Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Man goes 'stir crazy' waiting for rape-accuser to clear his name

So let me get this straight. She accuses this man of rape, and then has the nerve to go on vacation for over a month? Seriously? All because she liked the attention. What a lovely person.

Michelle Anne Taruka Grafton goes on vacation after making false rape allegation.

A Christchurch man falsely accused of kidnapping and raping a woman says he went "stir crazy" after his accuser made her allegations then went on holiday.

Michelle Anne Taruka Grafton, 19, a student, yesterday admitted her claims of being forced into a car, tied up, and repeatedly raped were false.

In the Christchurch District Court, Judge Stephen Erber told Grafton her lies had "devalued the currency" for women who made genuine rape complaints.

"In explanation, she stated she did it because she liked the attention," police prosecutor Constable Michael Tualii told the court.

Grafton told police she had been abducted by a man she knew at 3pm on December 19. She said he had forced her into a car, driven her to a Yaldhurst address, and tied her hands to a sofa bed where she was repeatedly raped. She told police she escaped at 7am the next day, when he left for work.

The man she accused of rape, who spoke to The Press on the condition of anonymity, said he was contacted by police on Christmas Eve and asked to make a statement.

Grafton's account made him sick, he said. "I'd never read so much rubbish in my life."

He said the pair had had a brief liaison that night but had spent most of the evening watching television with the man's flatmate.

Despite unanswered questions over the allegations, Grafton "decided to hop on a plane and go away on holiday to Australia", he said.

"I didn't know if I was going to be charged. I was going a bit stir crazy, I couldn't function. I was being accused of something that was out of this world."

Grafton returned more than a month later, he said.

The court heard yesterday that Grafton admitted lying when she was interviewed again on February 28 and asked to sign a statement.

The officer in charge of the case, Detective Amy Marshall, told The Press "absolutely no-one corroborated what she [Grafton] said".

Marshall said she agreed with the judge's comments that false allegations affected genuine rape complainants. However, it also showed any allegations would be thoroughly investigated.

The judge remanded Grafton on bail for sentencing on July 1 on a charge of making a false statement that a crime had been committed.

Director of Rape Prevention Education, Dr Kim McGregor, said false complaints were rare.

"We treat people who have made false allegations with compassion because there's always a question mark over other issues being played out,'' she said.

McGregor said 90 per cent of rapes were not reported.


FRS COMMENT: Ms. McGregor, with all due respect, need to pull her head out of her hind quarters. False complaints aren't rare, there is absolutely nothing that shows that 90 percent of rapes aren't reported, and funny how you don't bother to show the real victim of the crime in this case, a shred of compassion. I guess that's not allowed.


Link:

http://www.mathimortician.com/2010/05/man-goes-crazy-waiting-for-rape-accuser.html

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

"McGregor said 90 per cent of rapes were not reported."

Really? I heard it was 99.999999%

Anonymous said...

I think this is the link to the original article:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/3657562/Man-goes-stir-crazy-waiting-for-rape-accuser-to-clear-his-name

you've linked to a blog.

Anonymous said...

The misandry bubble continues to grow.

ASTRA REED said...

Yea this is true i also heard the same 100% truth..

Dr. Snark said...

Hahaha. You know, the number of times rape advocates are having to trot out their line about "but but but false accusations are so RARE!" ... it kind of proves the opposite, doesn't it? That they're having to say it so much in response to false claims lately ... it's just the expected disclaimer at the end of every story now.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone see the post over at Glenn Sacks?

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4845

If even Men's rights sites and Men's rights supporters think FRA should be let off with little or nothing.

It's no wonder that things are as bad as they are.

I read that post and thought...holy shit...unbelievable. I guess we should just not punish FRA at all because if we are nice to them they might let us out of prison after 4 years rather than after 20.

I think FRA should be a felony with prison time and sex offender registry for life.

We do not punish FRA now and you see the world of shit we are in here in the united states.

Anonymous said...

I say the sentence imposed upon a FRA ,and any other false accuser, should be the same as the sentence that would have been/was imposed upon their victim(s).

If the falsely accused would have received a twenty year sentence, the false accuser must serve the sentence, plus any/all time served in jail or prison. THIS BS MUST COME TO AN END!

Anonymous said...

""McGregor said 90 per cent of rapes were not reported."


90%? L...M...F...A...O.

Why not just go all out with the silly bullshit and say 100% of rapes are not reported?

100% of rapes not being reported would actually make false rape claims rare,logically.Then these morons would actually have some logic behind their ridiculous claims,if only they could make that pesky evidence go away.

I'm sure they're working on it.

scott said...

I went into a state of shock during the inquisition of my false rape accusation. Why do we let women harass men using our legal system, and when did our legal system regress to the degree that they are little more than agents for women to harass men??

Anonymous said...

It a very serious perversion of a legal system that fosters and enables a false Rape culture.
American law enforcement may not fix this themselves..because they are cashing in on state and federal dollars for it.

Anonymous said...

Break the gender feminist / law enforcement missinformation Alliance, it is a perversion, and is un-constitutional.
Gender feminism has no place in a legal system, accept the place of perversion.

slwerner said...

FRS COMMENT: Ms. McGregor, with all due respect, need to pull her head out of her hind quarters. False complaints aren't rare, there is absolutely nothing that shows that 90 percent of rapes aren't reported, and funny how you don't bother to show the real victim of the crime in this case, a shred of compassion. I guess that's not allowed.

Great comments that pretty much cover the real issue at work – the real victim ignored, the repeating of the standard lies, and the allusion that false accusers are somehow the ones suffering given the supposed ”question mark over other issues being played out”.

I can only imagine the living Hell this guy had to experience waiting for over a month before the police could reinterview her. They obviously doubted her claim, and their investigation revealed it likely false, but couldn’t close out the case without her statement.

”The officer in charge of the case, Detective Amy Marshall, told The Press "absolutely no-one corroborated what she [Grafton] said".”

Still, I’d give the police props on this one. Although he had an agonizing wait, he wasn’t arrested owing to a lack of cooberating evidence (this is how it should always be done).

Definitely an unjust situation for him as an innocent victim, falsely accused. But, the responsibility is clearly on the head of the false accuser – and definitely NOT on LE (sorry to break it to the cop-hating element here).

She Lied. She liked the attention. And, she made herself unavailable to further questioning. It’s all her fault – as it is with the majority of FRA’s.

slwerner said...

Anonymous - ”American law enforcement may not fix this themselves..because they are cashing in on state and federal dollars for it.”

Anyone who’s been paying attention knows that one of the feminists most favored (and, sadly, most successful) tactics has been to repeat lies over and over until such time as they come to be regarded as true (%2 of rape claim are false, 50%-90% of rapes never reported; just for two quick examples).

And, while the feminists have enjoyed some success by repeating lies, do we really want to take the same “low road”?

LE is not “cashing in” on rape claims, real or falsified. You (the anonymous poster) have been shown ample evidence on several occasions that very little federal money is granted to LE, and even then, it’s only a pittance of what the “funded” program is actually costing. A one time $50k federal grant for a police sex-crimes program is hardly “cashing-in” when that program is going to have an on-going budget of nearly a million dollars a year. Far short of “cashing-in”, it’s only marginally defraying the overall costs being incurred.

While there is a wide-spread over-emphasis on the crimes of rape and sexual assault (white-knighting, because those are crimes that affect primarily women), LE is not “cashing-in”. Given the greater costs incurred in the efforts to target these crimes (especially given that they’re relatively small percentage of overall crime), it would be more accurate to say that LE is hemorrhaging money in their anti-rape endeavors.

So, really, isn’t it time to stop repeating the lie that they are “cashing-in”? Again, let’s try to avoid the “low road” that feminists have taken.

Anonymous said...

”American law enforcement may not fix this themselves..because they are cashing in on state and federal dollars for it.”

This is also not the right article to be making such a claim - this particular incident didn't happen in the U.S., but in New Zealand.