Here is yet another indication about how "seriously" we take false rape accusations. A woman was charged with making a false rape claim but now apparently she's out on bail, and she's insisting it was a rape -- in a comment under the news story about her false claim. No kidding. Now, I believe in the first amendment, but shouldn't it be a condition of her release, at the very least, that she not be permitted to continue to foment fear and hysteria about the alleged rape that police say was false? When men accused of assaulting women are permitted to be out on bail, their first amendment rights are routinely curtailed with "no contact" orders (which often keep innocent fathers from even speaking with their own children for extended periods of time). Could she not be told to shut up, or else she's going to jail (where she should be in the first place)? One of the principal problems with false rape claims (aside from the harm they do to innocent men and boys) is the fear they instill, not to mention the slander of an entire gender. If false accusers are allowed out, it needs to be a condition of their release that they not publicize the very thing police have determined to be false.
First the news story:
SALISBURY CRIME: Woman charged with making false sexual assault report
SALISBURY -- A Fruitland woman was charged by city police after allegedly making a false report about a sexual assault.
Kelli Jean Davis-Riggin, of the 300 block of Holiday Street, has been charged with making a false report to an officer and obstructing and hindering, according to court records.
Davis-Riggin told police she was sexually assaulted inside a convenience store, but an investigation by city police found the report was false.
Davis-Riggin is being held at the Wicomico County Detention Center on a $10,000 bond.
Link: http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20100330/NEWS01/100330011
Now, her comment that appears under the news story:
First off where ever the daily times get their information from was not a reliable source. Yes true everyone has a right to their option But, were NOT in her shoes when it happened. However i was!!!!! Believe what you choose to believe the truth will all come out in the wash. In this article alone at least they did get the spelling of the name correct the address is incorrect "block" what a way to describe a resident. As far as the BOND that's a joke i was out with no bond period. All i have to say is that it happened and this foreigner will be found at fault. My best advise to all women is even if the OPEN sign is clearly on don't enter the store the one that uses a buzzer to let you in then buzzes you to leave I would hate to see this happen to anyone else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
25 comments:
You will want to see this:
http://www.vdare.com/francis/prison_rape.htm
"In a 2001 report published by the liberal Human Rights Watch, a researcher named Joanne Mariner disclosed facts the mainstream media have long ignored or denied: There are more men raped in the United States—about 90,000 every year—than women—a mere 40,000."
The actual numbers, from everything I can tell, are unknowable, but staggering, because in this area, there are very few reports and massive underreporting.
Most of the prisoners raped are young men who are in prison for drug or other non-violent offenses. Lambs to the slaughter.
Walk a mile in those shoes, ladies. If the genders were reversed, this would be the biggest issue in America, bar none, and you damn well know it.
"Most of the prisoners raped are young men who are in prison for drug or other non-violent offenses."
Or false allegations because a woman was 'upset'.
Chef Snark "You will want to see this:"
Snark,
That's some damned sobering news...and just when I was all set to roll around the floor in laughter at Kelli Jean Davis-Riggin.
[seriously, she's whining even about the news report not revealing her actual address. I know there's a lot more seriousness to the issue, but that part just struck me as sheer stupidity. Did she really want her address to be published?]
As to the issue of male (prison) rape, I'm wondering if long-time absent poster Dawn or the other troll-come-lately (assuming they are not one-and--the-same) might have something (anything) thoughtful and meaningful to say? [I think we can rest assured that Marcella Chester is way too busy to bother to consider the victimization of mere males].
Ah yes, I wonder if the feminists will be their usual sensitive selves.
"Oh teh porr porr men, being raped in more than twice teh numbas that wimmin are. Oh teh porr porr victimz"
Kelli Jean Davis-Riggin - "All i have to say is that it happened and this foreigner will be found at fault."
'Cause nothing says Xenophobe quite like targeting some foreigner with an FRA.
While the lack-luster reporting job doesn't explain much, given that it was a convenience store, I'd guess that there was video surveillance which lead to the conclusion that no crime had occurred. of course, Kelli Jean Davis-Riggin would probably contend that it was a filthy, lyin' foreign-made camera.
My guess is the feminists will say that men (they love that collective word) are the ones doing the raping in prison, and that patriarchy hurts men, too.
slwerner, what's your best guess about what happened in that case? I can't figure it out.
Ah yes, what is it they say? Men, as men, cannot be victims?
So even men in men's prisons, convicted because they are men, serving longer sentences because they are men, or perhaps falsely accused - a crime which happens near-exclusively to men, and being victimised by a crime which is considered by most to be a punchline when it happens to men ... even they, surely aren't victims, as men!
Snark, some of the more kind-hearted feminists will say that they never denied that prison rape occurs, but men need to advocate against it.
(I love that one -- men need to stand up, etc. But, gee, when it comes to women being raped, any 18-year-old boy on campus who doesn't join their rallies against the rape of women is "part of the problem.")
"'Cause nothing says Xenophobe quite like targeting some foreigner with an FRA."
How little has changed, eh? Whether it's the lynching of black men in the 19th and early 20th centuries, or 'the foreigner' falsely accused today ... for all their talk of tolerance and intersectionality, feminists won't raise a word against women targeting THE OTHER.
"(I love that one -- men need to stand up, etc. But, gee, when it comes to women being raped, any 18-year-old boy on campus who doesn't join their rallies against the rape of women is "part of the problem.")"
lol, indeed. You can either wear high heels and emasculate yourself, or you're a rapist.
I call false dichotomy!
And feminists might want to consider that a lot of men who are raped in prison are only there because feminists put them there.
"Men, as men, cannot be victims."
And that's the crux of the problem. They refuse to see that the real dividing line is between CRIMINALS and INNOCENT PEOPLE. Members of both genders fall in both group. That, of course, is the only sane and rational way to look at crime. I, as an innocent man who does not commit a crime, have nothing in common with criminal males, except external genitalia.
But, hey, why tell the truth if it interferes with a good woman-as-pertetual victim metanarrative?
"And that's the crux of the problem. They refuse to see that the real dividing line is between CRIMINALS and INNOCENT PEOPLE."
Yup. That's it, right there.
But their talk of treating people as individuals and not as stereotypes only extends to women.
Internally contradictory - but not self-defeating. Think of how much misandry they have brought about using phony arguments.
Archivist - "slwerner, what's your best guess about what happened in that case? I can't figure it out."
Playing on the ease with which I'm tempted into speculation?
I figure this woman simply got mad at the clerk over some (probably) minor bone of contention [maybe he asked her not to drink directly out of the Squishy machine]; and given her dislike of foreigners, she decide to go "nuclear" and retaliate in a way sure to annihilate him.
Some people really hate foreigners. Glenn Sacks once covered the story of a girl who claimed to have been attacked by a bunch of Latino boys over her anti-immigration stand (also disproved via video). Some (privileged white) women hate beta males with a passion, others seem to hate foreign immigrant males just as much. And, as the targets of their selected hatred are but mere males, who cares what happens to them, eh?
"[maybe he asked her not to drink directly out of the Squishy machine]" -- made me laugh out loud!
We reported on the immigration false accusation as well: what was scary about that one was that two girls joined in the lie, which only underscores how scary this can be. Even a rule requiring corroboration wouldn't stop that one. Fortunately, video to the rescue.
Girl lies that boys threatened her with rape, inflicts scratches on self
Then we should send false rape accusers to men's prison. Even better, since feminists have always protested male-only clubs and male-only schools, we should make the entire penal system coed. Who are we to deny women the same access to some of our nations most prestigious institutions, like Folsom and Attica? Female criminals, often resigned to petty shoplifting and street prostitution, make significantly less money than their male counterparts. How can women be expected to close this earning gap if we don't allow them equal opportunity to education, so that they can learn valuable technical and management skills, such as how to crack safes or run a gang, from the more privileged male felons? Female convicts should be allowed the same contacts as career opportunities as male convicts. If a young woman can get into Cornell, she should be allowed to get into Sing Sing.
Anon at 5:00 -- the spirit of Title IX demands nothing less.
Very well written.
Snark: From the report "Extrapolating these findings to the national level gives a total of at least 140,000 inmates who have been raped."
The American law enforcement community crossed some very real constitutional boundries when it started engaging in the "manufacture and distribution" of faulty and inflamatory missinformation.
Using state and federal dollars to in effect "manufacture a prejudice" is un-constitutional.
Let the lying filth run her mouth. Everything she says about her case can and will be used against her, and could also be used by her victim in a lawsuit.
First off I LOVE the comments in this thread.
And I have always thought that women should be in the same prison as men.
"Then we should send false rape accusers to men's prison. Even better, since feminists have always protested male-only clubs and male-only schools, we should make the entire penal system coed."
Yes! We can call it the "Mad MAX Maximum Security Prison Resort"
"(I love that one -- men need to stand up, etc. But, gee, when it comes to women being raped, any 18-year-old boy on campus who doesn't join their rallies against the rape of women is "part of the problem.")"
I love that one too. I have been involved in online debates with feminists before over issues like men's health problems being neglected compared to women's, and they have invariably resorted to the argument that 'oh well, women have organised themselves to bring attention to these issues, it is up to men to do the same for men.'. i.e. man up or quit whining. This is basically a might is right argument. We have the power to get what we want, so there.
What is hilarious about this is that feminists have accused men of selfishly looking after their own interests and running society for their own benefit, yet at the same time they blame men for not doing enough to help themselves! Nice contradiction.
And of course the same folks who tell men to man up are the first to start whining when we do finally start to organize and actually get somewhere!
It is un-christian, and un-American, and un-constitutional to enable a society where women and girls (as a matter of course) lie to our law enforcement community.
Break the perversion, get gender feminism out of our legal system.
Post a Comment