It doesn't explicitly state it, but I get the feeling that the rape charge was filed because her husband found out she cheated. Either way, it appears she claimed it to cover up her bad actions.
Kim Inslee charged with filing a false report.
NORTH BROOKFIELD — A 23-year-old woman has been arraigned on charges she filed a false report with police last summer, telling them she’d been raped in a vehicle when she’d really arranged the back-seat tryst herself.
Kim Inslee of 24 Grove St. called police from her home just after 1:15 a.m. July 16 and told an officer who responded she’d been walking around town after arguing with her disabled husband about their lack of sex when a man pulled her into a dark-green SUV. He raped her, she said, forced her to have oral sex, cleaned her up and dragged her out of the vehicle near the library. She walked home after the alleged encounter.
Court documents indicate Ms. Inslee gave police a detailed description of the alleged rapist, telling them he was a clean-shaven black man, 6 feet tall, with a deep voice. She provided details of the incident and said the man had a yellow safety vest hanging from the back seat.
She was taken to a hospital for treatment and so evidence might be collected while police put out an alert for area law enforcement officers to be on the lookout for the green SUV and its driver. But they were never found.
Later that day, when police did a follow-up interview, Ms. Inslee admitted “there was a pre-arranged meeting through a mutual friend to meet this ‘suspect’ for the express purpose of consensual sex,” police wrote in their report.
The description of the man was accurate, but there was “no rape or use of force at all,” the report says.
After conferring with staff from the Worcester district attorney’s office, Ms. Inslee was charged with false reporting of a crime and making a false statement under penalty of perjury.
Ms. Inslee was arraigned yesterday in Western Worcester District Court in East Brookfield. Her case is scheduled for a pretrial hearing March 9.
Link:
http://www.telegram.com/article/20100205/NEWS/2050497/1003/NEWS03
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
24 comments:
The cops might have gotten a hint from her conversation about 'a lack of sex!'
And they say only men think with their 'little head'.
"The cops might have gotten a hint from her conversation about 'a lack of sex!'"
More like a lack of brain
I live in a very "Gender feminist" dominated area of the country, in which the law enforcement are so "gender feminist" hysteria perverted that it is a roll of the dice if a guy has sex with a female.
Break the "gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation Alliance" of perversion that has crippled our legal system, and turned truth irrelevant.
It is a perversion of our legal system to allow girls to make false rape accusations with impunity.
Eventually folks...the gender feminist / law enforcement Alliance that "manufactures" faulty and inflammatory misinformation, in order to feed of federal VAWA dollars..will be seen as un-constitutional.
Perversion breeds perversion, so until this perverted "Alliance" is broken, our country will continue attacking men/boys as the main pretext to "forward" the gender / Raunch agenda.
"Eventually folks...the gender feminist / law enforcement Alliance that "manufactures" faulty and inflammatory misinformation, in order to feed of federal VAWA dollars"
There is no "gender feminist / law enforcement Alliance". The police are not manufacturing faulty statistics, and there are no VAWA programs that grant money to law enforcement based on statistics.
"The description of the man was accurate, but there was “no rape or use of force at all"
Well, another day, another kidnap-FRA to cover for an illicit affair.
This time, the women even gave a good description of her lover. She even went to the hospital, where one can assume her lovers DNA would have been collected as evidence against a rapist.
And all because she wanted more sex than her disabled husband could provide her. How very thoughtful - cheat on your husband, then through your lover under the bus via an FRA.
I said it several times before, and I'll say it again, I'm starting to wonder if there are not, in fact as many (or even more) false kidnap-rape allegations as there are actual kidnap-rapes. I think this might well be the case as A) there are relatively few cases of kidnap-rape, and women who are covering for infidelity (and wish to use and FRA) are "cornered" in to a claim of kidnap-rape (as a he-said/she-said date-rape story would still give away the infidelity). And, there do seem to be quite few instance of women using FRA's (kidnap-rape allegations, to be specific) to cover for their illicit sexual activities.
I wonder if there was even one other allegation of a kidnap rape in the North Brookfield area last summer; or, if this false one was the only one?
Anonymous - "Break the "gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation Alliance" of perversion that has crippled our legal system, and turned truth irrelevant."
Once again, you really need to read the stories, and then tailor a response that fits.
The Police sniffed this one out rather quickly, no innocent men were arrested, and she's been arraigned on charges.
The system worked as well as it possibly can in this situation. There is no practical way, short of the deterrence than can come via observing other women being punished for the crime, to keep women from making false claims.
I sometimes have to wonder of those of you who continually post these "break the alliance" type posts, what exactly do you think the police can or should do when a women comes to them with a rape complaint. Should they call her a liar and toss her unceremoniously out the door? [I'm sure some enterprising trial attorney's would love a shot at that lawsuit]. Should they dismissively take her statement, and file it directly in the circular bin?
Seriously, do you ever stop to consider that there are some real rapes, and some real victims, and/or that you might even know some women who you'd not want to be either rape victims, nor treated with contempt if they were to become so.
The very real problem of rape still exists, and needs to be dealt with appropriately. As Pierce and Steven have stressed here so often, fighting against the separate crime of FRA's should not, and need not come at the expense of the parallel fight against rape.
There are no simple solutions to both laudable goals - such as silencing all women claiming to have been raped just so as to stop FRA's. That some women will make FRA's is an unfortunate reality we must work-around.
What can, and should be done, is that the Police should do a thorough and impartial investigation, including considering possible motives for the woman to be lying. They should utilize the both the best available forensic procedures, as well as the best interviewing techniques to try to reach the truth.
And, where the claimants are found to be lying, punishments need to be applied - criminally, civilly, and (perhaps most importantly) publicly (with the FRA name published, and the crime detailed).
But, these repeated cries to "keep women from making false reports" ring hollow, as it seems you might just as well be calling for all women making all rape claims (including legitimate ones) to be silenced.
"I sometimes have to wonder of those of you who continually post these "break the alliance" type posts"
I think it's only one person who keeps posting the same thing over and over again. And unless the people who run this blog do something, it seems unlikely to stop.
"Break the "gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation Alliance" of perversion that has crippled our legal system, and turned truth irrelevant."
I am not the one responsible for posting these quotes over and over on all threads, but in many cases this quote is true. It is well known that the police side with feminists when it comes to rape and not with innocent men that have been falsely accused and that is what this website is supposed to be about, the falsely accused and the automatic bias from society against them. Open your eyes and wake up.
""I sometimes have to wonder of those of you who continually post these "break the alliance" type posts"
I think it's only one person who keeps posting the same thing over and over again. And unless the people who run this blog do something, it seems unlikely to stop."
I couldn't agree more! A "break the alliance" rubber-stamp on each story posted here dilutes the message we convey and may ultimately undermine the cause. FRA's are a deadly serious subject and require thoughtful commentary.
I try to ignore the "break the alliance" comments as they very often are irrelevant to the topic being discussed. Other times, it just makes me want to shout "TIMMAH!" a la Southpark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apmir1AURIE
"It is well known that the police side with feminists when it comes to rape"
Except they don't. Rape is a crime, and was a crime long before feminism existed.
The situation is that people are generally sympathetic if the police err on the side of the alleged victim ("they're just trying to do their job"), but the police risk catching hell from the press and the general public if they err on the side of the alleged rapist ("what are we paying them to eat donuts?").
The root of this problem, is that most people -- not just feminists -- view rape as much a more serious threat than the false accusation of rape. Perhaps part of that is because more than half the population feels immune to false rape accusations, but men still fear for the safety of their daughters and the other women in their lives.
Anonymous - "The root of this problem, is that most people -- not just feminists -- view rape as much a more serious threat than the false accusation of rape. Perhaps part of that is because more than half the population feels immune to false rape accusations, but men still fear for the safety of their daughters and the other women in their lives."
Great insight! Thank you for posting it.
Unfortunately, there's no way to distinguish Anonymous who posts brilliant intellectual commentary for Anonymous who cuts-n-pastes the same rhetorical comments over and over.
Someone who's willing to put the effort and the thought into crafting cogent prose ought to be recognized for their effort, and there should also be a way to give proper attribution to them when the rest of us "borrow" choice bits from them.
It is possible to remain anonymous to the world while still having a recognizable "handle" by which others can identify who is stating what on a forum.
The choice is yours, of course, but, as for myself, I like knowing which thoughts go with which poster.
"Rape is a crime, and was a crime long before feminism existed."
Really? The history of the word is very complex.
"break the alliance" type posts"
Again, I am not the one responsible for these posts, but the "alliance" exists in the conditioned mindset of lawyers, judges, police, and society at large.
"There is no "gender feminist / law enforcement Alliance"
The "alliance" is in the brain after 40 years of organized academic feminism.
My "break the Alliance" comments attack the root of the problem. The blind can lead the blind all they want to..but someone has to point out the root of the perversion.
If the law enforcement were to tell the truth about the true percentages of false rape accusations, the "Rape hysteria" that gives the gender /Raunch feminists their cultural / social power over campus politics would be seriously challenged.
The "Alliance" between gender feminism and law enforcement is the dynamic that tells officers of the law to "re-define what the meaning of is, is" in order to "manufacture" that less than 2% of all rape accusations are false, when the exact opposite maybe closer to reality that only 2% are true!!
The false rape accusation explosion is a perversion of the law enforcement that simply "stopped charging them"..that has led to all these false rape accusations " COMING FORWARD" with their lies. End the perversion...end the Alliance!! Return our legal system to one that is based on truth.
Scott - "My "break the Alliance" comments attack the root of the problem."
Sadly, this alliance you perceive to be all pervasive simply IS NOT the root of the problem.
The root of the problem WRT FRA's is, and has always been, women (99%+ of the times) choosing to act unscrupulously (even evilly) when they choose to serve their own interests at the expense of others (whom they drag in) by making those FRA's.
I doubt you can demonstrate one single instance where a police agency has gone about soliciting women to make FRA's. For better or worse, the police merely deal with the FRA's that are brought to them.
Even in instance where gender-feminist groups DO solicit more women to make claims (without regard to authenticity), they are NOT whole-heartedly backed by local police agencies. Often, these feminists simply threaten and cajole local police into "symbolic" acts to demonstrate a concern over the supposed rape-crisis.
Police agencies don't routinely manufacture statistics. they merely compile information on those cases they handle. The VAWA money that they might be able to apply for grants to get is but a pittance of their overall operational costs (borne overwhelmingly by local taxpayers, most of whom are unlikely to be either rapist or rape victim). For the most part, police agencies just want to stay out of the cross-hairs of local feminist trouble-makers, who WILL loudly complain about any perceived slight. They are not in an alliance, but rather an awkward and strained relationship, with LE feeling compelled to make it look good.
VAWA grant money goes primarily to support agencies (counsellings, etc.) that aim to help female victims of crimes - only rarely to police get enough money to even cover those additional duties that VAWA compels them to undertake. And, taking additional VAWA money comes with additional strings attached, which will typically make the grant monies far less appealing. The most likely reason left for a police agency to even apply is so that the Chief running for re-election can demonstrate to the women voters that he/she "really cares".
there are certainly many instance in which the police fail to do their jobs correctly - especially in cases of FRA's. However, your blanket targeting of all LE is, in my opinion, way off-target; and, can seemingly only alienate those with whom WE should be seeking a better ALLIANCE.
Scott - "The "Alliance" between gender feminism and law enforcement is the dynamic that tells officers of the law to "re-define what the meaning of is, is" in order to "manufacture" that less than 2% of all rape accusations are false"
one of the best, and frequently cited here, studies of the occurrence of FRA's was that done by Kanin. You do realize that he got his statistics straight for the police?
Your unsubstantiated claim that police manufacture statistics would, if it were actually true, only serve to undermine the validity of that seminal report.
"Someone who's willing to put the effort and the thought into crafting cogent prose ought to be recognized for their effort, and there should also be a way to give proper attribution to them when the rest of us "borrow" choice bits from them."
The "Anonymous" issue makes me think of a scene from the series Babylon 5 where one of the characters had ten identical twin brothers, all named Zathras:
"No, that was not Zathras, that was Zathras. There are 10 of us, all of family Zathras, each one named Zathras. Slight differences in how you pronounce. Zathraas, Zathras, Zathrass.. You are seeing now?"
"There are ten of you?"
"Yes! Well, nine now."
--Zathras and Ivanova, Babylon 5Conflicts of Interest
Most of my comments are a mile long, with links, sometimes in multiple parts, and with as much attention to grammar and diction as my falsely accused brain will allow. I like lists. I post nearly every day. You'll know me by my writing style. Once my case is dismissed or adjudicated, maybe I will let Pierce et al know who I am and I may identify all the posts that are mine, if needed. Until then, I am Anonymous. Anonymous. Anonymous. You are seeing now? :) Such is the paranoia of the falsely accused.
Slwerner, with all due respect sir, (and i mean that), we may have to dis-agree here. I do in fact believe that law enforcement protocol has been "perverted" over the last 20-30 years, and that has caused perversions of justice. It will be law enforcement protocol that gets.."un-perverted", that will heal a nation gone "hysterical", and has given the "gender feminist" community a disproportionate amount of sway over our nations politics and beurocracies.
"Great insight! Thank you for posting it."
You are too kind and quite welcome.
"Unfortunately, there's no way to distinguish Anonymous who posts brilliant intellectual commentary for Anonymous who cuts-n-pastes the same rhetorical comments over and over."
Sure there is. Anonymous who posts brilliant intellectual commentary posts brilliant intellectual commentary, anonymous who cuts-n-pastes the same rhetorical comments over and over cuts-n-pastes the same rhetorical comments over and over.
False rape reporting has cost my son his enrollment in college (3rd year engineering), his 'dream' job because it was on campus and he is not allowed on campus until this clears the courts, his health insurance because as a military dependent he has to be a full time student to keep his health benefits, and any jobs he has applied for because he lets the prospective employer know he is in this situation . While all have been sympathetic and appreciate his honsesty, none have been able to hire him. On the other hand the accuser has continued her life pretty much as normal, still in school and working. Including now being the girlfriend of the guy she was trying to make jealous by pursuing my son, then crying rape. Playing the victim worked for her...looking forward to our son's day in court. What could have been done differently....I don't know!! Having never been involved in the court system and now to be falsely accused, it is difficult to try to figure out how to make sense of this. First, maybe the school could have not overreacted and let the final judgement determine whether he stayed in school instead of using the accusation and arrest to determine whether he could remain on campus.
Post a Comment