She was caught driving drunk and claimed rape to get out of it. Once again, we see how women DO know what kind of reaction they will get when they cry rape. Only in this case, it backfired. I'm glad she apologized for that, because, I suppose, that makes it all ok.
Helen Witt apologizes for falsely claiming rape
LANDER -- Fremont County authorities say a 25-year-old Casper woman admitted to lying about a rape claim in order to get out of a drunk-driving charge.
The Fremont County sheriff's office says Helen Witt came clean after investigators couldn't make her story from last summer match up.
Witt originally told law enforcement she was raped by two men on the Fourth of July in Boysen State Park. She said the two men drug her from her car and sexually assaulted her on a dirt road near the Cottonwood Bay area of the park.
She also claimed that her attackers ran her over with their white Cadillac Escalade, and she only escaped because she was able to hitch a ride with a passing motorist.
In addition to drunk driving, Witt was originally charged with driving on a suspended license and reckless driving.
The sheriff's office said the driving on a suspended license charge stuck, even though charges for drunk and reckless driving were dismissed. Witt has now been charged with filing a false report.
Authorities say Witt has apologized for filing the false report.
Investigators spent hours on the case involving several agencies in addition to the sheriff's office: the Boysen State Park Rangers, the Fremont County Ambulance Service and the Fremont County attorney’s office.
Link: http://www.trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_ec613592-c823-5062-9da0-470485588be0.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
10 comments:
While not entirely relevant the article does give us an idea of the quality of journalists today.
What the hell does "drug" mean in the following...
She said the two men drug her from her car...
Gwallan
It means "dragged out of the car".
I'm just posting this for you to know....not to defend journalists in any way!
@Anon 1:50...
I know what it meant. Look it up. There is no such word.
Ok I remember from another forum that you were not from the united states. I thought it might be slang that was just used here and you really did not know what it meant.
I had no clue what a bloke was until about 5 years ago!!!
Some of the local journalists here are so bad that it made me stop getting one of the local newspapers. They did a total hit job on a guy that knew growing up. That was it for me...why pay a newspaper that does that? Because if they would do it to him they would do it to me in a heartbeat also.
BTW
I liked your posts on other forums and I'm glad you are posting here also.
"I'm glad she apologized for that, because, I suppose, that makes it all ok."
Not that I don't think that this woman is scum, but would you prefer it if she had not apologised?
Gender feminist "constructionists" encourage false rape accussations. Along with encourageing false rape accussations they have perverted our law enforcement to "keep all false accusations from the public".
This dynamic is what "EMPOWERS" the Gender/Raunch community. The gender feminist perverts are gonna do what they are gonna do, But when the American law enforcement community gets "Allied" with this perversion.."Houston we gots problems"
Break the gender feminist / law enforcement missinformnation Alliance...It is a perversion, and it is un-constitutional.
Charging false rape accussers would make real rape accusations more believeable.."ITS JUST COMMON SENSE".
The main thing that charging false rape accusers would do is that it would take away all the RapeKlan power that the Gender/Raunch community now hold over college campuses.
"Break the gender feminist / law enforcement missinformnation Alliance"
Will you please stop posting the same misspelled, poorly punctuated, insane comments over and over again? You are not helping.
Anonymous - "...they have perverted our law enforcement to "keep all false accusations from the public"."
Dude,
Did you read the article? It's the follow-up to a story about police informing the public about a false rape allegation. [That part about, "The Fremont County sheriff's office says..."]
And, I see you're back to the "alliance" bit. So, how did the police in this case ally themselves with gender-feminists to hide this story from the public?
If they were a part of the grand conspiracy you often alluded to, in which the government is trying to selectively use FRA's to attack the male gender, that part where the Sheriff's office told the reporter what had happened spoiled the whole effort.
OT: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/28/divorce-decree-more-wives-should-dump-their-men/
The title of this article by a feminist nut is "More Wives Should Dump Their Husbands."
Post a Comment