Sunday, March 21, 2010

Feminist's view of how rape is treated on campus is akin to holding the facts up to a funhouse mirror

To combat rape on campus, schools should stop keeping it quiet

"Correction to This Article [this appears in the Washington Post] This article about how colleges deal with campus sexual assault cases mischaracterized the policy at Bucknell University. The school does not use mediation to adjudicate such cases; rather, mediation is an option made available by Bucknell to victims of sexual assault in addition to a campus judicial proceeding. The article also said that, in reaction to a Center for Public Integrity report on colleges and their policies, Bucknell is considering abandoning mediation. It is not."

By Jaclyn Friedman
Sunday, March 14, 2010

In 1992, at about this time of year, a boy I knew sexually assaulted me. We were undergraduates at Wesleyan University. He was a member of a sports team, and I was one of the team's managers. Away at a tournament one night, the team decided to party in the captains' hotel room, and I decided to prove I was "one of the guys" by trying to match them drink for drink. When I failed, I stumbled back to my room and crawled into bed to pass out. That's when I discovered he'd followed me there.

[FRS COMMENT: We treat anyone who claims she or he has been raped with dignity and respect. But that doesn't mean we assume they are telling the truth. Because if we take them at their word, then we must assume the person they've accused of rape is, in fact, a rapist. When a woman goes public with her rape allegation, and when she also happens to be a rape advocate, we have a duty to point out that her accusation is just that -- an accusation. Take the above paragraph: is there any proof that this assault occurred aside from her assertion that it did? Has the "boy" (an undergraduate, so I am assuming he was at least 18 and had already registered for selective service) ever furnished a statement as to what occurred that we can review? All we have in this paragraph is the woman's conclusory statement that she was "sexually assaulted." There is no recitation of what the "boy" reasonably believed, or about what her outward conduct manifested to the "boy." All we know is that the "boy" followed her back to her room. Is his following her back to her room indicative of a crime? Is the fact that she had too much to drink dispositive? Is she insisting that she could find your way back to her room but that, by necessity, she was incapable of consenting to sex? Seriously?]

In the aftermath of the assault, I found myself needing a lot of things: a few incredibly patient friends who would listen to me say the same thing over and over and react as though it was a fresh insight every time. Time off from my job as a research assistant in the psychology department. A community of survivors who gathered in the mismatched chairs of the campus women's center to try to make sense of life-altering trauma and violation.

[FRS COMMENT: The "mismatched chairs" comment is intended to paint a picture of an underfunded organization. This is in contrast to the non-existent chairs at the campus' nonexistent men's center.]

I also needed justice. But I never considered going to the police. There had been no struggle, there was no physical evidence, and so I had no faith I'd be believed or taken seriously. Instead, I pressed charges through the on-campus judicial system.

[FRS COMMENT: She didn't make a criminal charge because she assumed she wouldn't be taken seriously. Yet, she assumes that by pressing a charge in the court of last resort -- the court of public opinion -- she would be taken seriously. The fact is, women who cry rape are taken seriously everywhere, every time.  I would add this: Victims of false rape claims also need justice. But frequently they are arrested and jailed first before anyone bothers even to check out a video or other evidence that proves they were wrongfully arrested]

Most American colleges have internal judicial boards, often populated by perfunctorily trained student "leaders" selected by the school's administration and acting with faculty supervision. These bodies are charged with handling cases involving the school's code of conduct: plagiarism allegations, on-campus underage-drinking charges and disputes between students. They are notoriously bad at dealing with charges of sexual violence.

[FRS COMMENT: Please save the hyperbole for someone who doesn't know any better, who hasn't seen it from the perspective of an advocate for the falsely accused. Yes, college judicial boards are notoriously bad at it -- because they are the epitome of "Kangaroo courts" where young men are often deprived of fundamental legal rights. They are often not permitted to have legal representation while their young accusers are afforded all manner of assistance. The young men are often treated as criminals while their accusers are treated gingerly (I know this first-hand). The hearings allow young men to be found responsible based on standards of proof far below "beyond a reasonable doubt." Often, there is not even a right to confront the accuser. In short, young men are permitted to be stripped of their dignity based on nothing more than an accusation.]

I'd heard horror stories about victims being grilled in excruciating detail about their sexual histories, as if anything a woman may have done in her past made her fair game to be raped in the present. But I got lucky on that front: My assailant agreed to plead no contest to the charges if I agreed to hear him out. So I spent a dark hour and a half in a dean's office, barely breathing while the guy who'd violated me wept about his family history of alcoholism. A few days later, the dean of students called me to say that the guy had been expelled for a year (the amount of time I had left at school) but that I mustn't speak of the case -- or the punishment -- to anybody.

Grateful that I would no longer have to see my attacker around campus, I didn't think to question the sentence or the muzzle at the time. But as I began to heal, I encountered survivors of on-campus sexual violence who had been taken even less seriously than I had by the system. Gag order or no, I began to speak out about my experience and advocate for change. And then, without warning, my assailant reappeared on campus, turning my last semester into a haze of fear, hiding and post-traumatic stress.

[FRS COMMENT: I remember the appellate judge I was clerking for in 1984 asking a rape advocate in open court why evidence of post-traumatic stress syndrome should be admissible for rape cases and not, for example, for robbery cases when someone has had a gun pointed at his head. The non-answer he received spoke volumes about the arrogance of the rape advocacy industry.]

The same thing that happened to me is still happening to young women on college campuses in this country dozens of times every day. And schools are no better equipped (or inclined) to dispense justice than they were in 1992. That's the conclusion of a recent report by the Center for Public Integrity, which found that, despite Justice Department evidence that one in five female college students will be sexually assaulted or the victim of an attempt while at school, students who say they've been raped on campus are rarely believed. Instead, advocates on these issues tell me, the women are encouraged not to file charges, asked about how high their heels were that night or forced into mediation with their assailants, as if this were some kind of unfortunate disagreement and not a profound and violent crime.

[FRS COMMENT: How many times must we prove that rape statistics are worse then unreliable? Moreover, the following assertion is nothing less than astounding: ". . . students who say they've been raped on campus are rarely believed." Excuse me? Students who claim they were raped are automatically believed, and we have overwhelming evidence to prove it. Go take a look at the TV news report of the Hofstra non-gang rape immediately after the story broke and before the rape accuser was caught in a lie. The report accepted the rape lie lock, stock, and barrel, and reported it in the most solemn, frightening tones. Newspapers do the same thing. We report on those stories all the time -- we reprint the story before the lie is exposed and after. Spend a couple of weeks reading through the archives of this site and you'll see for yourself.  The fact is, the accuser's account is typically taken as true, based on nothing more than her accusation, and we have innumerable examples to prove it. Yet, we have a rape advocate who says the exact opposite, and offers no evidence beyond her serene ipse dixit. THIS is why there is such a disconnect.  Just saying a thing, or repeating a myth, doesn't make it true.  Finally, note the last sentence in the above paragraph: to this writer, the accusation is enough to assume there was a violent crime. Sigh.]

Even in cases where the accused is found "responsible," he is rarely expelled. Instead, the Center for Public Integrity found, college rapists are subjected to such punishments as writing an apology letter or taking an anger-management class. They almost always graduate on time, while their victims, retraumatized by the judicial process and constantly afraid of running into their attacker or his friends on campus, often drop out or transfer.

[FRS COMMENT: Pardon me if I don't believe this.]

All of which leads to this question: If schools handle sexual assault cases so badly, why are they doing it at all? Isn't this a matter best left to the police?

[FRS COMMENT: This is the first remotely sensible thing this writer has said in this article.]

Unfortunately, the police are hardly ever a better option. Even in jurisdictions with favorable laws on the books -- such as Illinois, where in 1991 the Supreme Court ruled that no corroborating evidence is needed to convict an accused rapist if the accuser is found to be credible -- police and prosecutors rarely take rape charges seriously unless there are other witnesses or the victim has physical injuries. Even DNA isn't enough, because the accused often counterclaims that the sex was consensual.

[FRS COMMENT: I find the assertion that police don't take these claims "seriously" incredibly insulting to law enforcement. Again, we show case after case after case where police take even the most far-fetched claims seriously. Some of the stories we feature on this site chronicle the incredible man-hours spent taking these claims seriously -- and then they turn out to be lies. All of that evidence is contained on this website. What evidence does this author have to support her blithe dismissal of the police efforts? The fact that some claims are not pressed where it is at least equally plausible that nothing happened does not mean the claims are not taken seriously. It just means the D.A. is doing his or her job.]

This is especially problematic in light of studies (notably ones by David Lisak at the University of Massachusetts at Boston and Stephanie McWhorter at the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego) suggesting that 60 to 70 percent of rapists deliberately get their victims drunk or otherwise manipulate the situation so that it's not necessary to inflict the very physical injuries that might give them away. No wonder that the Justice Department has found that at least 60 percent of rapes go unreported.

[FRS COMMENT: And almost 100% of the falsely accused have their reputations destroyed based on cases where there is a similar absence of physical evidence.  Yet the rape accuser lies, and is automatically believed.]

Even if our legal system handled rape cases brilliantly, schools would still have a responsibility to maintain a safe and equal learning environment for everyone -- and that means doing everything in their power to ensure that female students don't find their studies interrupted by the kinds of fear or trauma that male students rarely are forced to imagine, let alone confront. That's not just my opinion -- that's the legal standard set by Title IX, the same federal regulation that has been so successful in ensuring that girls have a fair shake at athletic opportunities. The Supreme Court held in 1992 that Title IX -- which broadly prohibits sex discrimination in education -- specifically obligates schools to prevent and remedy sexual harassment and assault.

[FRS COMMENT: This writer obviously doesn't believe that countless falsely accused male students are forced to go through the hell of a Kangaroo court system. My guess is she doesn't believe there is much chance that accused males may be factually innocent.]

The problem is, unlike in the sports arena, it requires nearly superhuman emotional fortitude on the part of a campus assault victim to file a Title IX case. "The seemingly insurmountable obstacle," reports Colby Bruno, managing attorney at the Victim Rights Law Center, which represents campus rape victims, "is that after the victim has been retraumatized by the campus process, that victim no longer wishes to go forward with a Title IX complaint because of the additional trauma it would cause." It's one thing to sue your school for a fair chance to play soccer; it's quite another to take it on over its inability to properly handle rape cases, while trying to heal from your own sexual assault.

And that's what colleges seem to be counting on. When it comes to sexual assault, they'll do anything to be able to claim that "it doesn't happen here" -- even if that means flouting reporting laws and creating the very environment of silence, rape apology and victim-blame that ensures that it will.

[FRS COMMENT: Again, what is she talking about? At UC Davis, we got a first-hand look at how sexual assault stats are jacked up on campus, apparently to get more funding.]

It doesn't have to be this way. University campuses could easily become labs that innovate effective ways to prevent and prosecute rape. But for that to happen, everyone -- parents, alumni, students, school officials, law enforcement -- needs to stop treating rape like it's an embarrassing cold sore and start tackling it like the public health crisis it is. Using the Justice Department's numbers, we can predict that during this school year, more than 400,000 young women will be sexually assaulted on a U.S. college campus. And according to McWhorter's research, more than 90 percent of those 400,000 rapes will be committed by repeat offenders who will rape, on average, six times during their academic careers.

[FRS COMMENT: Oh, my, oh, my! What study is DOJ using? I mean, is this author claiming the DOJ stats came from a real study? The repeat offenders stats are almost double what we've seen elsewhere. Imagine that? Rape stats that don't agree! (They don't agree because all of them are a guessing game.)]

That rate of recidivism is actually a golden opportunity, if only schools and courts would take it. It means that all we need to do is get serious about punishing the tiny percentage of men who are committing the vast majority of assaults, and many, many fewer women will have to live through the trauma of sexual violation.

The solutions aren't even that complicated. First, colleges can eliminate the "miscommunication" excuse that many rapists use by creating an on-campus standard that requires any party to a sexual interaction to make sure their partner is actively enthusiastic about what's happening -- not just not objecting. They can create judicial boards equipped to seriously investigate rape accusations, instead of throwing their hands up at the first sign that the accused's testimony contradicts the accuser's. They can defend the safety of the entire campus by permanently expelling those found guilty of sexual assault. And they can be transparent about every step of the process.

[FRS COMMENT: And now, finally, we come to the supreme moonbat moment of the entire piece. It's rape if there isn't active enthusiastic consent manifested. One of the most extreme, inane suggestions that we've repeatedly discussed on this site. The main problem with this suggestion is that this isn't how men and women interact, and to punish young men for not conforming to a radical feminist created standard that is not accepted in the real world is barbaric. Newsflash: some people are incapable of showing enthusiasm about anything. Sex with a woman like that is always rape.  And who the hell would decide if it was enthusiastic?  It must be lost on this writer that men and women in a committed relationship do things for each other with regularity out of love and often without all that much enthusiasm, no matter how that word is defined.  And that includes sex. And, yes, sometimes they do it only after some cajoling. And it can work both ways.  When a woman is trying to get pregnant, her partner often has sex out of obligation even when it's not convenient and often when he is not especially "enthusiastic." Despite the male gender's reputation for wanting sex 24/7, sometimes it takes some cajoling. Has he been "raped" since he gave into her cajoling without being "enthusiastic"? No sane person would say he has. One other point: he said/she said cases where both parties present plausible accounts shouldn't allow for the male to be expelled based on a credibility contest. To punish the male because his accuser is a good actress is also barbaric.]

There is some small glimmer of hope that change is coming. Inspired by the Center for Public Integrity report, Bucknell University is considering abandoning mediation as a way of adjudicating sexual assault cases, and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst has a new policy requiring all sexual assault cases to be personally reviewed by the dean of students.

But while these are steps in the right direction, they are tiny ones. Stopping rape on campus is going to require a giant leap of faith. It may require a few extraordinarily strong survivors to file Title IX charges against their schools. It will require visionary campus administrators who care more about the safety of students than they do about their public image.

It will require parents, students and alumni to demand real, effective change. We will all need to recognize that, because the veil of silence must be pulled back for the real work to begin, the campuses we love may have to suddenly appear less safe if they're going to actually become safer.

jf@jaclynfriedman.com

Jaclyn Friedman is the editor of "Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape."
Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/12/AR2010031201792.html