Sometimes, you just have to let the story speak for itself.
“You’re going to have to bear with me,” the judge said. “I know you’re anxious.”
For a man wrongly convicted of rape almost 30 years ago, Raymond Towler did not look anxious.
Perhaps it was because a few more minutes in custody made little difference after so long. Perhaps it was because he had a reasonable idea of what Judge Eileen Gallagher was about to say.
In an extraordinary scene, barely noticed in America this week amid coverage of the enormous oil spill and the New York bomb plot, Mr Towler, a 52-year-old musician, walked free from a Cleveland court after spending more than half his life in prison for a crime of which he always maintained his innocence and which DNA analysis proved he did not commit.
His case is not unique, but the way it ended was uniquely moving. It may serve to galvanise a national movement of lawyers and activists who have used DNA evidence to free more than 250 inmates since 1992, almost all of them black men, but who have so far lacked the resources to tackle thousands of other cases in which experts’ fear of “junk science” and racial bias have produced unsafe convictions.
The moment of truth came just after 9am on Wednesday. After a brief recap of his arrest, trial and conviction for the rape of an 11-year-old girl in 1981, Judge Gallagher turned to the results of DNA analysis of skin and semen samples that she ordered two years ago from a lab in Texas. Both samples came from the victim’s underwear. They did not match the girl’s DNA, but they did match each other.
“They are consistent with deriving from the same individual, the assailant of the victim,” Judge Gallagher said. “And that individual was clearly not Raymond Towler.”
Mr Towler, in a white shirt and black V-neck sweater, blinked and briefly lowered his head. “It’s been a long time coming,” Judge Gallagher noted. Her voice breaking, she then read to the court an Irish blessing more commonly heard at weddings: “May the road rise to meet you, may the wind be always at your back. May the sun shine warm on your face, may the rain fall softly upon your fields. May God hold you in the palm of his hand, now and forever.”
Wiping tears from her face, the judge stepped forward to shake the hand of a man known to the state of Ohio for more than quarter of a century as Inmate A16468. “Good luck to you, Mr Towler,” she said. “You’re free.”
Mr Towler shook hands with his lawyers, a team of three from the Ohio Innocence Project at the University of Cincinnati, then hugged his brother and sister. Asked how he had been able to get up each morning knowing he had been wrongly convicted, he said: “You’ve got to get up, you know what I mean? Get up with God in your spirit and God will lead the way forward.”
Under state law, Mr Towler is entitled to $40,330 (£27,350) for every year of his wrongful imprisonment, not including lost wages and any damages he may win by suing the Ohio Department of Corrections. A previous inmate wrongfully jailed for a shorter period was awarded $1.4 million.
Mr Towler appeared to bear no grudge. “Evidently a crime was committed and I’ve got to respect that they tried the best that they could,” he said. “They had the wrong person. It took them a while to straighten it out but all I care about right now is that they did straighten it out.”
The authorities still have no idea who the culprit is, but the prosecutor, Bill Mason, said that the case was open and there would be a new examination of crime scene evidence.
Outside the court Mr Towler began taking in his new surroundings en route to a pizza restaurant. “Even though I was raised here I’ve still got to do a lot of sightseeing,” he said.
Despite pleading not guilty and offering a solid alibi, Mr Towler was sentenced to life without parole on the basis of a Cleveland police officer’s suspicion during a routine traffic stop that he resembled the man sought in a rape that had occurred two weeks earlier. He was later picked out by the victim from an identity parade.
“One of the leading causes of these wrongful convictions is witness misidentification, especially with crossracial identification,” Carrie Wood, one of Mr Towler’s lawyers, said. “There is still racial prejudice in our society. Anyone who tells you different just doesn’t have those interactions.”
Hat tip to AfOR
Link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7120167.ece
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
31 comments:
How can so many innocent persons be falsely accused and imprisoned?
The worst part of all of this is that justice is not being administered by our courts, judges, defense attorneys and prosecutors.
Rather justice is being administered by a few concerned citizens, journalist, and law students.
We need judicial reform!
DNA test clears American musician after 28 years in jail for rape
Jail or prison?
Arod99k said...
How can so many innocent persons be falsely accused and imprisoned?
VAWA (The much feminist protected, unconstitutional [ it violates the fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution's requirement for equal protectuion under the law])law and feminist jurisprudence.
The worst part of all of this is that justice is not being administered by our courts, judges, defense attorneys and prosecutors.
It is inaccordance with feminist laws and feminist legal theories (components in the nation's war on males).
Rather justice is being administered by a few concerned citizens, journalist, and law students.
Most of these have been fed feminist lies and feminist dogma(s) via women's studies and, the feminist ideologies/dogmas communicated via feminized mainstream media(s).
We need judicial reform!
May 17, 2010 12:39:00 PM
As fas as judicial refom, it must be approved by the judiciary's feminist owners/programmers, to benefit women and,maybe, few men.
“There is still racial( and antimale [misandrist]) prejudice(s
)in our society. Anyone who tells you different just doesn’t have those interactions.”
Silght edit, to tell the truth
Anyone agree?
"Arod99k said...
How can so many innocent persons be falsely accused and imprisoned?
VAWA"
Not in this case, as there was no VAWA 28 years ago.
Also, it seems that this was a case of honest misidentification, not a deliberately false accusation. It also seems like another case where someone was convicted without corroborating evidence.
this is why everyone who was jailed for rape that felt they were not guilty should have a DNA test done (especially since DNA tests werent as big 30 years ago)
The racial bias against black men accused of sex crimes is nothing short of disgusting. They're doubly victimised - as men, and as black men.
How do feminists feel about promoting this hatred? Because that is precisely what they do. It is their propaganda and their policies which maintain this state of affairs - the unjust and inhumane treatment of black men, as blacks and as men, and for no other reason.
When feminists say, "women must be believed," that includes these awful instances where they point the finger at the wrong man, because, I guess, "they all look alike."
Even ONE instance where a man serves 28 years for a rape he didn't commit is enough to completely nullify the validity of "the woman must always be believed."
DNA is not always a factor, or available in most convictions - it's why so relatively few exonerations exist.
Think of how many falsely accused men where NO rape ever happened are imprisoned - either in prison or on a registry for life.
The first thing they teach you in law school is "There is no such thing as justice".
There is alot of racial prejudice..and most of it is coming from the mostly all white, middle class, Gender/Raunch community.
I hope the guy gets more than an Irish blessing out of this deal...
"When feminists say, "women must be believed," that includes these awful instances where they point the finger at the wrong man, because, I guess, "they all look alike.""
Misidentification is a serious problem, but I would not attribute it to the feminist dogma that women never lie about rape. It occurred prior to modern feminism, and occurs with in situations where it doesn't apply, such as crimes other than rape, and crimes with male victims or female perpetrators.
"It occurred prior to modern feminism, and occurs with in situations where it doesn't apply, such as crimes other than rape, and crimes with male victims or female perpetrators."
Except that rape is different, because unlike most crimes, in many jurisdictions a man can be convicted of rape based largely on a woman's testimony.
I don't know of many cases where women are wrongly convicted of crimes based solely on a man's allegations. If you are aware of such cases, feel free to post a link.
Has anyone done any research on the accuracy of line-up identifications?
I would be surprised if there wasn't a big drop in accurate identifications when the line-up is people of similar build of one ethnicity, and the identifier is of another ethnic group.
It isn't so much a deliberate racial bias, but a lesser ability to recognize distinguishing facial characteristics outside one's own ethnic group.
It would be an easy experiment to design and line-up identification easy to improve if shown to be inaccurate eg people could be tested for their ability to distinguish individuals from a random group of another ethnicity before their testimony was allowed in court.
Anon, that is an excellent point. I agree, it is not deliberate racism. But it is often the case that people from different racial or ethnic groups tend to look more similar to those outside than individuals from one's own ethnic and racial groups.
I have had this problem before. For example, I will be working somewhere with two or more guys from a similar ethnic background, similar age and build, and I will get them confused.
It's not just false rape that puts innocent people in jail.
The thing that's difficult to read about your blog is that having been forced to have sex (raped) by a man I was seeing who was much older than me (I was 18 and he was 25). He got away with it. And many actually do get away with it.
I am glad that the innocent are freed. Because it's wrong for someone to be in prison/jail for something they didn't do.
"Except that rape is different, because unlike most crimes, in many jurisdictions a man can be convicted of rape based largely on a woman's testimony."
Few would argue that rape is different, but not so much for stranger rape where a crime actually occurred. If someone is mugged or assaulted, there could be injuries or other evidence of the crime, but the victim could misidentify the perpetrator, which could lead to a false conviction. One way that rape is different, is that the accused can be convicted without any evidence that a crime occurred in the first place.
"I don't know of many cases where women are wrongly convicted of crimes based solely on a man's allegations. If you are aware of such cases, feel free to post a link."
I don't see why there wouldn't be cases where a man misidentified a woman, but it's less likely to happen because most violent crimes involving strangers are committed by men.
The good thing is that with the DNA revolution, it will be harder and harder to convict the wrong man in alleged stranger rapes. My guess is that this is why we are seeing more and more men who actually had consensual sex with women falsely accused of rape -- the women can no longer plausibly accuse a male with whom she had no contact to cover up an illicit (but consensual) sexual encounter, so now they feel they have to throw their actual male lovers under the bus.
It is unknown how many allegedly stranger rape cases there have been involving supposed misidentification that were actually false rape claims (where a woman fingered the wrong man to cover up consensual sex for one reason or other). My guess is, more than we'd like to think.
Here's a nice white lady from Georgia, falsely accused by her husband in a child custody case:
Ga. teacher acquitted in molestation trial
A former Georgia kindergarten teacher was acquitted Tuesday on charges she molested three young girls.
The Catoosa County Superior Court jury found Tonya Craft, 37, not guilty on each of 22 charges of child molestation, aggravated sexual battery and aggravated child molestation. Craft wept after the verdict as supporters cheered loudly outside the courtroom.
"The amazing ordeal with the corruption that caught up these little girls and this wonderful woman has begun to end with a verdict from 12 people honest and true," said Craft's attorney, Demosthenes Lorandos, in a phone call with The Associated Press.
He said he and Craft's other attorneys have contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. attorney's office about what he called the "fraudulent" behavior of Judge Brian House and the Catoosa County district attorney's office during the case.
Questions have been raised about the fairness of a trial in front of House, who helped represent Craft's ex-husband in the couple's divorce in the 1990s. Defense attorneys filed a motion seeking the judge's recusal, but he refused to step down.
Prosecutor Chris Arnt also raised eyebrows when he posted on his Facebook page in January that Craft's defense lawyers "are really insane or just trying to jack up her defense bill," according to news reports.
Arnt and other officials from the district attorney's office did not immediately return a call for comment after Tuesday's verdict. House declined comment because he said he had "no idea" what Lorandos was talking about.
House also declined to comment on why he had refused to step down from the trial.
Since her arrest in May 2008, Craft has been fired from her job at Chickamauga Elementary School, lost custody of her daughter, lost her Georgia home and moved with her husband to Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., about 30 miles north of where she was on trial in Ringgold.
The trial divided the rural north Georgia community and drew national media attention, with people from across the country following the proceedings online via Twitter and Facebook. Both Chickamauga, where Craft lived when she was arrested, and neighboring Ringgold have populations of about 3,000.
Craft's supporters called the trial a witch hunt, while the friends and families of the accusers said they believed their children were molested by the teacher. Craft's attorneys argued the children falsely believe they were molested because of constant suggestions by their parents and social workers.
"It is unknown how many allegedly stranger rape cases there have been involving supposed misidentification that were actually false rape claims (where a woman fingered the wrong man to cover up consensual sex for one reason or other). My guess is, more than we'd like to think."
I agree, but I still think that a false claim is less likely when there are injuries and evidence that it took place in an uncomfortable place (eg. park, parking lot, the proverbial dark alley), and the accuser had no prior relationship with the accused. Not that women haven't faked such incidents. My point being that accusations of non-stranger rape a way more likely to be false, as they ignore almost everything we know about the pathology of rape and criminology in general.
I also agree that DNA is very helpful, but serology is far from perfect. It is still possible that a misidentification can lead to a false conviction.
Also, I should have written "Few would argue that rape is not different", before anyone gets confused about what I meant.
My point being that accusations of non-stranger rape a way more likely to be false, as they ignore almost everything we know about the pathology of rape and criminology in general.
****
This claim isn't just a matter of common sense. The recidivism rates for "date rape" are far, far lower than those for inmates convicted of stranger rape. The implication is that many more false convictions happen when the defendent has been accused of date rape, which is usually prosecuted based on nothing more than "he said/she said."
God Bless Mr Towler... may he have a huge lawsuit!
And Ms Craft.. sue sue sue!! They are corrupt in the south!
Anonymous said...
DNA is not always a factor, or available in most convictions - it's why so relatively few exonerations exist.
Think of how many falsely accused men where NO rape ever happened are imprisoned - either in prison or on a registry for life.
The first thing they teach you in law school is "There is no such thing as justice".
May 17, 2010 4:25:00 PM
http://science.jrank.org/pages/9875/Justice-Feminist-Justice.html
Feminism and Family JusticeFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/rarneson/feminfa4.pdf
Feminists for Life examines how women triumph over violence.File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Another way in which VAWA II varies from its predecessor is its focus on the effects of domes- tic violence in the workplace. The Bureau of ...
www.feministsforlife.org/taf/1998/fall/Fall98.pdf
I hope what I have posted is both interesting and revealing.
Anonymous said...
I hope what I have posted is both interesting and revealing.
May 19, 2010 3:58:00 AM
What did you post?
You are just one of many, many, many who post as 'ananymous'.
links
Post a Comment