If the organization called Women Against Rape is indicative of modern feminism, then I can say beyond any doubt, reasonable or otherwise, that feminism is a cesspool, an open sewer, a pit of putrefaction, a treasonous, slimy gathering of all that is rotten in the debris of human depravity. Why? Because Women Against Rape criticised the police and the Crown Prosecution Service for bringing the false rape case against Gail Sherwood. Read our prior reports about Gail Sherwood and tell me that Women Against Rape has a valid point in any rational world. Please. Educate me, all you man-hating, despicable, people. I'm serious.
Get it straight, misandrists: if anyone should be prosecuted for any crime, it is this serial false accuser. That we are even forced to write this is almost beyond belief.
That awful group shows its true colors when it complains about the number of women being prosecuted for false rape claims. Given their complaint, I would say that things might be looking up for the falsely accused. I would also say that my guess is that the percentage of convictions in false rape cases is very high. The reason it is very high is that not nearly enough rape liars are prosecuted, and the ones who are prosecuted are typically clearly guilty.
If Women Against Rape is indicative of modern feminism, then we need to do what is necesary, under law, to completely eradicate modern feminism from the face of the earth, because no male is safe.
Despicable.
Read the news story here:
Woman gets two years for false rape claims
More than 60 people had written to the judge insisting that Gail Sherwood, a former childminder and dog breeder, had not invented the story
A mother-of-three was today jailed for two years for falsely claiming she had been harassed and raped by an unknown stalker, despite protests from her family and anti-rape campaigners that she had been telling the truth.
More than 60 people had written to the judge at Bristol crown court insisting that Gail Sherwood, a former childminder and dog breeder, had not invented the story and that they believed there was a dangerous sex attacker free in Gloucestershire.
Maureen Till, a friend, had told the hearing Sherwood had been the victim of a "despicable" miscarriage of justice.
But sentencing, Judge Julian Lambert said Sherwood's "perverted mind" had invented a "malicious fantasy world". She was a "cunning and highly deceitful" woman responsible for a "huge waste" of police resources, he said.
Sherwood, 52, was found guilty of perverting the course of justice after a six-week trial. She twice claimed she had been raped at beauty spots in Gloucestershire, prompting police investigations. She also told detectives she had received strange calls, had been followed home, and that flowers had been left at her door.
But police began to doubt her and launched a covert surveillance operation that the prosecution said proved she was making the attacks up. Simon Morgan, prosecuting, told the court that "many hundreds" of police hours had been spent investigating Sherwood's claims and the trial had cost £100,000.
In mitigation, Alan Kent QC said that even since her conviction the stalker had continued to plague Sherwood, who lives with two teenage daughters and a partner in Thrupp, near Stroud in Gloucestershire. On Wednesday someone had broken into the family home, set off a burglar alarm and disturbed ornaments, Kent said. A hooded figure in a nearby field had been captured on the family's CCTV cameras.
Kent said that Sherwood "could have taken the easy option", told police she had lied and escaped with a caution or conditional discharge, but "she decided she would stand up and tell the truth".
Outside court the campaign group Women Against Rape criticised the police and the Crown Prosecution Service for bringing the case. It claimed Gloucestershire police had made mistakes.
The group said it was "alarmed" at the number of women being prosecuted for false allegations of rape, and that it intends to campaign to have Sherwood released.
Detective Chief Inspector Paul Shorrock, the senior investigating officer, said the police and CPS had dedicated significant resources to the case before concluding the rapist did not exist.
He said one reason why they prosecuted Sherwood was to reassure other people living nearby that there was no stalker on the loose.
Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/mar/04/rape-claims-gail-sherwood
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
23 comments:
Another Story that Archivist may want to add his comments to:
Campus Rape Victims: A Struggle For Justice
by Joseph Shapiro
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124001493
Get gender feminism out of our legal system. The gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation ALLIANCE is turning our otherwise sound legal system into a sort of hysteria/ klan court. This new Gender feminist court is manifesting perversions of the law where innocent men are being prosecuted, and violent women are being enabled.
seems like they believe their own lies.Women and children never lie about rape.
It seems they want to lie but never want that it's found out,so it is accepted as the truth,so they even believe themselfs.
Oh well not like my mom isn't any different with lying about things,but at least it ain't that serious and we recognize it at home.
Rape hysteria gives the gender / Raunch community a disproportionate amount of power and sway over campus politics. This disproportionate amount of sway over campus politics was not earned through there righteousness...it was usurped by angry / violent / and vulgar ..gender raunch lesbians who rose to power on faulty and inflammatory misinformation.
When hysteria gets tied into the legal community..thats when a perversion develops.
"gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation ALLIANCE..."
I don't see how. Law enforcement did the opposite of what the gender feminists want, as "Women Against Rape criticised the police and the Crown Prosecution Service for bringing the case." The police investigated, determined it was a hoax, then the false accuser was prosecuted and convicted in a court of law. Isn't that how the system is supposed to work? If hysteria is tied to the legal community, this was not an example of it.
Yer correct, but gender feminist perversion of our legal community is the main reason women and girls do not get charged for filing false rape accusations.
This one being charged is a good thing, but it is the exception rather than the rule.
Those that are effected most by rape hysteria and the legal perversions thereafter..are the American "matriarchal underclass".
Anon 6:27:00 here
i think a big problem is women are like a herd.This comes down to this problem also.
Off topic;
Domestic Violence Lobbyist Murders Her Husband
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/woman-charged-with-killing-344266.html
"Because some women only get one chance to make it out alive from sex crimes and domestic violence situations, The NDDVO Bill will also demand at least a 7-12 years mandatory sentence for first time offenders of domestic violence and sexual crimes against women and life sentences without the possibility of parole for cases that result in the death of a woman and/or women and children."
But shooting your husband to death is OK?
http://www.nddvo.info/Guestbook.php
Ah,
Gail Sherwood, who admitted to police that she made up the stalking and rape claims, and who had accused a man with whom she'd had a traffic accident of being the stalker/rapist.
Now her friends say she was lying when she confessed? Do they also believe this falsely accused innocent man also made wounds on her that looked like she had inflicted them herself?
Well, then, they must also believe that he has magical powers over video recorders, so as to drag her kicking and screaming from her home, but yet have the video recording showing hr calming walking out of her own home, alone, and under apparent duress.
Gotta love that magic thinking!
I thought this was rather transparent:
"In mitigation, Alan Kent QC said that even since her conviction the stalker had continued to plague Sherwood, who lives with two teenage daughters and a partner in Thrupp, near Stroud in Gloucestershire. On Wednesday someone had broken into the family home, set off a burglar alarm and disturbed ornaments, Kent said. A hooded figure in a nearby field had been captured on the family's CCTV cameras."
My! How convenient to have some break in, set off the alarm, and walk right in front of video camera (in disguise). Does the idea that this was most likely one of her friends purposefully staging this just to try to add credence to a story which she had already confessed was a fabrication?
Damn!, She sure seems to have some might dumb freinds.
Gender feminists are 95% white middle class liberals. They will let a black man in, if that black man is homo-sexual.
or a pussified mangina like obama,who just bends down and listens to everyone instead of standing up for the men when their rights are broken just for the mayority of women votes.
It's not just women - America's Most Wanted Fear Pimp is about to strike gold:
The America's Most Wanted host will sit down with President Barack Obama as part of the show's 1,000th episode this Saturday night.
The long-running show, which first aired in February 1988, will celebrate 22 years and 1,000 episodes this Saturday evening. The episode will include a 15-minute interview with President Obama. During the interview, the President congratulates Walsh and AMW on reaching this milestone and promises to do everything he can to ensure that Congress fully funds The Adam Walsh Act.
--------------------------------
This is the man who says you cannot trust males with children sitting down with the man who says fathers are deadbeats to fund a multi billion dollar boondoggle that protects NO ONE.
If you've never before written an Email or letter of concern to the White House, NOW would be a good time do do so.
URGENT! Contact the President and members of Congress and the House of Representatives.
The number to speak with someone is 202-456-1414 or the direct line is 202.456.1111
If you stay on for a few minutes, you can talk to a real person.
Or FAX A ONE PAGE OUTLINE summary sheet to 202-456-2461.
You can email but faxes will be MUCH more effective she said, because they
receive millions of emails.
1. At the top of the page, put a clear subject line- re: Adam Walsh Act.
2. List clear concise bullet points, not narrative. An outline form is
much more likely to be read than a narrative story.
If you do not know what to say, here are some talking points to use. Do not use all of them; use the ones that affect you the most. When writing use only one page. When calling be thoughtful of the persons time you are speaking to. Be kind and respectful whether you call or write. Always personalize any letter or fax you send. For a proper letter out line go here. http://tinyurl.com/yabyff8
The number 100,000 missing or non compliant sex offenders. After doing a detailed amount of research we cannot find any substantial data of that being a true number. This number is completely hype and not based in fact in any written study that exists.
The Adam Walsh Act violates constitutional rights of over 700,000 Americans.
Another myth that is used to pass costly counterproductive laws is the myth that former sex offenders have a very high recidivism rate. The federal government through the Department of Justice has sponsored credible studies that put that myth to rest and a study in California found “(research data from California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation indicate that fewer than 4% of the convicted sex offenders released to parole in 2003 were returned for a new sex offense over the course of a three year period of living in the community under parole supervision (CDCR Research, 2007)”
and happiness because the landlord will get tired of the problems and kick the registered citizen out.
Unemployment and Jobs. Once a person is on the public registry the likelihood of getting and keeping a good job is almost eliminated. Many registered former offenders are forced into homelessness due to lack of employment..
cont... Harassment of employers by vigilantes is another issue that causes many former offenders to lose their jobs. Once again this restricts a person’s life, liberty and happiness.
Vigilantism. Vigilantism is a direct result of the registry and retains the qualifications of punishment as it endangers a person’s life, liberty and happiness. This is not a new problem and it is not going away. Maine has had its share of vigilantism including two murders linked directly to the registry. Washington and California have also experienced murders due to the public registry. In addition, virtually every other state has experienced vigilantism. In several cases, it was not the former sex offender, but his wife or children who were killed. If you do not think this is a punishment, you need to live with this fear for a few days, then think how this fear would feel if it lasted for 10, 20 or 50 years.
Collateral Damage also retains the qualifications of punishment as it endangers and restricts a person’s life, liberty and happiness. Most former offenders have spouses and children who have to deal with each of these issues. Their lives are endangered and they are threatened and harassed by vigilantes and lawmakers are not standing up to protect these children and spouses. In this instance the punishment is transferred by marriage or by being related to the registered citizen. At some point this will be addressed before the courts. I wonder how law makers will brush this aside since they have been well aware of the ill-effects of these punitive laws on the innocent family members of registered citizens.
If there was any proof that the registry was doing its intended job, there would be some usefulness in it. But studies have shown that the registry is not working and is not protecting anyone.
“Megan's Law: does it protect children? Most states have very little evidence on the actual impact of community notification on their jurisdiction. Most of the understood benefits of the laws are based on assumptions about the nature of sexual offending and the behavior of parents and community members. Such assumptions are rarely supported through research, but continue to legitimize the law for law enforcement workers and members of the public.
http://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/research/Findings/meganslaw_wda48233.html
The Research & Evaluation Unit
Office of Policy and Planning
New Jersey Department of Corrections
“Megan’s Law has no effect on community tenure (i.e., time to first re-arrest).
Megan’s Law showed no demonstrable effect in reducing sexual re-offenses.
Megan’s Law has no effect on the type of sexual re-offense or first time sexual offense (still largely child molestation/incest).
Megan’s Law has no effect on reducing the number of victims involved in sexual offenses.
Given the lack of demonstrated effect of Megan’s Law on sexual offenses, the growing costs may not be justifiable.”
cont.
We ask that the President, and members of Congress, and the House of Representatives to please slow down and rethink these laws that are cruel and have the effect of pilferes on registered former offenders and their families. We ask that you oppose the AWA, a law that is being found to be unconstitutional in many ways. We are well aware that this law was passed under suspension of the rules. Therefore we can expect that most of you did not vote for it. We are also aware that there are those among you who would cry out that someone is protecting pedophiles if they oppose sex offender legislation. We offer an answer. No you are not pro sex offender. (By the way pedophiles make up a small portion of all registered sex offenders. Yes studies do prove that.) Tell them you are pro equality, freedom and the constitution; that you represent ALL the people. Do you have the courage to stand up and do the right thing for ALL the people?
Please return to law enforcement what has always been their job and take the registry out of the hands of the public. Once a sex offender completes his/her prison sentence place them in the hands of treatment providers and other experts who can help them reintegrate into society and become safe productive citizens instead of homeless, jobless outcasts.
One last thought. If a first time registered sex offender remains crime free for ten years, and turns his/her life around they should have the option to petition the court to have their name removed from the national registry. They should be given a second chance at life. Bobby Scott is right, “Once a person is placed upon the national sex offender registry, basically their life is over.”
It is within the power of legislators to give this life back after a person proves themselves. But do you have the courage and compassion to do that? Time will
Anonymous said...
seems like they believe their own lies.Women and children never lie about rape.
It seems they want to lie but never want that it's found out,so it is accepted as the truth,so they even believe themselfs.
Oh well not like my mom isn't any different with lying about things,but at least it ain't that serious and we recognize it at home.
Mar 5, 2010 6:27:00 AM
But they DON'T believe it themselves. They go to priests to 'confess' so they have the approval and 'forgiveness' of God and Priest for their lie, putting the burden of the lie on the Priest with the understanding he can't report it.
Put money in the plate, and it all goes away. Ever wonder why so many more women are church members than men?
"More than 60 people had written to the judge insisting that Gail Sherwood had not invented the story"
How the hell would they know? See this is what happens when people get brainwashed into believing women never lie about these things!
"How the hell would they know?"
Exactly, Porky.
These liars know full well that the victim was innocent all along. They're whining about the measly two years that the criminal is getting because they don't want to be busted for their own rape hoaxes.
Spousal rape alleged after a long term relationship is not a predator type crime but carries severe punishment including registration. After 12 years a spouse came forward recanting her testimony the court refused to considered it because the alleged victim-spouse did not come forward earlier but she actually had as court documents show she had told the District Attorney who failed to inform the defense prior to trial or anytime thereafter. I believe are justice system is broken in that they failed to even hold a hearing to consider the new evidence from state to federal court.
Post a Comment