One of the women noted in the stories is said to have falsely accused three men of rape in unrelated incidents on the same night -- a bouncer, a police officer, and a jail officer. (Serious question: if she ever really is raped, who on earth would believer her?) The second woman is also said to have falsely accused a police officer. We are fast approaching the point where male police officers will always need a witness, preferably a female, or a video, when arresting a young woman.
The news stories are below, and go here to watch a TV news report:
STORY ONE: Spring Breakers Falsely Accuse Cops Of Rape
A couple of spring breakers are being accused of filing false reports of sex crimes committed by law enforcement officers.
The first happened early Monday morning at a Front Beach Road condominium. A Bay County sheriff's deputy, working off-duty security, reports that he was trying to settle a dispute between 22-year-old Kimberly Anna Mills of McDonugh, Georgia, and her roommate 22-year-old Cynthia Nicole Crumbley.
Crumbley claims Mills blamed her for getting thrown-out of a Thomas Drive nightclub earlier in the evening for being drunk and disorderly, and locked Crumbley out of their room. When Mills allegedly became confrontational with the deputy, he arrested her. As he was taking her to a patrol car, Mills started yelling "rape".
Crumbley backed-up the deputy, saying Mills accused the nightclub's bouncer of raping her when he had to physically remove her from the business.
The second incident happened around 4:45 Monday afternoon, at a different Thomas Drive club. Authorities say 19-year-old Megan Judith Wheeler of Allen, Texas had passed-out drunk in a bathroom stall.
When club staff tried to escort her out, they say Wheeler became physically and verbally abusive.
Beach police arrested wheeler for disorderly conduct.
Once Wheeler reached the Bay County Jail, she claimed the Beach police officer who arrested her had raped her in the back of the patrol car.
Investigators checked out the claims and say Wheeler was never alone with the officer, she kept changing her story and refused to submit to a rape test examination.
Both women were charged with disorderly conduct and filing a false report of rape against a law enforcement officer.
Link to story and video here: http://www.wjhg.com/home/headlines/88201187.html
STORY TWO: Police, deputies charge women with filing false reports
PANAMA CITY BEACH — A woman who accused a sheriff's deputy, a jail officer and a club security guard of rape has been charged with filing a false crime report in addition to disorderly conduct.
Kimberly Mills, 22, of McDonough, Ga., was taken to the Bay County Jail early Monday after a sheriff's deputy said she locked a friend out of their hotel room, fought with her and resisted when he tried to intervene.
She was arrested for disorderly conduct but resisted on the way to a patrol car, according to an incident report, eventually accusing the deputy of raping her.
She later made the same accusation toward an officer at the Bay County Jail, where staff said she remained Wednesday on $5,000 bond for the felony charge. She also had $250 bond for the disorderly.
Panama City Beach police also charged a woman with disorderly conduct and filing a false rape report this week. They said 19-year-old Megan Wheeler reached the Bay County Jail and claimed an officer raped her in the back of his patrol car.
Link: http://www.newsherald.com/news/panama-82303-beach-police.html
STORY THREE: Woman arrested, loudly accuses 3 of rape
PANAMA CITY BEACH — A woman arrested for disorderly intoxication early Monday accused a security guard, a sheriff's deputy and a detention officer of raping her, according to a Bay County Sheriff's Office report.
The 22-year-old Georgia woman, staying at Beachbreak by the Sea on Front Beach Road, was booked into the Bay County Jail after she was kicked out of Sharky's Beach Club.
A deputy was working off-duty security at Beachbreak when an upset woman came to the night manager. She was locked out of a room.
Inside the room was her friend, who was carried out of Sharky's after an earlier disturbance. That woman was angry about what happened and wouldn't let her roommate in the room, according to the report.
The deputy went to the room to see if he could diffuse the dispute, but it escalated to yelling and shoving, he wrote.
He eventually arrested the 22-year-old on the disorderly charge, handcuffing her and leading her to the patrol car. On the way, she "kept trying to turn and look at me" and then "yelled that her breasts were exposed and asked me to pull her bra up," the deputy wrote.
"I told (her) I would not pull her bra up," he added.
As he put her in the back seat, "she yelled out, 'You raped me,'" although she later recanted, according to the report.
Her roommate said she wasn't surprised, because earlier the woman had accused the Sharky's guard of rape.
Just before the deputy took the woman to jail, she yelled out that she was going to "shank" her roommate and kill her, the deputy wrote.
After she arrived at the jail, he added, she claimed one of two male security guards who escorted her also raped her.
Link: http://www.newsherald.com/news/panama-82268-accuses-rape.html
Posts
41 comments:
Yep. Anyone in a position of authority: cops, doctors, nurses, teachers, caretakers, parents, and older relatives among others are now in targeting reticles of a new generation of false accusers.
What was the old adage: never trust anyone over 30? Now it's never trust anyone, and a drunk female at any age is RIGHT OUT!
Time for all men and women in positions of authority to get one of these:
http://justgetthere.us/blog/archives/UK-Traffic-cops-get-head-cameras.html
"Crumbley claims Mills blamed her for getting thrown-out of a Thomas Drive nightclub earlier in the evening for being drunk and disorderly"
&
"Authorities say 19-year-old Megan Judith Wheeler of Allen, Texas had passed-out drunk in a bathroom stall.
When club staff tried to escort her out, they say Wheeler became physically and verbally abusive.
Beach police arrested wheeler for disorderly conduct."
Wow! Too bad Georgia Girls isn't around to give us another round of her farcical explanation that it is men who go about plying the women with alcohol (so as to rape them).
At least for me, some of her typical "men are evil, and women are naïve, innocent and chaste creatures who are lead astray by those evil men and their evil drugs” nonsense, would make for some good comic relief right about now.
Anonymous - "Time for all men and women in positions of authority to get one of these"
Good call on the head-cams.
And, if they don't have them, they should always to take care to make arrests either in the line of sight of their dash-cams, or (where possible) security cams.
Same goes for bouncers. Angry drunk women tend to lash-out at any male who confronts them (which often leads to false claims of abuse and/or rape against those men).
For all men, in all walks of life, and in more and more situations they will encounter, electronic recording is becoming increasingly important and valuable as a means of self-defense.
Well, let's not wish too much for GG, slwerner.
I'm going to take a famous legal quote, by Justice O.W. Holmes, and modify it: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater, or a woman falsely shouting rape in a roomful of men.
OT:
The Fourth Amendment is Dead:
http://www.pogowasright.org/?p=7892
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/02/18/08-50403.pdf
From Justice Kozinski's dissenting opinion in the pdf linked above:
"Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judge PAEZ joins, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:
This is an extraordinary case: Our court approves, without blinking, a police sweep of a person’s home without a warrant, without probable cause, without reasonable suspicion and without exigency — in other words, with nothing at all to support the entry except the curiosity police always have
about what they might find if they go rummaging around a suspect’s home. Once inside, the police managed to turn up a gun “in plain view” — stuck between two cushions of the living room couch — and we reward them by upholding the
search.
Did I mention that this was an entry into somebody’s home, the place where the protections of the Fourth Amendment are supposedly at their zenith? The place where the “government bears a heavy burden of demonstrating that exceptional circumstances justify departure from the warrant requirement.”
United States v. Licata, 761 F.2d 537, 543 (9th Cir. 1985).
The place where warrantless searches are deemed “presumptively unreasonable.” Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586
(1980).
Government encroachment into the home, which I lamented three years ago in United States v. Black, 482 F.3d 1044, 1045-46 (9th Cir. 2007) (Kozinski, J., dissenting from
the denial of rehearing en banc), has continued, abetted by the
creative collaborators of the courts. This is another example:
The panel goes to considerable lengths to approve a fishing
expedition by four police officers inside Lemus’s home after he was arrested just outside it. The opinion misapplies Supreme Court precedent, conflicts with our own case law and is contrary to the great weight of authority in the other circuits. It is also the only case I know of, in any jurisdiction covered by the Fourth Amendment, where invasion of the
home has been approved based on no showing whatsoever. Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes.
Whatever may have been left of the Fourth Amendment after Black is now gone. The evisceration of this crucial constitutional protector of the sanctity and privacy of what Americans consider their castles is pretty much complete. Welcome to the fish bowl. "
So, you want evidence that our justice system is increasingly becoming corrupt? There it is, laid out by a Judge in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Fiat justitia ruat caelum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_justitia_ruat_caelum
"The news story is below, and go here to watch the news report"
I would also add that it is extremely valuable that these stories made the televised news (which more people will view than printed news). Even though their motives for FRA's are not explicitly stated, they are easily implicitly understood by viewers. This goes a long way towards un shrouding the “mystery” of why women would ever make FRA’s.
They make them, rather routinely, as it fits their selfish purposes. I cannot tell you how happy I am to see that plainly (and irrefutably) displayed, prominently on a news cast, for all to see.
I agree about the TV coverage, slwerner. It's actually refreshing, if also sad, to see a college girl's picture (and note I've stopped calling them "college women") next to the word "arrested." It's refreshing because it's about time the news media not bury these stories. I don't mean to exhibit malice but it is fitting that, for the rest of their lives, anytime a prospective employer Googles their names, he or she will find them tied to an act that casts suspicion on their credibility. That, of course, is what happens to college men routinely when they are falsely accused of rape. Perhaps when women begin to experience it people will start to question its propriety.
Do feminists still wonder why rape claims are sometimes met with sneering and hostile disbelief?
SO THEY SHOULD BE.
Snark, that's a great point. Imagine a rape victims reading this -- and seeing these horrid girls misusing their gift of speech with such slanders. The feminists prove by their silence with these avalanche of false rape claims that they don't really care about rape victims. They have a victim fetish, and admitting that some women lie about rape damages the fetish.
"a witness preferably a female"
Wtf so a man is not a good witness at all?
There is no difference in what ever gender they are anyway.But i would believe that women can lie more about this stuff since they are used to it,have a little too much power over it,so they can abuse the r word(people will abuse the power if there are not proper consequnces or ways of finding it out),but truth can be find out with proper questioning and evidence for the woman if she is a victim of actual rape.And i mean why wouldn't the man accused tell the truth since they will find evidence anyway and if he says he didn't rape her or have sex with her,then they need to consider that word also and try finding it out,even with dna evidence if there was no sex.Both people should be believed and try finding out who speaks the truth,no prefferable treatment should be allowed to a women or a man.
"Wtf so a man is not a good witness at all?
There is no difference in what ever gender they are anyway."
Tell that to the roomful of Duke lacrosse guys, whose story wasn't believed. The police chose to believe Crysal Gail Mangum. It's a shame that men aren't believed, isn't it?
". . . but truth can be find out with proper questioning and evidence for the woman if she is a victim of actual rape."
Not always, my friend. Spend a couple of weeks reading this site closely and you won't be so quick to arrive at that conclusion.
"And i mean why wouldn't the man accused tell the truth since they will find evidence anyway and if he says he didn't rape her or have sex with her,then they need to consider that word also and try finding it out,even with dna evidence if there was no sex."
Now isn't that the million dollar question: why don't they believe men when they truthfully say they didn't do it? If they DID believe men the way they believe women, we wouldn't need this site.
"Both people should be believed and try finding out who speaks the truth,no prefferable treatment should be allowed to a women or a man."
That's what I thought, too. When I found out that wasn't the way it works, I started this blog.
Archivist - "It's refreshing because it's about time the news media not bury these stories."
Speaking of which, here's another in which not only is she named, but her motive is also made plain:
Teen arraigned in rape lie:
"When he did not give her more money, Miss Poulin filed the false report.
Thankfully, that last sentence of the article spares me the need to go on my standard rant about the press covering-up the motives behind FRA's.
slwerner, I wrote up a post for that one earlier today but delayed running it because of the spring breakers. Those revenge cases scare me -- what power these girls have!
The male law enforcement officers will no longer feel safe when dealing with women and girls...but how much of this did they bring on themselves??
20 years of letting "gender feminism" reset law enforcement protocol, 20 years of re-defining what the meaning of, is, is, in order manufacture that "only 2% of rape accusations are false"...I mean lets get real life here,did they not foster a false rape accusation explosion???
we need to stop federal dollars to law enforcement who "No longer keep records" of the amounts of false rape accusations; for there has been a 20 fold increase in false rape acussations over the last 30 years...and the law enforcement can no longer bothered with their duties to "protect the innocent".
"Break the gender feminist/ law enforcement misinformation Alliance", stop the federal funding of faulty and inflammatory manufactured statistics that builds a "manufactured prejudice" against the innocent.
We need to reform the legal system so that cops as well as civilians are safe from false accusations.
I have to think that cops are attuned to the false rape problem, just as male teachers are. I don't see anything written about it, but I doubt that it's the sort of police officers would talk about. But if anything, their enhanced exposure to false rape claims should render them more sensitive to this epidemic. Which is a good thing.
Probably the only reason they were even charged is because it was the police they accused.
Isn't filing a false rape claim in Florida a felony?
I think that is one of the ONLY states that it is.
Of course since the are female they will probably find a way to make it a misdemeanor even if it is a felony.
And Archivist I agree with most of what you say but I do NOT find it sad at all for these women!
If it were up to them these guys would have lost their jobs and would be doing 20 years in prison.
If it were up to me they would all be registered sex offenders for life and would serve a decade in a MEN'S prison.
There are so many guys who have been imprisoned for up to life and beaten and killed and lost jobs and wives and all of their possessions because of scum like these women.
Anonymous - "And Archivist I agree with most of what you say but I do NOT find it sad at all for these women!
If it were up to them these guys would have lost their jobs and would be doing 20 years in prison."
Well, this part of your post I can agree with, anyway.
Another thing I believe worth mentioning is the utter flippancy with which these women made their claims.
We are told that many women choose not to report being raped out of a great sense of shame for what has happened to them.
Yet, here we see that idea turned on it’s head. These women saw it as no more shameful to have the world believe that they had been raped, than for the world to know they’d been arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct.
And, where are the feminist readers of this breaking their (lurking) silence to decry what these two have done? Is this not a slap in the face to the victim who have actually been raped? How must this feel to those who cannot even say the word without breaking down in tears of shame?
[crickets chirping]
When is it going to get to the point that the feminists will finally step up to the plate as comment? Maybe when we have women in bars shouting “Rape! Rape!” anytime some guy declines to buy them a drink?
"When is it going to get to the point that the feminists will finally step up to the plate as comment? Maybe when we have women in bars shouting “Rape! Rape!” anytime some guy declines to buy them a drink?"
More likely, when we have women BEHIND bars who were actually raped.
As regrettable as such a situation would be, it may be the only way that feminists would even begin to consider the false rape epidemic.
"And Archivist I agree with most of what you say but I do NOT find it sad at all for these women!"
Um. I don't either. They are despicable.
OT, one for snark, how nice modern women are
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258640/Bunny-crispy-rabbit-sorry-sight-hutch-torched-owners-sister-family-bust-up.html
"in order manufacture that "only 2% of rape accusations are false".
That is not now, nor never was a police statistic.
AfOR,
Strange as this may sound, animal abuse actually sickens me in a way that abuse against human beings does not.
Animals like that are utterly defenceless, and I mean utterly - a similar story I read recently left me almost unable to sleep at night.
What I am seeing lately, is that it is almost always women who victimise small, defenceless creatures like that. That's not to say that all or most women would ever do such a thing - I don't believe they would.
But it makes sense, doesn't it - a certain type of woman, with sociopathic tendencies, will victimise anything she can, be it a small animal or an innocent man.
I think there's a real parallel to be drawn here - out of control (often drunk) sociopathic women, destroying lives, leaving victims permanently traumatised if not dead.
It's becoming clear who the tyrants are.
@ snark
wimmin attacking the "utterly defenceless"
like animals, like kids, and of course the odd FRA thrown in for good luck.
Women who falsely cry rape will always be sent to prison.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1224122/Women-rape-ALWAYS-sent-prison-appeal-court-warns.html
The moral of the story is
'girls will be girls'
Betcha they all know how to spell the word, defenseless
lol
Women who falsely cry rape will always be sent to prison.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1224122/Women-rape-ALWAYS-sent-prison-appeal-court-warns.html
Only 6% of all rape allegations in England end with a man being convicted and we can't even be certain that that figure is correct due to the anti male bias in the judicial system. Real rape is in fact a rare crime. If this trend of prosecuting lying females really takes hold I wouldn't be surprised to see more females in prison for lying about rape than real rapists(very rare)
This article has a little more details about his incident. This girl is a train wreck!!
http://www.newsherald.com/news/deputy-82267-mills-roommate.html#slComments
Now she has a felony charge on her record! Good for Florida!
CBGirl
Does anyone know if Florida is the ONLY state that filing a false rape claim is a felony in?
"The male law enforcement officers will no longer feel safe when dealing with women and girls...but how much of this did they bring on themselves??"
They didn't bring any of it on themselves because the police were not the ones who changed the laws.
"20 years of letting "gender feminism" reset law enforcement protocol, 20 years of re-defining what the meaning of, is, is, in order manufacture that "only 2% of rape accusations are false""
The police did not manufacture that statistic. Afaik, Susan Brownmiller made it up, and that was 35 years ago.
"I mean lets get real life here,did they not foster a false rape accusation explosion???"
No, the police have always been one of the loudest voices against false rape accusations because they know the truth from first hand experience, and know how much of their time and money are wasted by such accusations.
""Break the gender feminist/ law enforcement misinformation Alliance", stop the federal funding of faulty and inflammatory manufactured statistics that builds a "manufactured prejudice" against the innocent."
There is no "misinformation Alliance", and there is no evidence that the police are manufacturing false statistics.
story number 3 still doesn't name the woman crying rape! what's up with that?
"Spring Break Rape Epidemic? Six Reported So Far in Daytona Beach
DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (CBS/AP) In just one week, six rapes were reported in Daytona Beach. Not coincidentally, the week in question was the first week of spring break, when students flock to the city."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20000708-504083.html
Shouldn't that be "Spring Break False Rape Epidemic"??
"Investigators checked out the claims and say Wheeler was never alone with the officer, she kept changing her story and refused to submit to a rape test examination."
Um, how about some implied consent for rape claims? If they can invade a man's privacy to do tests when he is accused of a rape, why can't they freely submit rape accusers to rape kit tests?
You know what, false rape accusations against police officers are, in a way, a good thing. It will make cops realize that WOMEN LIE about a great many things, including rape, domestic violence, and child abuse allegations. Maybe then cops will stop trampling on men's rights.
Feministing have a post about Spring Break here: http://www.feministing.com/archives/020418.html#more
With no mention of any of these at all...
Hey wait a minute! In college, I was taught that a woman would never, ever, ever, ever lie about rape! They lied to me!
They lied to me too.
I was taught that a girl could never ever ever be raped unless she 'deserved' it.
Ridiculous myth.
"You know what, false rape accusations against police officers are, in a way, a good thing. It will make cops realize that WOMEN LIE about a great many things, including rape, domestic violence, and child abuse allegations."
I'm sure they already know that.
Yeah, they already know. And when it happens to their fellow cops they have no problem turning their backs, if that's what's necessary to continue functioning within the politically correct hierarchy that is modern law enforcement.
As usual, men don't support men.
10:51 - yes, that is a ridiculous myth; which has been replaced with myths that are even more dangerous and ridiculous.
Head Cams? I think you're taking the wrong approach! What about the man on the street (or in a bar) who gets falsely accused?
How about really making equal rights for all and making it a serious offense of false rape reports?
Post a Comment