Thursday, June 10, 2010
The evolving narrative of a woman groping for victimhood: audio of the Roethlisberger accuser
An audio interview with the drunken "victim" shortly after the alleged Roethlisberger "rape" has been released. It confirms what we've previously written about this case. The audio interview is on the last page of media documents. (The cop "gets" it -- he asks her to explain how BEN construed her "I really don't think this is OK.")
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
In fairness to us ALL:
As Elizabeth Loftus describes in her book Memory: Surprising New Insights into How We Remember and Why We Forget:
“Memory is imperfect. This is because we often do not see things accurately in the first place. But even if we take in a reasonably accurate picture of some experience, it does not necessarily stay perfectly intact in memory. Another force is at work. The memory traces can actually undergo distortion. With the passage of time, with proper motivation, with the introduction of special kinds of interfering facts, the memory traces seem sometimes to change or become transformed. These distortions can be quite frightening, for they can cause us to have memories of things that never happened. Even in the most intelligent among us is memory thus malleable.”
Eyewitness testimony is naturally dependent upon a person’s memory — after all, whatever testimony is being reported is coming from what a person remembers. To evaluate the reliability of memory, it is once again instructive to look to the criminal justice system. Police and prosecutors go to great lengths to keep a person’s testimony “pure” by not allowing it to be tainted by outside information or the reports of others.
If prosecutors don’t make every effort to retain the integrity of such testimony, it will become an easy target for a clever defense attorney. How can the integrity of memory and testimony be undermined? Very easily, in fact — there is a popular perception of memory being something like a tape-recording of events when the truth is anything but. Memory is not so much a static state, but rather an ongoing process — and one which never happens in quite the same way twice.
"In fairness to us ALL:
As Elizabeth Loftus describes in her book Memory: Surprising New Insights into How We Remember and Why We Forget:
“Memory is imperfect. This is because we often do not see things accurately in the first place. But even if we take in a reasonably accurate picture of some experience.......bullshit,bullshit,bullshit...."
The bitch LIED. She didn't have a faulty memory. She knew what happened,but LIED.
I have studied false accusations for over a decade.
This does not have the earmarks of a malicious false accusation, nor does it have the earmarks of a shakedown.
If YOU were to do some research, you will find it is extremely common for outside sources or third parties to influence witnesse's memories.
The woman was drunk. Her 'sisters' were drunk, everyone was drunk.
I have no reason to post this information except as a person falsely accused I have become a FANATIC about the truth...whether it suits my purpose or not.
Post a Comment