The community of the wrongly accused has a new home--click the picture above to join us.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Rape hysteria infects sex play

Rape and molestation hysteria has infected the most mundane things when it comes to men.  Men are now viewed with suspicion in a variety of settings where suspicion formerly did not exist, and where suspicion should not exist.  Perhaps just as bad, men have become self-conscious in what should be completely innocent settings. For example, men are reluctant to aid a crying child in the mall for fear of a false molestation charge.  Now, how wrong is that?  Yet men's fears are legitimate.  Lots of men are even conscious about what women think when they play with their own children in the park.  Not right, by any measure, but don't blame the men.

Is it any wonder that men are self-conscious in bed, the proverbial "scene of the crime"?

Allow me to pose an honest question to our regular male readers who are familiar with the prevalence of false rape claims: how many of you now think aboiut the possibility of a false rape claim when you are in bed with a woman?  Even a woman you trust? Doesn't it at least cross your mind for a fleeting instant? 

My guess is, for quite a few of us, it crosses our minds.  Even if we've been married for many years to wonderful women whom we trust.

This rape hysteria has infected perfectly legal, consensual sex routines. Some women, of course, like to be dominated in bed. But their guys have been so emasculated by three decades of rape hysteria that they might be reluctant to give her what she wants.

Here's a woman-friendly discussion of that reluctance from 5 Moves Women Love In Bed, But Can Be Too Afraid To Ask:

"3. She wants to be dominated: Even big-mouthed ballsy women like me enjoy being dominated! Yet dominating a woman scares a lot of men because they are afraid — rightfully so — of being rape-y.
. . . .
"It’s also a good idea to create a 'safe word,' which is something she can say when she wants you to stop immediately. (Sometimes in the heat of the moment people say “Oh, noooo!” when they really mean “Oh, that feels good!” So it’s good if your safe word is something other than “no.”) My safe word is this sentence: 'I want you to stop now.' Because it makes my intentions clear."

Men "rightfully" fear being "rape-y."  Hmm.  See, it's a good fear; a legitimate fear; a fear not to be discouraged. And isn't it interesting how the author feels it necessary to spell out the fact that parties need to communicate non-consent clearly?  Rape feminism, my friends, has convinced everyone that couples are miscommunicating up a storm in bed. My guess is that there is far, far less miscommunication than the "experts" say there is, and that even for most cases that erupt into rape claims, the only communication during the act is the communication of love and consent. 

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Been with the same woman for years but I do think about false rape claims after reading this site.

Anonymous said...

I am uncomfortable being alone with any woman that I do not have a good idea about her personality.

Anonymous said...

I now fear encounters I had with one woman in particular a couple of years ago -- she had issues, and is the type who'd make up thinks to hurt a man.

Snark said...

No man who is not a rapist should EVER have to fear being perceived as "rape-y".

That is NOT a "legitimate fear."

Snark said...

To clarify, I am not blaming the men, I am not saying that men are wrong to feel that way.

I am blaming feminists who have made men feel this way about normal, consensual intercourse.

The fear itself is legitimate, in the sense that men should legitimately fear that the woman they are with might decide to make a false accusation.

But that fear shouldn't be there at all. That is the fault of feminism.

Toysoldier said...

She wants to be dominated: Even big-mouthed ballsy women like me enjoy being dominated! Yet dominating a woman scares a lot of men because they are afraid — rightfully so — of being rape-y.

Nothing says "Come have sex with me" than suggesting men are inherently "rape-y."

AfOR said...

The BDSM community came across this years ago, now most of them use written contracts before engaging in "play"

From http://www.domsubfriends.com/library/bd-v-ab.shtml

S&M

* Is based on the safe, sane, consensual theory
* S&M is a controlled environment
* S&M has safe words to stop the scene
* In a S&M scene the dominant looks out for the well being of the submissive
* S&M can be an erotic sexual encounter
* In S&M both partners are enjoying themselves
* in S&M the dominant respects limits
* In S&M there is mutual respect
* In S&M the relationship is fulfilling
* In S&M both parties feel they contribute towards the relationships
* In S&M one can ask their partner to "play"
* In S&M relationship there is trust
* In S&M a submissive voluntarily serves the dominant
* S&M is about building trust
* S&M builds self esteem
* S&M builds the spirit of a submissive

Abuse

* Abuse is not negotiated
* Abuse is an out of control environment
* Abuse does not have safe words
* An abuser does not give a damn about the victim
* Abuse is always one sided
* Abuse is never negotiated.
* In abuse, no one is enjoying the results
* The abuser is into non consensual violence
* The victim has no respect towards the abuser
* In abuse the victim is harmed
* In abuse both parties are left unfulfilled
* The abuser always feel they are superior
* A person does not ask for abuse
* In an abusive relationship there is no trust
* The abuser does not care for consent
* Abuse has no trust
* Abuse destroys self esteem
* An abuser destroys the spirit of the victim

FRA's fall very firmly, if you read it, into the second category.

Anonymous said...

AFOR I am shocked. I thought the 2nd category referred to only female victims until I read the rest of the post. Goes to show that gender doesn't matter.

Anonymous said...

After having been falsely accused, I see the entire world differently:

* http://www.fatherhood.gov/media/tv/index.cfm I see these "take time to be a dad" commercials in a much different light. They actually make me laugh. "Take time to be a dad" (Yeah, right. So they can falsely accuse you of sexual abuse and throw you in prison!) There wouldn't be a need for those commercials if men didn't have to fear SAID Syndrome, Parental Alienation, and the social hysteria created by gender feminists and the media. Most men I know would enjoy being mentors, coaches, caretakers, teachers, counselors, and involved in their children's lives and the lives of children in their communities. The majority of those same men I know will never put themselves in the position to be a father or even a father figure. Big brothers/Big Sisters programs? Forget about it. They stay as far away from Schools and child care centers as they can -- not because they have to but because they don't want to become targets. Help a crying child? Nope. Date someone with kids? Again, forget it. They don't want to get involved. The guys I know grew up believing in chivalry and protecting women and children. That's gone for many of them now. It takes a village to raise a child, but it takes being the village idiot to even consider risking one's reputation and freedom in order to do it. So, we men are vilified and the vilification results in a self-fulfilling prophecy whereby children and women are raised fearing men because they were never afforded the opportunity to interact, communicate with, and learn from intelligent, honest, competent, capable, stable, and honorable men in the first place. Men that I know with those qualities are either done with raising their own children or have gone their own way.

* As for me, do I trust my girlfriend? I now wonder every day, is she at some point going to find fault with me, and make a false accusation out of spite? She has never given me reason to fear such I thing, but I think about this all the time. Rape hysteria has definitely changed my approach to all of the women with whom I interact. Hyper-vigilance and polite-but-minimal contact has become my approach. Alone in a room with a woman I do not know? Yipes. It makes my skin crawl thinking about it. I refuse to be around children altogether unless it's at church or situations where there are several other adults (preferably their parents) constantly present. Not only do I not ever want to be perceived as "rape-y," I don't really want to be perceived at all. As an innocent victim of a false rape claim, I want to stay free, anonymous, and be able to quietly live the rest of my life in peace.

Anonymous said...

Thanks AfOR for giving that link. It may come in handy, really, it may. It is very interesting.

I know if I were a guy I wouldn't date without a contract.

Even now, I am afraid to work with anyone who may be unstable and I am a middle aged woman (and go to a Baptist church). I trust no one.

CBGirl

Anonymous said...

I guess I am just stupid but what does "rape-y" mean?

I saw it in the article and in the comments and I could not figure it out.

AfOR said...

"Rapey", as defined by feminists, means any sex where the man did not get quintuplicate written consent prior to the act, and where the man was not handcuffed at wrist and ankle to the bed, with a ball gag to prevent verbal "abuse" while servicing the feminazi.

Archivist said...

Anon at 10:53, thanks for sharing your story.

JayHammers said...

I posted this:

“Would you like it if I held down your arms while I lick your breasts?” Whisper in her ear, “Can I give you a little spank?” Then you should probably stop.

Um, no. You don't ASK a woman to do these things, you just do them. Girls don't want a man ASKing them to dominate them. Get over yourself.

ex feminist said...

A few years ago I said to my wife that she was over-protecting our child in a nonsensical way. She got a feminist lawyer and made a fake allegation, inventing that I beat and raped her weekly during 14 years of marriage.

Our child become father-less.

Two years later the joint custody was established, but suddenly our 4-years old child "remembered" that when she was 1 year old I sexually abused her. Being a nonsense, the authorities prosecuted the mother rather than the father.

After the due investigations it has been already established that our child suffered a "biological damage" from her mother. My ex-wife now risks jail. Her fat stupid feminist lawyer got the money of our child. I cannot yet provide details.

We got rid of nazism and communism, we will get rid of feminism.

Snark said...

"We got rid of nazism and communism, we will get rid of feminism."

It's certainly next on the list of totalitarian systems to be torn down by common men who want their freedom.

Johannes said...

many people believe eating meat is unhealthy. meat producers claim it is safe.

bosses of big companies believe opening markets in third-world countries will be to the benefit of all involved.

muslims preachers battle westernisation.

presidents of the USA, who are fathers of daughters, like feminist policies like VAWA etc. (see obama, bush, clinton)

we all tend to support political ideas and narratives that fit our own agenda. that is natural.

now why is it that old unattractive women, some of whom have never been married, and lesbians are numerous amongst the most outspoken feminists?

and how come they religiously believe that heterosexual women are constantly harassed, and that there is a 'rape epidemic'.

could it be because, as you have correctly observed, 'rape hysteria infects sex play'?

or because feminism in general destroys the nuclear family, and heterosexuality in general?

jealousy is a powerful instinct and i am convinced it plays a great role for the rape hysterics.

feminists try to brainwash young females into thinking they cant trust men, as men are supposedly sadistic and hate men. trust is the basis for a healthy relationship.

to be fair, i think that this is largely on a sub-conscious level. also there are some cynics who consciously want to mess up peoples sex lives, and some who honestly act with the sincere intent to protect real rape victims and make their pain visible.

young, heterosexual need to know that feminist ideology is largely not in their interest. not if they would like to enjoy a healthy relationship with a man or if they intend to have a family at some point in their lives.

Johannes said...

correction (spelling errors):

"feminists try to brainwash young females into thinking they cant trust men, as men are supposedly sadistic and hate WOMEN. trust is the basis for a healthy relationship."
and:
"young, heterosexual WOMEN need to know that feminist ideology is largely not in their interest."

Some more thoughts:

I would like to say that the paranoia and distrust that arrises as result of these claims of rampant rape and rampant, male spousal violence, and laws such as VAWA are not a side-effect of the attempt to minimise rape or spousal violence.

no

The underlying intention is to make heterosexual relationships more difficult, as these horror stories serve to erode the basis of mutual trust between the genders.

Young women, are by definition competers with old women, who are disadvantaged in the mating game, and men are competers with lesbians, who have a hard time attracting straight women.

Both old women and lesbians are numerous among feminists, and they have a common ground in their jealously regarding relationships between young women and men (of any age).

This, and not REAL rape, or ACTUAL violence, is the driving force behind propaganda portraying men as violent predators and legislation regarding sexual harassment and rape.

The same is true of the idea that women who dress provocatively or women who are quick to agree to have sex with a man, are victims of sexism. Sexism as a concerted effort on part of a supposedly patriarchal society to exploit women sexually. That is not true. Such women are simply aggressive competers in the dating game, and they know fully well what they do.

Yet feminist attempt to make young women less attractive both regarding casual sex as well as serious relationships. They are being told that they do not need to protect their virginity as this would surpress their sexuality, despite some young women's intentions to marry and have children. The more a woman sleeps around, the less attractive she will be for a long time relationship. At the same time dressing provocatively or even just trying to be pretty and preserving a slender body is portrayed as bowing to the alleged sexist nature of our society. Again, the opposite is true, such women want men to bow to them and getting from what they want. They don't act under pressure, and if they do, under the pressure to fall behind competing with other women.

Young women are made to distrust men, and men have reason to fear being sued for sexual harassment should they make advances the targeted woman later finds inappropriate, when they have sex, fear of being sued for rape.

Anonymous said...

Snark said...
To clarify, I am not blaming the men, I am not saying that men are wrong to feel that way.

I am blaming feminists who have made men feel this way about normal, consensual intercourse.

The fear itself is legitimate, in the sense that men should legitimately fear that the woman they are with might decide to make a false accusation.

But that fear shouldn't be there at all. That is the fault of feminism.

Mar 1, 2010 5:33:00 PM

You got that right! Feminists have been stirring up hysteria to oppress men but, most men do not seem to realize this.