Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Women tried to destroy cab driver with a false rape claim over a fare

COMMENT: The news report below chronicles a textbook false rape claim.  Two women were willing to destroy the life of a cab driver with a rape lie because they didn't want to pay a fare (cab drivers are among the classes of citizens most at risk for false rape claims -- see here).  At least one of the women, Charlene Beal, pictured here, physically attacked him and damaged his cab. Then the women accused him of rape.  Then he was jailed -- until police discovered he was innocent (you see, you must be found "innocent" before the police will free you after two drunken women accuse you of rape).  The court sentenced the women to eleven months in jail.  The judge told the women that they did a wicked thing, and that their lie was "a crime against women in general."

In short, this is a garden variety false rape claim case. The life of a hapless male is deemed less worthy than the price of a cab ride (we've actually seen worse on this site).  The male is arrested on the say-so of drunken women and retained until his innocence is proved (for what other class of citizens do we routinely hand the power to deprive another class of citizens of their liberty?).  The rape lie was called a lie against women in general, and that is correct.  But the cab driver was the primary victim.  Moreover, false rape claims, are crimes against males in general, not just because of the lie but because the lie is too readily believed by law enforcement and then not punished adequately when its falsity is exposed.  (If you are going to accept the word of a lone accuser and deprive a male of his liberty, then if the accuser turns out to be a liar, you'd damn well better be prepared to hold her accountable. We rarely do.)

In short, just another day in our false rape society.  Here is the news story:

Women jailed over false sex attack claims

Two drunken women who made false sexual allegations about a taxi driver have been sent to jail.

Charlene Beal, pictured left, became violent after she argued with Zubair Khan over the fare and then claimed he sexually assaulted her and exposed himself.

The 50-year-old cabbie was arrested and held in a police cell for several hours before police discovered he was innocent.

Jailing Beal, 27, for 19 months and her then partner Lisa McGuire, 26, for 11 months, a judge told them: "It was a wicked thing to do to accuse that man of what you accused him of.

"It is a crime against women in general. Do you know why?

"Lawyers acting for alleged victims of sex offences, he said, are entitled to say: "Read your newspapers, members of the jury, women make things up."

Recorder Cairns Nelson QC added: "You should hang your heads in shame."

Maidstone Crown Court heard Mr Khan had picked up Beal and McGuire in the early hours of February 19 at the River Tavern in Strood.

Neil Sandys, prosecuting, said Mr Khan, who was working for a Gillingham taxi firm, told the women the fare to Maidstone would be £30.

After Beal argued the fare should be £22.50, the cabbie asked for the cash up front.

Beal handed over £20 and said the rest would be paid when they arrived at their destination.

Mr Sandys said when they arrived in the town centre Beal and McGuire wanted to go further. Mr Khan said he would not take them anywhere until they had paid.

A struggle then ensued.

"Mr Khan was shocked and scared," said Mr Sandys. "From then on the incident escalated very quickly indeed."

About £750 worth of damage was caused to the dashboard, radio and meter equipment.

Mr Khan managed to get out of the cab but his mobile phone was thrown in the road. As he bent down to get it, he was pushed over. Beal kicked him in the legs.

She then made a 999 call in which she said Mr Khan had either attempted to rape her or sexually assault her.

Beal, of Bell Road, Park Wood, Maidstone, and McGuire, pictured right, of Glasgow House, Highland Road, Maidstone, admitted perverting the course of justice and damaging property.

Beal also admitted assaulting Mr Khan and a public order offence.

Mary Jacobson, for McGuire, said her client played little part in the allegation of indecent exposure. “She was literally a back seat passenger,” she said.

“This was simply meant to be a fun night out which went dramatically wrong for all parties involved. She and Miss Beal were partners at the time. They have since moved on to new partners.”

Timothy Banks, for Beal, said his client knew there was no truth in her allegations against Mr Khan and that he was entirely innocent.

“She was struggling with alcohol addiction,” he said. “It is a disgraceful incident.”

Beal worked as a school dinner lady but it came to an end when checks were made and her criminal record was discovered.

“She knows what she has done was close to wicked,” added Mr Banks.

Cabbie Zubair Khan said afterwards he was pleased with the sentence but would have liked to have seen the two women get at least two years jail.

"I think as they have admitted it the sentence is OK. If they had been given two years it would have been better."

Link http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/news/2010/april/27/women_jailed_over_false_ses.aspx

31 comments:

Nick S said...

"The male is arrested on the say-so of drunken women and retained until his innocence is proved (for what other class of citizens do we routinely hand the power to deprive another class of citizens of their liberty?)."

Indeed. And in what insane world do we class the group with the legal power to deprive another group of citizens of their liberty through a mere allegation as a downtrodden, disadvantaged group.

Brandon Webb said...

The Judge handling the case says the women did a "wicked thing" to accuse the cab driver of rape, but it was a "crime against women in general." Isn't the cab driver (a man) the victim here?

There is no question that false rape claims hurt true victims of rape, but IT IS NOT a crime against women in general when another lies about rape. IT IS a crime against the person they falsely accuse.

Nick S said...

I know I am not the first to suggest this, but whenever I see a photo of a false accuser one of the first things I notice is 'fuck, is she ugly!'.

AfOR said...

My FRA had a DIRECT, REAL, and NEGATIVE impact on the Police's ability and resources to prosecute the following person.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/15/vanessa-george-jailed-child-sex-abuse

How do you like them apples... an FRA that HELPS genuine paedophiles...

Anonymous said...

The perversion of law enforcement protocol over the last 30 years that has fostered this culture of false rape accussations has "empowered" the gender/ Raunch community in the immediate.
But immediate gratification always has longer term consequences. And folks are kinda getting sick of the empowered, loud, vulgar, and abnoxious Gender/Raunch community.

Anonymous said...

just another case of alcoholics,with weak values,probably even weak working values that could help them get a man.

Anonymous said...

"just another case of alcoholics,with weak values,probably even weak working values that could help them get a man."
I meant better working values could help them get a man.

slwerner said...

”The life of a hapless male is deemed less worthy than the price of a cab ride”

This is also what jumped out at me. I think it’s crucial that the public be informed as to just how little it takes to spur some women into making false claims that can literally ruin a man’s whole life. I don’t think that this aspect can be stress enough.

Thanks to the influence of feminism, women (especially) have come to view men as so valueless and inconsequential that they are not even worth the price of cab fare.

Recently, we also seen where FRA’s were made by one women trying to (and, being successful, BTW) avoid a DUI charge, and anther because she was upset with her ex-boy friend and father of her child who apparently didn’t approve of her new boyfriend.

This how little it really takes fro some women to chose to throw a man’s very life into the brink.

I do hope the some of our lurking gender-feminists will address this aspect of FRA’s. I’d have to conclude that their continued silence on the matter is their tacit approval of woman making FRA’s based on such minor provocations.

Anonymous said...

I know I am not the first to suggest this, but whenever I see a photo of a false accuser one of the first things I notice is 'fuck, is she ugly!'.

****

Yeah, as if anyone on earth would want to fuck Donkey Face!

Anonymous said...

OT: http://letters.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2010/04/28/click_feminist_moments/view/index1.html?show=all

This article is "How I became a feminist." Read the comments sections for the various petty slights and neuroses that cause women to hate men for the rest of their lives.

Anonymous said...

Here is my favorite:

I remember 2 eureka moments in my childhood. The first when I was 5 maybe. It was summer in Maryland just outside of D.C. I was playing in the yard with my 2 younger brothers in shorts with no top because of the heat and humidity when my mom called me in to put a top on because I was too old to go without a top. "But my chest looks exactly like my brothers! Doesn't matter was the answer. I have been angry ever since. But the worst was when I had to stay inside and iron my brothers' shirts while they got to cut the grass. I wanted to cut the grass, I was older and just as strong and why didn't they iron their own shirts. Boy did I NOT like that one and it still makes me REALLY ANGRY!

Anonymous said...

Best bet is not to work in any type of public service job that deals directly with the general public. People in Medical Professions, Law, Transit, Education, and Professional Sports are the biggest targets.

gwallan said...

It wasn't even a full fare that was at issue. £2.50 was what this animal was quibbling over.

What odds can I get that her "accomplice" has also been on the receiving end of mucho abuse from the main protagonist.

Once Bitten said...

Like many here the judges comments that 'it was a a crime against women outrages me'.

Yes real rape victims are affected by the impact of FRA, but the FRA crime here was against the poor male cabbie they falsely accused. He's the one who directly suffered for their lies and he is the one who should be acknowledged as the victim of their crime.

Anonymous said...

The court sentenced the women to eleven months in jail

Was that for making a false report or for damaging his cab? It seems that a piece of metal is more important than a man.
I hope that cab drivers just stop picking up all females.

Anonymous said...

"It is a crime against women in general. Do you know why?

"Lawyers acting for alleged victims of sex offences, he said, are entitled to say: "Read your newspapers, members of the jury, women make things up."


Listen to what this judge is saying here.

He's offended by these two crims because they damage the image of women being incapable of lying.

Why does he think such an image needs to be promoted? What possible reasoning could lead to such a preposterous idea?

All people can lie about anything. It's the judge's job (along with juries) to decide what is the truth - not to make-up fictitious rules of thumb about 'women not lying' so he doesn't have to make an effort to do his job properly, ie to judge.

Every criminal case needs to be examined in light of evidence, not the strength of the word of someone born into an arbitrarily privileged class.

Anonymous said...

"It is a crime against women in general. Do you know why?"

Can you imagine a judge saying to a convicted rapist:

"Rape is a crime against men in general. Do you know why?"

and then going on to say that every rapist makes it harder for innocent men to defend themselves against false rape accusers.

Anonymous said...

Thus going out of his way to emphasize that no matter who the victim is, women are still more important.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 10:11

I like that!

I have thought of it that way too.

Anonymous said...

http://www.coyote-tv.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2238&Itemid=269

This is one of the most sickening cases of injustice I have seen in a very long time.

If it makes anyone feel better, it is a WOMAN being sentenced to life in prison for 'forcing' a 13 year old boy to touch her breasts.

The sentencing hearing is reocrded on this site.

I suggest each and everyone read this-

The woman would have gotten LESS time if she had murdered the boy.

She got the same sentence as the guy who raped and murdered the two girls in California.

I am not posting this for sympathy of the woman -

I am posting this because it's scary as hell to watch what has become of our 'justice' system.

I'm beginning to believe the time to stop bickering among our selves, gender wise, is going to be too late to stop the FEMA camp train.

Anonymous said...

Video:
NV - Woman Sentenced To Life For Forcing 13-year-old Boy To Touch Her Breasts!

A Twin Falls woman convicted of forcing a 13-year-old boy to touch her breasts was sentenced Monday to life in prison.

Michelle Lyn Taylor, 34, was convicted of lewdness with a minor under 14 in November after a week-long trial in Elko County, Nev., District Judge Mike Memeo’s courtroom.

With the conviction, Taylor faced a mandatory life sentence, and Memeo set parole eligibility after 10 years, the minimum sentence. If released on parole she must register as a sex offender and will be under lifetime supervision.

The district attorney’s office did not offer a plea agreement in the case, said public defender Alina Kilpatrick, who argued the sentence is unconstitution al and doesn’t fit the crime.

“The jury was not allowed to know the potential sentence in this case and the Legislature doesn’t know the facts,” she said, alluding to the minimum sentence set by the Legislature in Nevada Revised Statute.

Kilpatrick said despite the parole eligibility after 10 years, there should be no mistake that it’s a life sentence for Taylor.

“She is getting a greater penalty for having a boy touch her breast than if she killed him,” she said.

After he sentenced her, Memeo said he was bound by state statute to impose the life sentence, but said he isn’t sure why the prosecution chose to charge her under that statute.

District Attorney Gary Woodbury could not be reached for comment.

Taylor, who lived in Jackpot, Nev., at the time of the crime, kissed a friend’s child, forced him to touch her breast and asked him to have sex with her in February 2008.

Taylor claimed she was intoxicated and doesn’t remember what happened that night. She told jurors she roughhoused with the boy, but didn’t force him to touch her inappropriatel y.

Anonymous said...

That is pretty crazy. These days I wouldn't be surprised if you could get life in prison for ripping the tag off of your mattress.

Anonymous said...

Just remember that there are guys in prison for life that never even touched anyone.

Look at that guy in new york that was serving 20 years in prison for a rape that never happened.

If it was the other way around and women were 95% of the ones on sex offender registries and in prison for "sex crimes" it would no longer be a crime...all rape would be legal.

Also remember that there is no way in hell this woman will do more than a few months for this. Just let the statistics speak for themselves.....93-94% of all people in prison are male.

You will hear about the initial sentence but you will NOT hear that she was released next week.

And as a woman she will have the world and entire media throwing a pity party for her and doing everything they can to get her out of jail.

It should be a real criminal like one of these false accusers doing life....not her.

But I do see what you are saying this is absolutely INSANE. And this country has totally gone to hell.

Anonymous said...

Notice the BIG TIME distortion in the media about this case!

Oooops they forgot to mention that she has a prior conviction for sexually abusing two young boys for a year and only served 10 months.Looks like she has a history of molesting young boys...funny how that is not mentioned though?

http://www.cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1661:life-sentence-for-copping-a-feel&catid=3:news&Itemid=96

So how many of you would want a guy that sexually abused two young girls for a year to be out of jail...and how many of you would feel sorry for him?

Do you think you would see anyone in the media defending a guy that sexually abused two young girls for a year??

I just witnessed a month long trash Big Ben fest in the media for a 10 minute mess around session in the bathroom of a bar.

Just goes to show the double standard.

The media will cover up for and defend female sex offenders.

AfOR said...

Here in the UK in the Vanessa George paedophile case, they spent months trying to make out that the one man involved was the ringleader and was in control of the two women involved.

Shame they all lived >100 miles apart.

Shame they had never met in person.

Shame the two women were known to each other and doing this stuff before they first knew the man

Shame the man never did anything against any child (he did view and keep the images of abuse the women sent him) within 100 miles of himself

slwerner said...

Anonymous - "Notice the BIG TIME distortion in the media about this case!

Oooops they forgot to mention that she has a prior conviction for sexually abusing two young boys for a year and only served 10 months.Looks like she has a history of molesting young boys...funny how that is not mentioned though?"


Good catch!

This little, inconvenient truth has NOT being readily disseminated in the media, but is pivotal as to why the (female) judge had no choice but to issue the life sentence.

Chef Snark said...

Eleven months? Nice. Have fun in jail, ladies.

AfOR said...

11 months for one, 19 for the other.

and a record for life as an ex-con, perverter of the course of justice, and false rape accuser...

nice...

Anonymous said...

Slwerner

Also notice that after her first conviction for sexually abusing boys for a year that she did NOT have to register as a sex offender.

But keep in mind that if a guy peed in public he would have to register.

Also if a guy just had a PICTURE of on of these boys he would have to register.

Anonymous said...

She doesn't have to register? Why the hell not?

Sid said...

She didn't have to register because the mass perception of society is that no matter what happens, the woman can never do no wrong or be wrong no matter what. And if she is wrong, then obviously it must be because of some man because society can never blame women, only men. And thanks to feminism any attempts to research and find out the truth or speak out against this clearly sexist practice is squashed because any facts are the enemies of feminists, because they thrive off falsehoods and lies