying it
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/06/02/article-1283435-09DC112E000005DC-687_468x286.jpg
"You say "sharia" and nobody in this country ever listens to anything to say ever again."
All the muslims will, home and abroad... that's about 100x more influence than you have now, and that's before the ball starts rolling.
"and look at Clegg's face, he ain't buying it"
Right, and it's Clegg's policy. He brought it to the coalition. Not Cameron. Cameron was put on the spot but I don't think he CAN backtrack. Not on his own anyway.
Then you guys tell me, who do we target to make him dig in his heels and support this thing -- the full measure -- not anonymity until charged?
We wait until innocent men are falsely accused, and then we attack labour for getting anonymity shot down. When the feminists are able to keep this debate abstract, they win; but when we show the real pain caused to innoncent lives by their pathetic policies we win.
And UK MRAs need to start writing letters to David Cameron starting immediately, and refuse to stop writing them until full anonymity is granted.
Oh -- and we won't be waiting long...
"Then you guys tell me, who do we target to make him dig in his heels and support this thing -- the full measure -- not anonymity until charged?"
I'll tell you what's really burning me up - I DON'T KNOW.
It's not like I've done this before. I don't even know where to start.
Mass email bombardment is my guess. Mailed to Cameron, Clegg, and other leading coalition figures. Through the FRSF.
Snark said he'd be front man, said he has an MP who is a mate of cameron's.
use that, and cc'd to the lib-dem people, with the message "fuck with us and well cause such a stink it will break the coalition, and force a general election"
THAT is what scares the living shit out of them.
go with us on this or it's Sharia law time, and that's where the stink will come from, Daily Mail et al will have a field day.
"Burka's for males accused of rape"
conniption fits
https://email.number10.gov.uk/Contact.aspx
Fill out form, it goes to Prime Minister's office.
email is a waste of time, it is ignored.
Snail mail is not.
Face time beats all else.
Press furore to follow... join the "Burka's for men falsely accused of rape" campaign, wear your Burka to show support for Sharia rape law, it didn't happen unless 4 men saw it, sorry, but we tried being reasonable and the Harriet Harman's of this world just wouldn't play fair.
The letters should not insult Cameron in any way. They should simply express our grave concerns over the consequences this will have on innocent men, and regarding false rape accusations in general.
Also, our recognition of Harriet Harmann as a liar who spews her own made-up statistics should be mentioned. The conservatives need to learn that we're not going away and that our support matters.
I'm serious, you get 100 men to go to London (you got 1 right here) wearing Burkas and carrying placards, you get front page press...
Press furore to follow... join the "Burka's for men falsely accused of rape" campaign, wear your Burka to show support for Sharia rape law, it
*****
Okay, that's a dingbat-inspired idea if I ever heard one...
The wrong kind of press.
"The wrong kind of press."
There ain't no such animal, just ask Harman and Smith et al.
I love how the title includes the phrase "Women Against Violence" then proceeds to encourage women to emulate Bonobo monkeys by viciously beating, even nearly castrating, offending males. Of course, we musn't forget that crime only matters as it happens to women. Feminism-blatant hypocrisy and unapologetic bigotry.
They are feminists. They can get away with spouting lies and all sorts of kooky, paranoid ideas. We can't.
Frankly, it's because they are women. They can afford to be irrational because other women will support them. Not us.
We have to make sense in order to win. They will always be held to a lower standard.
http://forum.politics.co.uk/
also a place to spread the word
actually means politics.co.uk
lots of useful links, and watched by a lot of politicos
Anon @ 1:52:
"Actually, women get along with other women just fine. Men are the ones who need to learn how to bond and stop competing with each other overzealously."
HA-LARIOUS! In every social situation I've ever encountered women are viciously competitive, backstabbing and gossiping constantly. The women I enjoy hanging with typically have mostly male friends for these reasons and they are not shy about pointing out the true nature of their sisters.
Their is definitely a tribalist streak amongst feminism: "We/women/us" are the "good" tribe and "they/them/men" are the "bad/evil/violent/rapist" tribe. It must be very convenient for feminists to grossly over-simplify their worldview into tidy black and white boxes. Can they just not deal with complex realities?
And this entry is yet another disgusting public display of the radical feminist castration fetish.
Women will gossip about each other, sure.
But men compete ferociously against each other, and behave ruthlessly toward men who are considered low on the social ladder. That is why many of the worst attacks against the falsely accused are made against men.
I don't think there is any comparison. For the most part, women are a herd.
Do me a favor, guys - go over there and add comments to Typhonblue's and mine. Remember, this is a semi-professional publication, articles by professionals for the genreal market, so pointing out the author's sub-professional flaws in methodology and threatening make an issue of her bigotry to her employers are one part of the battle. Publications like these are an important tool for these people to drip their lies into an entire profession, one with a lot of influence on these issues.
statistcally the most violent relationship in the United states are lesbian relationships. They beat the f@@k out of each other all the time, but see this information does not serve to "Empower" the Gender / Raunch community...so it does not make the newspapers.
Anon above me..
The newspapers print what they want and frame it the way they want.
And it is nearly always in a way that paints Men as criminals.
Naturally. Portraying men as the bad guys makes for a more exciting, titilating story, and that sells more newspapers. Which influences the politicians to pass even more biased, extreme laws. And the circle of bigotry continues.
Exactly!
At the office, we backstab our female colleagues and women are mostly bullied by other women
yeap, but they still blame men for all those things. somehow. inexplicably so.
-razvan
If we are going to wear muslim headdress, then why not just wear the male kinds? Wearing a burka is as ridiculous to me as wearing women's heels and walking a mile.
Feminists don't support violence against men to end violence against women, as this article might and commenters have suggested.
What we do believe is that the inequalities between men and women are systemic and based on the way we are socialized to think and act, inherent in comments such as "In every social situation I've ever encountered women are viciously competitive, backstabbing and gossiping constantly" or "Frankly, it's because they are women. They can afford to be irrational because other women will support them."
Feminists respect the men who choose not to use their social position against women.
As usual, the feminist whines about "socialized inequalities" without objecting to such chestnuts as "all men are potential rapists." Their petty complaints are supposed to trump our very real and serious issues.
Sarah M said...
"Feminists don't support violence against men to end violence against women, as this article might and commenters have suggested."
I have yet to hear any feminist, even a prominent feminist, ackowlege either of these;
1. The war against men
2. Violence against men( which has been treated as mere abberation by politicians, the media, the government and, law enforcement.
"What we do believe is
that the inequalities between men and women are systemic and based on the way we are socialized to think and act, inherent in comments such as "In every social situation I've ever encountered women are viciously competitive, backstabbing and gossiping constantly" or "Frankly, it's because they are women. They can afford to be irrational because other women will support them."
Feminists respect the men who choose not to use their social position against women.
Jun 3, 2010 3:52:00 AM
IMHO, feminists have a limited respect for those men yet, have tons of respect for women who use their social positions against men.
Namely NOW.
From Glenn Greenwald today, speaking on tribalism (not in the context of "Gender Wars," but relevant IMO):
"Those whose worldview is shaped by their identification as members of a particular religious, nationalistic, or ethnic [or gender] group invariably over-value the wrongs done to them and greatly under-value the wrongs their group perpetrates. Those whose world view is shaped by tribalism invariably believe they are plagued by an extreme persecution complex (the whole world is against us!!!; everyone who criticizes us is hateful and biased!!!)"
Gosh, does any of that sound like it applies to feminism, especially its more radical forms?
* * * * *
And forgive my lack of nuance, Sarah. In every social/workplace situation there have been some women who exhibit those behaviors and usually at least one who is as put off by them as I am. Even though this was purely anecdotal, my point was simply that it is not accurate to say, generally, that "women get along just fine."
And unfortunately, the only counterweight to female tribalism is male tribalism.
And I think that's the real problem: women have no problem identifying themselves as a tribe. Men are far more divided, it seems.
How many times have you heard a black woman gnashing her teeth about how horrible white women are, for example?
Anon @ 3:18/3:19:
I have read and learned much about tribalism as it relates to nationalism and religion. After delving into feminism, I quickly realized that the concepts of tribal worldview applied neatly to radical feminism: "We/women" are "good" and "they/men" are "bad." Tribalism causes otherwise rational people and groups of people to see themselves as Pure and Good even while perpetuating unimaginable horror on "others." It also fosters a perpetual victim mindset -- sound familiar?
Interestingly, feminism has a checkered past regarding white-black race relations. Many black women were offended by radical feminism that they felt betrayed the bonds created by their stand with black men to oppose racial injustice. Hence the jokes about feminism being a "middle-aged, middle-class, white women's movement," after so many black women would no longer identify with the movement.
Feminism is a quasi-religion, which allows narcissistic, over-privileged white women to view themselves as the main victims of history; thus providing themselves with a ready-made excuse for their failures and a justification for the resentment and neglect of males.
Ironically, one of the results of feminist policies has been the feminization of poverty, with many poor women with children being left unable to support themselves without their husbands. But the snotty, stuck-up Noo Yawk heart of the movement can afford to finance a broken home.
"What we do believe is that the inequalities between men and women are systemic and based on the way we are socialized to think and act, inherent in comments such as "In every social situation I've ever encountered women are viciously competitive, backstabbing and gossiping constantly" or "Frankly, it's because they are women. They can afford to be irrational because other women will support them.""
Yeah,and I suppose you're socialized into having 2 X chromosomes and growing tits at puberty too.
There are certainly "inequalities" between males and females,for instance, I have testicles and a penis, whereas you do not,but they are not "socialized inequalities" they're as natural as the lips on your cunt and due entirely to biological circumstances. This "socialized" bullshit is wishful thinking on your part, "wishful" in that you wish you could be just like a man,but you never will be.
Why you can't just say "Ok,women are different, we'll just work with what we have" instead of making excuses or inventing discrimination,I don't know.
Just admit it. You KNOW that you are biologically different from males, you KNOW that is the source of your "inequalities",but you're ashamed to admit it to everyone,including yourself. You're jealous of men and our achievements and wish you could have been born as one of us. That's why you're constantly inventing reasons to intrude upon our spaces,hassle us,and impede our progress. Admit it, and that black cankerous rot eating at your heart will disappear and then the healing can begin.
"Feminists respect the men who choose not to use their social position against women."
And which "social position" would that be? Cannon fodder or wage-slave?
I don't understand how you women figure that men have some kind of elevated position in society. We STILL don't have any reproductive rights,we are STILL the ONLY ones who can be forced to die for our country against our will,and we are now being increasingly portrayed as useless idiots,rapists, and pedophiles. Does that sound like something that happens to the people who are in charge to you?
Post a Comment